Schedule 13D Amendment: Definition, Example
Jump to Section
What is a Schedule 13D Amendment?
A Schedule 13D Amendment is a form that must be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to disclose the ownership of securities of one or more public companies. The SEC requires these filings because they are designed to ensure transparency in who owns shares in public companies, particularly when it comes to large shareholders who might impact management decisions.
Every business owner should know how their company's stock holdings could affect them - not just those who own 100% of the shares. A Schedule 13D Amendment outlines shares and voting power and the interest in securities of the issuer.
Schedule 13D Amendment Sample
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 13D
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. 1)*
FIRST BANCSHARES, INC.
| (Name of Issuer) |
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE
| (Title of Class of Securities) |
318687 10 0
| (CUSIP Number) |
Richard T. Gregg
2155 W. Koryton Drive
Nixa, Missouri
(417) 725-3009
| (Name, Address and Telephone Number of Person Authorized to Receive Notices and Communications) |
With a copy to:
Joseph T. Porter, Jr.
Polsinelli Shalton Flanigan Suelthaus PC
100 South Fourth Street, Suite 1100
St. Louis, MO 63102
(314) 552-6828
August 11, 2008
| (Date of Event Which Requires Filing of This Statement) |
If the filing person has previously filed a statement on Schedule 13G to report the acquisition that is the subject of this Schedule 13D, and is filing this schedule because of § 240.13d-1(e), 240.13d-1(f) or 240.13d-1(g), check the following box. ¨
NOTE: Schedules filed in paper format shall include a signed original and five copies of the schedule, including all exhibits. See Rule 13d-7 for other parties to whom copies are to be sent.
| * | The remainder of this cover page shall be filled out for a reporting person’s initial filing on this form with respect to the subject class of securities, and for any subsequent amendment containing information which would alter the disclosures provided in a prior cover page. |
The information required on the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the Act but shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act (however, see the Notes).
1
| (1) | Names of Reporting Persons:
Richard T. Gregg |
|||
| (2) | Check the appropriate box if a member of a Group (See Instructions) (a) ¨ (b) ¨ |
|||
| (3) | SEC Use Only
|
|||
| (4) | Source of Funds (See Instructions):
PF |
|||
| (5) | Check if Disclosure of Legal Proceedings is Required Pursuant to Items 2(d) or 2(e)
|
¨ | ||
| (6) | Citizenship or Place of Organization:
United States |
| Number of Shares Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person With |
(7) Sole Voting Power
0 | |
| (8) Shared Voting Power
143,744 | ||
| (9) Sole Dispositive Power
0 | ||
| (10) Shared Dispositive Power
143,744 |
| (11) | Aggregate Amount Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person
143,744 shares |
|||
| (12) | Check if the Aggregate Amount in Row (11) Excludes Certain Shares (See Instructions)
|
¨ | ||
| (13) | Percent of Class Represented by Amount in Row (11)
9.27% |
|||
| (14) | Type of Reporting Person (See Instructions)
IN |
2
| (1) | Names of Reporting Persons:
Jenny D. Gregg |
|||
| (2) | Check the appropriate box if a member of a Group (See Instructions) (a) ¨ (b) ¨ |
|||
| (3) | SEC Use Only
|
|||
| (4) | Source of Funds (See Instructions):
PF |
|||
| (5) | Check if Disclosure of Legal Proceedings is Required Pursuant to Items 2(d) or 2(e)
|
¨ | ||
| (6) | Citizenship or Place of Organization:
United States |
| Number of Shares Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person With |
(7) Sole Voting Power
0 | |
| (8) Shared Voting Power
143,744 | ||
| (9) Sole Dispositive Power
0 | ||
| (10) Shared Dispositive Power
143,744 |
| (11) | Aggregate Amount Beneficially Owned by Each Reporting Person
143,744 shares |
|||
| (12) | Check if the Aggregate Amount in Row (11) Excludes Certain Shares (See Instructions)
|
¨ | ||
| (13) | Percent of Class Represented by Amount in Row (11)
9.27% |
|||
| (14) | Type of Reporting Person (See Instructions)
IN |
3
Introduction
This constitutes Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to the statement on Schedule 13D filed on behalf of Richard T. Gregg and Jenny D. Gregg, dated as of August 11, 2008 (the “Statement”), relating to the Common Stock $0.01 par value per share, of First Bancshares, Inc., a Missouri corporation (the “Company”), whose principal executive offices are located at 142 East First Street, P. O. Box 777, Mountain Grove, Missouri 65711. The purpose of Amendment No. 1is solely to correct a clerical error in the Statement related to the number of shares beneficially owned by the reporting persons. Specifically, the Statement inaccurately reported the aggregate number of shares beneficially owned by the reporting persons as 142,253; the correct number of shares beneficially owned by the reporting person is 143,744. The Statement is hereby amended to correct such inaccuracy.
| Item 3. | Source and Amount of Funds or Other Consideration |
To correct the clerical error discussed above, Item 3 is hereby amended and restated as follows:
“As of August 11, 2008, Richard T. Gregg, jointly with his spouse, Jenny D. Gregg, had purchased 80,000 shares in the aggregate to cause them to obtain beneficial ownership of approximately 5.16% of the issued and outstanding shares of the issuer. The purchase price for such shares ranged from $16.97 to $11.99 per share. As of the date hereof, Mr. And Mrs. Gregg jointly beneficially own 143,744 shares. All shares beneficially owned by Mr. and Mrs. Gregg were purchased with their personal funds in open market transactions.”
| Item 5. | Interest in Securities of the Issuer |
To correct the clerical error discussed above, Item 5(a) is hereby amended and restated as follows:
| (a) | Aggregate number and percentage of class beneficially owned: 143,744 shares of Common Stock, representing approximately 9.27% of all of the outstanding shares in the class. |
To correct the clerical error discussed above, Item 5(b) is hereby amended and restated as follows:
| (b) | 1. Sole power to vote or direct vote: 0 |
| 2. Shared power to vote or direct vote: 143,744 |
| 3. Sole power to dispose or direct the disposition: 0 |
| 4. Shared power to dispose or direct the disposition: 143,744 |
4
SIGNATURES
After reasonable inquiry and to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, each of the undersigned certifies that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.
| Dated: October 22, 2008 | /s/ Richard T. Gregg | |
| Richard T. Gregg | ||
| Dated: October 22, 2008 | /s/ Jenny D. Gregg | |
| Jenny D. Gregg | ||
5
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, SC 13D/A 1 dsc13da.htm SCHEDULE 13D AMENDMENT NO. 1, Viewed January 27, 2022, View Source on SEC.
Who Helps With Schedule 13D Amendments?
Lawyers with backgrounds working on schedule 13d amendments work with clients to help. Do you need help with a schedule 13d amendment?
Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate schedule 13d amendments. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
D. Cassie B.
Cassie Bermudez Engel is a seasoned family law attorney with over a decade of litigation experience across Florida. She focuses her practice on divorce, custody and timesharing, alimony, child support, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, and post-judgment enforcement and modification. Cassie has served as lead counsel in thousands of cases and has represented clients in matters ranging from amicable settlements to high-conflict litigation. Before founding her own practice, Cassie honed her skills at boutique family law firms, served in-house for major insurance carriers, and was a partner at a nationwide law firm. She brings a strategic, results-driven approach to every case, with a particular focus on protecting her clients’ financial interests and guiding them through some of life’s most challenging transitions. Cassie is known for her clear communication, compassionate advocacy, and unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes for her clients.
"Working with Cassie was great! Not only did she stay on budget and was very responsive, but she completed the job on time. Cassie took her time to answer all of my questions and was a pleasure to work with. Would recommend!"
September 11, 2023
Torrey L.
Torrey Livenick, Esq. is a fourth generation Colorado lawyer. Although she was born in California and raised in Nevada, she spent every summer in Colorado and knew she planned to make Denver her home. After graduating from Bryn Mawr College with a degree in Classical Culture and Society, she returned to Las Vegas to work as a paralegal. Once she spent five years building her skills and confirming her interest, she attended Emory University School of Law. Torrey’s interests include trivia (she even was a contestant on Jeopardy! during her law school days), video games, playing with her cats, and the arts. She is active in pro bono organizations including Metro Volunteer Lawyers.
September 6, 2023
Peter H.
Haber Law Firm, APC, is a transactional business law firm with a focus on small/mid-market business purchases and sales, outside general counsel, and start-up assistance for businesses in their early stages. Peter Haber started Haber Law Firm, APC after several years as a legal executive at Popcornopolis, a gourmet popcorn brand sold at groceries and stadiums nationwide. In this role, Peter served as the company’s sole in-house legal advisor as it related to all functions of the company’s operations, including dispute resolution, compliance, and employment law, to name a few. With his help and guidance, the company relocated its entire corporate and manufacturing operation, developed a new factory and warehouse, and was successfully acquired by private equity. Prior to this, Peter was a litigator and business attorney with distinguished Los Angeles litigation boutiques. Such matters included the representation of numerous businesses in litigation and in the resolution of pre-litigation disputes as well as the representation of professionals in liability defense matters, including hospitals, physicians, and brokers.
Kyle T.
Obtained J.D. in December 2021, admitted to the Indiana Bar in November 2022. Began working as a clerk for civil defense firm in March 2022 and have been the same firm to the present, currently working as an Associate Attorney.
September 7, 2023
Sashi S.
Credible history in navigating complex legal landscapes to deliver strategic solutions that optimize employee benefits programs and healthcare compliance. Demonstrated mastery in interpreting and applying ERISA, HIPAA, and ACA regulations, safeguarding client interests, and minimizing legal risks. Remarkable background in advising diverse clientele, ranging from corporations to healthcare providers, on intricate regulatory frameworks, compliance strategies, and litigation support. Adept at crafting innovative strategies, providing expert guidance, and driving compliance with unwavering precision. Skilled in leveraging unique skill set that combines medical knowledge and technological proficiency to address multifaceted challenges at intersection of healthcare and technology. Exceptional project management skills with track record of contributing to high-impact initiatives. Accomplished in drafting and negotiating contracts, mitigating legal risks, and streamlining processes.
September 7, 2023
Paola R.
Attorney admitted to the New York State Bar. Hispanic. Eager to meet client's needs and provide legal assistance.
Gina O.
see resume.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Financial lawyers by top cities
- Austin Financial Lawyers
- Boston Financial Lawyers
- Chicago Financial Lawyers
- Dallas Financial Lawyers
- Denver Financial Lawyers
- Houston Financial Lawyers
- Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
- New York Financial Lawyers
- Phoenix Financial Lawyers
- San Diego Financial Lawyers
- Tampa Financial Lawyers
Schedule 13D Amendment lawyers by city
- Austin Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Boston Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Chicago Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Dallas Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Denver Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Houston Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Los Angeles Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- New York Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Phoenix Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- San Diego Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
- Tampa Schedule 13D Amendment Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review