Injunction: A General Guide
Jump to Section
An injunction is a legal instrument ordered by the court that requires or prohibits an individual from performing an action to safeguard a party's legal rights. It is ordered to maintain the existing state of affairs where a certain action or inaction would inflict irreversible damage on a party. A person or entity not obeying a court-ordered injunction may face criminal or civil penalties. In this article, we have provided a comprehensive guide on injunctions.
Types of Injunctions
The court grants various types of injunctions; the most prevalent ones are:
- Preliminary Injunction: This is a short-term order given before a trial to protect the status quo and the plaintiff’s rights. A preliminary injunction gives the plaintiff quick relief until the case is resolved.
- Preventive Injunction: This is a long-term order issued after a trial to prevent the defendant from engaging in harmful, illegal, or unethical conduct. A preventive injunction aims to avoid future harm, maintain things as they are, and stop a consistent error.
- Mandatory Injunction: This is a long-term order and the most strict type of injunction. It's granted after a trial to compel the defendant to perform a good, right, and lawful act. It's strict because it forces the defendant to modify his actions. For example, the court can order a mandatory injunction to make the defendant demolish a structure or building built in the wrong place.
- Temporary Restraining Order: This concise order remains intact until the restraint period expires. The court issues it to protect the current condition of the disputed subject until the application for a provisional injunction is heard. It also aims to avoid any unnecessary and irreparable damage.
- Permanent Injunction: This is a permanent order issued at the time of the final verdict to provide a conclusive remedy to the plaintiff. These injunctions persist if the circumstances that warranted them are irreversible.
Requisites for an Injunction
For an injunction order to be granted by the court, certain conditions must be satisfied. These are.
- Prima-Facie Case: This implies that the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to substantiate their valid legal claim with a reasonable prospect of success at trial.
- Balance of Convenience: The balance of convenience favors the applicant. It states that the applicant would face more harm and hardship if the injunction is not granted. The court considers the benefits and burdens that might occur by granting an injunction on the account of both parties. After that, the court comes up with a fair and equitable judgment.
- Irreparable Damage: This implies that the applicant would suffer irreparable damage on non-granting of an injunction. It states that the applicant shall face such damage or loss if the injunction is not granted. Monetary damages or other legal remedies cannot compensate for this loss. Irreparable damage is considered the most essential requirement for obtaining an injunction. It proves that there is an urgent need for the court to intervene and preserve the status quo.
Reasons for Denial of an Injunction
There are certain grounds on which a requisite for an injunction order can not be granted. These are:
- Similar Legal Action: The respondent is already involved in a similar legal action, and granting an injunction would create unnecessary duplication.
- Redress from Legislative Body: The respondent is seeking redress from a legislative body, and granting an injunction would interfere with the legislative process.
- Criminal Charges on Respondent: The respondent faces criminal charges, and granting an injunction would affect the criminal justice system.
- Consent of Applicant: The applicant has implicitly agreed to the respondent’s act, either by silence or previous conduct. Hence, granting an injunction would be unfair to the respondent.
- Less Harmful Act: The respondent’s act is not harmful or annoying to the applicant, and granting an injunction would be unreasonable or arbitrary.
- Monetary Damages Recovered: The applicant can recover monetary damages for the respondent’s act, and granting an injunction would be excessive or disproportionate.
- Bad Faith of Applicant: The applicant has acted in bad faith or violated the law, and granting an injunction would reward the applicant’s misconduct.
Benefits of an Injunction
There are many benefits to an injunction order to be granted. Some of these are:
- Safeguarding the Rights and Interests: It can prevent the parties’ rights and interests from being infringed or damaged by the unlawful actions of others.
- Preventing Further Damage or Loss: It can prevent further damage or loss to the parties in situations where monetary or other legal remedies are not enough or adequate.
- Maintaining Status Quo: It can keep the status quo or the current situation of the case intact until the court gives the final verdict.
- Avoiding Unnecessary or Irreparable Injury: It can avoid unnecessary or irreparable injury to the parties by conveniently stopping or compelling certain actions.
- Promoting Fairness: It can promote fairness and equity by balancing the convenience and inconvenience of both parties.
- Upholding Rule of Law: It can uphold the law by enforcing the court’s authority and preventing disobedience or contempt of court orders.
Importance of Contempt of Court in Enforcing an Injunction
When the court issues an injunction, the parties must adhere to its provisions. If they do not comply, they may be charged with contempt of court following a fair trial. It is a criminal offense that implies the disrespect of the court and its authority. A fair trial will determine whether a fine or jail time is appropriate for those who disobey a court order. The court determines the amount of fine and length of the jail term based on the severity and nature of the punishment and will depend on the extent and gravity of the default.
Key Terms for Injunctions
- Prima Facie: The term means "on the face of it," "on first sight," or "on the first presence." The Prima Facie term used in injunction means the case has enough evidence to prove the defendant's accountability. Then, they must proceed to the trial judgment without further investigation.
- Irreparable Injury: An injury so severe that it cannot be compensated with monetary damages or other legal remedies.
- Balance of Convenience: It refers to the relative misconduct or inconvenience caused to the party. It arises when there is uncertainty about whether the remedies available for damage are adequate for either party or both.
- Monetary Damage: A legal remedy awarded to the applicant to compensate for any wrongful act or injury. The main essence of such a legal remedy is the payment of money.
- Restraining Order: An official court order prohibits an individual from performing a particular act, especially approaching or contacting a designated person.
Final Thoughts on Injunctions
The injunction is a legal instrument used to refrain an individual from performing certain actions to protect the interests and rights of the disputing parties. Even though it’s not a final verdict, it is a temporary measure that a court can modify or dissolve as the case progresses. It is granted only when rigorous legal standards are met, demonstrating that granting an injunction is essential and reasonable in the given situation.
If you want free pricing proposals from vetted lawyers that are 60% less than typical law firms, click here to get started. By comparing multiple proposals for free, you can save the time and stress of finding a quality lawyer for your business needs.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Injunction Lawyers
David H.
Michigan licensed attorney. A compelling combination of technology, sourcing, sales, and legal experience. Over 20 years in technology positions negotiating technology engagements and contracts. General practice legal experience. Significant IT contracts experience (from IT sourcing/procurement) with the State of Michigan and Zimmer Biomet (Fortune 500). Excellent people, negotiation, and writing skills; keen eye for continuous improvement. Trusted business partner co-leading or supporting cross-functional integrated business/IT projects.
"David was great! Went above and beyond what was needed and really gave me a fresh perspective on the contract I needed consulting on."
Michael C.
A seasoned senior executive with experience leading the legal and compliance functions of healthcare entities through high-growth periods. I have experience managing voluminous litigation caseloads, while also handling all pre-litigation investigations for employment, healthcare regulatory, and compliance matters. Similarly, I have led multiple M&A teams through purchase and sale processes, including diligence and contract negotiations. Finally, I have extensive contract review experience in all matters, including debt and equity financing, healthcare payor contracting, vendor and employment agreements, as well as service and procurement agreements.
"Michael was super knowledgeable and efficient. He was very attentive, helpful and made himself available pursuant to our needs as well. He completed the initial drafts well before the scheduled timeframe. We are very pleased with his work ethic and delivery of this project. He was also very easy to work with. We recommend his legal services without hesitation. Would definitely hire him again!"
Mark D.
Partnering with business clients to keep their greatest asset - their employees - from becoming their biggest liability. Mark accomplishes this by working with in-house counsel and human resource professionals of several Fortune 50 companies, as well as many smaller public and privately held profit and not for profit organizations, to provide advice and counsel on the day to day employment and workforce practice issues encountered by those organizations. For over fifteen years Mark has been Board Certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. He is licensed and practices in both Texas and Colorado and has focused his practice for the last 20 plus years on defending companies in employment and labor related matters. During this time Mark has had extensive experience in handling and responding to a wide range of local, state and federal employment issues that impact the management and operations of businesses in a wide range of industries. Mark's experience includes appearances before state and federal agencies and regulatory boards, litigation in both state and federal courts, defense of class actions and appearances before courts of appeal. While Mark regularly handles matters in litigation, he has a high regard for handling every issue with the best interest of the client’s business. Mark is a published author and regular speaks on labor, employment and workplace practice topics. Whether it be an investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Wage & Hour division of the U.S. Department of Labor, or other state agency; an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or state agency charge claiming a violation of local, state or federal employment or labor laws; or the need for direction on a hiring, termination or business operational issue involving employees, Mark has extensive experience in handling these and many other employment and labor issues.
"opened by mistake. but i have kept all your contact info and will be in touch for anything we need in the future!"
Rebecca R.
Experienced attorneyin leasing, NDA, family law, commercial real estate, immigration and employment . Well versed in internal and external policy document and manual creation.
"Quickly understood our requirements and created a customized doc to meet our needs with a fast turnaround... We'd definitely work with Rebecca again!"
March 8, 2022
Stephanie C.
Alabama & Missouri Licensed Attorney offering Freelance Services for Wills, Trusts, Probate, Family Law Documents, Criminal Matters, and Real Estate Closings.
March 10, 2022
Benjamin V.
My practice involves counseling businesses and individuals on a variety of contracts, such as business formation, technology/IP, real estate, leases, and even domestic relations agreements. Much of my practice is dedicated to litigation. As such, I approach contract and transactional work from a litigation perspective by advising clients of the risks involved in failing to develop proper contracts. It takes more than knowledge of the law to be a good lawyer. A good lawyer is honest and forthcoming with clients and has a counseling ethos. And, to me, a good lawyer stands in the shoes of the client when considering how to best serve that client. Whether my client is a business or an individual, I am passionate about helping my clients understand their rights, responsibilities, risks, and possibilities.
March 23, 2022
Joann H.
I practiced law for the past 22 years in Immigration, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure, Civil Litigation, and Estate Planning. I am interested in downsizing to a more workable schedule to allow the pursuit of other interests.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Business lawyers by top cities
- Austin Business Lawyers
- Boston Business Lawyers
- Chicago Business Lawyers
- Dallas Business Lawyers
- Denver Business Lawyers
- Houston Business Lawyers
- Los Angeles Business Lawyers
- New York Business Lawyers
- Phoenix Business Lawyers
- San Diego Business Lawyers
- Tampa Business Lawyers
Injunction lawyers by city
- Austin Injunction Lawyers
- Boston Injunction Lawyers
- Chicago Injunction Lawyers
- Dallas Injunction Lawyers
- Denver Injunction Lawyers
- Houston Injunction Lawyers
- Los Angeles Injunction Lawyers
- New York Injunction Lawyers
- Phoenix Injunction Lawyers
- San Diego Injunction Lawyers
- Tampa Injunction Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review