Intellectual Property Lawyers for Topeka, Kansas

A Patent Assignment Agreement transfers ownership of an invention or patent rights from the inventor, known as the assignor, to another party, often a company serving as the assignee. To protect your business and ensure enforceability, the agreement should cover specific provisions that make the transfer clear, complete, and legally sound. What Is the Core Assignment Clause? The assignment clause is the heart of the agreement. It should use present-tense language such as “hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys all right, title, and interest.” Courts and the USPTO treat this as an immediate transfer, while “will assign” is only a future promise. The clause should also cover continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part applications, along with reissues, reexaminations, and foreign filings. What Rights Should Be Transferred? The assignee should receive the full bundle of rights granted under 35 U.S.C. § 154, including the right to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import, and license the invention. The agreement should also transfer the right to sue for past, present, and future infringement, so the company can recover damages even for activity that occurred before the assignment was signed. Do You Need Consideration? Every contract requires consideration, and patent assignments are no different. Even if the transfer is to your own company, the agreement should recite consideration. This can be nominal, such as “ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration,” or it can be tied to equity or to your role as founder. How Should the Patent Be Identified? The intellectual property should be identified with precision. If a patent has issued, include the number and issue date. For pending applications, list the application number, filing date, and invention title. If no application has been filed yet, provide a detailed description and later update the record once official filing details exist. What Warranties and Representations Are Common? The assignor should warrant ownership of the rights, authority to assign, and absence of liens or conflicting assignments. Over-warranting should be avoided. Do not guarantee novelty or validity, since those are determined by the USPTO and courts. Be cautious about warranting sole inventorship unless you are certain no other inventors contributed, since misstatements on inventorship can create validity problems. What Other Provisions Should Be Included? Other common provisions include further assurances requiring the inventor to assist with future filings, litigation, or USPTO actions, a limited power of attorney for patent prosecution and enforcement, and improvements clauses that attempt to capture future modifications or developments. Improvements provisions must be drafted carefully, as vague scope language can lead to disputes. The agreement should also address corporate authority, ensuring the company has approval under bylaws or state law before accepting the assignment. What Administrative Details Matter? The agreement should contain standard contract terms such as governing law, entire agreement, amendment requirements, successors and assigns, and dispute resolution through arbitration or mediation. Both the inventor and the company should sign, and notarization is advisable because it makes USPTO recordation smoother. Do You Need to Record with the USPTO? After execution, the assignment should be recorded with the USPTO through the Electronic Patent Assignment System. Recordation should occur promptly after execution to establish clear priority and maintain a clean chain of title. While recordation is not required for validity between the parties, it protects ownership against third-party claims. The USPTO currently charges little or no fee for electronic filings, so this step is inexpensive and essential. Should You Assign or License? An assignment transfers complete ownership, which investors generally expect. A license keeps ownership with the inventor while granting defined rights to the company. Licensing may be useful when the inventor wants to retain control, license the technology to multiple companies, or test the market before giving up ownership. For most startups, assignment is the preferred approach. What About Tax Considerations? Assignments can have tax consequences, especially when IP is transferred for equity or other forms of consideration. Professional tax advice is essential to evaluate both immediate tax effects and ongoing obligations. This is particularly important if the company later earns royalties or sells the patent. What Are the Next Steps? The implementation process should include drafting the agreement with qualified legal counsel, executing it with proper corporate authority and notarization where possible, recording it promptly with the USPTO using EPAS, and consulting a tax professional to address both the transfer itself and any ongoing obligations. If you need help drafting or reviewing a Patent Assignment Agreement, the attorneys on Contracts Counsel can guide you through the process so that your company’s rights are fully protected.

Hello! This is Attorney Damien Bosco. My law office is in Forest Hills, Queens County, New York City. My practice covers the New York City metropolitan area and Long Island. In some situations, I also handle matters throughout New York State. If your phrase contains common jewelry terms, registering it may be challenging. One suggestion is to check the USPTO Database for similar trademarks. If other businesses have brands using the same common word in their brand name, that could give an indication that you may still be able to use it in your brand name. Nonexclusive use means that the word or phrase can be used by other parties and is not solely owned or controlled by the trademark holder. Consult with a trademark attorney for guidance on the registration process and the viability of your chosen phrase.

Running a trademark search before registering your business name isn’t legally required, but it’s one of the most important steps you can take to avoid future problems. Registering your name with the state forms your business entity, but it doesn’t give you trademark rights. Trademark rights come from use in commerce and, if you file with the USPTO, registration at the federal level. Why a Trademark Search Matters The central legal test in trademark law is whether a name is likely to cause consumer confusion. That means you don’t need to copy someone else’s name exactly to get into trouble. Even something that looks or sounds similar in the same or related industry could be enough. If you skip the search and move forward, you risk: • Infringement claims: Another company could demand you stop using the name and, if necessary, sue for damages. • Forced rebranding: If you’ve already invested in your logo, website, signage, or marketing materials, being forced to change your name can be expensive and disruptive. • USPTO rejection: If you apply for a federal trademark, the USPTO will run its own search. If they find a confusingly similar mark, your application will be denied and you’ll lose the filing fees. A well-documented example is when small businesses open under a catchy name, only to receive a cease-and-desist letter from a national chain using a similar name in the same space. Even if you’re in a different state, a federal registration gives that company priority rights nationwide. A proper trademark clearance search should cover more than just identical names. You’ll want to check: • Federal database (USPTO TESS): This is the official record of all registered and pending federal trademarks. • State trademark databases: Many businesses register marks only at the state level. • Common law sources: Unregistered marks can still have legal protection. Check Google, industry directories, social media, and domain names. • Similar variations: Look for phonetic equivalents and alternative spellings, such as “Kwik” for “Quick,” or slight wording changes that could still cause confusion. Professional Assistance You can run an initial search yourself at no cost, but these searches have limits. For example, the USPTO database won’t flag marks that are spelled differently but sound alike, or names with similar meanings. Attorneys and specialized search firms use tools that uncover those kinds of risks. While hiring a professional costs more upfront, it’s often far cheaper than litigation or a rebrand. Limitations A search doesn’t guarantee that your name will never be challenged. Trademark law involves judgment calls about how similar marks are and whether they overlap in goods or services. Still, a thorough search puts you in a much stronger position to defend your choice and move toward federal registration if you want nationwide rights.

Whether you need a Work For Hire Agreement really depends on the project and what both sides are trying to get out of it. You’re not automatically required to sign one, but saying yes or no to that clause can completely change who owns the work and what rights you’ll have moving forward. Just because a client calls something “work for hire” in a contract doesn’t mean it actually qualifies under the law, especially when it comes to freelance design work. Here’s the thing. Under U.S. copyright law, “work made for hire” is a specific exception to the general rule that the creator owns the work. For a freelance project to qualify, two conditions have to be met. First, both parties need to sign a written agreement that says the work is considered “made for hire.” Second, the type of work has to fall into one of nine defined categories under 17 U.S.C. § 101. These include things like contributions to collective works, audiovisual pieces, instructional texts, or compilations. The list is pretty narrow. Standard marketing materials, logos, brochures, or campaign graphics usually don’t make the cut. Courts take a strict approach here, so just checking a box in a contract doesn’t magically make it enforceable. If your project doesn’t meet both requirements, labeling it “work for hire” doesn’t hold legal weight. In that case, the default is that you, the designer, own the copyright unless there’s a separate written agreement transferring it to the client. That leads us to ownership. If there’s no valid Work For Hire clause and no assignment of rights, you retain full copyright. That gives you control over how the work is used beyond whatever license you’ve granted. So if you created a logo and the contract only licenses it for digital use, the client can’t later slap it on T-shirts or license it to a partner without getting your permission first. But if there is a valid Work For Hire clause or an explicit copyright assignment, then the client becomes the legal owner. That means they can use it, change it, resell it, or do whatever they want with it, without needing to pay you again or ask for further approval. You’d have no say over how the work is used, and unless the agreement gives you permission, you wouldn’t even be able to include it in your portfolio. If you want more flexibility, there are alternatives. You can structure the deal with a copyright assignment that still reserves certain rights for you. For example, you could keep the right to show the work in your portfolio or limit resale to direct competitors. Or you could stick with licensing. An exclusive license gives the client broad rights but you still own the work. A non-exclusive license is more limited and usually makes sense for templates or assets used with multiple clients. Portfolio rights, by the way, are often negotiable. Even in exclusive arrangements, you can add a clause that lets you show the work on your website, social profiles, or print materials. Just make sure it’s clearly spelled out. Some corporate clients won’t allow it at all unless it’s written into the agreement. From a practical standpoint, your decision should take into account how much you’re getting paid, how the work will be used, and whether you want to reuse or showcase it later. If you’re giving up all rights, price accordingly. Clients pushing for Work For Hire terms often just want clean, uncomplicated ownership, especially for branding or long-term use. But that doesn’t mean you can’t negotiate. You might agree to transfer ownership only after full payment is received. You might keep the right to use rejected drafts. You might even allow Work For Hire treatment for the final deliverables but retain some creative rights behind the scenes. Also, keep an eye out for boilerplate clauses. Some clients include Work For Hire language by default, not realizing their project doesn’t meet the legal standard. Just because it’s in the contract doesn’t make it enforceable. If the work doesn’t meet the criteria, the clause won’t hold unless there’s a separate valid assignment of rights. When in doubt, it’s smart to run the agreement by an attorney who understands copyright law and freelance creative work. Contracts Counsel connects you with attorneys who handle exactly this kind of issue.

As a legal entity, a joint venture (JV) can own a patent. Given the temporary nature of JVs and the fact that there will be multiple owners of any patents, there is a complex mix of intellectual property (IP) ownership rights, dispute resolution, and enforcement issues that need to be agreed upon in order to properly protect everyone's intellectual property rights. Consideration will need to be given to what IP ownership and rights will look like during and after the JV and it may be easier to have both companies listed as the patent authors for inventions from the outset (versus naming the JV as the author). A joint IP agreement is the best solution to outline the rights of each party, the process for developing patentable technologies sufficient to be a patent author, filing and prosecuting patents, and future licensing and exploitation of the patent.