Intellectual Property Lawyers for Massachusetts
Looking for an intellectual property lawyer in Massachusetts?
ContractsCounsel helps businesses across Massachusetts hire vetted intellectual property lawyers, offering fixed-fee quotes with the first proposal typically arriving in just a few hours.
Hire a Lawyer for 60% Less than Traditional Law Firms
Meet some of our Massachusetts Intellectual Property Lawyers
Leonid G.
I have been practicing law since 2018. I used to be a litigator at a nationwide practice before going in-house at a fintech company. I have experience drafting NDAs, SaaS contracts, service agreements, and stock purchase agreements.
"Leonid was amazing. He understood the company ethos, our mission, and how to best update our contracts to serve both. He communicated with me on his progress and stayed within the budget I relayed to him. Will hire again for the next project."
John M.
John Mercer is a distinguished corporate counsel who is well-known for turning legal challenges into strategic assets. He possesses a deep understanding and expertise in intellectual property (IP), compliance, and corporate law, particularly in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. His proficiency lies in transforming legal complexities into strategic advantages, ensuring operational excellence, and driving innovation forward. John excels at safeguarding an organization's legal interests and integrity, ensuring operations adhere to the law. As a strategic leader, John excels at safeguarding an organization’s legal interests and integrity, ensuring operations adhere to the law. He also brings immense value to his profession through his skills in drafting, negotiating, and managing significant agreements that secure organizational interests with widespread industry impact. His unparalleled expertise in legal advisories significantly enhances compliance and develops risk management frameworks that protect and advance company ambitions. Moreover, John's command over patent and trademark portfolios, alongside his ability to drive innovation initiatives and design incentive schemes, substantially bolsters intellectual property prowess. John's areas of expertise are extensive, covering skills vital to corporate law, legal contract negotiations, material transfer agreements, and more. He is particularly adept in regulatory compliance, legal consulting, clinical trials, biotechnology, patents, and patent portfolio analysis, to name a few. His leadership is complemented by active listening, analytical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and other soft skills that make him a leader and visionary.
"Thank you John, I appreciate your very personal effort with quality and practicality in mind."
Bruce H.
Experienced patent attorney supporting a variety of technologies.
Stephen R.
Steve Reich is licensed to practice in both New York and Massachusetts and is based in Boston. He assists with environmental litigation and other complex litigation and heads the firm's intellectual property practice, including copyright and trademark registration and protection. Other practice areas include commercial contract drafting and civil litigation.
"Fast, professional, and articulate—I would work with Stephen again."
December 12, 2023
Alexis L.
I am an attorney in Michigan. I attended Boston College for my undergraduate degree and Suffolk University Law School for my law degree. I have been practicing law for over 20 years.
December 13, 2023
James S.
Business and Real Property
January 2, 2024
Elaine T.
Trusted Intellectual Property Attorney, Advisor and Strategic Partner
June 3, 2024
Colin M.
Experienced attorney with a substantial history of crafting, evaluating, and bargaining multimillion-dollar commercial and government contracts across diverse sectors, encompassing the US Army, DoD contractors, employee benefits, NASDAQ, Pharmaceuticals, and Finance.
Mark L.
I worked in the Intellectual Property Group at Fidelity Investments for almost 25 years, including managing the group from 2017-2021. I managed and developed the same high-performing group of three legal professionals from 2007-2021. Early in my career at Fidelity, I focused primarily on trademark matters, including trademark searching and clearance, as well as enforcement of trademark rights. In fact, I created Fidelity's trademark and brand protection programs and advanced them over more than two decades, eventually bringing the domestic trademark portfolio in-house and realizing savings of well over $2 million in outside counsel expenses for searching, prosecution and maintenance of US registrations from 2008-2021. Fidelity put me through law school, and I continued working full time while attending law school at night over four years. Upon graduation and passing the bar in 2006, I was promoted to an attorney position effective 1/1/2007. My practice broadened, and I began working on more transactional matters. I became a key transactional attorney for major technology groups and businesses within Fidelity, and negotiated numerous mission critical tech deals, transforming Fidelity's business. I provided transactional and IP support for Fidelity's software development and services affiliate in Ireland, and worked extensively with many of Fidelity's other foreign affiliates. Fidelity's General Counsel handpicked me to provide transactional and IP support to a new business initiative in 2017. That initiative became fintech startup Akoya, LLC, a paradigm-shifting business that enables secure, customer-controlled sharing of personal financial information between financial institutions and service providers. I developed template agreements between Akoya and data providers (financial institutions) and also between Akoya and data recipients (e.g. tax preparation services and financial advisors). Akoya had matured enough to be spun out by Fidelity in early 2020 to a consortium of financial services companies. In 2021, Fidelity offered a voluntary buyout to long-tenured associates, and following the pandemic, coupled with the financial and health benefits included in the package, it was an offer I could not refuse. Days later, my elderly father-in-law broke his hip, and my wife and I became his primary caregivers. It's been a blessing that I was able to contribute to his care and alleviate some of the burden on my wife. He is now in a long-term care facility, and I am eager to return to work as in-house counsel, whether on a contract basis, part time or full time. I did work briefly as a sole practitioner in 2021 and 2022, primarily helping friends, family and pro bono clients with NDAs, business formation issues, consulting agreements and license agreements. From August 2022 - July 2023, I was on the staff of Flex by Fenwick, an in-house counsel on demand business that is a subsidiary of the IP firm Fenwick & West, but did not get any engagements. My wife and I have volunteered for over a year with a dog rescue, Last Hope K9 Rescue, and have fostered several dogs, and adopted two of them!
June 6, 2024
Michael P.
I have been licensed since 2006 and have extensive experience in family law, personal injury, criminal law, and general litigation. I have a solo practice and I am seeking new opportunities.
John L.
I have been practising law for over 30 years. I have extensive legal experience in contract disputes and drafting demand letters. I have been lead counsel in over 100 civil and criminal jury trials and have extensive litigation stradegy knowledge. I belive my experience would be of great benefit to any prospective client.
July 26, 2024
Matthew S.
I am a business, Internet, and intellectual property lawyer. My practice is split between both transactional work and litigation. Prior to law school, I earned a master’s degree in computer science, which gives me the background and experience to understand technology, software, and the Internet better than most attorneys, and so my practice focuses on these areas. However, I represent clients in almost any industry, including real estate, construction, medicine, service, and consumer products.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowIntellectual Property Legal Questions and Answers
Intellectual Property
Content Licensing Agreement
Massachusetts
What are the legal implications and requirements for licensing internet content?
I run a small online business where I create and sell digital content such as videos, images, and written articles. Recently, I've been approached by a few potential buyers who are interested in licensing my content for their own websites and projects. However, I'm unsure about the legal aspects of content licensing on the internet, such as the rights I should grant, limitations, and any necessary agreements or contracts. I want to ensure that I protect my intellectual property while also allowing others to use it in a fair and legal manner, so I need guidance on the legal implications and requirements for licensing internet content.
Randy M.
Running a digital content licensing business in Massachusetts actually gives you a solid legal foundation. That said, there are a few important nuances you’ll want to keep in mind. Let’s walk through the full picture, including a few new developments that could impact how you operate. COPYRIGHT IS YOUR STARTING POINT The moment you create something, whether it's videos, images, or written content, it's automatically protected under federal copyright law. That gives you the exclusive right to decide how your work is used, copied, displayed, or modified. And in Massachusetts, there's no broad business license requirement for this type of work. Licensing intellectual property typically just falls under basic business registration. If you're serious about protecting your content, registering your copyrights with the U.S. Copyright Office is a smart move. Without registration, you’re limited to proving actual damages if someone infringes. That's often a costly uphill battle. But with registration, especially if it's done before the infringement occurs or within 3 months of publishing, you open the door to statutory damages ranging from $750 to $30,000 per work. If the infringement is willful, that number can go as high as $150,000. You may also be able to recover attorney’s fees. The filing fee is small, $45 for a single-author online submission or $65 for standard applications, and the legal protection it offers is substantial. One key legal detail: Exclusive licenses must be in writing under 17 U.S.C. § 204 to be enforceable. Non-exclusive licenses do not have that requirement, but oral agreements are harder to prove and much riskier to rely on. Also, keep in mind that exclusive licenses can be recorded with the U.S. Copyright Office. Doing so helps establish priority over competing claims and can strengthen your position in disputes. YOUR LICENSING AGREEMENTS MATTER This is where your business becomes real. Your licensing contracts should be in writing. Verbal agreements simply aren't going to cut it. At a minimum, your agreements should spell out: Scope of Rights: What exactly is the licensee allowed to do? Can they display your work, edit it, or redistribute it? Is the license exclusive or non-exclusive? Be specific. Territory and Term: Where can the content be used, and for how long? There is a big difference between a one-year North American license and a perpetual worldwide one. Payment Terms: Will they pay a flat fee, royalties, or milestone payments? Clarify timing, amounts, and what happens if a payment is late. Attribution: If you want credit, say so clearly. Detail how your name should appear. Termination: Under what circumstances can either party exit the agreement? What happens if someone violates the terms? Warranties and Indemnity: You'll likely warrant that you own the content and have the right to license it. It's also worth requiring that the licensee covers legal costs if they misuse your content. BUSINESS SETUP AND DATA CONSIDERATIONS Massachusetts doesn't require a general business license for most services, but you might need local permits depending on your location. If you're selling digital content, you'll likely need to register for a Sales and Use Tax Certificate with the Department of Revenue, especially if you hit $100,000 or more in remote sales annually. That said, not all digital content is taxed the same way. It depends on how it's delivered, such as streamed or downloaded, and what type of content it is. If you're selling courses, guides, or other educational materials, review Massachusetts DOR Letter Rulings carefully. Many types of downloadable content are not considered taxable. It's worth confirming your specific case with a tax professional or the Department of Revenue. Forming an LLC is a good step for liability protection. In Massachusetts, that means filing a Certificate of Organization with the Secretary of the Commonwealth. The fee is $500. You'll also need to get an EIN from the IRS, which you can do online for free. One new development to keep an eye on is the Massachusetts Data Privacy Act, Senate Bill 2516. Introduced in May 2025, it targets businesses that collect personal data from 25,000 or more residents or make money by selling data. If passed, it could require you to post separate privacy notices for things like geolocation and biometric data, restrict ad targeting to minors and comply with new civil penalties. If your licensing business collects user data or runs a platform, this is one to watch. HOW TO PROTECT YOUR WORK ONLINE The DMCA gives you a clear process to get unauthorized uses of your content taken down. Even if your copyright is not registered, you can still send a takedown notice to the site or platform hosting the infringing material. Your DMCA notice needs to include your contact information, what content is being infringed, where the infringing content appears, a statement that the use is not authorized, and your signature. Most platforms have a specific process or form you'll need to follow. You can look up their DMCA agents on the Copyright Office’s online directory. If you ever start hosting user-uploaded content on your site or platform, consider registering as a DMCA Designated Agent yourself. That gives you safe harbor protections in case users upload infringing content. Registering costs just $6. LICENSING MODELS THAT WORK There are several ways to structure your licensing depending on how you want to monetize: Exclusive Licenses: Higher fee; one client per use case. Ideal for unique or high-value content. Non-Exclusive Licenses: Lower fee, but you can license the same asset to multiple clients. Great for scale. Royalty-Free: One-time payment for broad, ongoing use. Popular with stock content buyers. Creative Commons: Free standardized licenses that can help with visibility but limit your control. They also cannot be revoked once granted. MANAGING RISK AND STAYING COMPLIANT It's smart to watermark your content and keep clear, well-organized records of all your licenses. Monitor for unauthorized use and consider business insurance as your operation grows. If you collect any personal data, Massachusetts law already requires that you maintain a Written Information Security Program, also known as a WISP. That includes encryption for data sent over public networks and other technical and administrative safeguards. Also be aware that digital accessibility requirements continue to evolve. Courts and regulators commonly reference the WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the current benchmark for website and platform compliance. If your site or tools serve the public, aligning with this standard is a strong risk-management move. THE FINAL ANALYSIS Federal copyright law gives you strong baseline protection. Massachusetts contract law enforces your licensing agreements. But the real strength lies in putting your licensing terms in writing and registering your key content early. As your business scales, keep an eye on privacy regulations and make sure your legal foundation grows along with your income. Focus on clarity in your contracts, structure your licensing in a way that fits your goals, and stay current on the laws that affect your specific business model.
Intellectual Property
Trademark
Massachusetts
Can I trademark the name of my software?
Can I trademark the name of my software if the same name is already trademarked in a different country/state? I am starting up a FinTech company right now and I am trying to trademark the name of my mobile app; however, after some searching, I realized that a company in the UK has already trademarked the same name. It is also a company that makes a mobile app in the FinTech industry - just in a different area of interest. Are there any suggestions for how I would go about trademarking the name of my software, or do I have to come up with a different name?
Roman V.
Yes, it's generally possible to trademark the name of your software, as long as it is not a generic name or descriptive of the product. You should also do a clearance search to make sure no other company is using the same or similar name for similar services. I would be glad to discuss more details and help with the trademark process. Thanks.
Intellectual Property
Trademark Cease And Desist
California
Can I ignore a cease and desist letter for trademark infringement if I believe my use of the mark is fair use?
I recently received a cease and desist letter from a company claiming that my use of their trademark in my blog posts constitutes trademark infringement. However, I am using the mark in a descriptive manner to criticize and comment on their products, which I believe falls under fair use. I am unsure of how to proceed and whether I can ignore the cease and desist letter without facing legal consequences.
Dolan W.
Hello! Thank you for posting this question. In your case, the other party may claim that you are infringing on their trademark, but proving it is a different case. The Lanham Act provides for a cause of action for infringement of both registered and unregistered trademarks. (15 USC Section 1114(1)(a); 15 USC Section 1125(a)(1)A).) The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has laid out some elements to help determine whether it creates an infringement lawsuit. 1. The complaining party has to prove they have a valid, protectable trademark and that they own that trademark; 2. The complaining party must prove that a mark is similar, and it was used without the consent of the moving party in a manner that is likely to cause confusion among ordinary consumers as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the goods. The likelihood of confusion can occur at the time of the sale, when there is initial interest by a consumer, or even after the sale, if the confusion causes a consumer to no longer buy a service or product connected to the mark. The court considers things like the strength of the original mark, whether you are using it for some fair use purpose, the similarity, the proximity of the products and marketing channels, whether there’s actual confusion, the defendant’s intent, the quality of respective products, and the sophistication of the customers. (Polaroid Corp. v. Polard Elecs. Corp. 287, F.2d. 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961.) So what this means is that it'd have to be litigated, but you can argue you are not trying to sell products or services using their mark, but rather you are using it for some other purpose, such as to educate people about their business practices. Best of luck!
Intellectual Property
Trademark Search
Florida
Is a trademark search necessary before registering my business name?
I am in the process of starting my own business and have chosen a unique name for it, but I am unsure if it is necessary to conduct a trademark search before officially registering the name. I want to ensure that my chosen business name does not infringe upon any existing trademarks and that I can safely use and protect it in the future.
Randy M.
Running a trademark search before registering your business name isn’t legally required, but it’s one of the most important steps you can take to avoid future problems. Registering your name with the state forms your business entity, but it doesn’t give you trademark rights. Trademark rights come from use in commerce and, if you file with the USPTO, registration at the federal level. Why a Trademark Search Matters The central legal test in trademark law is whether a name is likely to cause consumer confusion. That means you don’t need to copy someone else’s name exactly to get into trouble. Even something that looks or sounds similar in the same or related industry could be enough. If you skip the search and move forward, you risk: • Infringement claims: Another company could demand you stop using the name and, if necessary, sue for damages. • Forced rebranding: If you’ve already invested in your logo, website, signage, or marketing materials, being forced to change your name can be expensive and disruptive. • USPTO rejection: If you apply for a federal trademark, the USPTO will run its own search. If they find a confusingly similar mark, your application will be denied and you’ll lose the filing fees. A well-documented example is when small businesses open under a catchy name, only to receive a cease-and-desist letter from a national chain using a similar name in the same space. Even if you’re in a different state, a federal registration gives that company priority rights nationwide. A proper trademark clearance search should cover more than just identical names. You’ll want to check: • Federal database (USPTO TESS): This is the official record of all registered and pending federal trademarks. • State trademark databases: Many businesses register marks only at the state level. • Common law sources: Unregistered marks can still have legal protection. Check Google, industry directories, social media, and domain names. • Similar variations: Look for phonetic equivalents and alternative spellings, such as “Kwik” for “Quick,” or slight wording changes that could still cause confusion. Professional Assistance You can run an initial search yourself at no cost, but these searches have limits. For example, the USPTO database won’t flag marks that are spelled differently but sound alike, or names with similar meanings. Attorneys and specialized search firms use tools that uncover those kinds of risks. While hiring a professional costs more upfront, it’s often far cheaper than litigation or a rebrand. Limitations A search doesn’t guarantee that your name will never be challenged. Trademark law involves judgment calls about how similar marks are and whether they overlap in goods or services. Still, a thorough search puts you in a much stronger position to defend your choice and move toward federal registration if you want nationwide rights.
Intellectual Property
Trademark Assignment Agreement
Maryland
Can a trademark assignment agreement be used to transfer ownership of a trademark from one company to another?
I am part of a small startup company that has recently entered into a partnership with a larger corporation. As part of this partnership, we have agreed to transfer ownership of our trademark to the larger corporation. We have been advised to use a trademark assignment agreement for this purpose, but I want to ensure that this is the correct legal document to use and that it will effectively transfer ownership of the trademark to the new company.
Roman V.
Hello, I'd be glad to review the details of the trademark assignment and confirm it properly transfers ownership of your trademark. As a trademark attorney, I have helped clients in similar situations both draft trademark assignments and record them with the USPTO to ensure that the trademark reflects the right ownership information. I would be happy to have a brief free 15 minute consult call to learn more details and see how I can help. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Roman rvayner@vaynerlegal.com 414 628 9099 www.vaynerlegal.com
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
- Austin Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Chicago Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Dallas Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Denver Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Los Angeles Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Phoenix Intellectual Property Lawyers
- San Diego Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Tampa Intellectual Property Lawyers
Intellectual Property lawyers by nearby cities
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Brockton Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Cambridge Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Lowell Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Lynn Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New Bedford Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Quincy Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Springfield Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Worcester Intellectual Property Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer