Employee Rights Lawyers for Westminster, Colorado

Depending on the scope of the non-compete clause, it could substantially limit your future job prospects. Is the non-compete limited: in time? In industry? In geographical area? To certain competitors? You can certainly negotiate the scope of the clause with your former employer so that your ability to find a similar job is not too restricted. If your employer insists upon a non-compete that is too strict, you should consider whether the severance amount being offered is worth the loss of freedom for your future job hunt.

Generally, in Florida, severance is a gift. $1 of severance is usually $1 more than an employer is obligated to provide. An offer of severance may be required if an employee has an employment agreement providing for severance or is otherwise subject to a collective bargaining agreement that provides for severance. Severance agreements that are only offered to certain employees in a discriminatory manner (such as based on age, religion, national origin, sex, etc) may be a violation of local, state and/or federal law.

This would require a review of the agreement. The typical cost for such a review is $750 but can cost more depending on the complexity of the issues involved.

This is a very common concern, especially as more employers implement digital oversight tools. Generally speaking, a company can legally monitor and restrict employee internet usage through an Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), provided certain conditions are met. 1. Private Employers Have Broad Discretion In most states, private-sector employers are allowed to monitor internet usage on company-owned systems and networks, including: Websites visited Emails sent and received via company email Time spent online during working hours Downloads or uploads of content As long as the company owns the devices or network being used, courts typically uphold their right to control and monitor usage—especially when the employee has received advance notice through a written policy like an AUP. 2. Employees Have Limited Expectation of Privacy at Work Courts have generally held that employees do not have a strong expectation of privacy when using employer-provided devices or networks. However, an employer should: Clearly inform employees of monitoring in writing Apply the policy consistently across the workforce Avoid overreaching into private communications (e.g., personal email on personal devices) 3. Content Filtering and Restrictions Are Permitted Employers can legally block or restrict access to websites that: Are unrelated to work (e.g., social media, video streaming, shopping) Pose security risks (e.g., downloading pirated software) Violate workplace policies (e.g., inappropriate or offensive material) 4. Federal and State Considerations While there are few federal laws restricting workplace internet monitoring, employers must still comply with laws such as: The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) – allows monitoring of communications when done in the ordinary course of business or with employee consent State privacy laws – some states may have broader protections; however, most defer to employer rights on company property What You Can Do: Review the AUP carefully to understand what is being monitored and why Confirm whether you acknowledged the policy in writing If you are concerned about overreach, you may want to speak with HR or request clarification about what personal activity (if any) may be affected If you would like assistance reviewing the policy for reasonableness or compliance with state and federal law, I’d be happy to help.

I get why this feels so unfair, but the truth is, in Kansas, your employer really can fire you without giving a reason. That’s what at-will employment means. It sounds harsh, but unless something illegal happened, your coworker’s termination was probably legal. Kansas law gives both the employee and the employer the right to end the working relationship at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all. That’s the default. But that doesn’t mean employers can do whatever they want. There are limits, even here. They can’t fire someone for discriminatory reasons such as race, sex, age (if you’re over 40), disability, religion, pregnancy, military status, or national origin. They also can’t retaliate against someone for reporting illegal activity, filing a workers’ comp claim, serving on a jury, or engaging in other legally protected activities. The thing is, employers rarely admit it when their reasons cross the line. They’ll usually point to performance issues or vague personality conflicts, even if the real reason is discrimination or retaliation. So just because they didn’t give a reason doesn’t mean they’re doing something wrong. But it doesn’t mean they’re not, either. It’s complicated. Now, if there’s any kind of employment contract involved, that changes things. And it doesn’t have to be a formal signed agreement. Even an employee handbook with a discipline policy or verbal promises about job security could create contractual rights under the law. Courts sometimes treat these as implied contracts, especially if the company has a history of following certain termination procedures. That matters because the legal standard shifts. If there’s a contract that says employees can only be fired for cause or that outlines specific steps before termination, the employer has to follow those rules. In that case, you wouldn’t need to prove discrimination or retaliation. You would only need to show that the company broke its own policies. That is often much easier to prove. So the smartest thing you can do right now is go back through the materials you received when you were hired. Look at your employee handbook and see if it mentions progressive discipline, for-cause termination, or any guarantees around job security. Even if the handbook says it does not create a contract, courts will still consider the overall context. Also, keep detailed records. Save emails, document your performance, and write down anything that seems off. If there is a pattern of unfair treatment or if your coworker’s firing did not follow standard company procedures, that documentation could become important. At-will employment gives employers a lot of flexibility, but that flexibility has limits, especially when contracts or protected rights are involved. You're not powerless here. You just need to be prepared, informed, and proactive about understanding your rights and what your employer has promised, whether directly or indirectly. If anything seems questionable, there are places you can turn for help. Both state and federal laws may apply. Federal protections include Title VII, the ADEA, the ADA, and the FMLA. Kansas also offers protections under the Kansas Act Against Discrimination and its wage and hour laws. Agencies like the Kansas Department of Labor, the Kansas Human Rights Commission, and the EEOC can investigate wrongful termination claims. The KHRC requires discrimination complaints to be filed within six months. The EEOC allows 180 days. There is no filing fee with either agency. What happened to your coworker might be perfectly legal. But if anything about it raises red flags or does not line up with the company’s usual practices, it is worth looking into now while you still have time to protect yourself.