Intellectual Property Lawyers for Gresham, Oregon

Need an intellectual property lawyer in Gresham, Oregon?

ContractsCounsel matches businesses with Gresham-based intellectual property lawyers, providing fixed-fee quotes from vetted attorneys with the first proposal typically arriving in just a few hours.

Hire a Lawyer for 60% Less than Traditional Law Firms

1
Post your project.
Create a project posting in our marketplace. We will ask you the questions lawyers need to know to provide pricing.
2
Receive multiple bids.
Receive multiple bids from vetted lawyers in our network that have the experience to help you with your project.
3
Review and hire.
Compare multiple proposals from lawyers and arrange calls through our platform. Securely make payment to hire your lawyer.

Meet some of our Gresham Intellectual Property Lawyers

Jason P. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Jason
5.0 (5)
Member Since:
December 1, 2022

Jason P.

Business Lawyer
Free Consultation
Portland, OR
10 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR WA
Lewis & Clark Law School

Jason is a self-starting, go-getting lawyer who takes a pragmatic approach to helping his clients. He co-founded Fortify Law because he was not satisfied with the traditional approach to providing legal services. He firmly believes that legal costs should be predictable, transparent and value-driven. Jason’s entrepreneurial mindset enables him to better understand his clients’ needs. His first taste of entrepreneurship came from an early age when he helped manage his family’s small free range cattle farm. Every morning, before school, he would deliver hay to a herd of 50 hungry cows. In addition, he was responsible for sweeping "the shop" at his parent's 40-employee HVAC business. Before becoming a lawyer, he clerked at the Lewis & Clark Small Business Legal Clinic where he handled a diverse range of legal issues including establishing new businesses, registering trademarks, and drafting contracts. He also spent time working with the in-house team at adidas® where, among other things, he reviewed and negotiated complex agreements and created training materials for employees. He also previously worked with Meriwether Group, a Portland-based business consulting firm focused on accelerating the growth of disruptive consumer brands and facilitating founder exits. These experiences have enabled Jason to not only understand the unique legal hurdles that can threaten a business, but also help position them for growth. Jason's practice focuses on Business and Intellectual Property Law, including: ​ -Reviewing and negotiating contracts -Resolving internal corporate disputes -Creating employment and HR policies -Registering and protecting intellectual property -Forming new businesses and subsidiaries -Facilitating Business mergers, acquisitions, and exit strategies -Conducting international business transactions ​​ In his free time, Jason is an adventure junkie and gear-head. He especially enjoys backpacking, kayaking, and snowboarding. He is also a technology enthusiast, craft beer connoisseur, and avid soccer player.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Very nice! Great on responding back and being available! Recommend 100% !"

Curt B. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Curt
5.0 (4)
Member Since:
March 25, 2023

Curt B.

Managing Partner
Free Consultation
Los Angeles, California
12 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR CA, CO, DC, TX
UCLA School of Law

Curt Brown has experience advising clients on a variety of franchising, business litigation, transactional, and securities law matters. Mr. Brown's accolades include: - Super Lawyers Rising Star - California Lawyer of the Year by The Daily Journal - Pro Bono Attorney of the Year the USC Public Interest Law Fund Curt started his legal career in the Los Angeles office of the prestigious firm of Irell & Manella LLP, where his practice focused on a wide variety of complex civil litigation matters, including securities litigation, antitrust, trademark, bankruptcy, and class action defense. Mr. Brown also has experience advising mergers and acquisitions and international companies concerning cyber liability and class action defense. He is admitted in California, Florida, D.C., Washington, Illinois, Colorado, and Michigan.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"I was very impressed with the responsiveness and knowledge brought to my situation."

Jim B. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Jim
5.0 (1)
Member Since:
September 4, 2024

Jim B.

Managing Partner, Business Lawyer
Free Consultation
Portland, Oregon
24 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR
Southern Illinois University

Since 2002, when I first received my law license and began practicing in criminal litigation, I have dedicated myself to providing competent and impassioned legal representation to my clients. Transitioning into business and intellectual property law and serving the Oregon community under the banner of INTELLEQUITY since 2016, I embarked on a mission to offer an unparalleled level of personalized legal guidance that empowers my clients through understanding, support, and legal mastery. As a seasoned attorney, I recognize that behind every case is a person with a distinct set of emotions, aspirations, and challenges. This is why my approach to legal services is not just about cases and statutes; it's about people and their lives. Whether it's navigating the intricacies of business law or safeguarding your intellectual property, I'm here to provide more than just professional counsel—I offer a compassionate, personalized approach to every case. This means keeping you well-informed at every step, empowering you with in-depth understanding, and steering you towards decisions that are legally sound and, more importantly, right for you.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Great person to work with. He helped gain a better understanding of my own business."

Alexander M. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Alexander
5.0 (2)
Member Since:
July 23, 2025

Alexander M.

Lead Attorney
Free Consultation
Tampa, Florida
3 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR FL
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Broad area practice including Business (domestic & international), IP, Employment, Family Law, Administrative, etc. My focus is a direct, no-BS approach with fast turn around times on completed work.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Alexander delivered fast, thorough, and practical legal guidance. He identified 22 issues with my MSA, provided a clear MSO/PC structure opinion, and mapped out insurance requirements for both entities — all within 24 hours. Highly recommend for any healthcare startup needing Florida specific legal expertise."

Jessica M. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Jessica
4.8 (4)
Member Since:
June 24, 2023

Jessica M.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Portland, Oregon
26 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR
Lewis and Clark

Jessica Molligan is an attorney with twenty years of experience in family law, bankruptcy, and litigation.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Jessica was great to work with. We got a quick cliam deed done and it was an easy process to go through with her. Highly reccomend hiring her for any of your needs."

Shanon G. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Shanon
Member Since:
June 28, 2023

Shanon G.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Lake Oswego, Oregon
25 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR ID
Oklahoma City University Law School

Have experience in contract, family law, municipality work, criminal defense, litigation, some wills and estates as well. Been practicing law for over 22 years.

McCoy S. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View McCoy
Member Since:
December 4, 2023

McCoy S.

Founding Attorney
Free Consultation
Portland, Oregon
35 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR CA, NY, WA
University of Virginia

P. McCoy Smith is the Founding Attorney at Lex Pan Law LLC, a full-service technology and intellectual property law firm based in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A and Opsequio LLC, an open source compliance consultancy. Prior to his current position, he spent 20 years in the legal department of a Fortune 50 multinational technology company as a business unit intellectual property specialist; among his duties was setting up the free & open source legal function and policies for that company. He preceded his in-house experience with 8 years in private practice in a large New York City-based boutique intellectual property law firm, working simultaneously as a U.S. patent litigator and U.S. patent prosecutor. He was also a patent examiner at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office prior to attending law school. He is licensed to practice law in Oregon, California & New York and to prosecute patent applications in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; he is also a registered Trademark and Patent Agent with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. He has degrees from Colorado State University (Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, with honors), Johns Hopkins University (Masters of Liberal Arts) and the University of Virginia (Juris Doctor). While in private practice, and continuing into his in-house career, he taught portions of the U.S. patent bar exam for a long-standing and well-known patent bar exam preparation course, and from 2014-2020 was on the editorial board of the Journal of Open Law, Technology & Society (JOLTS), and starting in 2023 will be on the editorial board of the American Intellectual Property Law Quarterly Journal (AIPLAQJ). He is the author or co-author of chapters on open source and copyright and patents in “Open Source Law, Policy & Practice” (2022, Oxford University Press). He lectures frequently around the world on free and open source issues as well as other intellectual property topics.

Alexander C. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Alexander
Member Since:
August 23, 2025

Alexander C.

CEO
Free Consultation
Tampa, Florida
6 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR AL, CT, DC, NY
The George Washington University Law School

I am a solo practitioner that runs my own legal practice. I am currently licensed in 16 states and I'm working to expand that reach.

Neil R. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Neil
Member Since:
January 29, 2026

Neil R.

Partner/Shareholder
Free Consultation
Hood River, OR
39 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR CA, WA
University of Pennyslvania (JD)

Neil Rust is a transactional attorney with almost four decades of experience ranging across a broad range of fields, including M&A, finance, structured finance, VC and general corporate. Before moving to Oregon, Mr. Rust was a partner at the Los Angeles office of an international law for 26 years and the Century City office of a national law firm for 5 years. During his big firm tenure, Neil Rust gathered experience across multiple industries and enjoys counselling clients as much as drafting and negotiating.

Grace C. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Grace
Member Since:
May 12, 2026

Grace C.

Intellectual Property & Transactions Attorney | SaaS, Licensing, NDAs, Brand Protection & AI Contracts
Free Consultation
Issaquah, WA
6 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR WA
Seattle University School of Law

I’m Grace E. Carlson, an intellectual property & transactional attorney, founder of aTMospheric IP, LLC, with over 6 years of combined law firm and in-house experience. I help businesses, startups, creators, and entrepreneurs draft, review, and negotiate commercial contracts while protecting their brands and innovations. My expertise includes SaaS agreements, MSAs, NDAs, licensing contracts, vendor and partnership agreements, as well as comprehensive trademark strategy, copyright matters, AI-related IP issues, and technology transactions. I’ve supported global companies including Robinhood, Iron Mountain, and Microsoft, and provided flexible in-house counsel through Axiom Law across fintech, SaaS, consumer goods, and data center industries. Known for translating complex legal issues into clear, practical solutions, I focus on delivering contracts that reduce risk, support go-to-market strategies, and scale with your business. Whether you need a custom SaaS agreement, trademark-integrated contracts, or AI compliance review, I provide responsive, business-minded counsel. Bar Admissions: Washington (2020) & Oregon (2021) J.D., Seattle University School of Law Let’s get your contracts and IP protections done right — efficiently and effectively.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Meet some of our other Intellectual Property Lawyers

Kendra B. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Kendra
Member Since:
May 11, 2026

Kendra B.

Business Lawyer
Free Consultation
Stillwater, MN
13 Yrs Experience
Licensed in MN
William Mitchell College of Law

My law practice focuses on transactional business law and serving as outside general counsel for small businesses in Minnesota. I provide practical counseling on a range of day-to-day legal matters and prepare contracts tailored to meet your specific business needs.

Sarah B. - Intellectual Property Lawyer in Gresham, Oregon
View Sarah
Member Since:
May 12, 2026

Sarah B.

Transactional Attorney
Free Consultation
Madison, Wisconsin
12 Yrs Experience
Licensed in WI
Marquette University Law School

Experienced U.S.-licensed attorney with 10+ years of practice across commercial transactions, regulatory compliance, and contract drafting, currently in a part-time in-house counsel role and actively available for independent legal engagements on a project or contract basis. Proven ability to deliver efficient, high-quality legal work in flexible arrangements, including prior contract engagements with Am Law 100-affiliated firms. Adept at working autonomously, meeting tight turnarounds, and providing practical, business-focused legal counsel across a wide range of transactional matters.

Intellectual Property Legal Questions and Answers

Intellectual Property

Patent License Agreement

New York

Asked on Nov 16, 2024

Can you explain the key provisions and considerations in a Patent License Agreement?

I am a startup founder and I have developed a unique software algorithm that I believe has significant market potential. I have been approached by a larger company that is interested in licensing my patent rights to incorporate the algorithm into their existing product. I am unfamiliar with the intricacies of patent licensing and want to ensure I understand the key provisions and considerations that should be included in a Patent License Agreement to protect my interests and maximize the value of my invention.

Benjamin D.

Answered Dec 31, 2024

To protect your interests and maximize the value of your invention, a well-structured Patent License Agreement should include several key provisions and considerations. Here are some essential elements: Grant of License The grant clause is crucial as it defines the scope and extent of patent rights given to the licensee. Be specific about: -Type of license (exclusive or non-exclusive) -Geographic territory covered -Market segments or fields of use -Duration of the license Clearly outlining these aspects helps prevent misuse and ensures you retain control over your invention's application. -Financial Terms -Royalties and Fees Establish a clear compensation structure that may include: -Upfront fees -Ongoing royalties (consider tiered rates based on sales volume) -Minimum annual guarantees -Milestone payments Ensure the royalty calculation method is well-defined, whether based on net sales, profits, or another metric. -Payment Terms -Specify payment frequency (e.g., monthly, quarterly, annually) and reporting requirements. -Term and Termination Define the agreement's duration and include provisions for: -Early termination conditions (e.g., breach of contract, bankruptcy) -Renewal options -Effects of termination on rights and obligations Intellectual Property Protection Include clauses that: -Affirm your ownership of the patent -Prohibit the licensee from challenging the patent's validity -Outline responsibilities for maintaining and enforcing the patent -Address ownership of improvements or modifications to the invention Performance Obligations Consider including: -Minimum sales targets -Marketing commitments -Development milestones These ensure the licensee actively commercializes your invention. Confidentiality Protect your sensitive information with robust confidentiality provisions, specifying: -What information is considered confidential -How it can be used -Duration of confidentiality obligations Sublicensing Rights If allowing sublicensing, clearly define: -Conditions under which sublicensing is permitted -Your approval rights for sublicensees -How sublicense revenue will be shared Quality Control If your patent is associated with a trademark, include provisions for: -Inspecting and approving the quality of goods before sale -Maintaining quality standards -Indemnification and Liability Include clauses that: -Protect you from legal claims arising from the licensee's use of the patent -Define limitations on liability for both parties -Dispute Resolution Specify mechanisms for resolving conflicts, such as: -Mediation -Arbitration -Litigation Governing law and jurisdiction By carefully addressing these key provisions and considerations in your Patent License Agreement, you can better protect your interests and maximize the value of your invention. Remember to tailor the agreement to your specific situation and consider seeking legal counsel to ensure all aspects are properly covered.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Intellectual Property

Trademark Transfer Agreement

Texas

Asked on Aug 28, 2025

What are the key provisions that should be included in a Trademark Transfer Agreement?

I am in the process of selling my business, which includes several registered trademarks, and I need guidance on drafting a comprehensive Trademark Transfer Agreement to ensure a smooth transfer of ownership and to protect my rights as the seller, as well as the buyer's rights to use the trademarks going forward. I want to understand the essential provisions that should be included in the agreement, such as the scope of the transfer, warranties, indemnification, and any necessary post-transfer obligations, to ensure both parties are fully protected and the transfer is legally valid.

Randy M.

Answered Sep 1, 2025

When you're selling your business in Texas and that sale includes registered trademarks, getting the Trademark Transfer Agreement right isn’t just paperwork. It’s what protects you and the buyer from serious legal headaches. Here’s what you need to understand about how it all works and what to include. FIRST, THE LEGAL BASICS Let’s get clear on where the law comes into play. If your trademarks are registered with the USPTO, federal law applies, specifically 15 U.S.C. § 1060. If you’ve registered marks at the state level in Texas, those fall under Section 16.061 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code. A lot of businesses have federal trademarks, but some have both, and each needs to be handled the right way. Here’s a critical point: you can’t transfer a trademark by itself. Legally, it has to go with the goodwill tied to it. That means the reputation, customer trust, and market recognition associated with your brand. Courts take this seriously. If you try to assign a trademark without transferring the goodwill behind it, that assignment can be ruled invalid. The trademark has to stay connected to its original source, or the legal protection starts to fall apart. KEY PARTS OF THE AGREEMENT Identifying the Parties and Background Info Start simple. Spell out who’s selling and who’s buying, using full legal names and business addresses. Include a quick explanation in the recitals that you own the trademarks and plan to transfer them as part of the business sale. Detailed Trademark Descriptions List every trademark included in the transfer. For federal marks, include things like registration numbers, any pending application serial numbers, filing dates, and the international classes they fall under. For Texas marks, include the state registration numbers and any other relevant details. Don’t forget common law marks either. If you’ve been using a brand name or logo in business without registering it, it still has value and legal protection. The Assignment Clause Itself This is where the actual transfer happens. The language needs to make it crystal clear that you’re transferring all rights, title, and interest in the trademarks, and just as important, the goodwill that goes with them. That’s not optional. For federal trademarks, this clause has to meet the standard set by 15 U.S.C. § 1060. For Texas marks, the law requires that the transfer include “the goodwill of the business in which the mark is used.” Be sure to include language that talks about transferring the reputation, customer recognition, and market value of the marks. That’s what keeps the assignment legally valid. Purchase Price and Who Pays for What Spell out what the trademarks are worth as part of the overall deal. If the value is rolled into the full business sale price, say that clearly. Also note who’s responsible for any filing fees with the USPTO or Texas Secretary of State, legal costs, and whether there’s any money going into escrow. Warranties and Representations You’ll need to confirm that you’re the sole owner of the trademarks, that they’re valid and enforceable, and that there are no liens, disputes, or infringement claims you know of. You can qualify some of these with “to the best of your knowledge,” especially if you're not sure about everything. The buyer will also need to make some promises, like having the ability to maintain and protect the trademarks going forward. Indemnification Terms This is how you divide up risk. You should agree to cover any trademark issues that started before the sale, such as pending legal disputes or past infringement claims. The buyer takes on anything that happens after the transfer. Be sure to include who will handle any legal defense and how costs are covered. What Happens After the Sale You’ll probably need to sign additional paperwork later to finalize the transfer, especially for filing purposes. You also need to agree to stop using the trademarks after closing. If you’re going to help the buyer with trademark maintenance or recordation, lay that out clearly. Cooperation after closing is often what makes the legal side go smoothly. WHAT IF THERE'S A TRANSITION PERIOD? If you’ll still be involved in operations temporarily or helping during a handoff, add quality control provisions. This matters because if the buyer is using the trademark on the same goods or services you used to provide, the quality needs to stay consistent. Without oversight during that period, trademark rights can actually be lost. That’s called naked licensing, and it’s something you want to avoid at all costs. RECORDING THE ASSIGNMENT Federal Marks To make the transfer legally solid, you’ll need to record it through the USPTO Assignment Center. Right now, it costs $40 for the first trademark and $25 for each additional one in the same document. You have three months from the assignment date to record it to protect against third-party claims. Texas Marks For state trademarks, the process goes through the Texas Secretary of State. The fee is $25, and Texas gives you 90 days to record the assignment. That’s different from the federal timeline, so don’t mix them up. Common Law Marks Since these aren’t registered anywhere, there’s no official filing to do. Just make sure your agreement clearly spells out the transfer and ties it to goodwill. That’s your legal foundation for common law marks. A FEW EXTRA LEGAL PROTECTIONS Include standard contract language too, such as Texas law as the governing law, a venue for disputes, integration clauses, and a method for resolving disagreements. You might want to get the agreement notarized. It’s not legally required in Texas, but it adds a layer of security. If you're staying involved during the transition and helping the buyer keep up with trademark deadlines, make sure that’s written into the deal. COMMON PITFALLS TO AVOID Don’t treat all your trademarks the same. Some may be federal, some state, and some common law. They each need different handling. And never forget the goodwill piece. Without it, your trademark transfer isn’t valid. Also, make sure you stay on top of deadlines. You have three months to record federal assignments and 90 days for Texas. Missing either one could leave the buyer exposed to claims from someone else down the road. THE FINAL ANALYSIS Getting this agreement right helps avoid future disputes and protects the trademark value you’ve built over time. Trademarks are often one of the most valuable pieces of a business, so it’s worth taking the time to spell out exactly what’s being transferred, what the responsibilities are, and what happens next. Because trademark law is detailed and the consequences of mistakes can be serious, it’s smart to work with an experienced IP attorney. They’ll help you match the agreement to your specific situation and avoid costly errors. Mistakes in this area can lead to total loss of rights. If you've built a brand worth selling, make sure it's protected when you pass it on.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Intellectual Property

Copyright

New York

Asked on Apr 18, 2022

Is using a mug or merchandise in a flyer for an event with another company’s logo copyright infringement.

Creating imagery with for an event that has an item with a logo on it

Jane C.

Answered Apr 22, 2022

Do you have a license to use the intellectual property? Consult with an attorney.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Intellectual Property

Invention Assignment Agreement

Texas

Asked on Aug 14, 2025

Can an Invention Assignment Agreement require employees to assign ownership of inventions created outside of work hours?

I recently signed an employment contract that includes an Invention Assignment Agreement, which states that I must assign ownership of any inventions I create during or outside of work hours. While I understand the need for the agreement in relation to work-related inventions, I am concerned about its implications for inventions I create on my own time and using my own resources. Can an employer legally require me to assign ownership of inventions created outside of work hours?

Randy M.

Answered Sep 9, 2025

Invention Assignment Agreements usually require employees to hand over rights to any inventions they come up with during their employment. But things can get tricky when the agreement tries to claim ownership of something you created on your own time using your own resources. What’s Generally Enforceable Employers often write these agreements in broad terms, sometimes trying to cover anything you invent while you're employed, even if it’s unrelated to your job. Courts usually uphold fair agreements, but they’ll look closely at anything that seems to overreach. Most states try to strike a balance. If an invention is directly tied to your work or the company’s business, the employer may have a valid claim. But if it’s something truly independent that you built on your own time without company tools or knowledge, you’re more likely to keep it. State Laws That Protect Employees Some states have gone further and passed laws that give employees more protection. California’s Labor Code § 2870 is probably the most well-known. It says employers can’t force you to assign inventions that were developed entirely on your own time without using any company resources. The exception is if the invention is connected to the company’s business, research, or your actual job duties. Other states like Washington, Illinois, Delaware, Minnesota, and North Carolina have similar laws. New York passed its own version in 2023, called Labor Law § 203-f, which follows California’s lead. Most of these laws also require employers to give written notice to employees about their rights. In states without specific laws, courts typically rely on general contract principles and public policy. If a contract tries to claim every idea you’ll ever have, that language probably won’t hold up. But if the invention overlaps with your employer’s field, even if you built it at home, the company could still have a real claim. When Employers Still Have Rights Even with legal protections, there are a few situations where the company can still argue ownership: 1. If the invention is related to the business or current projects. 2. If you used any company tools, software, workspace, or confidential info. 3. If the invention came out of your assigned job duties, even if you worked on it after hours. These carve-outs are broader than most people realize. For example, if you’re a software engineer and your side project uses the same coding language or solves a similar problem as your employer’s product, that could raise red flags, even if you used your own laptop at home. How to Protect Your Own Inventions If you want to make sure you keep the rights to something you’ve created, documentation is key. Keep records of when you worked on it, what tools you used, and how it relates (or doesn’t relate) to your job. Don’t use your work email, computer, or cloud storage. And read your agreement carefully. Some contracts require you to disclose all inventions, even personal ones. Disclosure doesn’t always mean you have to assign it, but it can start a conversation you’d rather avoid. The Shop Right Rule Even if you own your invention, your employer might still be able to use it under what’s called the “shop right” doctrine. This means that if you used company time, tools, or resources, the company may have a free, nonexclusive license to use your invention in its operations. You’d still own it, but you couldn’t stop them from using it. Why Jurisdiction Matters The state where you work usually controls which laws apply to your agreement, not the state where your company is based. That can make a big difference. For example, engineers in California have strong statutory protections. Employees in Texas may need to rely on general contract law instead. The Final Analysis Your best move is to have an employment attorney review your agreement. The details matter, and so does your state's law. A good attorney can explain what's enforceable, help you negotiate better terms (like explicit carve-outs for personal projects), and show you how to protect your own work without violating your contract. If you're looking for this type of guidance, the attorneys on Contracts Counsel are available to help. Whether you need a quick contract review or full representation, you can connect with experienced employment lawyers who understand the nuances of invention assignment agreements in your state.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Intellectual Property

Trademark Cease And Desist

California

Asked on Nov 3, 2024

Can I ignore a cease and desist letter for trademark infringement if I believe my use of the mark is fair use?

I recently received a cease and desist letter from a company claiming that my use of their trademark in my blog posts constitutes trademark infringement. However, I am using the mark in a descriptive manner to criticize and comment on their products, which I believe falls under fair use. I am unsure of how to proceed and whether I can ignore the cease and desist letter without facing legal consequences.

Dolan W.

Answered Dec 3, 2024

Hello! Thank you for posting this question. In your case, the other party may claim that you are infringing on their trademark, but proving it is a different case. The Lanham Act provides for a cause of action for infringement of both registered and unregistered trademarks. (15 USC Section 1114(1)(a); 15 USC Section 1125(a)(1)A).)  The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has laid out some elements to help determine whether it creates an infringement lawsuit. 1. The complaining party has to prove they have a valid, protectable trademark and that they own that trademark; 2. The complaining party must prove that a mark is similar, and it was used without the consent of the moving party in a manner that is likely to cause confusion among ordinary consumers as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or approval of the goods.  The likelihood of confusion can occur at the time of the sale, when there is initial interest by a consumer, or even after the sale, if the confusion causes a consumer to no longer buy a service or product connected to the mark. The court considers things like the strength of the original mark, whether you are using it for some fair use purpose, the similarity, the proximity of the products and marketing channels, whether there’s actual confusion, the defendant’s intent, the quality of respective products, and the sophistication of the customers. (Polaroid Corp. v. Polard Elecs. Corp. 287, F.2d. 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961.) So what this means is that it'd have to be litigated, but you can argue you are not trying to sell products or services using their mark, but rather you are using it for some other purpose, such as to educate people about their business practices. Best of luck!

Read 1 attorney answer>
See more legal questions…

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

View Trustpilot Review

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 19,939 reviews
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
See All Intellectual Property Lawyers
Intellectual Property lawyers by nearby cities

Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.

View Trustpilot Review

I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.

View Trustpilot Review

I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.

View Trustpilot Review

How It Works

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 19,939 reviews

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city