Home Contract Samples C Closing Agreement

Closing Agreement: Definition, Example

Jump to Section

What is a Closing Agreement?

A closing agreement is a contract between the IRS and a taxpayer that brings a conclusion to a specific tax issue between the two parties. The contract includes details about what the tax issue was, how the conclusion was come to, and what promises each party mas made to come to the agreement. It also includes details about when the transaction was or will be finalized and if there are any documentation requirements once the form is filed with the court.

The purpose of the closing agreement is to document, in writing, the conclusion of a tax issue between taxpayer and IRS. It also provides vital proof if allegations arise in the future that the problem has already been rectified.

Closing Agreement Sample

Exhibit 10.10

Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service

CLOSING AGREEMENT ON FINAL DETERMINATION

COVERING SPECIFIC MATTERS

Pursuant to Section 7121 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (1) Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (EIN: 42-1579325), having an address of 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 (the “Trust”); (2) Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (EIN: 36-3337999), having an address of 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 (the “Advisor”) (the Trust and the Advisor collectively the “Taxpayers”); and (3) the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the “Commissioner”) make the following closing agreement (the “Agreement”):

WHEREAS:

A. The Trust elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) within the meaning of Code Section 856(a) and is organized under the laws of Maryland;

B. The Trust elected to be taxed as a REIT under Code Section 856(c)(1) effective with its initial tax year ending December 31, 2003;

C. The Trust adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) under which it allowed shareholders in the Trust to elect to receive distributions from the Trust in additional shares of the Trust (“DRIP Shares”), rather than in cash;

D. The Taxpayers represent that during the Trust’s tax years ending December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005 and the period beginning January 1, 2006 through April 30, 2006 (the “Relevant Period”), the Trust declared daily distributions so that each outstanding share of the Trust accrued a daily distribution but only actually distributed such accrued distributions declared in a particular calendar month approximately ten days following the close of such month;

E. The Taxpayers represent that during the Relevant Period, the Trust’s shareholders who elected to receive distributions from the Trust under the DRIP (the “DRIP Shareholders”) and the shareholders who received cash distributions from the Trust (the “Cash Shareholders”) all received their distributions from the Trust approximately ten days after the end of the calendar month in which such distributions were declared and accrued;

F. The Taxpayers represent that although the DRIP Shareholders did not receive their DRIP Shares during the Relevant Period until approximately ten days after the close of the relevant calendar month, they were treated as accruing additional distributions on such shares as if they had actually been distributed on the first day following the close of the relevant calendar month, while the Cash Shareholders did not accrue any additional distributions with respect to the cash to be distributed to them during the Relevant Period during the periods between the ends of the calendar months and the dates they received their cash distributions;

G. The Taxpayers represent that the value of the accruals received by the DRIP Shareholders during the Relevant Period with respect to the periods commencing one day


after the end of a calendar month and ending on the date approximately ten days later when the Cash Shareholders received their cash distributions for such calendar month approximately $359,000 for all of the Relevant Period;

H. The Taxpayers represent that the administration of the DRIP during the Relevant Period as described in the preceding Clauses E and F may have resulted in the DRIP Shareholders having received preferential dividends within the meaning of Code Section 562(c) (the “DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends”) because the administration of the DRIP could be characterized as resulting in (1) the DRIP Shareholders having received their distributions for a particular calendar month earlier than the Cash Shareholders having received their distributions for such calendar month, and (2) the DRIP Shareholders having begun to accrue additional distributions from the Trust upon their receipt of DRIP Shares, while the Cash Shareholders were unable to invest their cash distributions until they received them approximately ten days later;

I. The Taxpayers represent that in April 2006 they amended the manner in which the DRIP was administered (the “2006 DRIP Amendment”) so that the additional shares distributed to DRIP Shareholders are distributed to them on the same day that the Trust distributes cash to the Cash Shareholders and are not treated as outstanding prior to such date;

J. The Taxpayers represent that the 2006 DRIP Amendment corrected the manner of administration of the DRIP that created the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue;

K. The Taxpayers represent that they: (a) did not intend that the Trust distribute preferential dividends, as defined in Code section 562(c), during the Tax Years, and (b) were not aware of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue until December 2010 when the Trust’s tax advisor conducted tax due diligence in anticipation of the Trust’s listing and potential offering of shares;

L. In January 2011 the Taxpayers voluntarily disclosed the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue to the Commissioner before it was discovered by the Commissioner;

M. In recognition of their potential liabilities to the Commissioner as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue, the Taxpayers have approached the Commissioner seeking to resolve any and all liabilities to the Commissioner arising from such issue;

N. The Taxpayers and the Commissioner wish to avail of this Agreement to remove any uncertainty in respect of the Trust’s compliance with Code Sections 857(a)(1) and 857(b)(2)(B) as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue; and

O. The Taxpayers and the Commissioner desire to enter into this Agreement covering specific matters.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND AGREED for Federal income tax purposes that:

 

2


1. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Advisor, on behalf of the Trust, shall pay to the Commissioner (a) the principal sum of $50,000, plus (b) interest on such $50,000 computed as if such amount were tax using the interest rate(s) set forth in Code Section 6621(a)(2), which interest shall be computed from the following dates:

 

  (a) from March 15, 2005 on $25,000; and

 

  (b) from March 15, 2006 on $25,000.

Such interest shall accrue until the entire $50,000 principal amount and accrued interest (including any interest on the interest that might accrue) is paid in full.

2. The amount due under this Agreement, including all accrued interest, is hereafter known as the “Compliance Fee.”

3. The term “interest” as used in this Agreement is used solely to define the amount of the Compliance Fee described. The “interest” component of the Compliance Fee shall not be considered interest for federal income tax purposes.

4. The payment of the Compliance Fee shall be made by certified check or cashiers’ check payable to the United States Treasury and delivered to Internal Revenue Service, Large Business and International, Executive Assistant (Technical) to the Industry Director, Financial Services, 290 Broadway, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10007.

5. Although the Advisor has agreed to pay the Compliance Fee, this Agreement does not absolve the Trust of liability for the Compliance Fee. If the Advisor does not pay the Compliance Fee, then the Trust is required to pay the Compliance Fee.

6. The Compliance Fee need not be assessed in order to be properly collected.

7. Upon execution of this Agreement by the Taxpayers and the Commissioner and the full payment of the Compliance Fee, the terms and administration of the DRIP will not result in the Trust’s dividends paid during the tax years 2004, 2005 and 2006 (the “Tax Years”) being treated as preferential dividends as defined in Code section 562(c).

8. The Trust will not be assessed any additional tax, interest or penalties for any portion of the Relevant Period as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue.

9. The Compliance Fee is not deductible or otherwise amortizable or recoverable for Federal tax purposes by the Taxpayers in any taxable year.

10. The Compliance Fee is not refundable, or subject to credit or offset, for Federal tax purposes under any circumstances.

11. No portion of the Compliance Fee shall be considered as gross income to the Trust or any shareholder of the Trust.

 

3


12. Any reimbursements made to the Advisor for its payment of the Compliance Fee shall be considered gross income to the Advisor.

13. The Trust will not reimburse the Advisor for the Advisor’s payment of the Compliance Fee, and the Advisor will not seek any reimbursement of any portion of the Compliance Fee from the Trust.

14. Except as expressly provided herein, no determination is made concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of the organization and operation of the Trust during the Relevant Period.

15. This Agreement constitutes a resolution under the Code of the specific matters discussed herein. No inference is intended with respect to whether this resolution satisfies other Federal law.

16. Each of the parties hereto has had the opportunity to be represented or assisted by counsel in the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. The parties agree that this Agreement is to be construed as jointly drafted. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed according to the fair meaning of its language, and the rule of construction that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement.

17. Any inspection of records during the consideration of this Agreement does not preclude or impede, pursuant to Code § 7605(b) or any administrative provisions adopted by the Internal Revenue Service, a later examination of a return or inspection of records with respect to any tax year needed to resolve any issue outside the scope of this Agreement.

The remainder of the page is intentionally blank.

 

4


This Closing Agreement is final and conclusive except:

 

  a. The matter it relates to may be reopened in the event of fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of material fact;

 

  b. It is subject to Code sections that expressly provide that effect be given to their provisions (including any stated exception for Code § 7122) notwithstanding any other law or rule of law; and

 

  c. If it relates to any taxable period ending after the date that this Agreement is executed by all parties, it is subject to any law enacted after the Agreement date that applies to that taxable year.

By signing this closing agreement, the parties certify that they have read and agreed to the terms of this document.

Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.

 

By:     /s/ Steven P. Grimes    Date Signed: 6/1/11                            
Name:     Steven P. Grimes   
Title:     President and CEO   

Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

By:     /s/ Roberta S. Matlin    Date Signed: 6/1/11                            
Name:     Roberta S. Matlin   
Title:     Senior Vice President   

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

By:     /s/ Jolanta Sander    Date Signed: 6/17/11                            
Name:     Jolanta Sander   
Title:     Director, Field Operations   

 

5


Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.10 2 dex1010.htm CLOSING AGREEMENT, Viewed October 24, 2022, View Source on SEC.

Who Helps With Closing Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on closing agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a closing agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate closing agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.


ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.


How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

Meet some of our Closing Agreement Lawyers

Valerie I. on ContractsCounsel
View Valerie
5.0 (8)
Member Since:
February 24, 2026

Valerie I.

Advisory Attorney
Free Consultation
Coral Gables
5 Yrs Experience
Licensed in FL
St. Thomas College of Law

Miami-based transactional attorney specializing in corporate governance, contract drafting and negotiation, intellectual property, family law, and other general counsel assistance.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Valerie was knowledgeable, responsive, and thorough in reviewing my 1099 contractor agreement. She explained everything clearly and made sure my interests were protected. Highly recommend her for independent contractor agreements."

Erica L. on ContractsCounsel
View Erica
Member Since:
March 1, 2026

Erica L.

Principal Attorney
Free Consultation
Austin, TX
7 Yrs Experience
Licensed in TX
Lewis & Clark Law

I’m an experienced attorney offering practical, client-centered representation across contracts, estate planning (wills), and family law matters. I focus on clear communication, efficient strategy, and results that fit real life, not just the rulebook. Whether you need a straightforward document or steady advocacy through a difficult transition, I provide reliable guidance from start to finish.

Matthew R. on ContractsCounsel
View Matthew
Member Since:
March 5, 2026

Matthew R.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Boston, Massachusetts
7 Yrs Experience
Licensed in FL, MA
Suffolk University Law School

Matt Rubner is a Florida and Massachusetts licensed attorney. His practice focuses on estate planning, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, and civil litigation, with an emphasis on providing clear, practical legal guidance tailored to each client’s specific circumstances. Matt works with individuals and families to create thoughtful estate plans that protect assets, avoid unnecessary probate complications, and ensure that a client’s wishes are clearly documented. His estate planning services commonly include revocable living trusts, wills, powers of attorney, healthcare directives, and guidance on properly funding trusts and coordinating beneficiary designations. He also regularly advises clients on prenuptial and postnuptial agreements. Matt approaches these matters with a practical and balanced perspective, helping couples create agreements that clearly define financial expectations while preserving fairness and transparency for both parties. In addition to his transactional work, Matt maintains an active litigation practice and represents clients in a variety of civil matters. His litigation experience gives him a strategic perspective when drafting agreements and estate plans, allowing him to anticipate potential disputes and structure documents in a way that reduces future conflict. Matt represents clients in both Florida and Massachusetts and frequently works with individuals who have assets, businesses, or family connections in multiple states. He focuses on making the legal process straightforward, efficient, and understandable so clients can make informed decisions with confidence.

Spencer J. on ContractsCounsel
View Spencer
Member Since:
April 8, 2026

Spencer J.

Fractional General Counsel
Free Consultation
Los Angeles, CA
17 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
Loyola Law School

I provide the strategic legal guidance of an in-house general counsel without the full-time overhead. Whether you're launching a startup, scaling your digital business, or navigating complex privacy regulations, I'm here to help. With a practice concentrated in privacy law, digital marketing compliance, and small business operations, I help clients make informed decisions that protect their interests while supporting their growth objectives.

Gene R. on ContractsCounsel
View Gene
Member Since:
May 6, 2026

Gene R.

Lawyer
Free Consultation
San Jose, CA
30 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA, DC
Harvard Law School

I help founders and business owners set up core contracts, deal documents, and ownership terms so they can form companies, close business sales, bring in partners, and launch products without expensive surprises later. I focus on LLC and corporation formations and operating/shareholder agreements, business sales, founder and partner arrangements (including buyouts and separations), commercial contracts (NDAs, MSAs, privacy policies), and IP/SaaS ownership and licensing tied to those deals. Clients describe me as “the antidote to Big Law inefficiency,” “a legal sniper,” and say I’ve “potentially saved hundreds of thousands” by catching gaps other lawyers missed. I do all my own work, explain options in plain English, and give clear scope and hour ranges before I start. Harvard Law (cum laude), MIT, former Wilson Sonsini attorney, and GC/VP Legal for media and tech companies and venture‑backed startups, with a 5.0 rating and repeat clients on this platform.

Nick G. on ContractsCounsel
View Nick
Member Since:
March 20, 2026

Nick G.

Attorney
Free Consultation
San Diego, California
1 Yr Experience
Licensed in CA
University of California College of the Law, San Francisco

My name is Nick Gleason, and I’m an attorney licensed in California and a veteran of the United States Navy. While in law school, during my clerkship with Mob Entertainment, I worked under the General Counsel, drafting cease and desist letters, demand letters, and assignment and licensing agreements. I also worked with outside counsel on copyright infringement matters, helping to protect the interests of the company. Now in my professional practice, I continue to help clients like you protect your interests by offering affordable legal representation for all your contract and copyright needs. I can draft contracts, review proposed agreements for vulnerabilities, and negotiate terms on your behalf, as well as prepare effective cease and desist letters and demand letters tailored to your situation, including in copyright and DMCA-related matters. I will always be fair and transparent with my fees. I’d love to hear from you.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

View Trustpilot Review

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Financial lawyers by top cities
See All Financial Lawyers
Closing Agreement lawyers by city
See All Closing Agreement Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

View Trustpilot Review

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

View Trustpilot Review

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

View Trustpilot Review

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city