Intellectual Property Lawyers for Cambridge, Massachusetts
Need an intellectual property lawyer in Cambridge, Massachusetts?
ContractsCounsel matches businesses with Cambridge-based intellectual property lawyers, providing fixed-fee quotes from vetted attorneys with the first proposal typically arriving in just a few hours.
Hire a Lawyer for 60% Less than Traditional Law Firms
Meet some of our Cambridge Intellectual Property Lawyers
Leonid G.
I have been practicing law since 2018. I used to be a litigator at a nationwide practice before going in-house at a fintech company. I have experience drafting NDAs, SaaS contracts, service agreements, and stock purchase agreements.
"I highly recommend working with Leonid for any of your legal needs. Leonid clearly explained the process step by step, made sure to take the time to fully understand my case, and fought hard on our behalf. Hiring Leonid to represent my business not only made the entire process a lot less stressful, but also resulted in saving us some money on our settlement. Thanks again for all the help!"
John M.
John Mercer is a distinguished corporate counsel who is well-known for turning legal challenges into strategic assets. He possesses a deep understanding and expertise in intellectual property (IP), compliance, and corporate law, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. His proficiency lies in transforming legal complexities into strategic advantages, ensuring operational excellence, and driving innovation forward. John excels at safeguarding an organization's legal interests and integrity, ensuring operations adhere to the law. As a strategic leader, John excels at safeguarding an organization’s legal interests and integrity, ensuring operations adhere to the law. He also brings immense value to his profession through his skills in drafting, negotiating, and managing significant agreements that secure organizational interests with widespread industry impact. His unparalleled expertise in legal advisories significantly enhances compliance and develops risk management frameworks that protect and advance company ambitions. Moreover, John's command over patent and trademark portfolios, alongside his ability to drive innovation initiatives and design incentive schemes, substantially bolsters intellectual property prowess. John's areas of expertise are extensive, covering skills vital to corporate law, legal contract negotiations, material transfer agreements, and more. He is particularly adept in regulatory compliance, legal consulting, clinical trials, biotechnology, patents, and patent portfolio analysis, to name a few. His leadership is complemented by active listening, analytical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and other soft skills that make him a leader and visionary.
"Thank you John, I appreciate your very personal effort with quality and practicality in mind."
Bruce H.
Experienced patent attorney supporting a variety of technologies.
"Smooth and straightforward provisional filing, even as a foreign-based inventor. Clear communication and prompt filing. Highly recommended."
Stephen R.
Steve Reich is licensed to practice in both New York and Massachusetts and is based in Boston. He assists with environmental litigation and other complex litigation and heads the firm's intellectual property practice, including copyright and trademark registration and protection. Other practice areas include commercial contract drafting and civil litigation.
"Stephen was responsive, clear, and candid. He turned the work around quickly, welcomed my input, and offered honest, practical advice throughout. I would gladly hire him again."
December 12, 2023
Alexis L.
I am an attorney in Michigan. I attended Boston College for my undergraduate degree and Suffolk University Law School for my law degree. I have been practicing law for over 20 years.
December 13, 2023
James S.
Business and Real Property
January 2, 2024
Elaine T.
Trusted Intellectual Property Attorney, Advisor and Strategic Partner
June 3, 2024
Colin M.
Experienced attorney with a substantial history of crafting, evaluating, and bargaining multimillion-dollar commercial and government contracts across diverse sectors, encompassing the US Army, DoD contractors, employee benefits, NASDAQ, Pharmaceuticals, and Finance.
Mark L.
I worked in the Intellectual Property Group at Fidelity Investments for almost 25 years, including managing the group from 2017-2021. I managed and developed the same high-performing group of three legal professionals from 2007-2021. Early in my career at Fidelity, I focused primarily on trademark matters, including trademark searching and clearance, as well as enforcement of trademark rights. In fact, I created Fidelity's trademark and brand protection programs and advanced them over more than two decades, eventually bringing the domestic trademark portfolio in-house and realizing savings of well over $2 million in outside counsel expenses for searching, prosecution and maintenance of US registrations from 2008-2021. Fidelity put me through law school, and I continued working full time while attending law school at night over four years. Upon graduation and passing the bar in 2006, I was promoted to an attorney position effective 1/1/2007. My practice broadened, and I began working on more transactional matters. I became a key transactional attorney for major technology groups and businesses within Fidelity, and negotiated numerous mission critical tech deals, transforming Fidelity's business. I provided transactional and IP support for Fidelity's software development and services affiliate in Ireland, and worked extensively with many of Fidelity's other foreign affiliates. Fidelity's General Counsel handpicked me to provide transactional and IP support to a new business initiative in 2017. That initiative became fintech startup Akoya, LLC, a paradigm-shifting business that enables secure, customer-controlled sharing of personal financial information between financial institutions and service providers. I developed template agreements between Akoya and data providers (financial institutions) and also between Akoya and data recipients (e.g. tax preparation services and financial advisors). Akoya had matured enough to be spun out by Fidelity in early 2020 to a consortium of financial services companies. In 2021, Fidelity offered a voluntary buyout to long-tenured associates, and following the pandemic, coupled with the financial and health benefits included in the package, it was an offer I could not refuse. Days later, my elderly father-in-law broke his hip, and my wife and I became his primary caregivers. It's been a blessing that I was able to contribute to his care and alleviate some of the burden on my wife. He is now in a long-term care facility, and I am eager to return to work as in-house counsel, whether on a contract basis, part time or full time. I did work briefly as a sole practitioner in 2021 and 2022, primarily helping friends, family and pro bono clients with NDAs, business formation issues, consulting agreements and license agreements. From August 2022 - July 2023, I was on the staff of Flex by Fenwick, an in-house counsel on demand business that is a subsidiary of the IP firm Fenwick & West, but did not get any engagements. My wife and I have volunteered for over a year with a dog rescue, Last Hope K9 Rescue, and have fostered several dogs, and adopted two of them!
June 6, 2024
Michael P.
I have been licensed since 2006 and have extensive experience in family law, personal injury, criminal law, and general litigation. I have a solo practice and I am seeking new opportunities.
John L.
I have been practising law for over 30 years. I have extensive legal experience in contract disputes and drafting demand letters. I have been lead counsel in over 100 civil and criminal jury trials and have extensive litigation stradegy knowledge. I belive my experience would be of great benefit to any prospective client.
July 26, 2024
Matthew S.
I am a business, Internet, and intellectual property lawyer. My practice is split between both transactional work and litigation. Prior to law school, I earned a master’s degree in computer science, which gives me the background and experience to understand technology, software, and the Internet better than most attorneys, and so my practice focuses on these areas. However, I represent clients in almost any industry, including real estate, construction, medicine, service, and consumer products.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowIntellectual Property Legal Questions and Answers
Intellectual Property
Content Licensing Agreement
Massachusetts
What are the legal implications and requirements for licensing internet content?
I run a small online business where I create and sell digital content such as videos, images, and written articles. Recently, I've been approached by a few potential buyers who are interested in licensing my content for their own websites and projects. However, I'm unsure about the legal aspects of content licensing on the internet, such as the rights I should grant, limitations, and any necessary agreements or contracts. I want to ensure that I protect my intellectual property while also allowing others to use it in a fair and legal manner, so I need guidance on the legal implications and requirements for licensing internet content.
Randy M.
Running a digital content licensing business in Massachusetts actually gives you a solid legal foundation. That said, there are a few important nuances you’ll want to keep in mind. Let’s walk through the full picture, including a few new developments that could impact how you operate. COPYRIGHT IS YOUR STARTING POINT The moment you create something, whether it's videos, images, or written content, it's automatically protected under federal copyright law. That gives you the exclusive right to decide how your work is used, copied, displayed, or modified. And in Massachusetts, there's no broad business license requirement for this type of work. Licensing intellectual property typically just falls under basic business registration. If you're serious about protecting your content, registering your copyrights with the U.S. Copyright Office is a smart move. Without registration, you’re limited to proving actual damages if someone infringes. That's often a costly uphill battle. But with registration, especially if it's done before the infringement occurs or within 3 months of publishing, you open the door to statutory damages ranging from $750 to $30,000 per work. If the infringement is willful, that number can go as high as $150,000. You may also be able to recover attorney’s fees. The filing fee is small, $45 for a single-author online submission or $65 for standard applications, and the legal protection it offers is substantial. One key legal detail: Exclusive licenses must be in writing under 17 U.S.C. § 204 to be enforceable. Non-exclusive licenses do not have that requirement, but oral agreements are harder to prove and much riskier to rely on. Also, keep in mind that exclusive licenses can be recorded with the U.S. Copyright Office. Doing so helps establish priority over competing claims and can strengthen your position in disputes. YOUR LICENSING AGREEMENTS MATTER This is where your business becomes real. Your licensing contracts should be in writing. Verbal agreements simply aren't going to cut it. At a minimum, your agreements should spell out: Scope of Rights: What exactly is the licensee allowed to do? Can they display your work, edit it, or redistribute it? Is the license exclusive or non-exclusive? Be specific. Territory and Term: Where can the content be used, and for how long? There is a big difference between a one-year North American license and a perpetual worldwide one. Payment Terms: Will they pay a flat fee, royalties, or milestone payments? Clarify timing, amounts, and what happens if a payment is late. Attribution: If you want credit, say so clearly. Detail how your name should appear. Termination: Under what circumstances can either party exit the agreement? What happens if someone violates the terms? Warranties and Indemnity: You'll likely warrant that you own the content and have the right to license it. It's also worth requiring that the licensee covers legal costs if they misuse your content. BUSINESS SETUP AND DATA CONSIDERATIONS Massachusetts doesn't require a general business license for most services, but you might need local permits depending on your location. If you're selling digital content, you'll likely need to register for a Sales and Use Tax Certificate with the Department of Revenue, especially if you hit $100,000 or more in remote sales annually. That said, not all digital content is taxed the same way. It depends on how it's delivered, such as streamed or downloaded, and what type of content it is. If you're selling courses, guides, or other educational materials, review Massachusetts DOR Letter Rulings carefully. Many types of downloadable content are not considered taxable. It's worth confirming your specific case with a tax professional or the Department of Revenue. Forming an LLC is a good step for liability protection. In Massachusetts, that means filing a Certificate of Organization with the Secretary of the Commonwealth. The fee is $500. You'll also need to get an EIN from the IRS, which you can do online for free. One new development to keep an eye on is the Massachusetts Data Privacy Act, Senate Bill 2516. Introduced in May 2025, it targets businesses that collect personal data from 25,000 or more residents or make money by selling data. If passed, it could require you to post separate privacy notices for things like geolocation and biometric data, restrict ad targeting to minors and comply with new civil penalties. If your licensing business collects user data or runs a platform, this is one to watch. HOW TO PROTECT YOUR WORK ONLINE The DMCA gives you a clear process to get unauthorized uses of your content taken down. Even if your copyright is not registered, you can still send a takedown notice to the site or platform hosting the infringing material. Your DMCA notice needs to include your contact information, what content is being infringed, where the infringing content appears, a statement that the use is not authorized, and your signature. Most platforms have a specific process or form you'll need to follow. You can look up their DMCA agents on the Copyright Office’s online directory. If you ever start hosting user-uploaded content on your site or platform, consider registering as a DMCA Designated Agent yourself. That gives you safe harbor protections in case users upload infringing content. Registering costs just $6. LICENSING MODELS THAT WORK There are several ways to structure your licensing depending on how you want to monetize: Exclusive Licenses: Higher fee; one client per use case. Ideal for unique or high-value content. Non-Exclusive Licenses: Lower fee, but you can license the same asset to multiple clients. Great for scale. Royalty-Free: One-time payment for broad, ongoing use. Popular with stock content buyers. Creative Commons: Free standardized licenses that can help with visibility but limit your control. They also cannot be revoked once granted. MANAGING RISK AND STAYING COMPLIANT It's smart to watermark your content and keep clear, well-organized records of all your licenses. Monitor for unauthorized use and consider business insurance as your operation grows. If you collect any personal data, Massachusetts law already requires that you maintain a Written Information Security Program, also known as a WISP. That includes encryption for data sent over public networks and other technical and administrative safeguards. Also be aware that digital accessibility requirements continue to evolve. Courts and regulators commonly reference the WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the current benchmark for website and platform compliance. If your site or tools serve the public, aligning with this standard is a strong risk-management move. THE FINAL ANALYSIS Federal copyright law gives you strong baseline protection. Massachusetts contract law enforces your licensing agreements. But the real strength lies in putting your licensing terms in writing and registering your key content early. As your business scales, keep an eye on privacy regulations and make sure your legal foundation grows along with your income. Focus on clarity in your contracts, structure your licensing in a way that fits your goals, and stay current on the laws that affect your specific business model.
Intellectual Property
Trademark
Massachusetts
Can I trademark the name of my software?
Can I trademark the name of my software if the same name is already trademarked in a different country/state? I am starting up a FinTech company right now and I am trying to trademark the name of my mobile app; however, after some searching, I realized that a company in the UK has already trademarked the same name. It is also a company that makes a mobile app in the FinTech industry - just in a different area of interest. Are there any suggestions for how I would go about trademarking the name of my software, or do I have to come up with a different name?
Roman V.
Yes, it's generally possible to trademark the name of your software, as long as it is not a generic name or descriptive of the product. You should also do a clearance search to make sure no other company is using the same or similar name for similar services. I would be glad to discuss more details and help with the trademark process. Thanks.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property Rights Agreement
New York
What are the key provisions to include in an Employee IP Agreement?
I am a startup founder and I recently hired a few employees to work on developing our software. While we have a general employment agreement in place, I am concerned about protecting the intellectual property (IP) rights of the company, particularly the software they will be creating. I would like to know what key provisions should be included in an Employee IP Agreement to ensure that the company retains ownership of the IP developed by the employees.
Randy M.
Here’s how I’d approach structuring an Employee IP Agreement if your goal is to protect your company’s intellectual property without running into enforceability issues under U.S. law. Covering Core IP OwnershipCovering Core IP Ownership First, start with a “work made for hire” clause. It’s a good foundation, but it’s not enough on its own. Under U.S. copyright law (17 U.S.C. § 101), only certain types of work qualify as “made for hire,” and many employee-created assets may fall outside that definition. So you’ll want to pair it with a present-tense assignment clause. Be specific here. Use language like “the employee hereby assigns” rather than “will assign.” That slight shift matters. It ensures the company owns the rights immediately when the work is created. Also, define “intellectual property” broadly. Don’t just list patents or source code. Include software, algorithms, documentation, trade secrets, databases, and anything tied to your business. The scope should clearly include anything created during work hours, using company tools or systems, or connected to your current or future business operations. Disclosure and Documentation You’ll want to require employees to promptly disclose any inventions or creative works they produce. Put it in writing. This gives your company the chance to evaluate whether the work is covered under the agreement. It’s also a good idea to require them to maintain proper documentation. Accurate records can make a real difference in patent filings or if a dispute ever comes up. Pre-Existing IP and Legal Carve-Outs There should be a section where employees list anything they’ve developed or own before joining the company. If they don’t list anything, the agreement should include language confirming they’re representing that no such prior inventions exist. This prevents claims down the road that something developed during employment was actually theirs from before. Now, depending on your state, you may need to include statutory carve-outs. California, Illinois, and Washington all have laws that limit how far IP assignment clauses can go. For example, in California, you’re required to carve out inventions developed entirely on the employee’s own time, without company resources, and unrelated to your business (see California Labor Code § 2870). Without that carve-out, your entire assignment provision could be thrown out. Confidentiality Obligations Make sure there’s a strong confidentiality section. This should cover source code, technical documentation, designs, product plans, customer lists, financial data, and anything else proprietary. Make it clear that the obligation continues even after the employee leaves. You’ll also want to require that all company property and digital assets are returned at the end of employment, including devices, credentials, and files. Ongoing Cooperation and Enforcement Mechanisms Include a clause requiring employees to cooperate in IP protection efforts even after they leave. That could mean signing patent paperwork or providing testimony if needed. To make that enforceable, add a power of attorney clause. This gives the company the authority to act on the employee’s behalf if they’re unwilling or unreachable. It’s a simple way to prevent delays when you’re trying to secure or enforce rights. It’s also smart to include a waiver of moral rights where allowed. This is especially useful for creative works and software. It gives the company full freedom to modify or use the work without needing future approval. Legal Remedies and General Terms Be clear that the company can pursue equitable relief, like an injunction, if there’s a violation. Sometimes monetary damages aren’t enough to prevent harm. Include a severability clause so that if one part of the agreement is invalidated, the rest still stand. Don’t forget to specify the governing law and venue for any disputes. As for restrictive covenants, keep in mind that non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California and heavily restricted elsewhere. Non-solicitation clauses may still be allowed, but they need to be narrowly written. You should have your legal team confirm their enforceability based on your state. Finally, think about consideration. For new hires, the job offer itself usually counts. But for existing employees, you’ll likely need to offer something extra, like a bonus or promotion, to make the agreement stick.
Intellectual Property
Work For Hire Agreement
Arizona
Is a Work For Hire Agreement necessary for freelance graphic design work?
As a freelance graphic designer, I have been approached by a client to create a series of designs for their marketing campaign. While discussing the project details, the client mentioned the possibility of a Work For Hire Agreement. I am unsure if such an agreement is necessary in this situation and whether it would affect my ownership rights or future use of the designs. I would like to understand the implications and whether it is in my best interest to enter into such an agreement.
Randy M.
Whether you need a Work For Hire Agreement really depends on the project and what both sides are trying to get out of it. You’re not automatically required to sign one, but saying yes or no to that clause can completely change who owns the work and what rights you’ll have moving forward. Just because a client calls something “work for hire” in a contract doesn’t mean it actually qualifies under the law, especially when it comes to freelance design work. Here’s the thing. Under U.S. copyright law, “work made for hire” is a specific exception to the general rule that the creator owns the work. For a freelance project to qualify, two conditions have to be met. First, both parties need to sign a written agreement that says the work is considered “made for hire.” Second, the type of work has to fall into one of nine defined categories under 17 U.S.C. § 101. These include things like contributions to collective works, audiovisual pieces, instructional texts, or compilations. The list is pretty narrow. Standard marketing materials, logos, brochures, or campaign graphics usually don’t make the cut. Courts take a strict approach here, so just checking a box in a contract doesn’t magically make it enforceable. If your project doesn’t meet both requirements, labeling it “work for hire” doesn’t hold legal weight. In that case, the default is that you, the designer, own the copyright unless there’s a separate written agreement transferring it to the client. That leads us to ownership. If there’s no valid Work For Hire clause and no assignment of rights, you retain full copyright. That gives you control over how the work is used beyond whatever license you’ve granted. So if you created a logo and the contract only licenses it for digital use, the client can’t later slap it on T-shirts or license it to a partner without getting your permission first. But if there is a valid Work For Hire clause or an explicit copyright assignment, then the client becomes the legal owner. That means they can use it, change it, resell it, or do whatever they want with it, without needing to pay you again or ask for further approval. You’d have no say over how the work is used, and unless the agreement gives you permission, you wouldn’t even be able to include it in your portfolio. If you want more flexibility, there are alternatives. You can structure the deal with a copyright assignment that still reserves certain rights for you. For example, you could keep the right to show the work in your portfolio or limit resale to direct competitors. Or you could stick with licensing. An exclusive license gives the client broad rights but you still own the work. A non-exclusive license is more limited and usually makes sense for templates or assets used with multiple clients. Portfolio rights, by the way, are often negotiable. Even in exclusive arrangements, you can add a clause that lets you show the work on your website, social profiles, or print materials. Just make sure it’s clearly spelled out. Some corporate clients won’t allow it at all unless it’s written into the agreement. From a practical standpoint, your decision should take into account how much you’re getting paid, how the work will be used, and whether you want to reuse or showcase it later. If you’re giving up all rights, price accordingly. Clients pushing for Work For Hire terms often just want clean, uncomplicated ownership, especially for branding or long-term use. But that doesn’t mean you can’t negotiate. You might agree to transfer ownership only after full payment is received. You might keep the right to use rejected drafts. You might even allow Work For Hire treatment for the final deliverables but retain some creative rights behind the scenes. Also, keep an eye out for boilerplate clauses. Some clients include Work For Hire language by default, not realizing their project doesn’t meet the legal standard. Just because it’s in the contract doesn’t make it enforceable. If the work doesn’t meet the criteria, the clause won’t hold unless there’s a separate valid assignment of rights. When in doubt, it’s smart to run the agreement by an attorney who understands copyright law and freelance creative work. Contracts Counsel connects you with attorneys who handle exactly this kind of issue.
Intellectual Property
KISS Note
California
Can I legally use a KISS Note to protect my intellectual property?
I recently developed a new software application and I want to protect my intellectual property rights. I've heard about a KISS Note, which is a simplified form of a non-disclosure agreement, and I'm wondering if it would provide adequate legal protection for my software. I would like to know if using a KISS Note is a valid option to safeguard my intellectual property and if there are any limitations or considerations I should be aware of.
Randy M.
You’re not the first to confuse a KISS Note with intellectual property protection, and you definitely won’t be the last. It’s a common mix-up in the startup world. But here’s the truth: A KISS Note has nothing to do with protecting your software. It’s a financing instrument created by 500 Startups, designed as an alternative to convertible notes and SAFEs for early-stage fundraising. It’s a way for investors to give you money now in exchange for equity later. It does not offer any legal protection for your code or ideas. So What Do You Actually Need to Protect Your IP? If you're building software in California, there are several key legal tools you’ll want to have in place. Start with the ones that offer immediate protection and work your way toward longer-term strategies. Always Start with NDAs If you're showing your software to anyone (whether it's a co-founder, a contractor, an investor, or a beta tester) you need a solid non-disclosure agreement in place before you share anything. It’s your first line of defense, especially if you want to preserve trade secret protection. Your NDA should spell out exactly what you consider confidential. This might include your source code, algorithms, user data, business plans, or any other proprietary information. The agreement should also state how long confidentiality lasts and what the other party can and cannot do with your information. One important note here: California law prohibits non-compete clauses under Business and Professions Code Section 16600. Do not include one in your NDA. It won't be enforceable. Instead, focus strictly on confidentiality and use limitations. Copyright is Automatic, but Registration Matters As soon as you write your code, it’s protected under federal copyright law. That protection applies to the actual expression (the specific code) not to your underlying ideas, functionality, or algorithms. Even though protection is automatic, registering with the U.S. Copyright Office gives you significant legal benefits. You can’t file a federal lawsuit without registration. And if your copyright is registered before infringement occurs, you may be eligible for statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work and recovery of attorney’s fees. The process usually costs between $65 and $85 and takes a few months. Trade Secrets Require Real Effort to Stay Protected If your software includes proprietary algorithms, confidential processes, or unique technical methods that provide a competitive edge, you may be eligible for trade secret protection under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act. But here’s the catch. That protection only lasts as long as you actively protect the information. This includes limiting access to your source code, using secure development environments, marking documents as confidential, and having everyone involved sign NDAs. You need to treat your trade secrets like actual secrets if you want the law to do the same. Considering Patents? Proceed Carefully Software patents are complex, especially following the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice decision. You can’t patent abstract ideas, mathematical formulas, or generic computer processes. Your software needs to solve a specific technical problem in a novel, non-obvious way or improve the functionality of a computer system itself. If you've developed something truly unique — like a new data compression algorithm, a better machine learning architecture, or a new way to optimize networking — a patent might be worth exploring. Just keep in mind that the process is expensive, often costing $10,000 to $15,000 with legal fees. It can also take several years. Many software companies choose to rely on trade secrets and copyrights instead. How to Put All of This Into Practice Begin with what you can implement right away. Create a strong NDA template and use it consistently. Register your copyright as soon as your codebase is developed enough to be meaningful. Protect your trade secrets by putting real technical and legal safeguards in place. Track your development process carefully. Version control, timestamps, and contributor logs can all serve as useful evidence in a legal dispute. If you’re working with employees or contractors in California, be especially cautious. The state has employee-friendly laws, so your contracts must clearly state that all work product belongs to your company and that all confidential information stays confidential. When Should You Talk to a Lawyer? Once you’re dealing with patents, investor negotiations, infringement threats, or user data privacy, it’s time to bring in professional legal help. These are complex areas, and the risks are too high to wing it.
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
- Austin Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Chicago Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Dallas Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Denver Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Los Angeles Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Phoenix Intellectual Property Lawyers
- San Diego Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Tampa Intellectual Property Lawyers
Intellectual Property lawyers by nearby cities
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Brockton Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Lowell Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Lynn Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New Bedford Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Quincy Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Springfield Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Worcester Intellectual Property Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer