Merger Agreement vs Stock Purchase Agreement

Clients Rate Lawyers on our Platform 4.9/5 Stars
based on 5,739 reviews

Jump to Section

Need help with a Purchase Agreement?

Create a free project posting

Merger agreements define terms for two businesses merging into one while stock purchase agreements outline one business buying another's stock. In the modern business world, mergers and acquisitions are prevalent as businesses seek to grow their operations or gain a competitive advantage. Nevertheless, there are diverse ways in which a business can be acquired or merged, and the two most common methods are creating a merger agreement and a stock purchase agreement. While these two agreements may seem identical at first glance, they have some substantial differences. This blog post will explore the fundamental differences between merger and stock purchase agreements.

Merger Agreement

A merger agreement is a legal document that summarizes the terms and conditions under which two businesses agree to merge and become one entity. In a merger agreement, the acquiring and target businesses agree to integrate their assets, operations, liabilities, and stock to form a new entity.

The primary objective of a merger agreement is to streamline the transfer of ownership from the target business's shareholders to the acquiring business.

The acquiring company assumes all of the target company's assets, liabilities, and contractual responsibilities. The shareholders of the target company obtain compensation for their shares in the form of cash, shares in the acquiring business, or a combination of both. On the contrary, in a merger agreement, the acquiring company typically assumes all of the target organization's liabilities, including its debt and legal liabilities. The acquiring company also controls the target company's assets, including its real estate, intellectual property, and equipment.

Stock Purchase Agreement

A stock purchase agreement is a lawful record that summarizes the terms and conditions under which a business agrees to buy the stock of another business. In a stock purchase agreement, the acquiring organization agrees to buy specific shares from the target business's shareholders. In addition, the primary purpose of a stock purchase agreement is to acquire a controlling stake in the target company without taking its liabilities.

Unlike a merger agreement, the target company stays a separate legal entity, and its contractual responsibilities and liabilities remain with the company. On the other hand, in a stock purchase agreement, the acquiring business gains control over the target company's assets and functions but does not take its liabilities. The shareholders of the target corporation receive compensation for their claims in the form of cash, shares in the acquiring company, or a mix of both.

Meet some lawyers on our platform

Steven S.

1 project on CC
View Profile

Jeremiah C.

56 projects on CC
View Profile

Stacey D.

23 projects on CC
View Profile

Benjamin E.

64 projects on CC
View Profile

Merger Agreement vs. Stock Purchase Agreement

The fundamental differences between a merger agreement and a stock purchase agreement comprise the following:

  • Control of Assets

    In a merger contract, the acquiring business gains power over the target company's assets, including its real estate, intellectual property, and equipment. On the other hand, in a stock purchase agreement, the acquiring business gains control over the target company's assets and operations, but the target company stays a separate legal entity.

  • Transfer of Liabilities

    In a merger agreement, the acquiring company takes all of the target company's liabilities, including legal and debt liabilities. In contrast, the acquiring enterprise does not assume the target company's liabilities in a stock purchase agreement.

  • Ownership Structure

    In a merger agreement, the acquiring and target companies merge their stock to form a new entity. In contrast, in a stock purchase agreement, the acquiring company buys a controlling stake in the target company's stock, but the target company stays a separate legal entity.

  • Approval

    A merger needs authorization from the shareholders of both organizations, while a stock purchase only requires approval from the target business's shareholders.

  • Taxation

    The tax implications of a merger and a stock purchase are different. In a merger, the companies must consider the tax implications of combining their liabilities and assets. In a stock purchase, the purchaser must consider the tax implications of acquiring the target company's stock.

Key Terms

  • Board of Directors: A group of people elected by shareholders to manage a company's management.
  • Closing: The final step in a merger is when the deal is finalized, and the companies become one entity.
  • Definitive Agreement: A lawfully binding document that summarizes the merger terms.
  • Antitrust: Laws that control and prevent anticompetitive conduct in the market.
  • Regulatory Approval: The process of getting approval from government agencies for a merger or acquisition.
  • Due Diligence: The process of investigating a company before a deal to assess its monetary and legal health.

Conclusion

A merger and stock purchase agreements are two diverse approaches to acquiring or merging with a company. While both methods have their advantages, they greatly differ in the transfer of control of assets, liabilities, and ownership structure. Thus, it is necessary for companies to carefully evaluate these differences when determining which method to use for a particular acquisition or merger. So seeking the advice of legal and financial professionals can help companies make informed choices that align with their business objectives and goals.

If you are looking to get free pricing proposals from vetted lawyers that are 60% less than typical law firms, you can Click here to get started. By comparing multiple proposals for free, you can save the time and stress of finding a quality lawyer for your business needs.

Need help with a
Purchase Agreement?

Create a free project posting

Meet some of our Lawyers

Orly B. on ContractsCounsel
View Orly
5.0 (4)
Member Since:
April 21, 2022

Orly B.

Attorney
Free Consultation
New York (virtual)
8 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NY
Tel Aviv University

Orly Boger has worked in the high tech industry and in a leading law firm before launching her law firm. Orly focuses on startup companies and technology transactions. She structures and negotiates software and technology license agreements, strategic partnerships, cloud-based/SaaS agreements, internet related transactions, OEM agreements, supply, distribution, telecommunications. In addition, Orly has experience in serving as an in-house legal counsel for start up companies at various phases of their development, providing strategic legal advise to entrepreneurs and emerging companies with a comprehensive understanding of the business and legal issues. She has been helping companies develop a legal strategy for all aspects of their operations, from commercial transactions and partnerships, scalable SaaS or services agreements, privacy policies, employment related policies, open source licensing and much more.

Brian S. on ContractsCounsel
View Brian
5.0 (5)
Member Since:
April 16, 2022

Brian S.

Chief Legal Officer
Free Consultation
Washington, DC
14 Yrs Experience
Licensed in DC, PA
Duquesne Law School

Corporate attorney with 13+ years of in-house counsel, people leadership and client management experience. Provides legal expertise and a business-oriented approach to problem solving and building lines of business. Consistently works under pressure, prioritizing and managing workload and simultaneous tasks to meet deadlines in a changing, fast-paced environment.

Igor B. on ContractsCounsel
View Igor
5.0 (3)
Member Since:
May 4, 2022

Igor B.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Atlanta, GA
13 Yrs Experience
Licensed in GA
Georgia State University College of Law

As a corporate lawyer, I have dealt with international transactions, complex litigation and arbitration, regulatory compliance, and multijurisdictional tax planning. In March 2021, I started my firm and shifted my professional focus to working with start-ups, small businesses, entrepreneurs, and families. I help my clients structure and run their businesses and take care of their assets, including intellectual property issues and estate planning for their families. I try to bring big law quality and small firm personal attention to every client.

Zachary J. on ContractsCounsel
View Zachary
5.0 (73)
Member Since:
May 27, 2022

Zachary J.

Principal
Free Consultation
Crown Point, IN
4 Yrs Experience
Licensed in IL
The University of Michigan Law School

I am a solo-practitioner with a practice mostly consisting of serving as a fractional general counsel to growth stage companies. With a practical business background, I aim to bring real-world, economically driven solutions to my client's legal problems and pride myself on efficient yet effective work.

John M. on ContractsCounsel
View John
Member Since:
April 20, 2022
Aaron B. on ContractsCounsel
View Aaron
Member Since:
April 26, 2022

Aaron B.

Owner
Free Consultation
Hawthorne, New York
17 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NY
Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

I have been in practice for over 19 years. I have substantial experience across the spectrum of civil practice areas both as a litigator and transactional counsel. This includes: negotiating commercial and real estate transactions, corporate organization, commercial agreements, and resolving commercial disputes, and litigating numerous civil, administrative, and criminal cases through all phases of litigation from trial through appeal, as well as judgment enforcement. My vast experience as a litigator is an asset to my transactional clients. My background in Investigating and proving the breakdown of business relationships in court allows me a unique advantage in drafting, negotiating, and closing business transactions.

Dan P. on ContractsCounsel
View Dan
Member Since:
May 2, 2022

Dan P.

Attorney
Free Consultation
New York
16 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NY
University of San Francisco School of Law

I primarily work with small businesses and the self-employed. I help my clients build sustainable businesses, navigate risk, and resolve conflicts. Most of my cases involve contract review, drafting, negotiation, and disputes; I also work on business entity formation, employment and independent contractor issues, copyright licenses, trademark registration, and more.

Cindy A. on ContractsCounsel
View Cindy
Member Since:
May 4, 2022

Cindy A.

Contracts Manager
Free Consultation
Durham, NC
9 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NC
NCCU

Attorney that has worked in both litigation and transactional fields. Motivated and personable professional. Speaks fluent Spanish and very basic Portuguese.

Michael V. on ContractsCounsel
View Michael
Member Since:
May 5, 2022

Michael V.

Corporate Counsel
Free Consultation
Iowa
8 Yrs Experience
Licensed in MO
Saint Louis University

Seven years experience reviewing and drafting corporate and transactional documents, including NDAs, LLC operating agreements, MSAs, employment agreements, etc.

Brittany S. on ContractsCounsel
View Brittany
Member Since:
May 6, 2022

Brittany S.

Attorney
Free Consultation
New York / New Jersey
1 Yr Experience
Licensed in NJ, NY
Touro Law Center

I am licensed in New York and New Jersey. I graduated with my J.D. from Touro University Law Center, Summa Cum Laude, in 2021. In 2018, I graduated from SUNY Farmingdale with a B.S. in Sport Management and a minor in Business Management. I have experience in real estate law and insurance defense, including employment law. Please note, I do not carry malpractice insurance.

Josh L. on ContractsCounsel
View Josh
Member Since:
May 24, 2022

Josh L.

Director of Art and Business Law
Free Consultation
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
8 Yrs Experience
Licensed in FL
Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law

Josh is a founding partner and the director of Art and Business Law for Twig, Trade, & Tribunal PLLC a local Fort Lauderdale law firm. His practice focuses on Art and Business law including art transactions, legal strategy, art leasing, due diligence, contract drafting, contract negotiations as well as other facets of Art Law including consulting for all market participants. He also advises clients regarding issues for Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) again focusing on contract drafting, strategic guidance, and other factors as it relates to art produced as NFTs having given numerous presentations on the subject.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city