ContractsCounsel Logo

Closing Agreement

Clients Rate Lawyers on our Platform 4.9/5 Stars
based on 10,677 reviews
No Upfront Payment Required, Pay Only If You Hire.
Home Contract Samples C Closing Agreement

Jump to Section

What is a Closing Agreement?

A closing agreement is a contract between the IRS and a taxpayer that brings a conclusion to a specific tax issue between the two parties. The contract includes details about what the tax issue was, how the conclusion was come to, and what promises each party mas made to come to the agreement. It also includes details about when the transaction was or will be finalized and if there are any documentation requirements once the form is filed with the court.

The purpose of the closing agreement is to document, in writing, the conclusion of a tax issue between taxpayer and IRS. It also provides vital proof if allegations arise in the future that the problem has already been rectified.

Closing Agreement Sample

Exhibit 10.10

Department of the Treasury – Internal Revenue Service

CLOSING AGREEMENT ON FINAL DETERMINATION

COVERING SPECIFIC MATTERS

Pursuant to Section 7121 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (1) Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (EIN: 42-1579325), having an address of 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 (the “Trust”); (2) Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation (EIN: 36-3337999), having an address of 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, IL 60523 (the “Advisor”) (the Trust and the Advisor collectively the “Taxpayers”); and (3) the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (the “Commissioner”) make the following closing agreement (the “Agreement”):

WHEREAS:

A. The Trust elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) within the meaning of Code Section 856(a) and is organized under the laws of Maryland;

B. The Trust elected to be taxed as a REIT under Code Section 856(c)(1) effective with its initial tax year ending December 31, 2003;

C. The Trust adopted a dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) under which it allowed shareholders in the Trust to elect to receive distributions from the Trust in additional shares of the Trust (“DRIP Shares”), rather than in cash;

D. The Taxpayers represent that during the Trust’s tax years ending December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005 and the period beginning January 1, 2006 through April 30, 2006 (the “Relevant Period”), the Trust declared daily distributions so that each outstanding share of the Trust accrued a daily distribution but only actually distributed such accrued distributions declared in a particular calendar month approximately ten days following the close of such month;

E. The Taxpayers represent that during the Relevant Period, the Trust’s shareholders who elected to receive distributions from the Trust under the DRIP (the “DRIP Shareholders”) and the shareholders who received cash distributions from the Trust (the “Cash Shareholders”) all received their distributions from the Trust approximately ten days after the end of the calendar month in which such distributions were declared and accrued;

F. The Taxpayers represent that although the DRIP Shareholders did not receive their DRIP Shares during the Relevant Period until approximately ten days after the close of the relevant calendar month, they were treated as accruing additional distributions on such shares as if they had actually been distributed on the first day following the close of the relevant calendar month, while the Cash Shareholders did not accrue any additional distributions with respect to the cash to be distributed to them during the Relevant Period during the periods between the ends of the calendar months and the dates they received their cash distributions;

G. The Taxpayers represent that the value of the accruals received by the DRIP Shareholders during the Relevant Period with respect to the periods commencing one day


after the end of a calendar month and ending on the date approximately ten days later when the Cash Shareholders received their cash distributions for such calendar month approximately $359,000 for all of the Relevant Period;

H. The Taxpayers represent that the administration of the DRIP during the Relevant Period as described in the preceding Clauses E and F may have resulted in the DRIP Shareholders having received preferential dividends within the meaning of Code Section 562(c) (the “DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends”) because the administration of the DRIP could be characterized as resulting in (1) the DRIP Shareholders having received their distributions for a particular calendar month earlier than the Cash Shareholders having received their distributions for such calendar month, and (2) the DRIP Shareholders having begun to accrue additional distributions from the Trust upon their receipt of DRIP Shares, while the Cash Shareholders were unable to invest their cash distributions until they received them approximately ten days later;

I. The Taxpayers represent that in April 2006 they amended the manner in which the DRIP was administered (the “2006 DRIP Amendment”) so that the additional shares distributed to DRIP Shareholders are distributed to them on the same day that the Trust distributes cash to the Cash Shareholders and are not treated as outstanding prior to such date;

J. The Taxpayers represent that the 2006 DRIP Amendment corrected the manner of administration of the DRIP that created the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue;

K. The Taxpayers represent that they: (a) did not intend that the Trust distribute preferential dividends, as defined in Code section 562(c), during the Tax Years, and (b) were not aware of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue until December 2010 when the Trust’s tax advisor conducted tax due diligence in anticipation of the Trust’s listing and potential offering of shares;

L. In January 2011 the Taxpayers voluntarily disclosed the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue to the Commissioner before it was discovered by the Commissioner;

M. In recognition of their potential liabilities to the Commissioner as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue, the Taxpayers have approached the Commissioner seeking to resolve any and all liabilities to the Commissioner arising from such issue;

N. The Taxpayers and the Commissioner wish to avail of this Agreement to remove any uncertainty in respect of the Trust’s compliance with Code Sections 857(a)(1) and 857(b)(2)(B) as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue; and

O. The Taxpayers and the Commissioner desire to enter into this Agreement covering specific matters.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND AGREED for Federal income tax purposes that:

 

2


1. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Advisor, on behalf of the Trust, shall pay to the Commissioner (a) the principal sum of $50,000, plus (b) interest on such $50,000 computed as if such amount were tax using the interest rate(s) set forth in Code Section 6621(a)(2), which interest shall be computed from the following dates:

 

  (a) from March 15, 2005 on $25,000; and

 

  (b) from March 15, 2006 on $25,000.

Such interest shall accrue until the entire $50,000 principal amount and accrued interest (including any interest on the interest that might accrue) is paid in full.

2. The amount due under this Agreement, including all accrued interest, is hereafter known as the “Compliance Fee.”

3. The term “interest” as used in this Agreement is used solely to define the amount of the Compliance Fee described. The “interest” component of the Compliance Fee shall not be considered interest for federal income tax purposes.

4. The payment of the Compliance Fee shall be made by certified check or cashiers’ check payable to the United States Treasury and delivered to Internal Revenue Service, Large Business and International, Executive Assistant (Technical) to the Industry Director, Financial Services, 290 Broadway, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10007.

5. Although the Advisor has agreed to pay the Compliance Fee, this Agreement does not absolve the Trust of liability for the Compliance Fee. If the Advisor does not pay the Compliance Fee, then the Trust is required to pay the Compliance Fee.

6. The Compliance Fee need not be assessed in order to be properly collected.

7. Upon execution of this Agreement by the Taxpayers and the Commissioner and the full payment of the Compliance Fee, the terms and administration of the DRIP will not result in the Trust’s dividends paid during the tax years 2004, 2005 and 2006 (the “Tax Years”) being treated as preferential dividends as defined in Code section 562(c).

8. The Trust will not be assessed any additional tax, interest or penalties for any portion of the Relevant Period as a result of the DRIP Potential Preferential Dividends issue.

9. The Compliance Fee is not deductible or otherwise amortizable or recoverable for Federal tax purposes by the Taxpayers in any taxable year.

10. The Compliance Fee is not refundable, or subject to credit or offset, for Federal tax purposes under any circumstances.

11. No portion of the Compliance Fee shall be considered as gross income to the Trust or any shareholder of the Trust.

 

3


12. Any reimbursements made to the Advisor for its payment of the Compliance Fee shall be considered gross income to the Advisor.

13. The Trust will not reimburse the Advisor for the Advisor’s payment of the Compliance Fee, and the Advisor will not seek any reimbursement of any portion of the Compliance Fee from the Trust.

14. Except as expressly provided herein, no determination is made concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of the organization and operation of the Trust during the Relevant Period.

15. This Agreement constitutes a resolution under the Code of the specific matters discussed herein. No inference is intended with respect to whether this resolution satisfies other Federal law.

16. Each of the parties hereto has had the opportunity to be represented or assisted by counsel in the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. The parties agree that this Agreement is to be construed as jointly drafted. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed according to the fair meaning of its language, and the rule of construction that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party will not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement.

17. Any inspection of records during the consideration of this Agreement does not preclude or impede, pursuant to Code § 7605(b) or any administrative provisions adopted by the Internal Revenue Service, a later examination of a return or inspection of records with respect to any tax year needed to resolve any issue outside the scope of this Agreement.

The remainder of the page is intentionally blank.

 

4


This Closing Agreement is final and conclusive except:

 

  a. The matter it relates to may be reopened in the event of fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of material fact;

 

  b. It is subject to Code sections that expressly provide that effect be given to their provisions (including any stated exception for Code § 7122) notwithstanding any other law or rule of law; and

 

  c. If it relates to any taxable period ending after the date that this Agreement is executed by all parties, it is subject to any law enacted after the Agreement date that applies to that taxable year.

By signing this closing agreement, the parties certify that they have read and agreed to the terms of this document.

Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.

 

By:     /s/ Steven P. Grimes    Date Signed: 6/1/11                            
Name:     Steven P. Grimes   
Title:     President and CEO   

Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

By:     /s/ Roberta S. Matlin    Date Signed: 6/1/11                            
Name:     Roberta S. Matlin   
Title:     Senior Vice President   

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

By:     /s/ Jolanta Sander    Date Signed: 6/17/11                            
Name:     Jolanta Sander   
Title:     Director, Field Operations   

 

5


Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.10 2 dex1010.htm CLOSING AGREEMENT, Viewed October 24, 2022, View Source on SEC.

Who Helps With Closing Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on closing agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a closing agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate closing agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

Meet some of our Closing Agreement Lawyers

Darryl S. on ContractsCounsel
View Darryl
5.0 (21)
Member Since:
November 9, 2023

Darryl S.

Founder and Counselor-at-Law
Free Consultation
TEXAS
31 Yrs Experience
Licensed in TX
The University of Texas School of Law Austin

I specialize in contract law and focus on making sure your contract is clear, protects your interests and meets your needs. You can expect fast, straightforward communication from me, making sure you understand every step. With my experience, you'll get a detailed review of your contract at a fair, fixed price, without any surprises. I have over 30 years of business and legal experience that I bring to your project. I graduated from The University of Texas School of Law with High Honors in 1993 and practiced at Texas' largest law firm. I have founded companies and so understand how to be helpful as both a lawyer and business owner.

Katherine V. on ContractsCounsel
View Katherine
Member Since:
November 1, 2023

Katherine V.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Frankfort, Illinois
26 Yrs Experience
Licensed in IL
DePaul University College of Law

I am a skilled legal researcher and writer with a background in contract drafting and negotiation as well as litigation. I've served as an arbitrator for the past three years and have presided over nearly 400 binding arbitrations for an online dispute resolution platform. Additionally, I am a content writer and editor for the insurance division of LexisNexis. In my role as a contractor for LexisNexis, I research, draft, and edit high-quality legal reference tools on a variety of insurance topics for use by lawyers and insurance industry professionals.

Shawuki H. on ContractsCounsel
View Shawuki
Member Since:
November 3, 2023

Shawuki H.

Managing Attorney
Free Consultation
Bushnell, FL
4 Yrs Experience
Licensed in DC, FL
Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School

hawuki attended SUNY Binghamton where he graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Marketing and Leadership & Consulting. Shawuki then went on to pursue his Juris Doctorate from Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law (WMU Cooley). During his time at WMU Cooley, Shawuki served as Justice of Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity, International, Vice President of Entertainment of Sports and Entertainment Law Society, and an Associate Editor of the Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practical and Clinical Law. At the conclusion of law school, Shawuki graduated with cum laude honors earning a spot on the Honor Roll and Dean's List. Professionally, Shawuki is an attorney/contract advisor and a serial entrepreneur. As the Managing Attorney of The Hilton Law Firm, PLLC, Shawuki has aided over a dozen startups and existing businesses with contractual, regulatory, administrative, and other legal matters. As a Canadian Football League (CFL) Contract Advisor, Shawuki has negotiated multiple player contracts, ensuring just compensation for his clients. Entrepreneurially, Shawuki is an owner of multiple businesses and has a wealth of business experience. Shawuki is a member of the Florida and District of Columbia Bar, Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity, International, Phi Delta Phi Legal Honor Society, and was recently named to the National Black Lawyers Top 40 under 40 list Florida.

Darren W. on ContractsCounsel
View Darren
Member Since:
November 5, 2023

Darren W.

Attorney
Free Consultation
South Jordan, Utah
20 Yrs Experience
Licensed in AZ, CO, UT, WY
J. Reuben Clark, BYU

My main focus is estate planning and business transactions, but I have had many practice areas throughout my career, including criminal defense and prosecution, civil litigation from neighborhood squabbles to corporate contentions. I have also worked in bankruptcy, family law, collections, employment law, and personal injury. I stand ready to assist in any area to which I feel I can be of service, but will not try to fake it if I do not know the area of law I am being asked to serve in.

Dawn K. on ContractsCounsel
View Dawn
Member Since:
November 5, 2023

Dawn K.

Partner
Free Consultation
Los Angeles, CA
9 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
Concord Law School Kaplan University

Dawn K Kennedy has been licensed to practice law since 2015, but has been an entrepreneur since 2011. She uses her extensive project management and business background to support small and mid-sized businesses with contracts, negotiations, and other matters relating to the operation of a successful business venture.

Boris K. on ContractsCounsel
View Boris
Member Since:
November 7, 2023

Boris K.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Newport Brach
11 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
Western Michigan Law

With over 10 years experience as a Real Estate Broker and an attorney, I can help you with all your residential real estate needs such as For sale by owner transactions and drafting grant deeds

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

View Trustpilot Review

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Financial lawyers by top cities
See All Financial Lawyers
Closing Agreement lawyers by city
See All Closing Agreement Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

View Trustpilot Review

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

View Trustpilot Review

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

View Trustpilot Review

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city