Intellectual Property Lawyers for Meridian, Idaho

Do you have a license to use the intellectual property? Consult with an attorney.

Yes, you can and should include clauses in an Intellectual Property License Agreement that protect your rights as the licensor. A license agreement is your main tool for controlling how your software is used, setting boundaries for your clients, and limiting your financial exposure. The key is to draft it in a way that leaves no doubt about what rights are granted, what’s restricted, and what happens if there’s a breach. Grant of License Start with a clear license grant. Spell out that you’re giving the client only limited rights, not ownership. Most licensors define the license as non-exclusive, non-transferable, and revocable if the client doesn’t follow the terms. For example, you might allow a client to use the software only for its internal business operations, and only on a set number of machines. It’s equally important to list what the licensee cannot do, such as reverse engineering, modifying, sublicensing, or providing the software to third parties. Intellectual Property Ownership Reinforce that you retain all ownership rights in the software and any related intellectual property. A simple but strong statement is that you hold all right, title, and interest in the software, and the client only receives a limited right to use it under the agreement. This prevents confusion between a license and a sale. You can also require the licensee to notify you if they discover third-party infringement and confirm that you alone have the right to pursue action against infringers. Confidentiality If you’re providing source code, algorithms, or other sensitive information, a confidentiality clause is essential. Define confidential information broadly to include not just the software itself but also any documentation or business information you share. Require the client to protect that information with at least the same care they use for their own confidential material, and make the obligation survive termination of the agreement. Termination Every strong license has a termination clause. Termination for cause should allow you to end the agreement if the client fails to pay, violates the license scope, or breaches confidentiality. Many agreements include a short cure period, such as thirty days, for the licensee to fix the breach before termination takes effect. Spell out the consequences of termination: the licensee must stop using the software immediately, return or destroy all copies, and certify that they’ve complied. Without this, you risk losing leverage if the relationship breaks down. Payment Terms Protect your revenue by making payment terms clear. Define license fees, support or maintenance fees if applicable, the payment schedule, and penalties for late payment such as interest. Courts generally enforce these provisions as long as they’re reasonable. Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability These clauses protect you from lawsuits if things go wrong. A limited warranty might cover basic performance for a set time, but beyond that you should disclaim all other warranties. Standard language is that the software is provided “as is” and you disclaim implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. To limit your exposure, cap liability at a defined amount, often the fees paid by the licensee in the previous twelve months, and exclude liability for indirect or consequential damages such as lost profits. Courts usually enforce these limits, except in cases of fraud or intentional misconduct. Audit Rights If your pricing model depends on the number of users or installations, an audit right is valuable. This allows you to check, on reasonable notice, that the licensee isn’t exceeding their rights. For example, you might reserve the right to inspect usage records once a year during normal business hours. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution Designating which state’s law governs and how disputes are resolved reduces uncertainty. Many licensors choose their home state’s law and either local courts or arbitration for disputes. Remedies Make sure your agreement lets you seek injunctive relief if the licensee misuses or discloses your software. Monetary damages often aren’t enough to protect intellectual property, so courts will enforce contract terms that authorize immediate injunctive relief. Protect Your Software with Legal Guidance When you’re licensing valuable software, the details in your agreement can make the difference between real protection and unnecessary risk. The lawyers on Contracts Counsel are available to draft, review, or negotiate a license that secures your rights and keeps your business protected.

Hello! Thank you for posting this question. In your case, the other party may claim that you are infringing on their trademark, but proving it is a different case. The Lanham Act provides for a cause of action for infringement of both registered and unregistered trademarks. (15 USC Section 1114(1)(a); 15 USC Section 1125(a)(1)A).)  The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has laid out some elements to help determine whether it creates an infringement lawsuit. 1. The complaining party has to prove they have a valid, protectable trademark and that they own that trademark; 2. The complaining party must prove that a mark is similar, and it was used without the consent of the moving party in a manner that is likely to cause confusion among ordinary consumers as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the goods.  The likelihood of confusion can occur at the time of the sale, when there is initial interest by a consumer, or even after the sale, if the confusion causes a consumer to no longer buy a service or product connected to the mark. The court considers things like the strength of the original mark, whether you are using it for some fair use purpose, the similarity, the proximity of the products and marketing channels, whether there’s actual confusion, the defendant’s intent, the quality of respective products, and the sophistication of the customers. (Polaroid Corp. v. Polard Elecs. Corp. 287, F.2d. 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961.) So what this means is that it'd have to be litigated, but you can argue you are not trying to sell products or services using their mark, but rather you are using it for some other purpose, such as to educate people about their business practices. Best of luck!

Hello, I'd be glad to review the details of the trademark assignment and confirm it properly transfers ownership of your trademark. As a trademark attorney, I have helped clients in similar situations both draft trademark assignments and record them with the USPTO to ensure that the trademark reflects the right ownership information. I would be happy to have a brief free 15 minute consult call to learn more details and see how I can help. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Roman rvayner@vaynerlegal.com 414 628 9099 www.vaynerlegal.com

The terms of your specific agreement are the most important factors to consider. In general, an invention assignment agreement usually means that an employee gives the company any ideas or inventions they come up with while working. The rules can vary by agreement, but they often cover ideas made during work hours, using company resources, or related to the company’s business. In Texas, an agreement can apply to inventions made outside of work hours if they’re related to the company’s business or came from work the company assigned. In one case, the agreement said the employee had to give up all inventions made during or after regular work hours, whether on or off the job, if they were related to the company’s business or came from work the company assigned. Usually, an invention assignment agreement doesn’t apply to ideas that aren’t related to the employee’s job unless the agreement says otherwise. In Atlas Brick Co. v. North, 2 S.W.2d 980, the court said that the title to an invention wouldn’t belong to the employer unless the agreement said that ideas made and perfected under the employee’s contract of employment belong to the employer. Also, if a discovery is made outside the scope and purpose of employment, it belongs to the employee unless there’s an agreement to give up such inventions to the employer. So, it all depends on the terms of the invention assignment agreement. In the case of Halliburton Energy Servs. v. Axis Techs., LLC, the agreement required the employee to turn over all materials related to inventions created during employment, making them the company’s property. But, if the agreement doesn’t cover certain inventions or if the inventions are made outside the scope of employment without using company resources, the employee might still retain ownership.