Amendment To License Agreement: Definition, Terms, Example
Jump to Section
Quick Facts — Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Avg cost to draft a Licensing Agreement: $1110.00
- Avg cost to review a Licensing Agreement: $690.00
- Lawyers available: 151 business lawyers
- Clients helped: 176 recent amendment to license agreement projects
- Avg lawyer rating: 4.97 (22 reviews)
What is an Amendment To License Agreement?
An amendment to license agreement is a modification to the original agreement that allows a licensee to profit off of a licensor's property. License agreements allow a licensee to use a licensor's brand, trademark, or patent for profit. When changes need to be made to this agreement, they must be in writing and ideally in the form of an amendment.
Some common changes to a license agreement include extensions to the time period allotted, modifications to royalties, or the addition of new licensed property for use to make a profit. Adding an amendment to the original agreement makes the process quicker and easier for all parties, since it eliminates the need to draft an entirely new document.
Common Sections in Amendment To License Agreements
Below is a list of common sections included in Amendment To License Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.
Amendment To License Agreement Sample
Exhibit 10.83
[*] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Amendment to License Agreement (“Amendment”) is made effective as of May 19. 2005 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Japan Tobacco Inc., a Japanese corporation having a principal place of business at JT Bldg. 2-1, Toranomon 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8422, Japan (hereinafter, “JT”), and Gilead Sciences, Inc., a corporation having a principal place business at 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, California, U.S.A. (hereinafter, “GILEAD”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, JT and GILEAD have previously entered into a License Agreement dated March 22, 2005 relating to JTK-303 (the “Agreement”).
WHEREAS, JT and GILEAD desire to amend certain terms of the Agreement
NOW THEREFORE, based on the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants and obligations set forth below, the parties agree as follows:
1. Amendments
A. Section 6.4(a) Section 6.4(a) of the Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:
“In the event that either Party obtains from a Third Party a license to Patents, Know-How and/or a trademark that is necessary for, or actually used during the Term in, the Party’s Development or Commercialization of a Product, such Party shall, subject to Section 6.4(b), use its commercially reasonable efforts to include in such license aright to grant a sublicense on the same terms and conditions to the other Party solely to support the license grants contained in Sections 6.1 and 6.2.”
B. Section 16.1 Section 16.1 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:
“16,1. Entire Agreement; Amendment.
[*] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
(a) This Agreement, including the Schedules attached hereto and incorporated herein, sets forth the complete, final and exclusive agreement and all the covenants, promises, agreements, warranties, representations, conditions and understandings between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and terminates all prior agreements and understandings between the Parties, except for the Confidential Disclosure Agreements and Material Transfer Agreements with respect to such subject matter, as amended pursuant to Section 16.1(b) hereof.
(b) The Confidential Disclosure Agreements (other than the Confidential Disclosure Agreement dated February 1, 2005 (Gilead as recipient with respect to JTK-403)) and the Material Transfer Agreements are hereby considered amended to the extent necessary to provide that, notwithstanding any provision in such agreements to the contrary, any information and materials provided by one Party to the other Party pursuant to the Confidential Disclosure Agreements or the Material Transfer Agreements may be used by a Party to fulfill any obligation or to pursue any rights such Party has under this Agreement, including without limitation for the Development of Products.
(c) Except for the Confidential Disclosure Agreements and Material Transfer Agreements, there are no covenants, promises, agreements, warranties, representations, conditions or understandings, either oral or written, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof other than as are set forth in this Agreement. No subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties unless reduced to writing and signed by an authorized officer of each Party.”
C. Section 16.6 Section 16.6 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:
“Neither Party may assign or transfer this Agreement or any rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party, except that, subject to Section 16.7, a Party may make such an assignment or transfer without the other Party’s consent to the assigning Party’s Affiliates or to its successor to all or substantially all of the business of such Party in the field to which this Agreement relates (whether by merger, sale of stock, sale of assets or other transaction), provided that any such successor (other than an Affiliate) shall, in a writing reasonably acceptable to the other Party, expressly assume performance of such rights or obligations. The JT Technology and the Gilead Technology shall exclude any intellectual property held or developed by such a successor of the relevant Party not in connection with Compound or Products. Any such assignment shall be binding on the successors of the assigning Party. Any assignment or attempted assignment by either Party in violation of the terms of this Section 16.6 shall be null and void.”
[*] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
2. The Parties have each designated the three representatives to serve on the Joint Committee, one representative to serve as Alliance Manager and the three representatives to serve on the IP subcommittee, respectively, named on Schedule 2.2, Schedule 2.3 and Schedule 9.2, attached hereto.
3. Defined Terms
Unless otherwise defined herein, all of the capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement
4. Effect
Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.
5. Governing Law
This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of New York and the federal law of the United States of America.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date.
| JAPAN TOBACCO INC. | GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. | |||||||
| BY: | /s/ Noriaki Okubo | BY: | /s/ John F. Millingan | |||||
| NAME: Noriaki Okubo |
NAME: John F. Milligan, Ph.D. | |||||||
| TITLE: President, Pharmaceutical Business |
TITLE: Executive Vice President & CFO | |||||||
[*] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
SCHEDULE 2.2
Members of the Joint Committee
Gilead:
[*]
[*]
[*]
JT:
[*]
[*]
[*]
[*] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
SCHEDULE 2.3
Alliance Managers
Gilead:
[*]
JT:
[*]
[*] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS, IS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
SCHEDULE 9.2
IP subcommittee members
Gilead:
[*]
[*]
[*]
JT:
[*]
[*]
[*]
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.83 2 d226980dex1083.htm FIRST AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT, Viewed September 18, 2022, View Source on SEC.
Who Helps With Amendment To License Agreements?
Lawyers with backgrounds working on amendment to license agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an amendment to license agreement?
Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate amendment to license agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
See Real Licensing Agreement Projects
California Contract for Access to Digital / Cloud Platform Drafting
- California
- 3 lawyer bids
- $400 - $500
New York Artwork Licensing Agreement for Printing Company Drafting
- New York
- 4 lawyer bids
- $250 - $1,200
California Licensing Agreement Contract for Streaming Service Drafting
- California
- 11 lawyer bids
- $850 - $2,995
See all Licensing Agreement projects
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Need help with an Amendment To License Agreement?
Meet some of our Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
Anand A.
Anand is an entrepreneur and attorney with a wide-ranging background. In his legal capacity, Anand has represented parties in (i) commercial finance, (ii) corporate, and (iii) real estate matters throughout the country, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Arizona, and Georgia. He is well-versed in business formation and management, reviewing and negotiating contracts, advising clients on financing strategy, and various other arenas in which individuals and businesses commonly find themselves. As an entrepreneur, Anand is involved in the hospitality industry and commercial real estate. His approach to the legal practice is to treat clients fairly and provide the highest quality representation possible. Anand received his law degree from Rutgers University School of Law in 2013 and his Bachelor of Business Administration from Pace University, Lubin School of Business in 2007.
"Anand was a pleasure to work with! He was very thorough and professional."
Rhea d.
Rhea de Aenlle is a business-savvy attorney with extensive experience in Privacy & Data Security (CIPP/US, CIPP/E), GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, FERPA, Intellectual Property, and Commercial Contracts. She has over 25 years of legal experience as an in-house counsel, AM Law 100 firm associate, and a solo practice attorney. Rhea works with start-up and midsize technology companies.
"Rhea is very knowledgeable, responsive, and a pleasure to work with. She provided excellent guidance throughout the MSA and BAA process, and I highly recommend her services."
Nicholas M.
Nicholas Matlach is a cybersecurity expert (CISSP) and an attorney who is dedicated to helping small businesses succeed. He is a client-focused professional who has a deep understanding of the challenges that small businesses face in the digital age. He also provides legal counsel to small businesses on a variety of issues, including formation, intellectual property, contracts, and employment law.
"Enjoyed his demeanor. Professional yet down to earth. The document created for me was very explicit and easy to read. I would recommend :)"
Sunnita B.
Experienced sports and entertainment attorney. I specialize in contracts, business formation, licensing, wage disputes, negotiations, and intellectual property.
"Sunnita was quick to respond to my questions. Great service."
Max M.
Business attorney with a focus on the health care sector, bringing Biglaw experience in multi-million dollar mergers and acquisitions, financings, and general corporate counsel work to the small firm space. I now help startups and growing companies access the same level of sophistication and strategic guidance typically reserved for large institutions.
"Overall, Max M. did a great job compiling the demand letter. He was very thorough in requesting documentation, responding to questions promptly, and producing the letter. He provided reasonable explanations for the tone that he used along with recommendations for when to send it and what to demand. Additionally, he was very responsive and updated the draft promptly after feedback was provided. There were some minor grammatical errors present, but as Max M. provided me with a word document, I was able to easily rectify those."
Justin C.
Justin Camper is a small business and trademark attorney, entrepreneur, public speaker, and writer. Justin has been practicing law close to 5 years and has done various areas of law from criminal work as a Prosecutor, to business and civil litigation at private law firms.
"Justin C did a great job. I will recommend Contractscounsel to friends"
August 14, 2022
Madeline P.
I am the CEO and attorney at my law firm that I started in June 2020 (as other businesses were shuttering due to Covid-19). I am currently seeking contract work to supplement my case load as I recently finalized numerous family law cases within a short timeframe.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowLawyer Reviews for Amendment To License Agreement Projects
Review Licensing Agreement
"Super Fast and Very Easy to Work With!"
Licensing Agreement Review
"Very quick turnaround with thorough reviews on the docs and very helpful suggestions"
Review and advise on a license agreement
"Great response time and direction."
Employment
Amendment To License Agreement
North Carolina
Can my criminal record affect my eligibility for an occupational license?
I am currently in the process of applying for an occupational license in order to work in a regulated profession, but I have a previous criminal record that includes a non-violent offense from several years ago. I am concerned that this record may negatively impact my eligibility for the license, and I would like to know if my criminal history can affect my chances of obtaining an occupational license.
Parsa G.
While having a criminal conviction may negatively impact your eligibility for a license, it depends on the specifics of your case. Licensing boards typically evaluate the nature of the offense, how much time has passed since the conviction, and whether the offense is substantially related to the duties of the profession. A non-violent offense from several years ago may not be a barrier to licensure, especially if there is evidence of rehabilitation, there is no subsequent criminal history, and the crime is not substantially related to the purpose of the license. Many jurisdictions have adopted laws or policies aimed at reducing the impact of old or unrelated convictions on occupational licensing decisions. Boards often conduct individualized assessments and may consider factors such as your conduct since the offense, completion of sentencing terms, letters of recommendation, and your overall fitness to practice in the profession. A North Carolina-licensed attorney may be best suited to answer the specifics with regards to your license in North Carolina. If you are concerned about how your record might affect your application, it may be wise to review your criminal history, gather supporting documentation showing rehabilitation, and consult an attorney familiar with occupational licensing in your state. In some cases, I recommend pursuing an expungement or record sealing may also improve your chances in the future.
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewNeed help with an Amendment To License Agreement?
Business lawyers by top cities
- Austin Business Lawyers
- Boston Business Lawyers
- Chicago Business Lawyers
- Dallas Business Lawyers
- Denver Business Lawyers
- Houston Business Lawyers
- Los Angeles Business Lawyers
- New York Business Lawyers
- Phoenix Business Lawyers
- San Diego Business Lawyers
- Tampa Business Lawyers
Amendment To License Agreement lawyers by city
- Austin Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Boston Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Chicago Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Dallas Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Denver Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Houston Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Los Angeles Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- New York Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Phoenix Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- San Diego Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
- Tampa Amendment To License Agreement Lawyers
ContractsCounsel User
Contract for Access to Digital / Cloud Platform
Location: California
Turnaround: A week
Service: Drafting
Doc Type: Licensing Agreement
Number of Bids: 3
Bid Range: $400 - $500
User Feedback:
ContractsCounsel User