ContractsCounsel Logo

Purchase Price Allocation

Clients Rate Lawyers on our Platform 4.9/5 Stars
based on 7,558 reviews
Home Blog Purchase Price Allocation

Jump to Section

Purchase price allocation is a legal aspect of mergers and acquisitions that involves assigning the purchase prices to the acquired company's assets in a place. The purpose of purchase price allocation is to determine the fair value of the acquired company's identifiable assets and liabilities. Let us know more about purchase price allocation and its other relevant aspects.

Key Components of a Purchase Price Allocation

When conducting purchase price allocation (PPA) in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions, several key components are considered to assign the purchase price to individual assets and liabilities accurately. These components play an important role in determining the acquisition's fair value and financial impact. Let's explore the key components involved in purchase price allocation:

  • Tangible Assets: Tangible assets are physical assets with a physical form that can be seen and touched. It includes real estate properties, land, buildings, machinery, equipment, and inventory. These assets are typically valued based on their current market value or replacement cost.
  • Intangible Assets: Intangible assets are non-physical assets that derive value from intellectual or legal rights. It includes patents, trademarks, copyrights, brand value, customer relationships, software, and licenses. Valuing intangible assets can be more complex, often requiring specialized expertise and utilizing methods like income or market approaches.
  • Financial Assets: Financial assets refer to investments or securities the acquired company holds. These can include stocks, bonds, derivatives, or other financial instruments. The fair value of financial assets is determined based on market prices or other valuation techniques specific to the particular asset.
  • Inventory: Inventory represents the goods and materials the acquired company holds for sale or production. The value of inventory is typically assessed based on the cost or net realizable value. This component is important in determining the acquired company's inventory's fair value.
  • Liabilities: Liabilities encompass the financial obligations and debts of the acquired company. They can include accounts payable, loans, accrued expenses, and other obligations. The fair value of liabilities is assessed based on factors such as interest rates, payment terms, and market conditions.

Importance of Purchase Price Allocations

The importance of purchase price allocation (PPA) in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions cannot be overstated. This process plays an important role in accurately reflecting the financial impact of an acquisition and providing transparency to stakeholders. Let's explore why purchase price allocation is paramount in M&A deals.

  • Financial Reporting Accuracy: One of the primary reasons for conducting purchase price allocation is to ensure accurate financial reporting. PPA helps create a comprehensive and transparent financial picture of the acquiring and acquired companies post-transaction by assigning the purchase price to specific assets and liabilities. It provides stakeholders, such as investors, analysts, and regulators, with reliable information about the value and financial health of the entities involved.
  • Fair Valuation: PPA enables a fair valuation of the acquired company's assets and liabilities. The allocation process determines the fair value of individual assets and liabilities based on market conditions and other relevant factors.. This fair valuation is important for reflecting the true economic worth of the acquired company and avoiding overvaluation or undervaluation of assets, which can distort financial statements.
  • Disclosure and Compliance: Accurate and transparent financial reporting is essential for regulatory compliance and meeting accounting standards. PPA ensures that companies comply with relevant accounting guidelines, such as the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or international financial reporting standards (IFRS). It helps adhere to specific requirements for recognizing and measuring assets, liabilities, goodwill, intangible assets, and deferred taxes.
  • Decision-Making and Investor Confidence: Investors and stakeholders heavily rely on financial statements to make informed decisions. By properly allocating the purchase price, PPA provides a clear breakdown of the value attributed to various assets and liabilities. This information aids investors in evaluating the financial impact of the acquisition and assessing the future prospects and risks associated with the merged entity. Transparent financial reporting enhances investor confidence and facilitates better decision-making.
  • Tax Planning and Compliance: Purchase price allocation significantly affects tax planning and compliance. It affects the tax basis of acquired assets and liabilities, impacting future tax deductions, capital gains, and depreciation schedules. Accurate purchase price allocation helps companies navigate tax regulations effectively, minimize tax liabilities, and comply with tax laws.
Meet some lawyers on our platform

Brian R.

1 project on CC
View Profile

Jennifer P.

1 project on CC
View Profile

Gregory B.

138 projects on CC
View Profile

Michael M.

463 projects on CC
View Profile

Methods and Approaches for a Purchase Price Allocation

Regarding purchase price allocation (PPA) in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions, various methods and approaches are utilized to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities. These methods rely on financial analysis, market data, and professional judgment to allocate the purchase price accurately. Let's explore some common methods and approaches used in the purchase price allocation process:

  • Market Approach: The market approach involves comparing the acquired company to similar entities in the market that have recently been sold or have publicly traded securities. This approach relies on market multiples, such as price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios or price-to-sales (P/S) ratios, to determine the fair value of the acquired company's assets. By analyzing market data, comparable transactions, and industry benchmarks, the market approach provides insights into the relative value of the assets being acquired.
  • Income Approach: The income approach estimates the future cash flows generated by the acquired company's assets. This approach typically utilizes discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, which considers the time value of money. The DCF analysis involves projecting future cash flows, applying an appropriate discount rate to account for risk and time, and arriving at the present value of those cash flows. The income approach provides a valuation based on the income-generating potential of the assets and is commonly used for intangible assets and long-term investments.
  • Cost Approach: The cost approach evaluates the cost to replace or reproduce the acquired assets. It considers the cost of acquiring or building similar assets in the current market. This approach is often used for tangible assets like property, plants, and equipment. It determines the fair value by considering the cost of acquiring equivalent assets and adjusting for depreciation and obsolescence.
  • Hybrid Approach: A hybrid approach sometimes combines elements from different valuation methods. This approach considers the specific characteristics and circumstances of the acquired company and may involve a combination of market, income, and cost-based approaches. The hybrid approach aims to provide a comprehensive and well-rounded assessment of the fair value of assets and liabilities.
  • Professional Judgment: Professional judgment is vital in purchasing price allocation. Valuation experts, accountants, and financial advisors bring their expertise and experience to assess the unique aspects of the acquired company and select appropriate valuation methods. Professional judgment is used to interpret data, make adjustments, and determine the most accurate and reasonable purchase price allocation.

Key Terms for Purchase Price Allocations

  • Fair Value: The estimated value of an asset or liability in the purchase price allocation process based on market conditions and other relevant factors.
  • Tangible Assets: Physical assets, such as property, equipment, and inventory, that have a measurable value in the allocation of the purchase price.
  • Intangible Assets: Non-physical assets, including patents, trademarks, and customer relationships, which contribute to the overall value of the acquired company.
  • Goodwill: The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets, representing the value of intangible factors like brand reputation and customer loyalty.
  • Amortization: The systematic allocation of the cost of intangible assets over their useful lives, reflecting their gradual consumption or expiration.

Final Thoughts on Purchase Price Allocations

Purchase price allocation is a critical aspect of M&A transactions that helps determine the fair value of assets and liabilities. By accurately allocating the purchase price, stakeholders gain insight into the financial impact of the acquisition. Companies can provide transparent and reliable financial reporting through careful consideration of key components, utilizing appropriate methods, and ensuring compliance with accounting standards. As M&A activities continue to shape the business landscape, understanding purchase price allocation becomes increasingly vital for companies seeking successful integration and growth.

If you want free pricing proposals from vetted lawyers that are 60% less than typical law firms, click here to get started. By comparing multiple proposals for free, you can save the time and stress of finding a quality lawyer for your business needs.

Meet some of our Lawyers

Rudy C. on ContractsCounsel
View Rudy
Member Since:
July 19, 2023

Rudy C.

Free Consultation
New York
1 Yr Experience
Licensed in NY
St-John's Law School

As a multilingual attorney, Rudy Cohen-Zardi holds multiple degrees from several institutions worldwide. He has gained experience in leading firms, including Eversheds Sutherland, LLP and Bank of China (NY). He is licensed to practice in New York. His practice focuses on bankruptcy, corporate, and contracts law.

Rhea J. on ContractsCounsel
View Rhea
Member Since:
July 21, 2023

Rhea J.

Attorney at Law
Free Consultation
Evansville, IN
9 Yrs Experience
Licensed in IN
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

I am a graduate from Wittenberg University and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I have been admitted to the Indiana bar since 2013. I have collaborated on several writing projects for the Indiana State Bar.

Mark P. on ContractsCounsel
View Mark
Member Since:
July 21, 2023

Mark P.

Free Consultation
Lee's Summit, Missouri
8 Yrs Experience
Licensed in KS, MO, NE
University of Missouri - Kansas City

I represent a diverse mix in a vast array of specialties, including litigation, contracts, compliance, business and financial strategies, and emerging industries. Credit for this foundation of strength goes to those who taught me. Skilled professors and professionals fostered my powerful educational and professional background. Prior to law school, I earned dual Bachelor’s degrees in Business Administration & Accounting from Peru State College. I received a Master of Business Administration degree from Chadron State College. My ambitions did not stop there. While working full time as a Senior Accountant for the University of Missouri, Columbia, I achieved the lifelong goal of becoming a licensed Certified Public Accountant (CPA). Mizzo provided excellent opportunities and amazing experiences. Managing over $50M in government and private research funding was a gift. As a high ranking professional in the Department of Research, I was given priceless insight into the greatest scientific, journalistic, medical, and legal minds in the world. My passion for successful growth did not, and has not stopped. I graduated summa cum laude (top 3%) with a Doctorate in Law, emphasizing in urban, land use and environmental/toxic tort law from the University of Missouri, Kansas City. This success lead to invaluable experiences of serving as Hon. Brian C. Wimes' judicial clerk for the U.S. District Court for the W. D. of Missouri, as a staff editor/writer for UMKC Law Review, and as a litigation and transactional attorney with Lathrop GPM (fka Lathrop & Gage). My professional and personal network is expansive, with established relationships throughout the U.S. and overseas. Although I engage in legal practice all over the country, I maintain law licenses in Missouri, Kansas, and Nebraska. Federally, I hold licenses in the W.D. and E.D. of Missouri and the District of Nebraska. To offer extra value, efficiency, and options, I maintain a CPA license and am obtaining a real-estate brokerage license.

Karen H. on ContractsCounsel
View Karen
Member Since:
July 23, 2023

Karen H.

Former Division General Counsel
Free Consultation
42 Yrs Experience
Licensed in IL
Loyola University Chicago School of Law

During my tenure as VP & Division General Counsel of PepsiCo Inc. in Chicago, I built upon my diverse career overseeing legal matters for both the domestic and international businesses of PepsiCo and The Quaker Oats Co. My extensive practice areas included M&A, contracts, competition, NDAs, regulatory compliance, consumer product & protection, environmental, patents, and advertising regulations. Throughout my professional journey, I navigated legal complexities associated with an eclectic range of products, spanning juices, sports drinks, cereals, snacks, needlepoint kits, canned goods, eyeglasses, men's suits, car seats and toys. For further information, see my LinkedIn:

John W. on ContractsCounsel
View John
Member Since:
July 23, 2023

John W.

Strategic Business Partner
Free Consultation
Brookline, MA
37 Yrs Experience
Licensed in DC, MD, VA
Georgetown University Law Center

I am a business lawyer with 30+ years of experience, with a specialization in the life sciences industry. I have been general counsel at 5 different companies - both large and growing, as well as small and emerging. I have built legal teams and have extensive experience with Boards of Directors.

Tameko P. on ContractsCounsel
View Tameko
Member Since:
July 24, 2023

Tameko P.

Free Consultation
Olive Branch, MS
4 Yrs Experience
Licensed in MS
Mississippi College School of Law

My Solo law firm specializes in Personal Injury, some Criminal Law, Contract Dispute, Wills & POAs, Irreconcilable Differences Divorce, and landlord tenant dispute.

Jeffrey Z. on ContractsCounsel
View Jeffrey
Member Since:
July 24, 2023

Jeffrey Z.

Free Consultation
Albany, New York
20 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NY
Albany Law School

After a career in aviation, I went to Albany Law School graduating in 2003. I opened my own practice in 2005 following a 2-year term with a large, Albany-based law firm. I focus my practice on helping individuals and small business with various matters including defense representation, family law/matrimonial matters, estate planning, probate and estate administration, bankruptcy, business formation and general litigation.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now
Learn About Contracts
See More Contracts
other helpful articles

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer


Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city