Technical Collaboration Agreement: Definition, Example
Jump to Section
Quick Facts — Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Avg cost to draft a Collaboration Agreement: $780.00
- Avg cost to review a Collaboration Agreement: $470.00
- Lawyers available: 73 business lawyers
- Clients helped: 53 recent technical collaboration agreement projects
- Avg lawyer rating: 5.0 (7 reviews)
What is a Technical Collaboration Agreement?
A technical collaboration agreement is a legal document that governs the relationship of a party with industry knowledge who agrees to share it with another. For example, a well-established tech company might enter into a technical collaboration agreement with a startup who has little industry knowledge. In exchange, the technical collaboration agreement would entail certain requirements in exchange for the knowledge. A tech company might consider this type of agreement to break into a new geographical area or to entice a different audience.
The technical collaboration agreement is intended to be a nearly all-encompassing guide of this relationship. It includes details about who each party is, what their roles are, as well as deadlines and important protocol information.
Technical Collaboration Agreement Sample
Exhibit 10.2
TECHNICAL COLLABORATION AGREEMENT
This Agreement made and entered into as of the 29th day of September 2010 by and between
Seahawk Drilling LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SDL”) which expression shall include its successors and permitted assigns acting through its duly authorised Mr. Randall D. Stilley, President:
And
Essar Oilfield Services India Limited (“EOSIL”), a body corporate established under the laws of India which expression shall include its successors and permitted assigns acting through its duly authorized Mr. Ankur Gupta, Chief Executive Officer.
WITNESSETH:
Whereas
| 1. | Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (“ONGC”), a body corporate established under the laws of India has invited bids from interested parties in the prescribed bid forms and Proforma for Charter Hire of One No 150 Feet Water Depth MAT Rig by Tender No .MR /DS /MAT /CT /RIGS /CH/MAT-FLOATER/49(308) /2010 /P46JC010007 (“the Tender”) for carrying out drilling operations in eligible PEL/ML areas (“the Areas”). |
| 2. | One of the conditions stipulated in the Tender with respect to the experience of the bidder is that the bidder should be an offshore drilling contractor / company having minimum 3 years experience of operating Mat rig; and that in case bidder is a company including an Indian company/ Indian joint venture company who do not meet the minimum 3 years experience criteria, then such companies can participate in the Tender through a joint venture partner/ technical collaborator who meets the criteria regarding minimum 3 years experience of operating mat rig. |
| 3. | EOSIL is not having minimum 3 years experience of operating mat rig. EOSIL, therefore, desires to submit its bid in pursuance of the Tender in technical collaboration with the Foreign Company. |
| 4. | SDL is an affiliate of Seahawk Drilling, Inc., formerly known as Pride Offshore, Inc., which has represented that it has the necessary technical competence and experience of more than 3 years in operating mat rigs and has agreed to make available to EOSIL its technical experience necessary for proper discharge and/or performance of all obligations that EOSIL may be required to perform in case its bid is accepted and contract is awarded by ONGC in pursuance of the Tender. |
1
| 5. | The Parties desire to enter into this contract with respect to carrying out by EOSIL of drilling operations by using the mat rig named “Seahawk 2505” (“the Mat Rig”) in technical collaboration with SDL on the terms and conditions herein set forth |
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants and conditions herein contained, IT IS HEREBY AGREED between the Parties as follows:
| 1. | EOSIL shall provide ONGC the Mat Rig along with equipment conforming to the broad technical specifications as mentioned in the Tender, personnel required for drilling exploratory wells from 30 feet to 150 feet water depth in the Areas as per the Work Program approved by ONGC, including modifications or revisions to the Work Program. |
| 2. | SDL shall make available to EOSIL expertise and technical know-how in relation to carrying out by EOSIL Mat Rig operations in the Areas during the term of the contract that may be entered into between ONGC and EOSIL, pursuant to the Tender. Such expertise and technical know-how to be made available by SDL to EOSIL may include giving assistance, training and practical experience in accordance with good HSE practices to personnel employed by EOSIL. It is hereby expressly agreed and declared that this Agreement shall remain in full force and virtue during the term of the contract that may be entered into ONGC and EOSIL in pursuance of the Tender. |
| 3. | In consideration of SDL making available to EOSIL the said expertise and technical know-how, EOSIL shall pay to SDL the sums of money as specified in Annexure 1 hereto. |
| 4. | The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as amended (“FCPA”) in general, prohibits the promise, payment or giving of anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a Government Official for the purpose of influencing any act or decision in his official capacity, or inducing him to use his influence with a foreign government to assist a company or agent in obtaining or retaining business or any improper advantage. Under the FCPA and for the purposes of this Agreement, “Government Official” includes, without limitation, any official, officer, employee, or representative of any non-U.S. government department, agency or instrumentality (including any government-owned or -controlled commercial enterprise, such as a government-controlled oil company) or any outside consultancy group engaged thereby, or any official of a public international organization or political party, or candidate for political office outside the United States. EOSIL certifies that it is knowledgeable and familiar with and in compliance with the FCPA. The parties agree to ensure that all of their officers, employees, agents, consultants, representatives, business partners, and affiliates who are engaged in implementing this Agreement are knowledgeable regarding the purpose and provisions of the FCPA, and agree to take appropriate steps to ensure that such officers, employees, agents, consultants, representatives, business partners, and affiliates shall comply with the FCPA and shall not take or refrain from taking any action which would cause either party to be in violation of the FCPA. |
2
| 5. | All data, information or reports furnished by SDL to EOSIL pursuant to this agreement, shall be treated as confidential and EOSIL shall not disclose the contents thereof to any third party without the prior consent in writing of SDL. The obligation of EOSIL as to confidentiality under this clause shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. |
| 6. | SDL shall and will not be responsible for proper discharge and /or performance of all obligations that may be required to be performed by EOSIL under a contract that EOSIL may enter into with ONGC in pursuance of acceptance of its bid. It is agreed by and between the Parties that it is the sole responsibility of EOSIL to properly discharge and /or perform all its obligations under such contract. |
| 7. | SDL shall and will not be liable to indemnify and save harmless either EOSIL or ONGC against any and all losses, damages, liabilities, suits, claims, counterclaims, demands, actions, penalties, costs, charges, expenses (including attorney’s fees and court costs) (collectively, “the losses”), which EOSIL or ONGC shall have actually suffered or incurred as a result of SDL providing its expertise and technical know-how to EOSIL. It is agreed by and between the Parties that EOSIL as bidder is responsible for completion of the job under be contract and shall alone be liable to indemnify and keep indemnified ONGC and SDL against losses which ONGC and SDL may have actually suffered or incurred as a result of any breach by EOSIL in the performance of its obligations under a contract with ONGC. |
| 8. | Except as otherwise limited by this Clause 8 EOSIL and Essar Oilfields Services Ltd., agree to indemnify, defend and hold SDL, and each of its officers, directors, employees, agents, shareholders, members and controlling Persons and their respective successors and assigns (collectively, the “SDL Indemnitees”) harmless from and against and in respect of damages actually suffered, incurred or realized by such SDL Indemnitee (collectively, “SDL Losses”), arising out of or resulting from or relating to claims from an unrelated third party (“Third-Party Claims”) relating to the this Agreement. |
All claims for indemnification under this Clause 8 shall be asserted and resolved as follows:
| (a) | SDL will promptly give EOSIL notice of any matter that SDL has determined has given or could give rise to a right of indemnification under this Agreement, stating the amount of the losses, if known, and method of computation thereof, all with reasonable particularity, and stating with particularity the nature of such matter. Failure to provide such notice shall not affect the right of SDL to indemnification except to the extent such failure shall have resulted in liability to EOSIL that could have been actually avoided had such notice been provided within such required time period. |
| (b) | EOSIL, at its option, assume and control the defense of such Third-Party Claim at EOSIL’s expense and through counsel of EOSIs’s choice reasonably acceptable to SDL. In the event EOSIL assumes the defense against any such Third Party Claim as provided above, SDL shall have the right (but not the obligation) to participate at its own expense in the defense of such asserted liability, shall cooperate with EOSIL in such defense and will |
3
| attempt to make available on a reasonable basis to EOSIL all witnesses, pertinent records, materials and information in its possession or under its control relating thereto as is reasonably required by EOSIL. In the event EOSIL does not elect to conduct the defense against any such Third-Party Claim within 30 days after notice of any such Third-Party Claim, or such shorter period as is reasonably required, SDL shall (upon further notice to the EOSIL) have the right to undertake the defense thereof, and EOSIL shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses of such defense as incurred and shall cooperate with SDL (and be entitled to participate) in such defense and attempt to make available to it on a reasonable basis all such witnesses, records, materials and information in its possession or under its control relating thereto as is reasonably required by SDL. Except for the settlement of a Third-Party Claim that involves the payment of money only and for which SDL is totally indemnified by EOSIL, no Third-Party Claim may be settled without the written consent of the SDL. |
| (c) | Payment of any amounts due pursuant to this Clause 8 shall be made in United States dollars in immediately available funds by wire transfer to a bank account or accounts to be designated by SDL within ten calendar days after notice is sent by SDL. |
| (d) | If and to the extent SDL shall make written demand upon EOSIL for indemnification pursuant to this Clause 8 and EOSIL shall refuse or fail to pay in full within fifteen calendar days of such written demand the amounts demanded pursuant hereto and in accordance herewith, then SDL may utilize any legal or equitable remedy to collect from the EOSIL the amount of its losses indemnifiable hereunder. |
| 9. | EOSIL shall bear all taxes levied by the central government or state government, or any other local or statutory authorities, incurred by SDL or SDL employees for services rendered in relation to this contract, including but not limited to, customs duty, excise duty, value-added tax/sales tax, withholding, service, employment, income and any other similar taxes. |
| 10. | In the event the sale of the Mat Rig from an affiliate of SDL to EOSIL does not occur, this Agreement will terminate. EOSIL may terminate this Agreement upon any material breach of the Agreement by Seahawk. EOSIL may terminate the Agreement only upon thirty (30) days written notice to SDL of the material breach complained of. If SDL is able to cure the said material breach prior to the end of thirty (30) days, EOSIL’s said right to terminate this Agreement shall cease. |
| 11. | This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the English Law. |
| 12. | Any and all disputes arising out of or in connection with the interpretation, performance, non-performance, validity, extension, modification or termination of this Agreement, shall be settled by arbitration conducted in accordance with the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) as in effect on the date hereof and the following procedure shall be followed in such arbitration: |
(a) Each party shall appoint its own arbitrator. In case a party fails to appoint an arbitrator within fifteen (15) days, then the arbitrator already appointed by one party shall be the sole arbitrator.
4
(b) In case each party appoints its own arbitrator, then the party-appointed arbitrators shall, within fifteen (15) days of their appointment, jointly appoint one or more arbitrators who shall be the President/Chairman of the arbitral panel.
(c) The venue of the arbitration shall be London and the arbitration shall be conducted in the English language.
(d) The award shall be in writing, in English and be a reasoned award. The prevailing party shall be entitled to claim its costs and expenses (including reasonable counsel fees), but the arbitral tribunal shall not be required to award costs and expenses.
(e) The award shall be final and conclusive and judgment thereon may be entered in any court for its enforcement. In addition, the Parties agree that no party shall have any right to commence or maintain any lawsuit or legal proceeding of any kind concerning a dispute hereunder until the dispute has been determined in accordance with the arbitration procedure provided for herein and then only for enforcement of the award rendered in such arbitration.
(f) During the pendency of any arbitration each party shall continue to perform its obligations hereunder; (ii) neither party shall exercise any remedies hereunder arising by virtue of the matters in dispute; and (iii) any party shall be entitled to apply only to the arbitral tribunal for any equitable relief or interim measures.
(g) The joinder of or claims against any third parties to any dispute between the Parties herein shall not render this arbitration agreement void, inoperative or incapable of performance and the Parties agree that joinder of or claims against such third parties who are not parties to this arbitration agreement shall not be pleaded or raised as a defense to defeat, delay or avoid any arbitration proceedings commenced or to be commenced pursuant to this arbitration agreement.
(h) The Parties expressly agree that notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement or in the laws of India, Part I of the [Indian] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (or any succeeding Act) shall not apply to any arbitration proceedings commenced pursuant to this arbitration agreement or to any award made thereto.
5
| 13. | Any notice or other communication under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be transmitted by hand delivery or by prepaid postage, registered mail or recognized courier service or by facsimile transmission to the Parties as follows, as elected by the Party giving such notice. |
In the case of notice to SDL, to
| Address: | Seahawk Drilling, Inc | |
| 5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2700 | ||
| Houston, Texas 77046 | ||
| Attention: | Mr. Robert Moore, Vice President Corporate Development & Planning | |
| Fax: | +1 713-369-7312 | |
| Attention: | Mr. Alejandro Cestero, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer | |
| Fax: | +1 713-369-2761 | |
In the case of notices to EOSIL, to
Capt. Sajid Y. Syed, Jt. GM – Marketing & Business Development,
Essar Oilfield Services India Limited,
Equinox Business Park,
Building ‘B”, 5th Floor,
LBS Marg, Off BKC, Kurla (W),
Mumbai – 400 070,
India.
T + 91 22 6733 5000
F + 91 22 6708 2178
6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the representatives of the parties to this Agreement, being duly authorised have hereunto set their hands and have executed these presents this 29th day of September, 2010.
| Signed for and on behalf of Seahawk Drilling LLC | Signed for and on behalf of Essar Oilfield Services India Ltd. | |
| /s/ Randall D. Stilley | /s/ Anand D. Amladi | |
| Name: Randall D. Stilley | Name: Anand D. Amladi | |
| Designation: President and Chief Executive Officer | Designation: Vice President - Commercial | |
| In presence of | In presence of | |
| /s/ Debbie Venditto | /s/ Dibyendu Dey | |
| Name: Debbie Venditto | Name: Dibyendu Dey | |
| Designation: Sr. Executive Assistant | Designation: General Manager - Fin | |
7
ANNEXURE-I
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE
(Clause 3 of the Agreement dated September 29, 2010 )
| a. | For providing the services mentioned in Clause 2, SDL shall be paid a Technical Service Fee of United States Dollars one hundred thirty-five thousand (US$135,000.00). |
| b. | For costs and expenses incurred in the provision of services covered in Clause 2, SDL shall be reimbursed at actual documented cost of service provided +15% service charge. This includes, but is not limited to, personnel costs/burden and travel expenses. EOSIL shall submit payment to SDL within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoices for such costs and expenses. |
8
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.2 3 dex102.htm TECHNICAL COLLABORATION AGREEMENT, Viewed September 22, 2022, View Source on SEC.
Who Helps With Technical Collaboration Agreements?
Lawyers with backgrounds working on technical collaboration agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a technical collaboration agreement?
Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate technical collaboration agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
See Real Collaboration Agreement Projects
New York Midwifery Practice Collaborative Agreement Drafting
- New York
- 6 lawyer bids
- $490 - $1,550
Delaware Licensing / Partnership Agreement Contract Review Review
- Delaware
- 6 lawyer bids
- $300 - $550
Montana Workhorse Properties/Tax Sale Associates Contract Review
- Montana
- 3 lawyer bids
- $400 - $799
Georgia Give your legal perspective on if I am able to pursue a collaboration agreement after agreement was previously terminated with Zivain Review
- Georgia
- 3 lawyer bids
- $300 - $400
See all Collaboration Agreement projects
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Need help with a Technical Collaboration Agreement?
Meet some of our Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
Anna C.
I am a business attorney focused on practical, efficient contract drafting, review, and negotiation for healthcare organizations and growth-stage and established businesses. My work includes commercial agreements such as NDAs, MSAs/SOWs, leases, vendor and services agreements, SaaS, and employment and severance agreements. I partner closely with clients to identify key legal and business risks, deliver clear, business-minded redlines with concise issue summaries, and keep transactions moving. Clients value my responsive turnaround, judgment, and ability to balance risk with commercial objectives.
"Working with Anna was great! She took the time to review and build out all the documents I needed (privacy policy, t&c, health data policy, etc.) to start going on my online business. Would definitely work with her again."
Ryenne S.
My name is Ryenne Shaw and I help business owners build businesses that operate as assets instead of liabilities, increase in value over time and build wealth. My areas of expertise include corporate formation and business structure, contract law, employment/labor law, business risk and compliance and intellectual property. I also serve as outside general counsel to several businesses across various industries nationally. I spent most of my early legal career assisting C.E.O.s, General Counsel, and in-house legal counsel of both large and smaller corporations in minimizing liability, protecting business assets and maximizing profits. While working with many of these entities, I realized that smaller entities are often underserved. I saw that smaller business owners weren’t receiving the same level of legal support larger corporations relied upon to grow and sustain. I knew this was a major contributor to the ceiling that most small businesses hit before they’ve even scratched the surface of their potential. And I knew at that moment that all of this lack of knowledge and support was creating a huge wealth gap. After over ten years of legal experience, I started my law firm to provide the legal support small to mid-sized business owners and entrepreneurs need to grow and protect their brands, businesses, and assets. I have a passion for helping small to mid-sized businesses and startups grow into wealth-building assets by leveraging the same legal strategies large corporations have used for years to create real wealth. I enjoy connecting with my clients, learning about their visions and identifying ways to protect and maximize the reach, value and impact of their businesses. I am a strong legal writer with extensive litigation experience, including both federal and state (and administratively), which brings another element to every contract I prepare and the overall counsel and value I provide. Some of my recent projects include: - Negotiating & Drafting Commercial Lease Agreements - Drafting Trademark Licensing Agreements - Drafting Ambassador and Influencer Agreements - Drafting Collaboration Agreements - Drafting Service Agreements for service-providers, coaches and consultants - Drafting Master Service Agreements and SOWs - Drafting Terms of Service and Privacy Policies - Preparing policies and procedures for businesses in highly regulated industries - Drafting Employee Handbooks, Standard Operations and Procedures (SOPs) manuals, employment agreements - Creating Employer-employee infrastructure to ensure business compliance with employment and labor laws - Drafting Independent Contractor Agreements and Non-Disclosure/Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation Agreements - Conducting Federal Trademark Searches and filing trademark applications - Preparing Trademark Opinion Letters after conducting appropriate legal research - Drafting Letters of Opinion for Small Business Loans - Drafting and Responding to Cease and Desist Letters I service clients throughout the United States across a broad range of industries.
"Very helpful and easy to work with, a lot of experience with licensing"
Daehoon P.
Daehoon P.
Corporate, M&A & Securities Lawyer | Managing Attorney, DP Counsel PLLC Practice Areas: Business Formation | Commercial Contracts | Contract Drafting & Review | Mergers & Acquisitions | Venture Capital | Securities Offerings | Franchise Law | Employment & Equity Compensation | Intellectual Property | Cross-Border Transactions About/Bio: I represent companies, investors, and fund sponsors in corporate transactions, commercial contracting, and private securities matters, from entity formation and early-stage financings to acquisitions, exits, and ongoing strategic counsel. As Managing Attorney of DP Counsel PLLC, I help clients structure transactions clearly, allocate risk thoughtfully, and move deals forward with documentation that is practical, enforceable, and aligned with business objectives. My practice includes both day-to-day commercial matters and more complex transactional work, including venture financings, private offerings, M&A deals, fund-related documents, and cross-border structuring. What I Do: Corporate & Commercial • Entity formation and structuring for corporations, LLCs, and limited partnerships • Operating agreements, shareholder agreements, and governance documents • Commercial contract drafting, review, and negotiation • Vendor, distribution, manufacturing, SaaS, and licensing agreements • Employment, consulting, confidentiality, and equity compensation agreements • Outside general counsel support for growing companies Securities & Private Capital • Private offerings under Regulation D and Regulation S • Private placement memoranda, subscription agreements, and investor documents • SAFE, convertible note, and priced equity financings • Venture capital and private fund formation matters • Fund governing documents and offering document packages • Securities law analysis for private capital raising transactions Mergers & Acquisitions • Letters of intent and term sheets • Stock purchase, asset purchase, and merger agreements • Due diligence coordination and transaction support • Disclosure schedules, closing documents, and post-closing matters • Earnouts, rollover equity, indemnity structures, and related deal terms • HSR, CFIUS, and related regulatory issue spotting for qualifying transactions Digital Assets & Emerging Technologies • Federal-law digital asset and token securities analysis • Entity structuring for blockchain and Web3 ventures • Digital asset fund and operating structures • AML/KYC documentation support and regulatory issue spotting Franchising • Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) • Franchise agreements • Master franchise and area development agreements • Franchise structuring and registration coordination Real Estate Transactions • Commercial real estate acquisitions and dispositions • Real estate joint ventures and syndications • Commercial lease drafting and negotiation • Real estate investment structures and related offering documents Cross-Border & International • U.S. market entry and entity structuring for international clients • Delaware and multi-entity holding structures • Cross-border transaction planning and documentation • Coordination with foreign counsel and tax advisors on cross-border matters Why Clients Hire Me: • Big-law-level drafting with boutique responsiveness • Practical, business-focused advice grounded in execution reality • Clear scoping and transparent fee arrangements • Experience across financings, acquisitions, fund formations, and cross-border transactions Typical Projects: • Contract drafting and negotiation • Entity formation and governance packages • Private offering document suites • Venture financing documentation • M&A transactions from LOI through closing • Fractional or outside general counsel support Industries Technology | SaaS | FinTech | Digital Assets | E-commerce | Healthcare | Real Estate | Food & Beverage | Professional Services
"Solid drafting work on a B2B paid services agreement with a nuanced surcharge model. Daehoon delivered on time across two rounds, cited actual Illinois case law where relevant, and proactively flagged edge cases I hadn't specifically asked about. His initial bid was the sharpest of the seven I received — he clearly read the parameters carefully. One note for future buyers: scope discipline runs both ways with him. He'll flag scope creep quickly and quote a supplemental fee (in my case $600 on a $1,200 base) for revisions beyond the follow-up envelope. That's fair and clearly communicated, but budget for it if you expect iteration. Would hire again for drafting work where scope is well-defined upfront."
Gamal H.
I am a commercial contracts attorney with twenty years of experience. I have represented major corporate clients including Amazon, Marvel, and Viacom as well as independent entertainment professionals and technology startups.
"Gamal has been a pleasure to work with. This book is the first in a 4-book series and I will certainly retain him for all of them should the publisher wish to exercise that option. Well done!"
Nicholas M.
Nicholas Matlach is a cybersecurity expert (CISSP) and an attorney who is dedicated to helping small businesses succeed. He is a client-focused professional who has a deep understanding of the challenges that small businesses face in the digital age. He also provides legal counsel to small businesses on a variety of issues, including formation, intellectual property, contracts, and employment law.
"Nicholas is very professional and efficient, addressing my specific concerns that I found in the draft agreement, and ensuring my IP is protected. The revised agreement accurately reflected the agreed-upon terms. His expertise is valuable in identifying potential legal issues and business risks. I find his pricing to be fair for the services provided."
Michael B.
Michael has extensive experience advising companies from start-ups to established publicly-traded companies . He has represented businesses in a wide array of fields IT consulting, software solutions, web design/ development, financial services, SaaS, data storage, and others. Areas of expertise include contract drafting and negotiation, terms of use, business structuring and funding, company and employee policies, general transactional issues as well as licensing and regulatory compliance. His prior experience before entering private practice includes negotiating sales contracts for a Fortune 500 healthcare company, as well as regulatory compliance contracts for a publicly traded dental manufacturer. Mr. Brennan firmly believes that every business deserves a lawyer that is both responsive and dependable, and he strives to provide that type of service to every client.
"Very thorough with reviewing our contract and making the appropriate suggestions. Quick response time and very professional."
John H.
John Daniel "J.D." Hawke is an experienced attorney with a law practice in Mobile, Alabama. He was born in Fairhope, Alabama and after earning his undergraduate degree at Auburn University, he received a law degree from Thomas Goode Jones School of Law in 2010. After law school, he formed the Law Office of J.D. Hawke LLC and over the last decade he has fought incredibly hard for each and everyone of his clients. His practice focuses on representing people facing criminal charges and clients dealing with family law matters. In addition to criminal defense and domestic relations cases, he also regularly handles contract disputes, personal injury cases, small business issues, landlord/tenant disputes, document drafting, and estate planning. He is licensed to practice law in the State of Alabama and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowLawyer Reviews for Technical Collaboration Agreement Projects
Workhorse Properties/Tax Sale Associates Contract
"Very thorough work and the explanations were understandable even for me. Great work"
ContractsCounsel User
Group Purchasing Organization Partnership
"Dolan was punctual with the deadline needed and provided a high quality and detailed analysis of the contract at hand. I feel very confident that I have the information to move forward with the suggested presented. Would highly recommend."
ContractsCounsel User
Review and update business collaboration agreement
"Nicholas is very professional and efficient, addressing my specific concerns that I found in the draft agreement, and ensuring my IP is protected. The revised agreement accurately reflected the agreed-upon terms. His expertise is valuable in identifying potential legal issues and business risks. I find his pricing to be fair for the services provided."
ContractsCounsel User
Licensing / Partnership Agreement Contract Review
"Very helpful and easy to work with, a lot of experience with licensing"
ContractsCounsel User
Give your legal perspective on if I am able to pursue a collaboration agreement after agreement was previously terminated with Zivain
"Enlist her services..you won't be disappointed!!!"
ContractsCounsel User
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewNeed help with a Technical Collaboration Agreement?
Business lawyers by top cities
- Austin Business Lawyers
- Boston Business Lawyers
- Chicago Business Lawyers
- Dallas Business Lawyers
- Denver Business Lawyers
- Houston Business Lawyers
- Los Angeles Business Lawyers
- New York Business Lawyers
- Phoenix Business Lawyers
- San Diego Business Lawyers
- Tampa Business Lawyers
Technical Collaboration Agreement lawyers by city
- Austin Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Boston Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Chicago Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Dallas Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Denver Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Houston Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Los Angeles Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- New York Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Phoenix Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- San Diego Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
- Tampa Technical Collaboration Agreement Lawyers
ContractsCounsel User
Review a business collaboration agreement
Location: Nevada
Turnaround: Less than a week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Collaboration Agreement
Page Count: 9
Number of Bids: 10
Bid Range: $370 - $800
ContractsCounsel User