Intellectual Property Lawyers for New Jersey

When you’re preparing work for a client, the key issue isn’t whether you’ve run a formal copyright search, but whether you have the legal right to use the image. Copyright law automatically protects most images, so relying on the absence of a watermark or a registration record isn’t enough to keep you safe. Copyright Protection and Ownership Under U.S. law, copyright attaches the moment an original work is created and fixed in a tangible form (17 U.S.C. § 102). That means virtually every photo, illustration, or graphic you find online is already protected. Registration with the U.S. Copyright Office strengthens enforcement rights, but it isn’t required for protection. Likewise, the lack of a © symbol doesn’t mean an image is free to use. Because there’s no central database covering all copyrighted images, a formal copyright search isn’t practical or reliable in most cases. Even if you searched the Copyright Office’s records, you’d only be looking at registered works, which are a small fraction of what’s actually protected. Risks of Using Unlicensed Images If you incorporate an image without permission into a commercial project, you and your client could face serious consequences. Infringement can lead to cease-and-desist orders, statutory damages of $750 to $30,000 per work (and up to $150,000 for willful infringement) under 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), and potential liability for the copyright holder’s attorney’s fees. Courts generally view commercial use as disfavoring any “fair use” defense. Even if you didn’t intend to infringe, liability can still be imposed. Best Practices for Designers The best practice is to focus on obtaining images from sources where the licensing terms are clear and legally sound. For example: • Use reputable stock photo agencies such as Adobe Stock, Shutterstock, or Getty, where commercial licenses are explicit. • Choose Creative Commons images that allow commercial use (e.g., CC BY or CC0), but review license terms carefully. • Confirm public domain status when applicable, such as U.S. federal government works. • Contact creators directly for written permission if you want to use their work. • Keep copies of receipts, license agreements, or permission letters so you can show proof of rights if challenged. Reverse image search tools like Google Images or TinEye can be useful to trace the origin of an image and identify whether it’s sold or licensed by a third party. However, this is a step in due diligence, not a substitute for obtaining rights. Professional Responsibility As a freelance designer, your contracts may hold you responsible for ensuring that the materials you deliver don’t infringe anyone else’s rights. Delivering work that exposes your client to infringement claims can damage your reputation and your client relationship. The safest practice is to assume that any image you didn’t create yourself is protected until you confirm otherwise and secure the proper license.

A Patent Assignment Agreement transfers ownership of an invention or patent rights from the inventor, known as the assignor, to another party, often a company serving as the assignee. To protect your business and ensure enforceability, the agreement should cover specific provisions that make the transfer clear, complete, and legally sound. What Is the Core Assignment Clause? The assignment clause is the heart of the agreement. It should use present-tense language such as “hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys all right, title, and interest.” Courts and the USPTO treat this as an immediate transfer, while “will assign” is only a future promise. The clause should also cover continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part applications, along with reissues, reexaminations, and foreign filings. What Rights Should Be Transferred? The assignee should receive the full bundle of rights granted under 35 U.S.C. § 154, including the right to make, use, sell, offer for sale, import, and license the invention. The agreement should also transfer the right to sue for past, present, and future infringement, so the company can recover damages even for activity that occurred before the assignment was signed. Do You Need Consideration? Every contract requires consideration, and patent assignments are no different. Even if the transfer is to your own company, the agreement should recite consideration. This can be nominal, such as “ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration,” or it can be tied to equity or to your role as founder. How Should the Patent Be Identified? The intellectual property should be identified with precision. If a patent has issued, include the number and issue date. For pending applications, list the application number, filing date, and invention title. If no application has been filed yet, provide a detailed description and later update the record once official filing details exist. What Warranties and Representations Are Common? The assignor should warrant ownership of the rights, authority to assign, and absence of liens or conflicting assignments. Over-warranting should be avoided. Do not guarantee novelty or validity, since those are determined by the USPTO and courts. Be cautious about warranting sole inventorship unless you are certain no other inventors contributed, since misstatements on inventorship can create validity problems. What Other Provisions Should Be Included? Other common provisions include further assurances requiring the inventor to assist with future filings, litigation, or USPTO actions, a limited power of attorney for patent prosecution and enforcement, and improvements clauses that attempt to capture future modifications or developments. Improvements provisions must be drafted carefully, as vague scope language can lead to disputes. The agreement should also address corporate authority, ensuring the company has approval under bylaws or state law before accepting the assignment. What Administrative Details Matter? The agreement should contain standard contract terms such as governing law, entire agreement, amendment requirements, successors and assigns, and dispute resolution through arbitration or mediation. Both the inventor and the company should sign, and notarization is advisable because it makes USPTO recordation smoother. Do You Need to Record with the USPTO? After execution, the assignment should be recorded with the USPTO through the Electronic Patent Assignment System. Recordation should occur promptly after execution to establish clear priority and maintain a clean chain of title. While recordation is not required for validity between the parties, it protects ownership against third-party claims. The USPTO currently charges little or no fee for electronic filings, so this step is inexpensive and essential. Should You Assign or License? An assignment transfers complete ownership, which investors generally expect. A license keeps ownership with the inventor while granting defined rights to the company. Licensing may be useful when the inventor wants to retain control, license the technology to multiple companies, or test the market before giving up ownership. For most startups, assignment is the preferred approach. What About Tax Considerations? Assignments can have tax consequences, especially when IP is transferred for equity or other forms of consideration. Professional tax advice is essential to evaluate both immediate tax effects and ongoing obligations. This is particularly important if the company later earns royalties or sells the patent. What Are the Next Steps? The implementation process should include drafting the agreement with qualified legal counsel, executing it with proper corporate authority and notarization where possible, recording it promptly with the USPTO using EPAS, and consulting a tax professional to address both the transfer itself and any ongoing obligations. If you need help drafting or reviewing a Patent Assignment Agreement, the attorneys on Contracts Counsel can guide you through the process so that your company’s rights are fully protected.

Hello! Thank you for posting this question. In your case, the other party may claim that you are infringing on their trademark, but proving it is a different case. The Lanham Act provides for a cause of action for infringement of both registered and unregistered trademarks. (15 USC Section 1114(1)(a); 15 USC Section 1125(a)(1)A).)  The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has laid out some elements to help determine whether it creates an infringement lawsuit. 1. The complaining party has to prove they have a valid, protectable trademark and that they own that trademark; 2. The complaining party must prove that a mark is similar, and it was used without the consent of the moving party in a manner that is likely to cause confusion among ordinary consumers as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the goods.  The likelihood of confusion can occur at the time of the sale, when there is initial interest by a consumer, or even after the sale, if the confusion causes a consumer to no longer buy a service or product connected to the mark. The court considers things like the strength of the original mark, whether you are using it for some fair use purpose, the similarity, the proximity of the products and marketing channels, whether there’s actual confusion, the defendant’s intent, the quality of respective products, and the sophistication of the customers. (Polaroid Corp. v. Polard Elecs. Corp. 287, F.2d. 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961.) So what this means is that it'd have to be litigated, but you can argue you are not trying to sell products or services using their mark, but rather you are using it for some other purpose, such as to educate people about their business practices. Best of luck!

Do you have a license to use the intellectual property? Consult with an attorney.

Hello! This is Attorney Damien Bosco. My law office is in Forest Hills, Queens County, New York City. My practice covers the New York City metropolitan area and Long Island. In some situations, I also handle matters throughout New York State. If your phrase contains common jewelry terms, registering it may be challenging. One suggestion is to check the USPTO Database for similar trademarks. If other businesses have brands using the same common word in their brand name, that could give an indication that you may still be able to use it in your brand name. Nonexclusive use means that the word or phrase can be used by other parties and is not solely owned or controlled by the trademark holder. Consult with a trademark attorney for guidance on the registration process and the viability of your chosen phrase.