Intellectual Property Lawyers for Peoria, Illinois

Although not necessarily required, the parties to an asset purchase agreement oftentimes find that it is in their best interests to work with a knowledgeable intellectual property attorney. The attorney can negotiate and draft the parts of the agreement that pertain specifically to intellectual property. The attorney can also assist with the parts of the agreement that do not appear to affect intellectual property but have the potential to. If you are considering an asset purchase agreement that involves intellectual property, you should also consider hiring an intellectual property attorney.

Hi. If the Creative Commons License that you mentioned (CC BY-NC 4.0) does not allow for commercial usage, using that content commercially would violate the license. If you tranform the work sufficiently, you could potentially use it without violating the terms of the license.

Whether you need a Work For Hire Agreement really depends on the project and what both sides are trying to get out of it. You’re not automatically required to sign one, but saying yes or no to that clause can completely change who owns the work and what rights you’ll have moving forward. Just because a client calls something “work for hire” in a contract doesn’t mean it actually qualifies under the law, especially when it comes to freelance design work. Here’s the thing. Under U.S. copyright law, “work made for hire” is a specific exception to the general rule that the creator owns the work. For a freelance project to qualify, two conditions have to be met. First, both parties need to sign a written agreement that says the work is considered “made for hire.” Second, the type of work has to fall into one of nine defined categories under 17 U.S.C. § 101. These include things like contributions to collective works, audiovisual pieces, instructional texts, or compilations. The list is pretty narrow. Standard marketing materials, logos, brochures, or campaign graphics usually don’t make the cut. Courts take a strict approach here, so just checking a box in a contract doesn’t magically make it enforceable. If your project doesn’t meet both requirements, labeling it “work for hire” doesn’t hold legal weight. In that case, the default is that you, the designer, own the copyright unless there’s a separate written agreement transferring it to the client. That leads us to ownership. If there’s no valid Work For Hire clause and no assignment of rights, you retain full copyright. That gives you control over how the work is used beyond whatever license you’ve granted. So if you created a logo and the contract only licenses it for digital use, the client can’t later slap it on T-shirts or license it to a partner without getting your permission first. But if there is a valid Work For Hire clause or an explicit copyright assignment, then the client becomes the legal owner. That means they can use it, change it, resell it, or do whatever they want with it, without needing to pay you again or ask for further approval. You’d have no say over how the work is used, and unless the agreement gives you permission, you wouldn’t even be able to include it in your portfolio. If you want more flexibility, there are alternatives. You can structure the deal with a copyright assignment that still reserves certain rights for you. For example, you could keep the right to show the work in your portfolio or limit resale to direct competitors. Or you could stick with licensing. An exclusive license gives the client broad rights but you still own the work. A non-exclusive license is more limited and usually makes sense for templates or assets used with multiple clients. Portfolio rights, by the way, are often negotiable. Even in exclusive arrangements, you can add a clause that lets you show the work on your website, social profiles, or print materials. Just make sure it’s clearly spelled out. Some corporate clients won’t allow it at all unless it’s written into the agreement. From a practical standpoint, your decision should take into account how much you’re getting paid, how the work will be used, and whether you want to reuse or showcase it later. If you’re giving up all rights, price accordingly. Clients pushing for Work For Hire terms often just want clean, uncomplicated ownership, especially for branding or long-term use. But that doesn’t mean you can’t negotiate. You might agree to transfer ownership only after full payment is received. You might keep the right to use rejected drafts. You might even allow Work For Hire treatment for the final deliverables but retain some creative rights behind the scenes. Also, keep an eye out for boilerplate clauses. Some clients include Work For Hire language by default, not realizing their project doesn’t meet the legal standard. Just because it’s in the contract doesn’t make it enforceable. If the work doesn’t meet the criteria, the clause won’t hold unless there’s a separate valid assignment of rights. When in doubt, it’s smart to run the agreement by an attorney who understands copyright law and freelance creative work. Contracts Counsel connects you with attorneys who handle exactly this kind of issue.

As a legal entity, a joint venture (JV) can own a patent. Given the temporary nature of JVs and the fact that there will be multiple owners of any patents, there is a complex mix of intellectual property (IP) ownership rights, dispute resolution, and enforcement issues that need to be agreed upon in order to properly protect everyone's intellectual property rights. Consideration will need to be given to what IP ownership and rights will look like during and after the JV and it may be easier to have both companies listed as the patent authors for inventions from the outset (versus naming the JV as the author). A joint IP agreement is the best solution to outline the rights of each party, the process for developing patentable technologies sufficient to be a patent author, filing and prosecuting patents, and future licensing and exploitation of the patent.

You’re not the first to confuse a KISS Note with intellectual property protection, and you definitely won’t be the last. It’s a common mix-up in the startup world. But here’s the truth: A KISS Note has nothing to do with protecting your software. It’s a financing instrument created by 500 Startups, designed as an alternative to convertible notes and SAFEs for early-stage fundraising. It’s a way for investors to give you money now in exchange for equity later. It does not offer any legal protection for your code or ideas. So What Do You Actually Need to Protect Your IP? If you're building software in California, there are several key legal tools you’ll want to have in place. Start with the ones that offer immediate protection and work your way toward longer-term strategies. Always Start with NDAs If you're showing your software to anyone (whether it's a co-founder, a contractor, an investor, or a beta tester) you need a solid non-disclosure agreement in place before you share anything. It’s your first line of defense, especially if you want to preserve trade secret protection. Your NDA should spell out exactly what you consider confidential. This might include your source code, algorithms, user data, business plans, or any other proprietary information. The agreement should also state how long confidentiality lasts and what the other party can and cannot do with your information. One important note here: California law prohibits non-compete clauses under Business and Professions Code Section 16600. Do not include one in your NDA. It won't be enforceable. Instead, focus strictly on confidentiality and use limitations. Copyright is Automatic, but Registration Matters As soon as you write your code, it’s protected under federal copyright law. That protection applies to the actual expression (the specific code) not to your underlying ideas, functionality, or algorithms. Even though protection is automatic, registering with the U.S. Copyright Office gives you significant legal benefits. You can’t file a federal lawsuit without registration. And if your copyright is registered before infringement occurs, you may be eligible for statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work and recovery of attorney’s fees. The process usually costs between $65 and $85 and takes a few months. Trade Secrets Require Real Effort to Stay Protected If your software includes proprietary algorithms, confidential processes, or unique technical methods that provide a competitive edge, you may be eligible for trade secret protection under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act. But here’s the catch. That protection only lasts as long as you actively protect the information. This includes limiting access to your source code, using secure development environments, marking documents as confidential, and having everyone involved sign NDAs. You need to treat your trade secrets like actual secrets if you want the law to do the same. Considering Patents? Proceed Carefully Software patents are complex, especially following the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice decision. You can’t patent abstract ideas, mathematical formulas, or generic computer processes. Your software needs to solve a specific technical problem in a novel, non-obvious way or improve the functionality of a computer system itself. If you've developed something truly unique — like a new data compression algorithm, a better machine learning architecture, or a new way to optimize networking — a patent might be worth exploring. Just keep in mind that the process is expensive, often costing $10,000 to $15,000 with legal fees. It can also take several years. Many software companies choose to rely on trade secrets and copyrights instead. How to Put All of This Into Practice Begin with what you can implement right away. Create a strong NDA template and use it consistently. Register your copyright as soon as your codebase is developed enough to be meaningful. Protect your trade secrets by putting real technical and legal safeguards in place. Track your development process carefully. Version control, timestamps, and contributor logs can all serve as useful evidence in a legal dispute. If you’re working with employees or contractors in California, be especially cautious. The state has employee-friendly laws, so your contracts must clearly state that all work product belongs to your company and that all confidential information stays confidential. When Should You Talk to a Lawyer? Once you’re dealing with patents, investor negotiations, infringement threats, or user data privacy, it’s time to bring in professional legal help. These are complex areas, and the risks are too high to wing it.