Employee Rights Lawyers for Manchester, New Hampshire

Generally, in Florida, severance is a gift. $1 of severance is usually $1 more than an employer is obligated to provide. An offer of severance may be required if an employee has an employment agreement providing for severance or is otherwise subject to a collective bargaining agreement that provides for severance. Severance agreements that are only offered to certain employees in a discriminatory manner (such as based on age, religion, national origin, sex, etc) may be a violation of local, state and/or federal law.

You would be wise to request that an attorney review the proposed employment agreement before you sign. In addition to ensuring that you would have voting rights, there are numerous other terms that should be carefully reviewed, such as non-compete language if and when you leave employment; TRAP language (usually requiring an employee to reimburse the employer if the employee receives training during his or her employment); terms and conditions of employment (such as schedule, work type, and duties); vacation hours; how disputes will be resolved; and, sometimes, future severance.

I get why this feels so unfair, but the truth is, in Kansas, your employer really can fire you without giving a reason. That’s what at-will employment means. It sounds harsh, but unless something illegal happened, your coworker’s termination was probably legal. Kansas law gives both the employee and the employer the right to end the working relationship at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all. That’s the default. But that doesn’t mean employers can do whatever they want. There are limits, even here. They can’t fire someone for discriminatory reasons such as race, sex, age (if you’re over 40), disability, religion, pregnancy, military status, or national origin. They also can’t retaliate against someone for reporting illegal activity, filing a workers’ comp claim, serving on a jury, or engaging in other legally protected activities. The thing is, employers rarely admit it when their reasons cross the line. They’ll usually point to performance issues or vague personality conflicts, even if the real reason is discrimination or retaliation. So just because they didn’t give a reason doesn’t mean they’re doing something wrong. But it doesn’t mean they’re not, either. It’s complicated. Now, if there’s any kind of employment contract involved, that changes things. And it doesn’t have to be a formal signed agreement. Even an employee handbook with a discipline policy or verbal promises about job security could create contractual rights under the law. Courts sometimes treat these as implied contracts, especially if the company has a history of following certain termination procedures. That matters because the legal standard shifts. If there’s a contract that says employees can only be fired for cause or that outlines specific steps before termination, the employer has to follow those rules. In that case, you wouldn’t need to prove discrimination or retaliation. You would only need to show that the company broke its own policies. That is often much easier to prove. So the smartest thing you can do right now is go back through the materials you received when you were hired. Look at your employee handbook and see if it mentions progressive discipline, for-cause termination, or any guarantees around job security. Even if the handbook says it does not create a contract, courts will still consider the overall context. Also, keep detailed records. Save emails, document your performance, and write down anything that seems off. If there is a pattern of unfair treatment or if your coworker’s firing did not follow standard company procedures, that documentation could become important. At-will employment gives employers a lot of flexibility, but that flexibility has limits, especially when contracts or protected rights are involved. You're not powerless here. You just need to be prepared, informed, and proactive about understanding your rights and what your employer has promised, whether directly or indirectly. If anything seems questionable, there are places you can turn for help. Both state and federal laws may apply. Federal protections include Title VII, the ADEA, the ADA, and the FMLA. Kansas also offers protections under the Kansas Act Against Discrimination and its wage and hour laws. Agencies like the Kansas Department of Labor, the Kansas Human Rights Commission, and the EEOC can investigate wrongful termination claims. The KHRC requires discrimination complaints to be filed within six months. The EEOC allows 180 days. There is no filing fee with either agency. What happened to your coworker might be perfectly legal. But if anything about it raises red flags or does not line up with the company’s usual practices, it is worth looking into now while you still have time to protect yourself.

Non-Competes in Connecticut for physicians are limited to 15 miles and one year. In addition, a non-compete agreement is not enforceable if the employment relationship is terminated by the employer without cause, or the agreement is not made in anticipation of, or as part of, a partnership or ownership agreement. Aks your prospective employer if they are aware of Connecticut law, and in particular Conn. Gen Stat. § 20-14p.

Hello! Generally, New York courts require that a non-compete agreement be supported by adequate consideration. If the agreement is signed at the beginning of employment, the job itself may serve as adequate consideration. However, if the non-compete is signed after employment begins, the employer may need to offer additional benefits, such as a raise or promotion, for the agreement to be enforceable. There are other defenses against enforcement. For a non-compete agreement to be enforceable, it must be reasonable in terms of duration, geographic scope, and the scope of activities it restricts. A court will evaluate whether the agreement is necessary to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests, such as confidential information or customer relationships. If not, a court could rule the noncompete is not enforceable.