Intellectual Property Lawyers for Honolulu, Hawaii

Here’s how I’d approach structuring an Employee IP Agreement if your goal is to protect your company’s intellectual property without running into enforceability issues under U.S. law. Covering Core IP OwnershipCovering Core IP Ownership First, start with a “work made for hire” clause. It’s a good foundation, but it’s not enough on its own. Under U.S. copyright law (17 U.S.C. § 101), only certain types of work qualify as “made for hire,” and many employee-created assets may fall outside that definition. So you’ll want to pair it with a present-tense assignment clause. Be specific here. Use language like “the employee hereby assigns” rather than “will assign.” That slight shift matters. It ensures the company owns the rights immediately when the work is created. Also, define “intellectual property” broadly. Don’t just list patents or source code. Include software, algorithms, documentation, trade secrets, databases, and anything tied to your business. The scope should clearly include anything created during work hours, using company tools or systems, or connected to your current or future business operations. Disclosure and Documentation You’ll want to require employees to promptly disclose any inventions or creative works they produce. Put it in writing. This gives your company the chance to evaluate whether the work is covered under the agreement. It’s also a good idea to require them to maintain proper documentation. Accurate records can make a real difference in patent filings or if a dispute ever comes up. Pre-Existing IP and Legal Carve-Outs There should be a section where employees list anything they’ve developed or own before joining the company. If they don’t list anything, the agreement should include language confirming they’re representing that no such prior inventions exist. This prevents claims down the road that something developed during employment was actually theirs from before. Now, depending on your state, you may need to include statutory carve-outs. California, Illinois, and Washington all have laws that limit how far IP assignment clauses can go. For example, in California, you’re required to carve out inventions developed entirely on the employee’s own time, without company resources, and unrelated to your business (see California Labor Code § 2870). Without that carve-out, your entire assignment provision could be thrown out. Confidentiality Obligations Make sure there’s a strong confidentiality section. This should cover source code, technical documentation, designs, product plans, customer lists, financial data, and anything else proprietary. Make it clear that the obligation continues even after the employee leaves. You’ll also want to require that all company property and digital assets are returned at the end of employment, including devices, credentials, and files. Ongoing Cooperation and Enforcement Mechanisms Include a clause requiring employees to cooperate in IP protection efforts even after they leave. That could mean signing patent paperwork or providing testimony if needed. To make that enforceable, add a power of attorney clause. This gives the company the authority to act on the employee’s behalf if they’re unwilling or unreachable. It’s a simple way to prevent delays when you’re trying to secure or enforce rights. It’s also smart to include a waiver of moral rights where allowed. This is especially useful for creative works and software. It gives the company full freedom to modify or use the work without needing future approval. Legal Remedies and General Terms Be clear that the company can pursue equitable relief, like an injunction, if there’s a violation. Sometimes monetary damages aren’t enough to prevent harm. Include a severability clause so that if one part of the agreement is invalidated, the rest still stand. Don’t forget to specify the governing law and venue for any disputes. As for restrictive covenants, keep in mind that non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California and heavily restricted elsewhere. Non-solicitation clauses may still be allowed, but they need to be narrowly written. You should have your legal team confirm their enforceability based on your state. Finally, think about consideration. For new hires, the job offer itself usually counts. But for existing employees, you’ll likely need to offer something extra, like a bonus or promotion, to make the agreement stick.

Hello, I'd be glad to review the details of the trademark assignment and confirm it properly transfers ownership of your trademark. As a trademark attorney, I have helped clients in similar situations both draft trademark assignments and record them with the USPTO to ensure that the trademark reflects the right ownership information. I would be happy to have a brief free 15 minute consult call to learn more details and see how I can help. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Roman rvayner@vaynerlegal.com 414 628 9099 www.vaynerlegal.com

Hello! Thank you for posting this question. In your case, the other party may claim that you are infringing on their trademark, but proving it is a different case. The Lanham Act provides for a cause of action for infringement of both registered and unregistered trademarks. (15 USC Section 1114(1)(a); 15 USC Section 1125(a)(1)A).)  The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has laid out some elements to help determine whether it creates an infringement lawsuit. 1. The complaining party has to prove they have a valid, protectable trademark and that they own that trademark; 2. The complaining party must prove that a mark is similar, and it was used without the consent of the moving party in a manner that is likely to cause confusion among ordinary consumers as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the goods.  The likelihood of confusion can occur at the time of the sale, when there is initial interest by a consumer, or even after the sale, if the confusion causes a consumer to no longer buy a service or product connected to the mark. The court considers things like the strength of the original mark, whether you are using it for some fair use purpose, the similarity, the proximity of the products and marketing channels, whether there’s actual confusion, the defendant’s intent, the quality of respective products, and the sophistication of the customers. (Polaroid Corp. v. Polard Elecs. Corp. 287, F.2d. 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961.) So what this means is that it'd have to be litigated, but you can argue you are not trying to sell products or services using their mark, but rather you are using it for some other purpose, such as to educate people about their business practices. Best of luck!

A Patent Assignment Agreement transfers ownership of an invention or patent rights from the inventor, known as the assignor, to another party, often a company serving as the assignee. To protect your business and ensure enforceability, the agreement should cover specific provisions that make the transfer clear, complete, and legally sound. What Is the Core Assignment Clause? The assignment clause is the heart of the agreement. It should use present-tense language such as “hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys all right, title, and interest.” Courts and the USPTO treat this as an immediate transfer, while “will assign” is only a future promise. The clause should also cover continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part applications, along with reissues, reexaminations, and foreign filings. What Rights Should Be Transferred? The assignee should receive the full bundle of rights granted under 35 U.S.C. § 154, including the right to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import, and license the invention. The agreement should also transfer the right to sue for past, present, and future infringement, so the company can recover damages even for activity that occurred before the assignment was signed. Do You Need Consideration? Every contract requires consideration, and patent assignments are no different. Even if the transfer is to your own company, the agreement should recite consideration. This can be nominal, such as “ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration,” or it can be tied to equity or to your role as founder. How Should the Patent Be Identified? The intellectual property should be identified with precision. If a patent has issued, include the number and issue date. For pending applications, list the application number, filing date, and invention title. If no application has been filed yet, provide a detailed description and later update the record once official filing details exist. What Warranties and Representations Are Common? The assignor should warrant ownership of the rights, authority to assign, and absence of liens or conflicting assignments. Over-warranting should be avoided. Do not guarantee novelty or validity, since those are determined by the USPTO and courts. Be cautious about warranting sole inventorship unless you are certain no other inventors contributed, since misstatements on inventorship can create validity problems. What Other Provisions Should Be Included? Other common provisions include further assurances requiring the inventor to assist with future filings, litigation, or USPTO actions, a limited power of attorney for patent prosecution and enforcement, and improvements clauses that attempt to capture future modifications or developments. Improvements provisions must be drafted carefully, as vague scope language can lead to disputes. The agreement should also address corporate authority, ensuring the company has approval under bylaws or state law before accepting the assignment. What Administrative Details Matter? The agreement should contain standard contract terms such as governing law, entire agreement, amendment requirements, successors and assigns, and dispute resolution through arbitration or mediation. Both the inventor and the company should sign, and notarization is advisable because it makes USPTO recordation smoother. Do You Need to Record with the USPTO? After execution, the assignment should be recorded with the USPTO through the Electronic Patent Assignment System. Recordation should occur promptly after execution to establish clear priority and maintain a clean chain of title. While recordation is not required for validity between the parties, it protects ownership against third-party claims. The USPTO currently charges little or no fee for electronic filings, so this step is inexpensive and essential. Should You Assign or License? An assignment transfers complete ownership, which investors generally expect. A license keeps ownership with the inventor while granting defined rights to the company. Licensing may be useful when the inventor wants to retain control, license the technology to multiple companies, or test the market before giving up ownership. For most startups, assignment is the preferred approach. What About Tax Considerations? Assignments can have tax consequences, especially when IP is transferred for equity or other forms of consideration. Professional tax advice is essential to evaluate both immediate tax effects and ongoing obligations. This is particularly important if the company later earns royalties or sells the patent. What Are the Next Steps? The implementation process should include drafting the agreement with qualified legal counsel, executing it with proper corporate authority and notarization where possible, recording it promptly with the USPTO using EPAS, and consulting a tax professional to address both the transfer itself and any ongoing obligations. If you need help drafting or reviewing a Patent Assignment Agreement, the attorneys on Contracts Counsel can guide you through the process so that your company’s rights are fully protected.

It would be a good idea for you to have the agreement reviewed by an attorney. You said there's no explicit language regarding termination or notice - is there something implied? With no language regarding termination, most likely either party can terminate at any time, with just a moment's notice, and no reason given. You have asked a lot of questions - I suggest that you post a project here on Contracts Counsel, and ask for an attorney well versed in intellectual property (not me) to discuss your rights, as that is probably the most important issue. An attorney who can also review the language of the entire agreement would be very helpful. (I'm sorry, but I'm not available for this project).