Intellectual Property Lawyers for Providence, Rhode Island
Need an intellectual property lawyer in Providence, Rhode Island?
ContractsCounsel matches businesses with Providence-based intellectual property lawyers, providing fixed-fee quotes from vetted attorneys with the first proposal typically arriving in just a few hours.
Hire a Lawyer for 60% Less than Traditional Law Firms
Meet some of our Providence Intellectual Property Lawyers
Moss S.
Over 30 years of experience practicing commercial real estate and complex business litigation law.
"Moss S was responsive and attentive to my needs and completed the task ahead of time and within budget"
Elizabeth W.
Liz is an experienced insurance professional, having worked with carriers and brokers for over 10 years. She can review or draft a variety of commercial agreements and is here to help your business. Specialties include: Master Service Agreements, business process outsourcing, marketing and partnership agreements, broker agreements, business associate agreements, and NDAs.
"Liz was very responsive, eager to do a good job, and a pleasure to work with."
Nicholas M.
Nicholas Matlach is a cybersecurity expert (CISSP) and an attorney who is dedicated to helping small businesses succeed. He is a client-focused professional who has a deep understanding of the challenges that small businesses face in the digital age. He also provides legal counsel to small businesses on a variety of issues, including formation, intellectual property, contracts, and employment law.
"Enjoyed his demeanor. Professional yet down to earth. The document created for me was very explicit and easy to read. I would recommend :)"
Paul M.
Transactional attorney and corporate in house counsel for 15 years. Draft all types of contracts and employment agreements.
"Paul was incredibly helpful in reviewing a non-compete agreement I needed to sign. He helped me understand the key risks, identify what was worth negotiating, and prepare redlines to bring the agreement more in line with Massachusetts law. He was knowledgeable, responsive, and practical throughout the process. I would definitely work with him again."
March 8, 2025
David W.
David has experience assisting individuals, startups, mid-sized, and publicly traded companies with various business, corporate, and real estate matters including residential and commercial real estate sales, acquisitions, financing and leasing; contract drafting and negotiation; regulatory compliance; and business acquisition, sale, formation, and dissolution.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowMeet some of our other Intellectual Property Lawyers
Philips V.
General Counsel for Construction and Related Legal Services - Although Phil specializes in construction-related law, Phil’s law practice areas include commercial, construction, contract, criminal, employment, ERISA, energy, environmental, OSHA, government, immigration, insurance, labor (EEOC, FLSA, FMLA, COBRA, etc.), personal injury, product liability, real estate, surety, utilities, and workers’ compensation, amongst others.
"I hired Philips for a limited-scope review of a fairly complicated commercial lease and payment dispute involving several years of leases, accounting ledgers, payment records, correspondence, and a draft pre-suit demand. Philips did an excellent job. He carefully reviewed the underlying documents, identified both the strengths and potential weaknesses of my position, addressed possible defenses and procedural issues, and provided a detailed written memorandum with clear, actionable recommendations. What impressed me most was his thoroughness. He addressed a number of additional questions that went beyond the basic scope of what I originally requested because he felt they were important to properly evaluating the matter. He also communicated clearly throughout the process and asked thoughtful questions rather than making assumptions when something needed clarification. I came away with a much better understanding of my legal position and a clear path forward. I would absolutely work with Philips again and would recommend him to anyone looking for an attorney who is thorough, practical, responsive, and willing to dig into the details."
Jennifer G.
August 8, 2026
Jennifer G.
Business and estate planning attorney with 12 years in law — five as licensed counsel, plus seven as a law clerk and legal assistant before that. I draft and review business contracts, form LLCs and corporations, and build wills, trusts, and estate plans. Two things make my work different. Alongside my JD I hold an LLM in Wealth Management and have passed the Series 65 (Uniform Investment Adviser Law Exam), so I understand the tax and financial mechanics behind a document, not just its language — the same rigor I've applied to trust and entity structures for families with $100M+ in assets goes into a single NDA review. And I spent years in civil litigation defending insurers and their insureds, so I know which clauses actually get fought over, and I draft with that in mind instead of pasting boilerplate. Flat-fee quotes whenever scope allows. Same-business-day responses. Most single-document projects delivered in 1–3 business days, with a plain-English summary of what I changed and why. Licensed in Texas (Bar No. 24123061) and malpractice insured; available nationwide for contract, business, and commercial matters that don't require state-specific admission. Message me what you're working on and I'll tell you honestly whether I'm the right fit.
August 4, 2026
Christopher W.
I am a licensed Alabama attorney with a focus on estate planning, probate, contracts, family law, and debt negotiation. I have a dual background in law and healthcare which gives me a unique perspective and experience concerning risk management, documentation, and regulatory requirements. I am committed to providing thorough results, quick turnaround, and steady communication from start to finish.
August 1, 2026
Katherine P.
Ms. Pallidine earned her Juris Doctor from St. Thomas University College of Law, where she distinguished herself academically and received certificates in Intellectual Property Law and Real Estate Law. She also holds a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology with a concentration in Behavioral Analysis, as well as a dual major in Women and Gender Studies from Florida International University. Throughout her legal education, Katherine gained valuable practical experience through various externship and internship programs. She served at the City Attorney’s Office of Coral Gables and Catholic Legal Services for the Archdiocese of Miami, as well as at a prominent Personal Injury Firm. These diverse experiences provided her with a broad understanding of multiple legal disciplines, sharpening her advocacy skills and deepening her understanding of client-centered service. Katherine is dedicated to helping her clients navigate sensitive legal issues with empathy, clarity, and a steadfast commitment to their best interests. She strives to build strong, trust-based relationships and is passionate about empowering her clients through knowledgeable legal guidance.
August 4, 2026
Anthony A.
Anthony Amato is the principal attorney of AMATO LAW, where he advises business owners, families, and executives on complex legal and strategic matters. With decades of experience in law, executive leadership, and regulated industries, Mr. Amato brings a measured, business‑minded approach to legal representation. His practice is focused on transactions, planning, and disputes where judgment, clarity, and experience are critical. Clients work directly with Mr. Amato and benefit from thoughtful legal guidance informed by real‑world commercial and organizational considerations.
August 12, 2026
Nichelle W.
Nichelle Womble, Esq., M.S.Ed is an accomplished litigation attorney, sports executive, and legal advisor admitted to practice law in Florida (2021) and Washington, D.C. (2022). Recognized continuously as an Elite Lawyer recipient, she combines multi-jurisdictional trial practice with extensive executive experience in sports governance, corporate counsel, and student defense.
August 14, 2026
Hunter M.
Before law school I built the contract management system for a publicly traded medical device company — so I read your agreement the way the people who have to live with it will, not just the way a court would. I draft and review business contracts on a fixed fee, with the delivery date agreed before I start. You get the redlined document plus a short written summary of what I changed, why it matters, and what I'd push back on if the other side objects. Revisions are included — I'd rather get the document right than count rounds. NDAs, MSAs and SOWs, contractor and employment agreements, SaaS terms, terms of service and privacy policies, operating agreements, vendor and construction contracts, and full contract review with a plain-English risk summary. Send me the document and what you're trying to accomplish with it, and I'll come back with a fixed fee and a date.
Intellectual Property Legal Questions and Answers
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property License Agreement
New York
Can I include clauses in an Intellectual Property License Agreement to protect my rights as the licensor?
I am a software developer who has created a unique application that I want to license to multiple clients. I have been researching Intellectual Property License Agreements and want to ensure that my rights as the licensor are protected. I am wondering if it is possible to include clauses in the agreement that address issues such as termination, infringement, and confidentiality, to safeguard my intellectual property and prevent unauthorized use or distribution of my software.
Randy M.
Yes, you can and should include clauses in an Intellectual Property License Agreement that protect your rights as the licensor. A license agreement is your main tool for controlling how your software is used, setting boundaries for your clients, and limiting your financial exposure. The key is to draft it in a way that leaves no doubt about what rights are granted, what’s restricted, and what happens if there’s a breach. Grant of License Start with a clear license grant. Spell out that you’re giving the client only limited rights, not ownership. Most licensors define the license as non-exclusive, non-transferable, and revocable if the client doesn’t follow the terms. For example, you might allow a client to use the software only for its internal business operations, and only on a set number of machines. It’s equally important to list what the licensee cannot do, such as reverse engineering, modifying, sublicensing, or providing the software to third parties. Intellectual Property Ownership Reinforce that you retain all ownership rights in the software and any related intellectual property. A simple but strong statement is that you hold all right, title, and interest in the software, and the client only receives a limited right to use it under the agreement. This prevents confusion between a license and a sale. You can also require the licensee to notify you if they discover third-party infringement and confirm that you alone have the right to pursue action against infringers. Confidentiality If you’re providing source code, algorithms, or other sensitive information, a confidentiality clause is essential. Define confidential information broadly to include not just the software itself but also any documentation or business information you share. Require the client to protect that information with at least the same care they use for their own confidential material, and make the obligation survive termination of the agreement. Termination Every strong license has a termination clause. Termination for cause should allow you to end the agreement if the client fails to pay, violates the license scope, or breaches confidentiality. Many agreements include a short cure period, such as thirty days, for the licensee to fix the breach before termination takes effect. Spell out the consequences of termination: the licensee must stop using the software immediately, return or destroy all copies, and certify that they’ve complied. Without this, you risk losing leverage if the relationship breaks down. Payment Terms Protect your revenue by making payment terms clear. Define license fees, support or maintenance fees if applicable, the payment schedule, and penalties for late payment such as interest. Courts generally enforce these provisions as long as they’re reasonable. Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability These clauses protect you from lawsuits if things go wrong. A limited warranty might cover basic performance for a set time, but beyond that you should disclaim all other warranties. Standard language is that the software is provided “as is” and you disclaim implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. To limit your exposure, cap liability at a defined amount, often the fees paid by the licensee in the previous twelve months, and exclude liability for indirect or consequential damages such as lost profits. Courts usually enforce these limits, except in cases of fraud or intentional misconduct. Audit Rights If your pricing model depends on the number of users or installations, an audit right is valuable. This allows you to check, on reasonable notice, that the licensee isn’t exceeding their rights. For example, you might reserve the right to inspect usage records once a year during normal business hours. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution Designating which state’s law governs and how disputes are resolved reduces uncertainty. Many licensors choose their home state’s law and either local courts or arbitration for disputes. Remedies Make sure your agreement lets you seek injunctive relief if the licensee misuses or discloses your software. Monetary damages often aren’t enough to protect intellectual property, so courts will enforce contract terms that authorize immediate injunctive relief. Protect Your Software with Legal Guidance When you’re licensing valuable software, the details in your agreement can make the difference between real protection and unnecessary risk. The lawyers on Contracts Counsel are available to draft, review, or negotiate a license that secures your rights and keeps your business protected.
Intellectual Property
Trademark
Massachusetts
Can I trademark the name of my software?
Can I trademark the name of my software if the same name is already trademarked in a different country/state? I am starting up a FinTech company right now and I am trying to trademark the name of my mobile app; however, after some searching, I realized that a company in the UK has already trademarked the same name. It is also a company that makes a mobile app in the FinTech industry - just in a different area of interest. Are there any suggestions for how I would go about trademarking the name of my software, or do I have to come up with a different name?
Roman V.
Yes, it's generally possible to trademark the name of your software, as long as it is not a generic name or descriptive of the product. You should also do a clearance search to make sure no other company is using the same or similar name for similar services. I would be glad to discuss more details and help with the trademark process. Thanks.
Intellectual Property
Trademark Cease And Desist
California
Can I ignore a cease and desist letter for trademark infringement if I believe my use of the mark is fair use?
I recently received a cease and desist letter from a company claiming that my use of their trademark in my blog posts constitutes trademark infringement. However, I am using the mark in a descriptive manner to criticize and comment on their products, which I believe falls under fair use. I am unsure of how to proceed and whether I can ignore the cease and desist letter without facing legal consequences.
Dolan W.
Hello! Thank you for posting this question. In your case, the other party may claim that you are infringing on their trademark, but proving it is a different case. The Lanham Act provides for a cause of action for infringement of both registered and unregistered trademarks. (15 USC Section 1114(1)(a); 15 USC Section 1125(a)(1)A).) The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has laid out some elements to help determine whether it creates an infringement lawsuit. 1. The complaining party has to prove they have a valid, protectable trademark and that they own that trademark; 2. The complaining party must prove that a mark is similar, and it was used without the consent of the moving party in a manner that is likely to cause confusion among ordinary consumers as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the goods. The likelihood of confusion can occur at the time of the sale, when there is initial interest by a consumer, or even after the sale, if the confusion causes a consumer to no longer buy a service or product connected to the mark. The court considers things like the strength of the original mark, whether you are using it for some fair use purpose, the similarity, the proximity of the products and marketing channels, whether there’s actual confusion, the defendant’s intent, the quality of respective products, and the sophistication of the customers. (Polaroid Corp. v. Polard Elecs. Corp. 287, F.2d. 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961.) So what this means is that it'd have to be litigated, but you can argue you are not trying to sell products or services using their mark, but rather you are using it for some other purpose, such as to educate people about their business practices. Best of luck!
Intellectual Property
Trademark Search
Florida
Is a trademark search necessary before registering my business name?
I am in the process of starting my own business and have chosen a unique name for it, but I am unsure if it is necessary to conduct a trademark search before officially registering the name. I want to ensure that my chosen business name does not infringe upon any existing trademarks and that I can safely use and protect it in the future.
Randy M.
Running a trademark search before registering your business name isn’t legally required, but it’s one of the most important steps you can take to avoid future problems. Registering your name with the state forms your business entity, but it doesn’t give you trademark rights. Trademark rights come from use in commerce and, if you file with the USPTO, registration at the federal level. Why a Trademark Search Matters The central legal test in trademark law is whether a name is likely to cause consumer confusion. That means you don’t need to copy someone else’s name exactly to get into trouble. Even something that looks or sounds similar in the same or related industry could be enough. If you skip the search and move forward, you risk: • Infringement claims: Another company could demand you stop using the name and, if necessary, sue for damages. • Forced rebranding: If you’ve already invested in your logo, website, signage, or marketing materials, being forced to change your name can be expensive and disruptive. • USPTO rejection: If you apply for a federal trademark, the USPTO will run its own search. If they find a confusingly similar mark, your application will be denied and you’ll lose the filing fees. A well-documented example is when small businesses open under a catchy name, only to receive a cease-and-desist letter from a national chain using a similar name in the same space. Even if you’re in a different state, a federal registration gives that company priority rights nationwide. A proper trademark clearance search should cover more than just identical names. You’ll want to check: • Federal database (USPTO TESS): This is the official record of all registered and pending federal trademarks. • State trademark databases: Many businesses register marks only at the state level. • Common law sources: Unregistered marks can still have legal protection. Check Google, industry directories, social media, and domain names. • Similar variations: Look for phonetic equivalents and alternative spellings, such as “Kwik” for “Quick,” or slight wording changes that could still cause confusion. Professional Assistance You can run an initial search yourself at no cost, but these searches have limits. For example, the USPTO database won’t flag marks that are spelled differently but sound alike, or names with similar meanings. Attorneys and specialized search firms use tools that uncover those kinds of risks. While hiring a professional costs more upfront, it’s often far cheaper than litigation or a rebrand. Limitations A search doesn’t guarantee that your name will never be challenged. Trademark law involves judgment calls about how similar marks are and whether they overlap in goods or services. Still, a thorough search puts you in a much stronger position to defend your choice and move toward federal registration if you want nationwide rights.
Intellectual Property
Trademark Transfer Agreement
Maryland
Need advice on Trademark Transfer Agreement.
I recently started a small business and have developed a unique brand name and logo. I have been approached by another company expressing interest in acquiring my trademark rights through a transfer agreement. I am unfamiliar with the legal aspects of trademark transfers and would like to understand the process, potential risks, and ensure that I am adequately protecting my brand before entering into any agreement.
Roman V.
Hello, I wanted to express my interest in helping you understand your trademark rights and the trademark transfer proposal you received. As brief background, I am a US-licensed trademark attorney and have helped clients in similar situations buy, sell, and otherwise transfer trademark rights through transfer agreements. I can also help you prepare and file a federal trademark registration to protect your unique brand name and logo throughout the US. I'd be glad to set up a brief call to learn more about your business and see how I can help. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Roman Vayner (c) 414.628.9099 (e) rvayner@vaynerlegal.com www.vaynerlegal.com VaynerLegal, LLC
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
- Austin Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Chicago Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Dallas Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Denver Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Los Angeles Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Phoenix Intellectual Property Lawyers
- San Diego Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Tampa Intellectual Property Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer