Home Blog 83B Election

Jump to Section

Quick Facts — Option Grant Lawyers

The 83(b) election is a provision that allows individuals who receive equity compensation to include the value of equity in their taxable income during a grant. By making the 83(b) election, the recipient recognizes any potential appreciation in the value of the equity at the grant date as taxable income, even if the equity is subject to vesting restrictions. Let us learn more about its important aspects below.

Importance of Filing the 83(b) Election

Filing an 83(b) election is important for individuals who receive equity compensation because it can have major tax advantages and potential long-term financial benefits. Here are a few reasons why it is important to file an 83(b) election:

  • Potential Tax Savings: By filing an 83(b) election, individuals can include the value of their equity in their taxable income at the time of grant rather than at the time it vests. This can be beneficial if the value of the equity is expected to appreciate over time. By paying taxes on the lower grant value, individuals may reduce their overall tax liability compared to paying taxes on the higher vesting value.
  • Avoiding Higher Tax Rates: When it vests, equity compensation is typically taxed at ordinary income tax rates. By making an 83(b) election, individuals can lock in a lower tax rate based on the grant date value. If the equity value increases substantially when it vests, the individual could save on taxes by paying the lower grant date value.
  • Flexibility with Future Sales: Filing an 83(b) election can establish a higher cost basis for the equity. This can be advantageous when the individual decides to sell or transfer the equity in the future. A higher cost basis may result in lower capital gains taxes if the equity is sold at a profit.
  • Avoiding Tax on Forfeited Equity: In certain cases, individuals may not fully vest in their equity due to job termination or other circumstances. If no 83(b) election were made, the individual would not have paid taxes on the value of the forfeited equity. However, if an 83(b) election were filed, the individual would have already paid taxes on the grant date value, potentially avoiding taxes on the forfeited portion.

Benefits of the 83(b) Election

The 83(b) election can be a valuable tax strategy for individuals receiving equity compensation. Here are some key considerations and potential benefits of using the 83(b) election as part of a tax strategy:

  • Capital Gains Treatment: If the equity appreciates after the 83(b) election, any future gains on selling the equity may be eligible for capital gains treatment. This can result in a lower tax rate than ordinary income tax rates, providing potential tax savings.
  • Avoiding Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT): The 83(b) election can help individuals avoid triggering the alternative minimum tax (AMT) when their equity vests. By recognizing the income at the grant date, the individual's AMT liability may be reduced or eliminated, depending on their circumstances.
  • Flexibility in Tax Planning: Filing an 83(b) election can provide individuals with flexibility in tax planning. It allows them to establish a higher cost basis for the equity, potentially reducing capital gains taxes upon future sale or transfer of the equity. This flexibility can be valuable for long-term tax planning and optimizing overall tax liability.
  • Mitigating Tax Risks: The equity value may sometimes decline after the grant date. By filing an 83(b) election, individuals would have already paid taxes on the grant date value, potentially minimizing the impact of any subsequent decrease in value and avoiding taxes on the lower vesting value.
Meet some lawyers on our platform

Lori B.

218 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Dolan W.

1071 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Jorge R.

23 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Allen L.

131 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Timing Factor of the 83(b) Election

The right time to make an 83(b) election is within 30 days of receiving equity compensation, subject to vesting. Filing the election with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) within this timeframe is essential. The time begins when you receive the equity grant, not the date it vests.

The timing factor is essential because once the 30-day window expires, you may lose the opportunity to make the election. Missing the deadline can have major tax consequences, as the equity will be taxed as it vests, potentially resulting in higher tax liabilities.

Therefore, it is advisable to consult with a tax professional or an experienced attorney as soon as you receive equity compensation to understand the implications and evaluate whether making an 83(b) election is beneficial in your specific circumstances. Promptly assessing and making the election can maximize the potential tax advantages of the 83(b) election.

Drawbacks of the 83(b) Election

While the 83(b) election can offer certain tax advantages, it also carries potential drawbacks and risks that individuals should carefully consider. Here are some key drawbacks of making an 83(b) election:

  • Immediate Tax Liability: By making an 83(b) election, you include the value of the equity in your taxable income at the grant date, even if it is subject to vesting. This means you must pay taxes on the grant date value, which could be substantial depending on the equity value. It could create financial strain if you need more funds to cover the tax liability.
  • Loss of Taxes if Equity is Forfeited: If you make an 83(b) election and later forfeit the equity due to job termination or other reasons before it vests, you cannot recover the taxes you paid on the grant date value. This can result in paying taxes on the equity you ultimately did not benefit from.
  • Potential Tax on Illiquid Equity: If the equity you receive is illiquid, meaning there is no readily available market to sell or transfer, you may need help generating cash to pay the taxes resulting from the 83(b) election. This can be particularly problematic if the equity does not appreciate or has restrictions on selling or transferring it.
  • Uncertain Future Value: Making an 83(b) election assumes that the equity value will increase over time, justifying the upfront tax payment. However, if the equity value does not appreciate as expected, you may have paid taxes on a value you did not realize, resulting in a potential loss.

Key Terms for 83(b) Elections

  • Equity Compensation: The compensation granted to an individual, typically in company shares or stock options.
  • Grant Date: The date on which an individual receives equity compensation, marking the beginning of the vesting period.
  • Vesting: The process by which an individual gains ownership rights to equity compensation over a specific period of time or upon meeting certain conditions.
  • Taxable Income: The portion of an individual's income that is subject to taxation by the government.
  • Capital Gains: The profit realized from the sale or transfer of an asset, such as equity compensation, which may be subject to a different tax rate than ordinary income.

Final Thoughts on 83(b) Elections

The 83(b) election is a powerful tool for individuals receiving equity compensation to optimize their tax situation. While it offers advantages such as potential tax savings, capital gains treatment, and flexibility in tax planning, it has risks. Considerations such as immediate tax liability, potential loss if equity is forfeited, and the uncertain future value of the equity should be carefully evaluated. Consulting with a tax professional or an experienced attorney is necessary to fully understand the implications and make an informed decision about whether to make the 83(b) election, considering individual circumstances and financial goals.

If you want free pricing proposals from vetted lawyers that are 60% less than typical law firms, click here to get started. By comparing multiple proposals for free, you can save the time and stress of finding a quality lawyer for your business needs.


ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.


Meet some of our Lawyers

Michael O. on ContractsCounsel
View Michael
5.0 (4)
Member Since:
February 14, 2022

Michael O.

Managing Attorney
Free Consultation
Los Angeles
19 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA, NY
University of Southern California

A corporate and commercial litigation attorney with transactional and civil litigation experience including corporate and finance transactions, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, commercial contracts, bankruptcy, restructuring, international business transactions, general counsel services, real estate litigation, partnership, joint venture and contract disputes. Additional background skills and experience include investment banking, financial analysis, and management consulting. Sectors covered include technology, media, healthcare, franchises, small to medium enterprises, investment funds, and international business.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"He was amazing! He protected me from fraud and I will most definitely continue my business with him… Thank you Michael!"

Kenneth G. on ContractsCounsel
View Kenneth
4.9 (11)
Member Since:
November 25, 2023

Kenneth G.

Partner
Free Consultation
Washington, DC
19 Yrs Experience
Licensed in DC, PA
Georgetown University

Kenneth E. Gray, Jr. is a business and tax attorney who advises entrepreneurs, investors, and closely held companies on transactions, tax planning, disputes, and long-term wealth structuring. He focuses on helping clients make legally sound decisions that also make business sense. Ken’s practice includes business formation and restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, private investments and fundraising transactions, contract drafting and negotiation, and cross-border matters. He also maintains a significant tax practice, advising on federal and state structuring, specialty filings (including partnership, corporate, and non-resident matters), and representing clients in disputes before the U.S. Tax Court and other federal and state tribunals. In addition to his transactional work, Ken handles commercial and business litigation, including tax controversies, financial disputes, and partnership matters. His litigation experience informs how he structures deals and governance documents, with an eye toward preventing disputes before they arise. Ken also advises individuals and families on estate planning, trust formation, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies, and probate administration, including planning involving closely held businesses and foreign assets. Before practicing law, Ken worked in banking and private equity, including managing a $5 billion emerging markets fund-of-funds portfolio at the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) and serving in equity research at ABN AMRO. That financial background allows him to understand transactions from both the legal and capital perspective. He holds a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and an MBA from Yale University. He practices before the U.S. Tax Court, various state courts, and other federal courts.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"It is not easy to find a lawyer that knows Offshore Asset Protection Trusts, which own a foreign LLC, which owns a USA LLC. Fines could reach $100K if the tax forms are incorrect, or not filed. He was able to review my draft returns and provide memos with required changes (many, many changes), after 1 follow-up everything was basically done other than a few tiny edits. I really appreciated how he worked me in, right in the busiest time of tax season, to ensure there were no errors. Would definitely hire again."

Ralph S. on ContractsCounsel
View Ralph
5.0 (59)
Member Since:
October 31, 2021

Ralph S.

Business, contract, prenup and startups Attorney
Free Consultation
Gainesville FL
15 Yrs Experience
Licensed in DC, FL, MA
University of Florida Levin College of Law

Ralph graduated from University of Florida with his JD as well as an LLM in Comparative Law. He has a Master's in Law from Warsaw University , Poland (summa cum laude) and holds a diploma in English and European Law from Cambridge Board of Continuous Education. Ralph concentrates on business entity formation, both for profit and non profit and was trained in legal drafting. In his practice he primarily assists small to medium sized startups and writes tailor made contracts as he runs one of Florida disability non profits at the same time. T l Licensed. in Florida Massachusetts and Washington DC this attorney speaks Polish.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"I had an excellent experience working with Ralph on my prenuptial agreement. From the beginning, Ralph was professional, knowledgeable, and incredibly patient. He took the time to explain the legal concepts, options, and implications in a way that was clear and easy to understand. He never made me feel rushed and was always willing to answer my questions thoroughly. What I appreciated most was his ability to make a potentially stressful process feel comfortable and straightforward. Ralph completed the agreement much faster than I expected, while still being extremely thorough and attentive to detail. I am extremely happy with his work and would not hesitate to recommend Ralph to anyone needing assistance with contracts or other legal agreements. His professionalism, responsiveness, and genuine willingness to help made all the difference. Thank you, Ralph, for making this process such a positive experience."

Andrew T. on ContractsCounsel
View Andrew
Member Since:
July 24, 2023

Andrew T.

Attorney-at-Law
Free Consultation
Indianapolis, IN
13 Yrs Experience
Licensed in IN
Indiana University Maurer School of Law

I am a lawyer with over 10 years of experience drafting and negotiating complex capital agreements, service agreements, SaaS agreements, waivers and warranties.

John A. on ContractsCounsel
View John
Member Since:
July 24, 2023

John A.

Managing Attorney
Free Consultation
Baltimore, Maryland
14 Yrs Experience
Licensed in MD
Loyola University New Orleans College of Law

John Arthur-Mensah is a highly skilled attorney with extensive expertise in drafting contracts, information law, international law, insurance defense, and complex civil litigation. Throughout his career, he has demonstrated a keen eye for detail and a strong ability to craft well-structured, comprehensive legal agreements. John's track record includes successfully managing the entire contract drafting process, from initial negotiation to final execution. His proficiency in legal research and documentation enables him to ensure that contracts comply with applicable laws and regulations. With a strategic approach and persuasive communication skills, John excels in negotiating contract terms and providing valuable counsel on contractual matters. Admitted to the Maryland Bar and the United States District Court in Maryland, he is well-equipped to handle a diverse range of legal challenges, making him a valuable asset in contract drafting and beyond.

Albert I. on ContractsCounsel
View Albert
Member Since:
July 25, 2023

Albert I.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Irvine, California
38 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
Pepperdine University SOL

Construction lawyer practicing in Southern California since 1988. Have extensive experience in construction contracts and forms drafting, negotiating. I also serve as counsel for large material suppliers and have extensive experience in commercial transactions, drafting and negotiation of commercial documents including dealerships, NDAs, etc.

Brad B. on ContractsCounsel
View Brad
Member Since:
July 28, 2023

Brad B.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Denison, Iowa
20 Yrs Experience
Licensed in IA, NE
University of South Dakota

Business attorney with over 15 years of experience serving companies big and small with contracting including business, real estate and employment.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

See Real Employee Stock Options Agreement Projects

Washington Review Employee Stock Option Agreement Review
  • Washington
  • 2 lawyer bids
  • $550 - $950
View Details
Washington Vesting Agreement for Minority Partner in Startup Drafting
  • Washington
  • 4 lawyer bids
  • $1,000 - $2,250
View Details
Wyoming Setup employee stock incentive plan for LLC Drafting
  • Wyoming
  • 4 lawyer bids
  • $1 - $1,500
View Details
New York Review ISO and advise on transfer from ISO to NSO Review
  • New York
  • 8 lawyer bids
  • $195 - $759
View Details
California Creating a Phantom Stock Plan For Employees Drafting
  • California
  • 7 lawyer bids
  • $90 - $2,500
View Details
Wyoming Draft warrants agreement for contractors of LLC Drafting
  • Wyoming
  • 8 lawyer bids
  • $350 - $1,300
View Details

See all Employee Stock Options Agreement projects

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

View Trustpilot Review

Need help with an Option Grant?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 20,425 reviews
CONTRACT LAWYERS BY TOP CITIES
See All Business Lawyers
83B ELECTION LAWYERS BY CITY
See All 83B Election Lawyers

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

View Trustpilot Review

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

View Trustpilot Review

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

View Trustpilot Review

Need help with an Option Grant?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 20,425 reviews

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city