Intellectual Property Lawyers for New Haven, Connecticut
Need an intellectual property lawyer in New Haven, Connecticut?
ContractsCounsel matches businesses with New Haven-based intellectual property lawyers, providing fixed-fee quotes from vetted attorneys with the first proposal typically arriving in just a few hours.
Hire a Lawyer for 60% Less than Traditional Law Firms
Meet some of our New Haven Intellectual Property Lawyers
Nicholas M.
Nicholas Matlach is a cybersecurity expert (CISSP) and an attorney who is dedicated to helping small businesses succeed. He is a client-focused professional who has a deep understanding of the challenges that small businesses face in the digital age. He also provides legal counsel to small businesses on a variety of issues, including formation, intellectual property, contracts, and employment law.
"Enjoyed his demeanor. Professional yet down to earth. The document created for me was very explicit and easy to read. I would recommend :)"
Brian J R.
Immigration expert with over 30 years’ experience focused on start-up companies H-1, L-1, E, O-1 visas. PERM and extraordinary ability immigrant visas. Complex family immigration cases and waivers. I also assist early stage comapnies in entity formation and general legal matters for start-up companies in the areas of Telehealth, Technology and International Trade.
Sam Y.
I am a Connecticut-licensed business attorney with over a decade of combined legal and business-operations experience, including roles as in-house counsel, Director of Operations & Compliance, and Director of Growth. I provide practical, business-focused legal solutions to entrepreneurs, small and mid-sized businesses, and investors who need a trusted advisor that understands both the legal and operational realities of running a company.
"Had great SaaS product legal knowledge and got me everything I needed."
Neil B.
Professional Experience Neil Belloff is an accomplished business lawyer with over 35 years of business and legal experience, including as Board Member, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary. After law school, Neil joined a boutique law firm in New York City and practiced as a litigator and corporate securities lawyer. Soon thereafter, Neil became a Senior Attorney-Advisor in the Division of Corporation Finance at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. responsible for reviewing 1933 Act and 1934 Act documents, coordinating projects with the EPA and DOL, overseeing bankruptcy, reorganization and work-outs, responding to Congressional inquiries, and providing assistance to other SEC divisions and the Department of Justice. Following his tenure with the government, Neil practiced with several NY-based law firms providing legal and business services to public and private enterprises focusing on securities, corporate, employment, IP, licensing, M&A, finance, governance, litigation, compliance and privacy matters. Neil became an in-house attorney in 2003 joining Deutsche Telekom, one of the largest telecommunications companies in the world, as Executive Vice President and US Securities and Corporate Counsel. He joined Celgene Corporation, a publicly listed global biopharmaceutical company, in 2010 and became General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of Eloxx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2018 (and Chief Operating Officer in 2020) and General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. in 2021. Neil went back to private practice in 2024. Neil has been lead counsel on dozens of IPOs (representing both issuers and underwriters) and multi-billion dollar M&A transactions. His practice includes licensing, structured finance, venture capital, risk assessment, corporate governance, legal and regulatory compliance, pharmaceutical development, and all aspects of corporate, securities, intellectual property, privacy and employment law. Education • J.D. - Quinnipiac University School of Law • LL.M. - Program in Securities Regulation at Georgetown University Law Center • M.A. - New York University • B.A. - Queens College of the City University of New York Admissions • New York, New Jersey, Connecticut • Southern District of New York • Eastern District of New York • District of Connecticut Publications • Frequent conference speaker (FEI, NACD, NIRI, ACC, PLI, MarcusEvans) • Co-authored chapter of NACD report on the Role of Directors in Strategic Planning, member of Blue Ribbon Commission of NACD • Authored various articles on securities, litigation and governance topics • Featured in Vanguard Law Magazine - https://www.vanguardlawmag.com/case-studies/neil-belloff-acorda-therapeutics/ Board Memberships • Former Board Member | Private computer network and software development company sold to NASDAQ listed company • Former Board Member | NASDAQ listed location-based entertainment company
"Responsive & professional turnaround. Would work with Neil again in the future!"
Frank G.
Accomplished business and litigation counsel with experience managing a broad spectrum of legal matters on behalf of individuals as well as early-stage and established technology, software, service and medical device companies. Substantial experience in drafting commercial agreements as well as litigation and arbitration of complex business disputes as plaintiff’s and defendant’s counsel. Served as infantry officer (attaining rank of Major) in ground combat units for the United States Marine Corps and educated in Marine Corps management and tactics. Adept at taking complicated information and legal principles and presenting strategy to non-lawyers in a concise and easy-to-understand format.
"Working with Frank is like going on a road trip with your best friend. You have more fun during the road trip than at your final destination. Frank told me a deadline and stayed with it, always being responsive to messages, with thick detail to reinforce his reasoning. When talking over the phone, Frank goes into great detail and paints the real picture of what to expect, in his experience, dealing with the court and judges. I would work with Frank again for future work."
Joe S.
I am a Connecticut-licensed attorney and transaction advisor with extensive experience in middle-market mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, and complex deal structuring. As the principal of Amirext LLC, I serve as lead counsel and strategic advisor to founders, boards, and investors, often working at the intersection of legal, financial, and operational decision-making.
"Joe was responsive, communicative and a real advocate for me. He was thorough with the work, and managed expectations very clearly. I would 100% hire Joe again, and may do so very soon."
July 17, 2023
Christine T.
Christine E. Taylor focuses her practice in the areas of Hospitality Law, Business Law, Labor and Employment Law, Real Estate Law, Administrative Law, Estate Law and Litigation. Ms. Taylor grew up within the campground industry, working at parks in both the Yogi Bear’s Jellystone Park Franchise and the Kampgrounds of America Franchise. Armed with two decades of experience, Ms. Taylor is quick to point out the legal issues that apply to outdoor hospitality business owners. She has provided a wide variety of services to campgrounds, RV Parks, and glamping venues, including seasonal licenses, waivers, employment contracts, real estate services and even litigation services as needed.
June 28, 2023
Heather B.
I currently focus on estate planning, uncontested divorces, mobile real estate closings, and contract review for small businesses after starting my firm after leaving my position a partner at a national law firm specializing in creditor rights and real property.
September 14, 2023
Rachel B.
I am a new attorney who is licensed to practice in Connecticut and Massachusetts. I am waiting for bar admission to North Carolina. I have over 20 year of experience working in both the public and private sectors. I am a fierce advocate for my clients and am committed to delivering solutions for clients with excellence.
Neil B.
Family Law attorney with focus on Divorce Mediation
August 23, 2025
Alexander C.
I am a solo practitioner that runs my own legal practice. I am currently licensed in 16 states and I'm working to expand that reach.
Monica T.
October 20, 2025
Monica T.
NYC based attorney of over 15 years in NY & CT who specializes in entertainment transactional law. 10 years as a general/in-house counsel in 2 entertainment companies and former indie film company executive as well as a creative professional (actress, singer, writer, model, blogger, podcast host/producer and beauty ambassador). Also have over 5 years of court appearance experience in various practice areas including foreclosure defense, bankruptcy, personal injury (plaintiff), immigration, consumer debt, etc.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowIntellectual Property Legal Questions and Answers
Intellectual Property
Trademark Transfer Agreement
Texas
What are the key provisions that should be included in a Trademark Transfer Agreement?
I am in the process of selling my business, which includes several registered trademarks, and I need guidance on drafting a comprehensive Trademark Transfer Agreement to ensure a smooth transfer of ownership and to protect my rights as the seller, as well as the buyer's rights to use the trademarks going forward. I want to understand the essential provisions that should be included in the agreement, such as the scope of the transfer, warranties, indemnification, and any necessary post-transfer obligations, to ensure both parties are fully protected and the transfer is legally valid.
Randy M.
When you're selling your business in Texas and that sale includes registered trademarks, getting the Trademark Transfer Agreement right isn’t just paperwork. It’s what protects you and the buyer from serious legal headaches. Here’s what you need to understand about how it all works and what to include. FIRST, THE LEGAL BASICS Let’s get clear on where the law comes into play. If your trademarks are registered with the USPTO, federal law applies, specifically 15 U.S.C. § 1060. If you’ve registered marks at the state level in Texas, those fall under Section 16.061 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code. A lot of businesses have federal trademarks, but some have both, and each needs to be handled the right way. Here’s a critical point: you can’t transfer a trademark by itself. Legally, it has to go with the goodwill tied to it. That means the reputation, customer trust, and market recognition associated with your brand. Courts take this seriously. If you try to assign a trademark without transferring the goodwill behind it, that assignment can be ruled invalid. The trademark has to stay connected to its original source, or the legal protection starts to fall apart. KEY PARTS OF THE AGREEMENT Identifying the Parties and Background Info Start simple. Spell out who’s selling and who’s buying, using full legal names and business addresses. Include a quick explanation in the recitals that you own the trademarks and plan to transfer them as part of the business sale. Detailed Trademark Descriptions List every trademark included in the transfer. For federal marks, include things like registration numbers, any pending application serial numbers, filing dates, and the international classes they fall under. For Texas marks, include the state registration numbers and any other relevant details. Don’t forget common law marks either. If you’ve been using a brand name or logo in business without registering it, it still has value and legal protection. The Assignment Clause Itself This is where the actual transfer happens. The language needs to make it crystal clear that you’re transferring all rights, title, and interest in the trademarks, and just as important, the goodwill that goes with them. That’s not optional. For federal trademarks, this clause has to meet the standard set by 15 U.S.C. § 1060. For Texas marks, the law requires that the transfer include “the goodwill of the business in which the mark is used.” Be sure to include language that talks about transferring the reputation, customer recognition, and market value of the marks. That’s what keeps the assignment legally valid. Purchase Price and Who Pays for What Spell out what the trademarks are worth as part of the overall deal. If the value is rolled into the full business sale price, say that clearly. Also note who’s responsible for any filing fees with the USPTO or Texas Secretary of State, legal costs, and whether there’s any money going into escrow. Warranties and Representations You’ll need to confirm that you’re the sole owner of the trademarks, that they’re valid and enforceable, and that there are no liens, disputes, or infringement claims you know of. You can qualify some of these with “to the best of your knowledge,” especially if you're not sure about everything. The buyer will also need to make some promises, like having the ability to maintain and protect the trademarks going forward. Indemnification Terms This is how you divide up risk. You should agree to cover any trademark issues that started before the sale, such as pending legal disputes or past infringement claims. The buyer takes on anything that happens after the transfer. Be sure to include who will handle any legal defense and how costs are covered. What Happens After the Sale You’ll probably need to sign additional paperwork later to finalize the transfer, especially for filing purposes. You also need to agree to stop using the trademarks after closing. If you’re going to help the buyer with trademark maintenance or recordation, lay that out clearly. Cooperation after closing is often what makes the legal side go smoothly. WHAT IF THERE'S A TRANSITION PERIOD? If you’ll still be involved in operations temporarily or helping during a handoff, add quality control provisions. This matters because if the buyer is using the trademark on the same goods or services you used to provide, the quality needs to stay consistent. Without oversight during that period, trademark rights can actually be lost. That’s called naked licensing, and it’s something you want to avoid at all costs. RECORDING THE ASSIGNMENT Federal Marks To make the transfer legally solid, you’ll need to record it through the USPTO Assignment Center. Right now, it costs $40 for the first trademark and $25 for each additional one in the same document. You have three months from the assignment date to record it to protect against third-party claims. Texas Marks For state trademarks, the process goes through the Texas Secretary of State. The fee is $25, and Texas gives you 90 days to record the assignment. That’s different from the federal timeline, so don’t mix them up. Common Law Marks Since these aren’t registered anywhere, there’s no official filing to do. Just make sure your agreement clearly spells out the transfer and ties it to goodwill. That’s your legal foundation for common law marks. A FEW EXTRA LEGAL PROTECTIONS Include standard contract language too, such as Texas law as the governing law, a venue for disputes, integration clauses, and a method for resolving disagreements. You might want to get the agreement notarized. It’s not legally required in Texas, but it adds a layer of security. If you're staying involved during the transition and helping the buyer keep up with trademark deadlines, make sure that’s written into the deal. COMMON PITFALLS TO AVOID Don’t treat all your trademarks the same. Some may be federal, some state, and some common law. They each need different handling. And never forget the goodwill piece. Without it, your trademark transfer isn’t valid. Also, make sure you stay on top of deadlines. You have three months to record federal assignments and 90 days for Texas. Missing either one could leave the buyer exposed to claims from someone else down the road. THE FINAL ANALYSIS Getting this agreement right helps avoid future disputes and protects the trademark value you’ve built over time. Trademarks are often one of the most valuable pieces of a business, so it’s worth taking the time to spell out exactly what’s being transferred, what the responsibilities are, and what happens next. Because trademark law is detailed and the consequences of mistakes can be serious, it’s smart to work with an experienced IP attorney. They’ll help you match the agreement to your specific situation and avoid costly errors. Mistakes in this area can lead to total loss of rights. If you've built a brand worth selling, make sure it's protected when you pass it on.
Intellectual Property
Invention Assignment Agreement
Texas
Can you please explain the scope and implications of an Invention Assignment Agreement?
I am an employee at a technology company, and I have been asked to sign an Invention Assignment Agreement as a condition of my employment. I understand that this agreement is meant to assign any intellectual property or inventions I create during my employment to the company, but I am unsure about the specific extent of this assignment. I am concerned about whether this agreement applies to all inventions, even those created outside of work hours or unrelated to my job, and whether I would have any rights or ownership in these inventions. I would like a lawyer's guidance to understand the scope and implications of this agreement before signing it.
Jennifer B.
The terms of your specific agreement are the most important factors to consider. In general, an invention assignment agreement usually means that an employee gives the company any ideas or inventions they come up with while working. The rules can vary by agreement, but they often cover ideas made during work hours, using company resources, or related to the company’s business. In Texas, an agreement can apply to inventions made outside of work hours if they’re related to the company’s business or came from work the company assigned. In one case, the agreement said the employee had to give up all inventions made during or after regular work hours, whether on or off the job, if they were related to the company’s business or came from work the company assigned. Usually, an invention assignment agreement doesn’t apply to ideas that aren’t related to the employee’s job unless the agreement says otherwise. In Atlas Brick Co. v. North, 2 S.W.2d 980, the court said that the title to an invention wouldn’t belong to the employer unless the agreement said that ideas made and perfected under the employee’s contract of employment belong to the employer. Also, if a discovery is made outside the scope and purpose of employment, it belongs to the employee unless there’s an agreement to give up such inventions to the employer. So, it all depends on the terms of the invention assignment agreement. In the case of Halliburton Energy Servs. v. Axis Techs., LLC, the agreement required the employee to turn over all materials related to inventions created during employment, making them the company’s property. But, if the agreement doesn’t cover certain inventions or if the inventions are made outside the scope of employment without using company resources, the employee might still retain ownership.
Intellectual Property
Copyright Search
Texas
Is it necessary to conduct a copyright search before using a specific image for commercial purposes?
I am a freelance graphic designer and I recently came across a striking image that I would like to incorporate into a client's commercial project. However, I want to ensure that I am not infringing on any copyright laws. I have heard about copyright searches, but I am unsure if they are necessary or if there are any potential legal consequences for using an image without conducting such a search. I want to make sure I am taking the necessary precautions to protect myself and my client from any legal issues.
Randy M.
When you’re preparing work for a client, the key issue isn’t whether you’ve run a formal copyright search, but whether you have the legal right to use the image. Copyright law automatically protects most images, so relying on the absence of a watermark or a registration record isn’t enough to keep you safe. Copyright Protection and Ownership Under U.S. law, copyright attaches the moment an original work is created and fixed in a tangible form (17 U.S.C. § 102). That means virtually every photo, illustration, or graphic you find online is already protected. Registration with the U.S. Copyright Office strengthens enforcement rights, but it isn’t required for protection. Likewise, the lack of a © symbol doesn’t mean an image is free to use. Because there’s no central database covering all copyrighted images, a formal copyright search isn’t practical or reliable in most cases. Even if you searched the Copyright Office’s records, you’d only be looking at registered works, which are a small fraction of what’s actually protected. Risks of Using Unlicensed Images If you incorporate an image without permission into a commercial project, you and your client could face serious consequences. Infringement can lead to cease-and-desist orders, statutory damages of $750 to $30,000 per work (and up to $150,000 for willful infringement) under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), and potential liability for the copyright holder’s attorney’s fees. Courts generally view commercial use as disfavoring any “fair use” defense. Even if you didn’t intend to infringe, liability can still be imposed. Best Practices for Designers The best practice is to focus on obtaining images from sources where the licensing terms are clear and legally sound. For example: • Use reputable stock photo agencies such as Adobe Stock, Shutterstock, or Getty, where commercial licenses are explicit. • Choose Creative Commons images that allow commercial use (e.g., CC BY or CC0), but review license terms carefully. • Confirm public domain status when applicable, such as U.S. federal government works. • Contact creators directly for written permission if you want to use their work. • Keep copies of receipts, license agreements, or permission letters so you can show proof of rights if challenged. Reverse image search tools like Google Images or TinEye can be useful to trace the origin of an image and identify whether it’s sold or licensed by a third party. However, this is a step in due diligence, not a substitute for obtaining rights. Professional Responsibility As a freelance designer, your contracts may hold you responsible for ensuring that the materials you deliver don’t infringe anyone else’s rights. Delivering work that exposes your client to infringement claims can damage your reputation and your client relationship. The safest practice is to assume that any image you didn’t create yourself is protected until you confirm otherwise and secure the proper license.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property Rights Agreement
New York
What are the key provisions to include in an Employee IP Agreement?
I am a startup founder and I recently hired a few employees to work on developing our software. While we have a general employment agreement in place, I am concerned about protecting the intellectual property (IP) rights of the company, particularly the software they will be creating. I would like to know what key provisions should be included in an Employee IP Agreement to ensure that the company retains ownership of the IP developed by the employees.
Randy M.
Here’s how I’d approach structuring an Employee IP Agreement if your goal is to protect your company’s intellectual property without running into enforceability issues under U.S. law. Covering Core IP OwnershipCovering Core IP Ownership First, start with a “work made for hire” clause. It’s a good foundation, but it’s not enough on its own. Under U.S. copyright law (17 U.S.C. § 101), only certain types of work qualify as “made for hire,” and many employee-created assets may fall outside that definition. So you’ll want to pair it with a present-tense assignment clause. Be specific here. Use language like “the employee hereby assigns” rather than “will assign.” That slight shift matters. It ensures the company owns the rights immediately when the work is created. Also, define “intellectual property” broadly. Don’t just list patents or source code. Include software, algorithms, documentation, trade secrets, databases, and anything tied to your business. The scope should clearly include anything created during work hours, using company tools or systems, or connected to your current or future business operations. Disclosure and Documentation You’ll want to require employees to promptly disclose any inventions or creative works they produce. Put it in writing. This gives your company the chance to evaluate whether the work is covered under the agreement. It’s also a good idea to require them to maintain proper documentation. Accurate records can make a real difference in patent filings or if a dispute ever comes up. Pre-Existing IP and Legal Carve-Outs There should be a section where employees list anything they’ve developed or own before joining the company. If they don’t list anything, the agreement should include language confirming they’re representing that no such prior inventions exist. This prevents claims down the road that something developed during employment was actually theirs from before. Now, depending on your state, you may need to include statutory carve-outs. California, Illinois, and Washington all have laws that limit how far IP assignment clauses can go. For example, in California, you’re required to carve out inventions developed entirely on the employee’s own time, without company resources, and unrelated to your business (see California Labor Code § 2870). Without that carve-out, your entire assignment provision could be thrown out. Confidentiality Obligations Make sure there’s a strong confidentiality section. This should cover source code, technical documentation, designs, product plans, customer lists, financial data, and anything else proprietary. Make it clear that the obligation continues even after the employee leaves. You’ll also want to require that all company property and digital assets are returned at the end of employment, including devices, credentials, and files. Ongoing Cooperation and Enforcement Mechanisms Include a clause requiring employees to cooperate in IP protection efforts even after they leave. That could mean signing patent paperwork or providing testimony if needed. To make that enforceable, add a power of attorney clause. This gives the company the authority to act on the employee’s behalf if they’re unwilling or unreachable. It’s a simple way to prevent delays when you’re trying to secure or enforce rights. It’s also smart to include a waiver of moral rights where allowed. This is especially useful for creative works and software. It gives the company full freedom to modify or use the work without needing future approval. Legal Remedies and General Terms Be clear that the company can pursue equitable relief, like an injunction, if there’s a violation. Sometimes monetary damages aren’t enough to prevent harm. Include a severability clause so that if one part of the agreement is invalidated, the rest still stand. Don’t forget to specify the governing law and venue for any disputes. As for restrictive covenants, keep in mind that non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California and heavily restricted elsewhere. Non-solicitation clauses may still be allowed, but they need to be narrowly written. You should have your legal team confirm their enforceability based on your state. Finally, think about consideration. For new hires, the job offer itself usually counts. But for existing employees, you’ll likely need to offer something extra, like a bonus or promotion, to make the agreement stick.
Intellectual Property
Trademark
Massachusetts
Can I trademark the name of my software?
Can I trademark the name of my software if the same name is already trademarked in a different country/state? I am starting up a FinTech company right now and I am trying to trademark the name of my mobile app; however, after some searching, I realized that a company in the UK has already trademarked the same name. It is also a company that makes a mobile app in the FinTech industry - just in a different area of interest. Are there any suggestions for how I would go about trademarking the name of my software, or do I have to come up with a different name?
Roman V.
Yes, it's generally possible to trademark the name of your software, as long as it is not a generic name or descriptive of the product. You should also do a clearance search to make sure no other company is using the same or similar name for similar services. I would be glad to discuss more details and help with the trademark process. Thanks.
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
- Austin Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Chicago Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Dallas Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Denver Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Los Angeles Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Phoenix Intellectual Property Lawyers
- San Diego Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Tampa Intellectual Property Lawyers
Intellectual Property lawyers by nearby cities
- Bridgeport Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Hartford Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Stamford Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Waterbury Intellectual Property Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer