Closing Agreement: Definition, Example
Jump to Section
What is a Closing Agreement?
A closing agreement is a contract between the IRS and a taxpayer that brings a conclusion to a specific tax issue between the two parties. The contract includes details about what the tax issue was, how the conclusion was come to, and what promises each party mas made to come to the agreement. It also includes details about when the transaction was or will be finalized and if there are any documentation requirements once the form is filed with the court.
The purpose of the closing agreement is to document, in writing, the conclusion of a tax issue between taxpayer and IRS. It also provides vital proof if allegations arise in the future that the problem has already been rectified.
Closing Agreement Sample
Exhibit 10.10
Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service
CLOSING AGREEMENT ON FINAL DETERMINATION
COVERING SPECIFIC MATTERS
Pursuant to Section 7121 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (1) Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (EIN: 42-1579325), having an address of 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 (the “Trust”); (2) Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (EIN: 36-3337999), having an address of 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 (the “Advisor”) (the Trust and the Advisor collectively the “Taxpayers”); and (3) the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the “Commissioner”) make the following closing agreement (the “Agreement”):
WHEREAS:
A. The Trust elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) within the meaning of Code Section 856(a) and is organized under the laws of Maryland;
B. The Trust elected to be taxed as a REIT under Code Section 856(c)(1) effective with its initial tax year ending December 31, 2003;
C. The Trust adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) under which it allowed shareholders in the Trust to elect to receive distributions from the Trust in additional shares of the Trust (“DRIP Shares”), rather than in cash;
D. The Taxpayers represent that during the Trust’s tax years ending December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005 and the period beginning January 1, 2006 through April 30, 2006 (the “Relevant Period”), the Trust declared daily distributions so that each outstanding share of the Trust accrued a daily distribution but only actually distributed such accrued distributions declared in a particular calendar month approximately ten days following the close of such month;
E. The Taxpayers represent that during the Relevant Period, the Trust’s shareholders who elected to receive distributions from the Trust under the DRIP (the “DRIP Shareholders”) and the shareholders who received cash distributions from the Trust (the “Cash Shareholders”) all received their distributions from the Trust approximately ten days after the end of the calendar month in which such distributions were declared and accrued;
F. The Taxpayers represent that although the DRIP Shareholders did not receive their DRIP Shares during the Relevant Period until approximately ten days after the close of the relevant calendar month, they were treated as accruing additional distributions on such shares as if they had actually been distributed on the first day following the close of the relevant calendar month, while the Cash Shareholders did not accrue any additional distributions with respect to the cash to be distributed to them during the Relevant Period during the periods between the ends of the calendar months and the dates they received their cash distributions;
G. The Taxpayers represent that the value of the accruals received by the DRIP Shareholders during the Relevant Period with respect to the periods commencing one day
after the end of a calendar month and ending on the date approximately ten days later when the Cash Shareholders received their cash distributions for such calendar month approximately $359,000 for all of the Relevant Period;
H. The Taxpayers represent that the administration of the DRIP during the Relevant Period as described in the preceding Clauses E and F may have resulted in the DRIP Shareholders having received preferential dividends within the meaning of Code Section 562(c) (the “DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends”) because the administration of the DRIP could be characterized as resulting in (1) the DRIP Shareholders having received their distributions for a particular calendar month earlier than the Cash Shareholders having received their distributions for such calendar month, and (2) the DRIP Shareholders having begun to accrue additional distributions from the Trust upon their receipt of DRIP Shares, while the Cash Shareholders were unable to invest their cash distributions until they received them approximately ten days later;
I. The Taxpayers represent that in April 2006 they amended the manner in which the DRIP was administered (the “2006 DRIP Amendment”) so that the additional shares distributed to DRIP Shareholders are distributed to them on the same day that the Trust distributes cash to the Cash Shareholders and are not treated as outstanding prior to such date;
J. The Taxpayers represent that the 2006 DRIP Amendment corrected the manner of administration of the DRIP that created the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue;
K. The Taxpayers represent that they: (a) did not intend that the Trust distribute preferential dividends, as defined in Code section 562(c), during the Tax Years, and (b) were not aware of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue until December 2010 when the Trust’s tax advisor conducted tax due diligence in anticipation of the Trust’s listing and potential offering of shares;
L. In January 2011 the Taxpayers voluntarily disclosed the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue to the Commissioner before it was discovered by the Commissioner;
M. In recognition of their potential liabilities to the Commissioner as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue, the Taxpayers have approached the Commissioner seeking to resolve any and all liabilities to the Commissioner arising from such issue;
N. The Taxpayers and the Commissioner wish to avail of this Agreement to remove any uncertainty in respect of the Trust’s compliance with Code Sections 857(a)(1) and 857(b)(2)(B) as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue; and
O. The Taxpayers and the Commissioner desire to enter into this Agreement covering specific matters.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND AGREED for Federal income tax purposes that:
2
1. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Advisor, on behalf of the Trust, shall pay to the Commissioner (a) the principal sum of $50,000, plus (b) interest on such $50,000 computed as if such amount were tax using the interest rate(s) set forth in Code Section 6621(a)(2), which interest shall be computed from the following dates:
| (a) | from March 15, 2005 on $25,000; and |
| (b) | from March 15, 2006 on $25,000. |
Such interest shall accrue until the entire $50,000 principal amount and accrued interest (including any interest on the interest that might accrue) is paid in full.
2. The amount due under this Agreement, including all accrued interest, is hereafter known as the “Compliance Fee.”
3. The term “interest” as used in this Agreement is used solely to define the amount of the Compliance Fee described. The “interest” component of the Compliance Fee shall not be considered interest for federal income tax purposes.
4. The payment of the Compliance Fee shall be made by certified check or cashiers’ check payable to the United States Treasury and delivered to Internal Revenue Service, Large Business and International, Executive Assistant (Technical) to the Industry Director, Financial Services, 290 Broadway, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10007.
5. Although the Advisor has agreed to pay the Compliance Fee, this Agreement does not absolve the Trust of liability for the Compliance Fee. If the Advisor does not pay the Compliance Fee, then the Trust is required to pay the Compliance Fee.
6. The Compliance Fee need not be assessed in order to be properly collected.
7. Upon execution of this Agreement by the Taxpayers and the Commissioner and the full payment of the Compliance Fee, the terms and administration of the DRIP will not result in the Trust’s dividends paid during the tax years 2004, 2005 and 2006 (the “Tax Years”) being treated as preferential dividends as defined in Code section 562(c).
8. The Trust will not be assessed any additional tax, interest or penalties for any portion of the Relevant Period as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue.
9. The Compliance Fee is not deductible or otherwise amortizable or recoverable for Federal tax purposes by the Taxpayers in any taxable year.
10. The Compliance Fee is not refundable, or subject to credit or offset, for Federal tax purposes under any circumstances.
11. No portion of the Compliance Fee shall be considered as gross income to the Trust or any shareholder of the Trust.
3
12. Any reimbursements made to the Advisor for its payment of the Compliance Fee shall be considered gross income to the Advisor.
13. The Trust will not reimburse the Advisor for the Advisor’s payment of the Compliance Fee, and the Advisor will not seek any reimbursement of any portion of the Compliance Fee from the Trust.
14. Except as expressly provided herein, no determination is made concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of the organization and operation of the Trust during the Relevant Period.
15. This Agreement constitutes a resolution under the Code of the specific matters discussed herein. No inference is intended with respect to whether this resolution satisfies other Federal law.
16. Each of the parties hereto has had the opportunity to be represented or assisted by counsel in the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. The parties agree that this Agreement is to be construed as jointly drafted. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed according to the fair meaning of its language, and the rule of construction that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement.
17. Any inspection of records during the consideration of this Agreement does not preclude or impede, pursuant to Code § 7605(b) or any administrative provisions adopted by the Internal Revenue Service, a later examination of a return or inspection of records with respect to any tax year needed to resolve any issue outside the scope of this Agreement.
The remainder of the page is intentionally blank.
4
This Closing Agreement is final and conclusive except:
| a. | The matter it relates to may be reopened in the event of fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of material fact; |
| b. | It is subject to Code sections that expressly provide that effect be given to their provisions (including any stated exception for Code § 7122) notwithstanding any other law or rule of law; and |
| c. | If it relates to any taxable period ending after the date that this Agreement is executed by all parties, it is subject to any law enacted after the Agreement date that applies to that taxable year. |
By signing this closing agreement, the parties certify that they have read and agreed to the terms of this document.
Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.
| By: | /s/ Steven P. Grimes | Date Signed: 6/1/11 | ||||
| Name: | Steven P. Grimes | |||||
| Title: | President and CEO | |||||
| Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation | ||||||
| By: | /s/ Roberta S. Matlin | Date Signed: 6/1/11 | ||||
| Name: | Roberta S. Matlin | |||||
| Title: | Senior Vice President | |||||
| Commissioner of Internal Revenue | ||||||
| By: | /s/ Jolanta Sander | Date Signed: 6/17/11 | ||||
| Name: | Jolanta Sander | |||||
| Title: | Director, Field Operations | |||||
5
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.10 2 dex1010.htm CLOSING AGREEMENT, Viewed October 24, 2022, View Source on SEC.
Who Helps With Closing Agreements?
Lawyers with backgrounds working on closing agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a closing agreement?
Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate closing agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Closing Agreement Lawyers
George L.
I am a corporate attorney with offices in Rock Hill, SC, and Lavonia, GA. My practice is focused on contracts, tax, and asset protection planning. I act as a fractional outside general counsel to over 20 businesses in 6 countries. When not practicing law, I can usually be found training my bird dogs.
"Appreciated his insight into contract matters for our start up!"
Max N.
Oklahoma attorney focused on real estate transactions, quiet title lawsuits, estate planning, probates, business formations, and all contract matters.
"I am so impressed with Max's work ethic, communication, and thoroughness. This is a five-start customer service experience and I look forward to continuing working with him as I grow my out of state investments in the state of Oklahoma (currently based in FL)"
Mark F.
International-savvy technology lawyer with 35years+ in Silicon Valley, Tokyo, Research Triangle, Silicon Forest. Outside & inside general counsel, legal infrastructure development, product exports, and domestic & international contracts for clients across North America, Europe, and Asia. Work with Founders to establish startup and continuous revenue, sourcing and partnering with investors to attract funding, define success strategy and direct high-performing teams, advising stakeholders and Boards of Directors to steer company growth.
"Mark has guided us through a complex acquisition involving shareholders with different interests, IP and litigation questions and management issues with great expertise and patience. We could not have done this without his help."
August 14, 2022
Madeline P.
I am the CEO and attorney at my law firm that I started in June 2020 (as other businesses were shuttering due to Covid-19). I am currently seeking contract work to supplement my case load as I recently finalized numerous family law cases within a short timeframe.
John C.
Licensed to practice law in the states of Missouri and Kansas. Have been licensed to practice law for 44 years. Have been AV rated by Martindale Hubbel for almost 30 years.
September 20, 2022
Michael S.
Real estate and corporate attorney with over 30 years of experience in large and small firms and in house.
August 30, 2022
David A.
David Alexander advises clients on complex real estate transactions, including the acquisition, disposition, construction, financing and leasing of shopping centers, office buildings and industrial buildings throughout the U.S. An experienced real estate attorney, David reviews, drafts and negotiates all manner of retail, office and industrial real estate agreements, including purchase and sale agreements, construction contracts, leases and financing documentation.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Financial lawyers by top cities
- Austin Financial Lawyers
- Boston Financial Lawyers
- Chicago Financial Lawyers
- Dallas Financial Lawyers
- Denver Financial Lawyers
- Houston Financial Lawyers
- Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
- New York Financial Lawyers
- Phoenix Financial Lawyers
- San Diego Financial Lawyers
- Tampa Financial Lawyers
Closing Agreement lawyers by city
- Austin Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Boston Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Chicago Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Dallas Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Denver Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Houston Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Los Angeles Closing Agreement Lawyers
- New York Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Phoenix Closing Agreement Lawyers
- San Diego Closing Agreement Lawyers
- Tampa Closing Agreement Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review