Tax Indemnification Agreement: Definition, Terms, Example
Jump to Section
What is a Tax Indemnification Agreement?
A tax indemnification agreement is a legal contract in which one party agrees to protect the other from any possible financial penalties incurred as a result of their tax obligations. This type of agreement can be very beneficial for businesses, as it can help them avoid costly fines and penalties from the IRS. In order to enter into a tax indemnification agreement, both parties must agree to its terms and conditions. It is important to work with an experienced attorney when drafting this type of agreement, so that all potential risks are accounted for.
Common Sections in Tax Indemnification Agreements
Below is a list of common sections included in Tax Indemnification Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.
Tax Indemnification Agreement Sample
Exhibit 10.5
TAX INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT dated as of [•], 2010 (this “Agreement”), between THE FRESH MARKET, INC. (the “Company”) and all of the shareholders identified on the signature pages of this Agreement.
WHEREAS the Company has elected to be an S-corporation (the “S Election”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as applicable, and in each case as amended (the “Code”);
WHEREAS The Fresh Market of Massachusetts, Inc. (the “Subsidiary”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and has elected to be a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (the “QSub Election”) under the Code;
WHEREAS the Company intends to conduct an initial public offering (the “IPO”) and, in connection with the IPO, the Company’s S Election and the Subsidiary’s QSub Election will terminate, and each of the Company and the Subsidiary will each be treated as C-corporations under the Code;
WHEREAS at all times the Company’s S Election was in effect, the Shareholders (defined below) paid Federal and certain state and local income taxes on their allocable share of the Company’s Taxable Income (defined below) as determined under the Code and certain equivalent state or local statutes, and the Shareholders will continue to pay such taxes (as they become due) for such periods as the Company’s S Election remains in effect;
WHEREAS the Company is obligated under its shareholder agreement to make pro rata distributions to its Shareholders in amounts equal to the Shareholders’ estimated tax liability, calculated as if each Shareholder would be taxable on its allocable share of the Company’s Taxable Income at the maximum Federal income tax rate and the maximum state and local income tax rates; and
WHEREAS the Company and the Shareholders desire to set forth their agreement that the Company shall bear the risk of any additional tax liability, as well as any related losses, costs and expenses, resulting from (i) any statement or restatement of the Company’s Taxable Income on any income tax return or (ii) any Determination (as defined below), in each case for any open taxable period beginning before the termination of the Company’s S Election;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Definitions
SECTION 1.01. General. The following terms shall have the following meanings (such meanings to apply equally to the singular and plural forms of the terms
defined). All section references are to this Agreement unless otherwise stated. All references to “includes” and “including” mean “includes without limitation” or “including without limitation”, as the case may be.
SECTION 1.02. Definition of Terms.
“Company’s Taxable Income” means the Company’s taxable income, combined with the Subsidiary’s taxable income, as applicable.
“Determination” means the final resolution of liability for any tax for any taxable period as a result of (i) a “determination” as defined in Treasury Regulation § 1.1377-2(c), (ii) a final determination made by a competent Taxing Authority or (iii) the payment of tax by the Shareholders if the Shareholders and the Company agree that the payment should be made and no action should be taken to recoup that payment.
“Proceeding” means any proceeding that will potentially give rise to a Determination.
“Shareholder” means for any taxable period a person who was a shareholder of the Company during all or part of such taxable period.
“taxes” means all Federal, state and local taxes, assessments, duties or similar charges of any kind whatsoever, including any interest, additions to tax or penalties applicable thereto.
“Taxing Authority” means any governmental body charged with the determination, collection or imposition of taxes.
ARTICLE II
Payments and Indemnity
SECTION 2.01. Tax Returns. Upon filing any Federal, state or local income tax return (amended or otherwise) for any taxable period during which the Company had an S Election in effect, the Company shall calculate each Shareholder’s estimated tax liability for such taxable period as if each such Shareholder would be taxable on its allocable share of the Company’s Taxable Income at the maximum Federal income tax rate and the maximum state and local income tax rates applicable to each such Shareholder; provided, that in any case where another person or entity is directly taxed on a Shareholder’s income, such Shareholder’s estimated tax liability shall be determined by reference to such other person or entity. The Company shall calculate for each Shareholder the excess of such Shareholder’s estimated tax liability over the amount previously distributed by the Company to such Shareholder in respect of tax liabilities for the relevant taxable period (the “2.01 Excess”). The Company shall make a payment to each Shareholder in proportion to each Shareholder’s shareholdings during the relevant taxable period in an amount sufficient so that the Shareholder with the highest 2.01 Excess receives a payment equal thereto. Payments made pursuant to this Section 2.01 shall be made at the time the relevant income tax return is filed.
2
SECTION 2.02. Determinations. After any Determination, the Company shall calculate each Shareholder’s estimated tax liability for the relevant taxable period as if each such Shareholder would be taxable on its allocable share of the Company’s Taxable Income at the maximum Federal income tax rate and the maximum state and local income tax rates applicable to each such Shareholder; provided, that in any case where another person or entity is directly taxed on a Shareholder’s income, such Shareholder’s estimated tax liability shall be determined by reference to such other person or entity. The Company shall calculate for each Shareholder the excess of such Shareholder’s estimated tax liability over the amount previously distributed by the Company to such Shareholder in respect of taxes for such taxable period (the “2.02 Excess”). The Company shall make a payment to each Shareholder in proportion to each Shareholder’s shareholdings during the relevant taxable period in an amount sufficient so that the Shareholder with the highest 2.02 Excess receives a payment equal thereto. Payments made pursuant to this Section 2.02 shall be made within 120 days of the relevant Determination.
SECTION 2.03. Indemnification. The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless the Shareholders from any losses, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of any claims made pursuant to Section 2.01 or Section 2.02. Payments made pursuant to this Section 2.03 shall be made at the same time as the payment made pursuant to Section 2.01 or Section 2.02, as applicable.
ARTICLE III
Notice, Proceedings and Inconsistent Reporting
SECTION 3.01. Notice and Proceedings. (a) Any Shareholder that believes it may be entitled to a payment under this Agreement as a result of a Proceeding shall use reasonable efforts to promptly notify the Company of such Proceeding.
(b) The Company will have the option to represent itself in any Proceeding, at its own expense and using advisors of the Company’s choice.
(c) Each Shareholder shall cooperate fully with the Company in any Proceeding and shall have the right, but not the obligation, to participate in such Proceeding at its own expense.
(d) Breach by any Shareholder of any of the provisions of this Section 3.01 will terminate the Company’s obligation to make payments to such Shareholder under Article II, to the extent any such breach materially prejudices the result of any Proceeding.
SECTION 3.02. Inconsistent Reporting. If a Shareholder hereafter reports an item on such Shareholder’s income tax return in a manner materially inconsistent with the tax treatment reflected in the Schedule K-1 or other tax information provided to the Shareholder by the Company for a taxable period during which the Company had an S Election in effect, such Shareholder shall notify the Company of such
3
treatment before filing such Shareholder’s income tax return. If such Shareholder fails to notify the Company of such inconsistent reporting, such Shareholder shall be liable to the Company for any losses, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising from such inconsistent reporting, including an audit.
ARTICLE IV
Miscellaneous
SECTION 4.01. Confidentiality. Each of the parties agrees that any information furnished pursuant to this Agreement is confidential and, except as and to the extent required by law or otherwise during the course of an audit or contest or other administrative or legal proceeding, shall not be disclosed to other persons.
SECTION 4.02. Successors and Access to Information. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successor to any of the parties, by merger, acquisition of assets or stock in the Company or otherwise, to the same extent as if the successor had been an original party to this Agreement or the relevant Shareholder for the taxable period in question, and in such event, all references herein to a party shall refer instead to the successor of such party; provided, however, that for purposes of calculating the estimated tax liability to which any payments under this Agreement would relate, the original Shareholder’s estimated tax liability shall be taken into account, but any payments in connection therewith shall be made to the successor of such original Shareholder.
SECTION 4.03. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York excluding (to the greatest extent permissible by law) any rule of law that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York.
SECTION 4.04. Headings. The headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be deemed for any purpose to constitute a part or to affect the interpretation of this Agreement.
SECTION 4.05. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, and it shall not be necessary in making proof of this Agreement to produce or account for more than one counterpart.
SECTION 4.06. Notices. Any notice or communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing (including telecopy communication) and mailed, telecopied or delivered to the parties at the addresses specified in Schedule A or at such other address as one party may specify by notice to the other party. All such notices and communications shall be effective when received. Any payment required to be made under this Agreement shall be mailed or delivered to the parties at the addresses specified in Schedule A or at such other address or account as one party may specify by notice to the other party.
4
SECTION 4.07. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable for any reason, it shall be adjusted rather than voided, if possible, in order to achieve the intent of the parties to the maximum extent practicable. In any event, all other provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed valid, binding, and enforceable to their full extent.
SECTION 4.08. Survival. This Agreement shall remain in force and be binding so long as the applicable period of assessments (including extensions) remains unexpired for any taxes contemplated by this Agreement.
SECTION 4.09. Successor Provisions. Any reference herein to any provisions of the Code or Treasury Regulations shall be deemed to include any amendments or successor provisions thereto as appropriate.
SECTION 4.10. Integration; Amendments. Except as explicitly stated herein, this Agreement embodies the entire understanding between the parties relating to its subject matter and supersedes and terminates all prior agreements and understandings among the parties with respect to such matters. No promises, covenants or representations of any kind, other than those expressly stated herein, have been made to induce any party to enter into this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be modified or terminated except by a writing duly signed by each of the parties hereto, and no waiver of any provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless in a writing duly signed by the party sought to be bound.
SECTION 4.11. Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY WITH RESPECT TO ANY DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY (A) CERTIFIES THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING WAIVER AND (B) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 4.11.
[Signature pages follow]
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties of this Agreement has executed this Agreement, or caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer or trustee, as of the date first set forth above.
| THE FRESH MARKET, INC. | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: | ||||
| Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE JENNER TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: | ||||
| Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE UNGER TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: | ||||
| Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FLOYD TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: | ||||
| Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE KEIGAN TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: | ||||
| Title: | ||||
6
| AMY B. BARRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE ROSSLER TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| BRETT M. BERRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE ROSSLER TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE ROSSLER TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| WINSTON B. BERRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE TUTTLE TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE TUTTLE TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| WINSTON B. BERRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE MILLARD TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Trust: | ||||
7
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE MILLARD TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| MICHAEL J. BARRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE LERRA TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE LERRA TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| MICHAEL J. BARRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE FARRA TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE FARRA TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
8
| MICHAEL J. BARRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE CAITO TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE CAITO TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| BRETT M. BERRY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE GIBSON TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| RAY D. BERRY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PAIKO TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| AMY B. BARRY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ATMA TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
| J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ELLER TRUST | ||||
| by |
| |||
| Name: Title: | ||||
9
SCHEDULE A
Notices
To the Company:
The Fresh Market, Inc.
628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500
Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
Facsimile: (336) 272-1664
Attn: General Counsel
With a copy to:
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
Facsimile No.: (212) 474-3700
Attention: Craig F. Arcella
To the Shareholders:
| Jenner Trust; Unger Trust; Floyd Trust; Eller Trust; and Keigan Trust c/o J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware 500 Stanton Christiana Road DE3-1680 Newark, Delaware 19713-2107 Facsimile: 302-634-4474 Attn: Timothy S. Egan |
Rossler Trust c/o J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware 500 Stanton Christiana Road DE3-1680 Newark, Delaware 19713-2107 Facsimile: 302-634-4474 Attn: Timothy S. Egan
With copies to: Amy B. Barry c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664
and
Brett M. Berry c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 |
10
| Tuttle Trust c/o J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware 500 Stanton Christiana Road DE3-1680 Newark, Delaware 19713-2107 Facsimile: 302-634-4474 Attn: Timothy S. Egan
With a copy to: Winston B. Berry c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 |
Millard Trust c/o J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware 500 Stanton Christiana Road DE3-1680 Newark, Delaware 19713-2107 Facsimile: 302-634-4474 Attn: Timothy S. Egan
With a copy to: Winston B. Berry c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 |
| Lerra Trust c/o J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware 500 Stanton Christiana Road DE3-1680 Newark, Delaware 19713-2107 Facsimile: 302-634-4474 Attn: Timothy S. Egan
With a copy to: Michael J. Barry c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 |
Farra Trust c/o J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware 500 Stanton Christiana Road DE3-1680 Newark, Delaware 19713-2107 Facsimile: 302-634-4474 Attn: Timothy S. Egan
With a copy to: Michael J. Barry c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 | |
| Caito Trust c/o J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware 500 Stanton Christiana Road DE3-1680 Newark, Delaware 19713-2107 Facsimile: 302-634-4474 Attn: Timothy S. Egan
With a copy to: Michael J. Barry c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 |
Gibson Trust c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 Attention: Brett M. Berry | |
11
| Paiko Trust c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 Attention: Ray D. Berry |
Atma Trust c/o The Fresh Market, Inc. 628 Green Valley Road, Suite 500 Greensboro, North Carolina 27408 Facsimile: (336) 272-1664 Attention: Amy B. Barry |
12
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.5 8 dex105.htm FORM OF TAX INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT, Viewed April 25, 2022, View Source on SEC.
Who Helps With Tax Indemnification Agreements?
Lawyers with backgrounds working on tax indemnification agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a tax indemnification agreement?
Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate tax indemnification agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
Samuel R.
My career interests are to practice Transactional Corporate Law, including Business Start Up, as well as Real Estate Law, Estate Planning Law, and Intellectual Property Law. I am currently licensed in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Utah, after having moved to Phoenix from Philadelphia in September 2019. I currently serve as General Counsel for a bioengineering company. I handle everything from their Business Transactional Agreements, Private Placement Memorandums, and Corporate Structures to Intellectual Property Assignments, to Employment Law and Beach of Contract settlements. Responsibilities include writing and executing agreements, drafting court pleadings, court appearances, mergers and acquisitions, transactional documents, managing expert specialized legal counsel, legal research and anticipating unique legal issues that could impact the Company. Conducted an acquisition of an entire line of intellectual property from a competitor. In regards to other clients, I am primarily focused on transactional law for clients in a variety of industries including, but not limited to, real estate investment, property management, and e-commerce. Work is primarily centered around entity formation and corporate structure, corporate governance agreements, PPMs, opportunity zone tax incentives, and all kinds of business to business agreements. I have also recently gained experience with Estate Planning law, drafting numerous Estate Planning documents for people such as Wills, Powers of Attorney, Healthcare Directives, and Trusts. I was selected to the Super Lawyers Southwest Rising Stars list for 2024 - 2026. Each year no more than 2.5% of the attorneys in Arizona and New Mexico are selected to the Rising Stars. I am looking to further gain legal experience in these fields of law as well as expand my legal experience assisting business start ups, and also trademark registration and licensing.
"Thanks Samuel for your thorough review of my materials. I'm incredibly impressed by your prompt turnaround in drafting my letter. The letter captured the facts perfectly and struck exactly the right tone."
Gregory B.
I love contracts - and especially technology-related contracts written in PLAIN ENGLISH! I've worked extensively with intellectual property contracts, and specifically with IT contracts (SaaS, Master Subscriptions Agreements, Terms of Service, Privacy Policies, License Agreements, etc.), and I have built my own technology solutions that help to quickly and thoroughly draft, review and customize complex contracts.
"Greg was very helpful and responsive. He not only provided insightful comments on the contract but also explained the reasoning behind them. Highly recommended, especially for software contracts."
Jordan M.
I am a software developer turned lawyer with 7+ years of experience drafting, reviewing, and negotiating SaaS agreements, as well as other technology agreements. I am a partner at Freeman Lovell PLLC, where I lead commercial contracts practice group. I work with startups, growing companies, and the Fortune 500 to make sure your legal go-to-market strategy works for you.
David W.
The Law Office of David Watson, LLC provides comprehensive and individualized estate-planning services for all stages and phases of life. I listen to your goals and priorities and offer a range of estate-planning services, including trusts, wills, living wills, durable powers of attorney, and other plans to meet your goals. And for convenience and transparency, many estate-planning services are provided at a flat rate.
"David quickly put in a bid and began work. He was very responsive to any questions I had."
Clara D.
October 8, 2021
Clara D.
Clara Duffield is a seasoned financial services, technology, privacy, business, intellectual property, and real estate lawyer, with in-house and large firm experience. She currently represents a range of clients, from start-ups to large, heavily-regulated companies, in a wide variety of transactional matters. After graduating from The University of Chicago Law School, Clara spent eight years in private practice representing clients in complex commercial real estate, merger and acquisition, branding, and other transactional matters. Clara then worked as in-house counsel to a large financial services company, handling intellectual property, vendor contracts, technology, privacy, cybersecurity, licensing, marketing, and otherwise supporting general operations. She opened her own practice in September of 2017. Duffield Law provides strategic and flexible representation to businesses of all sizes. Its clients include entrepreneurs and early-stage startups to Fortune 100 companies. From outside general counsel or volume work to discreet assignments, our small firm model allows us the flexibility to provide only the legal services a client needs, without sacrificing the quality all clients deserve. With a depth of in-house and large law firm experience, we work with clients to thoughtfully assess risk, identify and engage subject matter experts, and manage legal spend.
October 12, 2021
Grant P.
Founder and owner of Grant Phillips Law.. Practicing and licensed in NY, NJ & Fl with focus on small businesses across the country that are stuck in predatory commercial loans. The firm specializes in representing business owners with Merchant Cash Advances or Factoring Arrangments they can no longer afford. The firms clients include restaurants, truckers, contractors, for profit schools, doctors and corner supermarkets to name a few. GRANT PHILLIPS LAW, PLLC. is at the cutting edge of bringing affordable and expert legal representation on behalf of Merchants stuck with predatory loans or other financial instruments that drain the companies revenues. Grant Phillips Law will defend small businesses with Merchant Cash Advances they can no longer afford. Whether you have been sued, a UCC lien filed against your receivables or your bank account is levied or frozen, we have your back. See more at www.grantphillipslaw.com
November 12, 2021
Jonathan K.
Pico & Kooker provides hands on legal advice in structuring, drafting, negotiating, interpreting, managing and enforcing complex high value commercial transactions. Adept at navigating complex environments, Jonathan has extensive expertise advising clients on a wide range of long- and medium-term cross border and financial engagements, including public tender participation, PPPs, export sales agreements as well as policy and regulatory formulation. Jonathan and his co-founder, Eva Pico have represented and acted on behalf of lenders, global corporations and other market participants across a range of industries including financial services, infrastructure and transportation. As outside counsel, Pico & Kooker, has developed a strong rapport and working relationship with their clients and appropriately work with their in-house teams to increase consistency, processes and procedures. The company employs a unique approach as practical, business minded outside legal counsel who believe in proactively partnering with their clients to achieve desired results while managing and engaging key stakeholders. They listen to their clients to develop customized solutions that best meet their needs while aligning with their objectives, vision and values. Some representative transactions include advising the World Bank on project finance and portfolio options to address the costs and risks associated with integrating renewable power sources. Also advising them as legal counsel, Jonathan developed policies, regulation and models for emerging market governments entering into public-private partnerships. In addition to his work with the World Bank, Jonathan has worked with some of the world’s largest consulting firms, financial institutions and governmental organizations, including the United Nations, the governments of the US, UK and select African countries. Through out his career, he has worked with large, multinational corporations both by consulting in-house and acting as outside counsel on large cross-border transactions. He graduated from Georgetown University’s law school and was admitted practice as a lawyer in New York, England and Wales and, as a foreign lawyer, in Germany. He has written several articles for trade journals and has been cited by several business publications in worldwide. Jonathan is a native English speaker and has high proficiency in German and a functional understanding of Spanish.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Financial lawyers by top cities
- Austin Financial Lawyers
- Boston Financial Lawyers
- Chicago Financial Lawyers
- Dallas Financial Lawyers
- Denver Financial Lawyers
- Houston Financial Lawyers
- Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
- New York Financial Lawyers
- Phoenix Financial Lawyers
- San Diego Financial Lawyers
- Tampa Financial Lawyers
Tax Indemnification Agreement lawyers by city
- Austin Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Boston Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Chicago Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Dallas Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Denver Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Houston Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Los Angeles Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- New York Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Phoenix Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- San Diego Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
- Tampa Tax Indemnification Agreement Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review