Intellectual Property Lawyers for Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Need an intellectual property lawyer in Sioux Falls, South Dakota?
ContractsCounsel matches businesses with Sioux Falls-based intellectual property lawyers, providing fixed-fee quotes from vetted attorneys with the first proposal typically arriving in just a few hours.
Hire a Lawyer for 60% Less than Traditional Law Firms
Meet some of our Sioux Falls Intellectual Property Lawyers
August 23, 2025
Alexander C.
I am a solo practitioner that runs my own legal practice. I am currently licensed in 16 states and I'm working to expand that reach.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowMeet some of our other Intellectual Property Lawyers
Norman R.
Norman Romney is an attorney and professional engineer with over 35 years of experience in the engineering, construction, and real estate industries. He is a seasoned transactional lawyer experienced in the review, negotiation, drafting and analysis of commercial contracts, including: business asset purchase agreements, partnership buy-out agreements, non-disclosure/confidentiality agreements, commercial leases, cease-desist letters, payment demand letters, construction contracts, consulting agreements and many more. He is also experienced in the preparation and review of construction industry standard contract forms including AIA documents, EJCDC documents and FIDIC international construction industry forms. Norman’s practice has included serving a General Counsel for a large non-profit. He also represented and assisted clients in the resolution of business contract disputes. He is experienced in many forms of alternative dispute resolution such as mediation, arbitration and third-party neutrals. His clients include large and small businesses, entrepreneurs, non-profits and freelancers. He is devoted to all his clients and seeks to provide timely, efficient and cost-effective legal services.
Sarah T.
Sarah has been practicing law since 2010. Prior to becoming an attorney, Sarah worked in the insurance industry for 5 years. Sarah's practice includes civil litigation, contracts, and family matters.
"You were such a joy to work with!!! Thank you so much for your responsiveness and attention to detail!!! Your'e exactly what I needed!!!!!"
Tsion L.
Seasoned Fractional COO and Legal Counsel with a proven track record of driving operational excellence and legal compliance in high-growth companies. Skilled in developing and executing strategic plans, optimizing business processes, and managing complex legal matters. Demonstrated ability to draft commercial, partnership, and sponsorship agreements, file trademark applications and manage IP portfolios, support corporate filings and board governance. Industries served: small and medium sized small business, cannabis, hemp, consumer goods, e-commerce, SAAs and health and wellness.
"Great experience, very responsive and professionally handled our needs."
Ricardo A.
Ricardo Aponte Parsi is a real estate and corporate counsel with a 22+-year track record of assessing risk, managing litigation, and building compliance systems to protect organizational interests. Trusted business partner and problem solver, dedicated to delivering exceptional results that advance business objectives through preventive counseling, strategic risk management, and shrewd advocacy. Collaborative team leader and project manager who builds relationships, leads change, and communicates effectively with private and public stakeholders. He obtained a bachelor's degree from Syracuse University (1994) with a major in International Relations and his law degree from the Interamerican University of Puerto Rico School of Law (2000). In May 2014, he completed a Master of Laws from Northwestern University School of Law and a Certificate in Business Administration from IE Business School in Madrid, Spain. In 2018, he completed a second LL.M. at Georgetown University Law School in Securities and Financial Regulation. In 2022, he completed a certification in Privacy Law from Seton Hall University School of Law. He was president of the Board of the Puerto Rico Education Council, the licensing agency for the Commonwealth, and is currently the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the San Juan Community College. Since November of 2024, he has worked as an attorney-advisor for the United States Air Force Installations, Energy and Environmental Law Division (SAF/GCN) at Lackland Air Force Base, in San Antonio, Texas.SAF/GCN provides legal and policy advice to members of the Secretariat, the Air Staff, and the Space Staff on virtually all matters relating to the Department’s 180 installations, nearly 10 million acres of real estate, Base Realignment, and Closure; annual $7 billion installation and operational energy budgets; annual multibillion-dollar military construction program; $8.3 billion military privatized housing portfolio; programs for environmental planning, compliance, and restoration and natural and cultural resources management; and programs for safety and occupational health. The Division advises the Center of Excellence for Environment, Facilities, and Installations and the Energy, Environmental, and Installations Directorates within the Air Force Civil Engineer Center. Experienced with estate planning, wills, trusts, prenuptial agreements and powers of attorney.
"Ricardo was great to work with. Delivered everything on time as promised and even identified areas where would could add additional protections. Highly recommend."
Grace A.
Business Lawyer with over 9 years of legal experience. Can assist with all types of business and commercial agreements, including formation documents, employment/hiring, financing/fundraising & business sales and purchases.
December 21, 2024
Feras M.
Feras Mousilli is a globally recognized leader in intellectual property, entrepreneurship, and corporate strategy. As the founder and managing partner of Lloyd & Mousilli, he has driven scalable growth strategies for Fortune 500 companies as well as innovative startups in emerging markets.
December 24, 2024
Benjamin E.
Dr. Ben Earwicker, J.D., Ph.D., is the director and administrator of the Idaho Human Rights Commission, the state-wide administrative law agency within the Idaho Department of Labor that enforces anti-discrimination law in Idaho. Prior to his work in administrative employment and civil rights law, he served as a faculty member and administrator at universities in the U.S. and New Zealand for 13 years and managed dual-enrollment modern language courses throughout Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. Ben is the CEO of VirNet Virtual Mediation, an online mediation platform with clients throughout the United States and abroad. He holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of Idaho College of Law, a Ph.D. in Spanish and Latin American Studies and a Master’s of International Studies from the University of Otago in New Zealand, and Bachelor of Arts Degrees in Psychology, Social Work, Spanish, and International Studies from Northwest Nazarene University.
December 30, 2024
Brian W.
I founded Brian Wynne Law, PC (based in Los Angeles, CA) in late 2023 after spending over 25 years as an in-house lawyer and over 13 years serving in General Counsel and department head-level business & legal affairs, and corporate operations positions. I provide fractional general counsel and legal advisory services to a broad range of companies, both early-stage and more established, primarily in the technology, digital media, and hospitality sectors. I negotiate a variety of sales, licensing, marketing,g and technology agreements, and handle employment, compliance, privacy, board matters, dispute resolution, and risk management matters. I also assist my clients by managing corporate transactions, IP, M&A, and corporate/legal operations as a combination GC/COO.
January 21, 2025
Julian D.
I have practiced law in the State of Alabama for going on eight years now. I have extensive experience in debt resolution, probate, traffic court, lemon law, contract law, and general counsel work.
January 24, 2025
Melissa K.
Your California Attorney for Startup, Business, Corporate, Arts, Publishing, and Entertainment Matters Melissa is a California attorney, assisting startups with general corporate and business counsel, seed-round investors, and international transactions. Melissa also represents entertainment clients with art placements, writer/publisher agreements, licensing, and film and television matters. Melissa received her J.D. from University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law and clerked at Kozolchyk National Law Center. She holds a Master of International Management (M.I.M.) from Thunderbird School of Global Management.
February 5, 2025
David G.
I specialize in commercial and technology agreements, and general corporate and real estate matters. My passion for transactional and corporate work grew out of helping small and medium sized businesses with agreements of all types and real estate matters. Though I primarily represent large private and publicly traded Fortune 500 companies, I very much enjoy representing new and emerging businesses. From the private family office or new start-up to the rapidly growing and mature company, I have a proven track record of exceeding expectations in helping clients achieve their vision.
Intellectual Property Legal Questions and Answers
Intellectual Property
Work For Hire Agreement
Texas
Can an employer claim ownership of intellectual property created by an employee under a Work For Hire Agreement?
I recently started a new job where I am expected to create original content as part of my role. I was asked to sign a Work For Hire Agreement that states any intellectual property I create during my employment will be owned by the company. However, I have concerns about this arrangement as I have invested significant time and resources into developing my creative skills and worry that my work may be undervalued or exploited without proper compensation or recognition. I would like to understand if the employer can legitimately claim ownership of my intellectual property under the Work For Hire Agreement, and if there are any steps I can take to protect my rights while still meeting my employment obligations.
Sara S.
Hi, Yes, intellectual property created by you as an employee, within the scope of your employment, under a work-for-hire agreement, probably belongs to your employer. To learn more about your rights under the agreement and any exceptions, you should consult with a qualified attorney.
Intellectual Property
Trademark Transfer Agreement
Texas
What are the key provisions that should be included in a Trademark Transfer Agreement?
I am in the process of selling my business, which includes several registered trademarks, and I need guidance on drafting a comprehensive Trademark Transfer Agreement to ensure a smooth transfer of ownership and to protect my rights as the seller, as well as the buyer's rights to use the trademarks going forward. I want to understand the essential provisions that should be included in the agreement, such as the scope of the transfer, warranties, indemnification, and any necessary post-transfer obligations, to ensure both parties are fully protected and the transfer is legally valid.
Randy M.
When you're selling your business in Texas and that sale includes registered trademarks, getting the Trademark Transfer Agreement right isn’t just paperwork. It’s what protects you and the buyer from serious legal headaches. Here’s what you need to understand about how it all works and what to include. FIRST, THE LEGAL BASICS Let’s get clear on where the law comes into play. If your trademarks are registered with the USPTO, federal law applies, specifically 15 U.S.C. § 1060. If you’ve registered marks at the state level in Texas, those fall under Section 16.061 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code. A lot of businesses have federal trademarks, but some have both, and each needs to be handled the right way. Here’s a critical point: you can’t transfer a trademark by itself. Legally, it has to go with the goodwill tied to it. That means the reputation, customer trust, and market recognition associated with your brand. Courts take this seriously. If you try to assign a trademark without transferring the goodwill behind it, that assignment can be ruled invalid. The trademark has to stay connected to its original source, or the legal protection starts to fall apart. KEY PARTS OF THE AGREEMENT Identifying the Parties and Background Info Start simple. Spell out who’s selling and who’s buying, using full legal names and business addresses. Include a quick explanation in the recitals that you own the trademarks and plan to transfer them as part of the business sale. Detailed Trademark Descriptions List every trademark included in the transfer. For federal marks, include things like registration numbers, any pending application serial numbers, filing dates, and the international classes they fall under. For Texas marks, include the state registration numbers and any other relevant details. Don’t forget common law marks either. If you’ve been using a brand name or logo in business without registering it, it still has value and legal protection. The Assignment Clause Itself This is where the actual transfer happens. The language needs to make it crystal clear that you’re transferring all rights, title, and interest in the trademarks, and just as important, the goodwill that goes with them. That’s not optional. For federal trademarks, this clause has to meet the standard set by 15 U.S.C. § 1060. For Texas marks, the law requires that the transfer include “the goodwill of the business in which the mark is used.” Be sure to include language that talks about transferring the reputation, customer recognition, and market value of the marks. That’s what keeps the assignment legally valid. Purchase Price and Who Pays for What Spell out what the trademarks are worth as part of the overall deal. If the value is rolled into the full business sale price, say that clearly. Also note who’s responsible for any filing fees with the USPTO or Texas Secretary of State, legal costs, and whether there’s any money going into escrow. Warranties and Representations You’ll need to confirm that you’re the sole owner of the trademarks, that they’re valid and enforceable, and that there are no liens, disputes, or infringement claims you know of. You can qualify some of these with “to the best of your knowledge,” especially if you're not sure about everything. The buyer will also need to make some promises, like having the ability to maintain and protect the trademarks going forward. Indemnification Terms This is how you divide up risk. You should agree to cover any trademark issues that started before the sale, such as pending legal disputes or past infringement claims. The buyer takes on anything that happens after the transfer. Be sure to include who will handle any legal defense and how costs are covered. What Happens After the Sale You’ll probably need to sign additional paperwork later to finalize the transfer, especially for filing purposes. You also need to agree to stop using the trademarks after closing. If you’re going to help the buyer with trademark maintenance or recordation, lay that out clearly. Cooperation after closing is often what makes the legal side go smoothly. WHAT IF THERE'S A TRANSITION PERIOD? If you’ll still be involved in operations temporarily or helping during a handoff, add quality control provisions. This matters because if the buyer is using the trademark on the same goods or services you used to provide, the quality needs to stay consistent. Without oversight during that period, trademark rights can actually be lost. That’s called naked licensing, and it’s something you want to avoid at all costs. RECORDING THE ASSIGNMENT Federal Marks To make the transfer legally solid, you’ll need to record it through the USPTO Assignment Center. Right now, it costs $40 for the first trademark and $25 for each additional one in the same document. You have three months from the assignment date to record it to protect against third-party claims. Texas Marks For state trademarks, the process goes through the Texas Secretary of State. The fee is $25, and Texas gives you 90 days to record the assignment. That’s different from the federal timeline, so don’t mix them up. Common Law Marks Since these aren’t registered anywhere, there’s no official filing to do. Just make sure your agreement clearly spells out the transfer and ties it to goodwill. That’s your legal foundation for common law marks. A FEW EXTRA LEGAL PROTECTIONS Include standard contract language too, such as Texas law as the governing law, a venue for disputes, integration clauses, and a method for resolving disagreements. You might want to get the agreement notarized. It’s not legally required in Texas, but it adds a layer of security. If you're staying involved during the transition and helping the buyer keep up with trademark deadlines, make sure that’s written into the deal. COMMON PITFALLS TO AVOID Don’t treat all your trademarks the same. Some may be federal, some state, and some common law. They each need different handling. And never forget the goodwill piece. Without it, your trademark transfer isn’t valid. Also, make sure you stay on top of deadlines. You have three months to record federal assignments and 90 days for Texas. Missing either one could leave the buyer exposed to claims from someone else down the road. THE FINAL ANALYSIS Getting this agreement right helps avoid future disputes and protects the trademark value you’ve built over time. Trademarks are often one of the most valuable pieces of a business, so it’s worth taking the time to spell out exactly what’s being transferred, what the responsibilities are, and what happens next. Because trademark law is detailed and the consequences of mistakes can be serious, it’s smart to work with an experienced IP attorney. They’ll help you match the agreement to your specific situation and avoid costly errors. Mistakes in this area can lead to total loss of rights. If you've built a brand worth selling, make sure it's protected when you pass it on.
Intellectual Property
Invention Assignment Agreement
Texas
Can you please explain the scope and implications of an Invention Assignment Agreement?
I am an employee at a technology company, and I have been asked to sign an Invention Assignment Agreement as a condition of my employment. I understand that this agreement is meant to assign any intellectual property or inventions I create during my employment to the company, but I am unsure about the specific extent of this assignment. I am concerned about whether this agreement applies to all inventions, even those created outside of work hours or unrelated to my job, and whether I would have any rights or ownership in these inventions. I would like a lawyer's guidance to understand the scope and implications of this agreement before signing it.
Jennifer B.
The terms of your specific agreement are the most important factors to consider. In general, an invention assignment agreement usually means that an employee gives the company any ideas or inventions they come up with while working. The rules can vary by agreement, but they often cover ideas made during work hours, using company resources, or related to the company’s business. In Texas, an agreement can apply to inventions made outside of work hours if they’re related to the company’s business or came from work the company assigned. In one case, the agreement said the employee had to give up all inventions made during or after regular work hours, whether on or off the job, if they were related to the company’s business or came from work the company assigned. Usually, an invention assignment agreement doesn’t apply to ideas that aren’t related to the employee’s job unless the agreement says otherwise. In Atlas Brick Co. v. North, 2 S.W.2d 980, the court said that the title to an invention wouldn’t belong to the employer unless the agreement said that ideas made and perfected under the employee’s contract of employment belong to the employer. Also, if a discovery is made outside the scope and purpose of employment, it belongs to the employee unless there’s an agreement to give up such inventions to the employer. So, it all depends on the terms of the invention assignment agreement. In the case of Halliburton Energy Servs. v. Axis Techs., LLC, the agreement required the employee to turn over all materials related to inventions created during employment, making them the company’s property. But, if the agreement doesn’t cover certain inventions or if the inventions are made outside the scope of employment without using company resources, the employee might still retain ownership.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property Rights Transfer Agreement
Georgia
Can I transfer the intellectual property rights for a product I created to another company?
I have recently developed a new product and I am considering transferring the intellectual property rights to a larger company that has the resources to manufacture and market it on a larger scale. I want to ensure that I can retain some control or receive royalties from the product's future success, and I am unsure of the legal process and implications involved in transferring the intellectual property rights to another entity.
Benjamin M.
Yes, you can achieve this through an IP license agreement versus a sale of your IP rights. In your license you would want to protect against gray market product manufacturing and also have provisions on how to handle defective products and components during the manufacturing process. I am available for a free consultation if you would like.
Intellectual Property
Work For Hire Agreement
Arizona
Is a Work For Hire Agreement necessary for freelance graphic design work?
As a freelance graphic designer, I have been approached by a client to create a series of designs for their marketing campaign. While discussing the project details, the client mentioned the possibility of a Work For Hire Agreement. I am unsure if such an agreement is necessary in this situation and whether it would affect my ownership rights or future use of the designs. I would like to understand the implications and whether it is in my best interest to enter into such an agreement.
Randy M.
Whether you need a Work For Hire Agreement really depends on the project and what both sides are trying to get out of it. You’re not automatically required to sign one, but saying yes or no to that clause can completely change who owns the work and what rights you’ll have moving forward. Just because a client calls something “work for hire” in a contract doesn’t mean it actually qualifies under the law, especially when it comes to freelance design work. Here’s the thing. Under U.S. copyright law, “work made for hire” is a specific exception to the general rule that the creator owns the work. For a freelance project to qualify, two conditions have to be met. First, both parties need to sign a written agreement that says the work is considered “made for hire.” Second, the type of work has to fall into one of nine defined categories under 17 U.S.C. § 101. These include things like contributions to collective works, audiovisual pieces, instructional texts, or compilations. The list is pretty narrow. Standard marketing materials, logos, brochures, or campaign graphics usually don’t make the cut. Courts take a strict approach here, so just checking a box in a contract doesn’t magically make it enforceable. If your project doesn’t meet both requirements, labeling it “work for hire” doesn’t hold legal weight. In that case, the default is that you, the designer, own the copyright unless there’s a separate written agreement transferring it to the client. That leads us to ownership. If there’s no valid Work For Hire clause and no assignment of rights, you retain full copyright. That gives you control over how the work is used beyond whatever license you’ve granted. So if you created a logo and the contract only licenses it for digital use, the client can’t later slap it on T-shirts or license it to a partner without getting your permission first. But if there is a valid Work For Hire clause or an explicit copyright assignment, then the client becomes the legal owner. That means they can use it, change it, resell it, or do whatever they want with it, without needing to pay you again or ask for further approval. You’d have no say over how the work is used, and unless the agreement gives you permission, you wouldn’t even be able to include it in your portfolio. If you want more flexibility, there are alternatives. You can structure the deal with a copyright assignment that still reserves certain rights for you. For example, you could keep the right to show the work in your portfolio or limit resale to direct competitors. Or you could stick with licensing. An exclusive license gives the client broad rights but you still own the work. A non-exclusive license is more limited and usually makes sense for templates or assets used with multiple clients. Portfolio rights, by the way, are often negotiable. Even in exclusive arrangements, you can add a clause that lets you show the work on your website, social profiles, or print materials. Just make sure it’s clearly spelled out. Some corporate clients won’t allow it at all unless it’s written into the agreement. From a practical standpoint, your decision should take into account how much you’re getting paid, how the work will be used, and whether you want to reuse or showcase it later. If you’re giving up all rights, price accordingly. Clients pushing for Work For Hire terms often just want clean, uncomplicated ownership, especially for branding or long-term use. But that doesn’t mean you can’t negotiate. You might agree to transfer ownership only after full payment is received. You might keep the right to use rejected drafts. You might even allow Work For Hire treatment for the final deliverables but retain some creative rights behind the scenes. Also, keep an eye out for boilerplate clauses. Some clients include Work For Hire language by default, not realizing their project doesn’t meet the legal standard. Just because it’s in the contract doesn’t make it enforceable. If the work doesn’t meet the criteria, the clause won’t hold unless there’s a separate valid assignment of rights. When in doubt, it’s smart to run the agreement by an attorney who understands copyright law and freelance creative work. Contracts Counsel connects you with attorneys who handle exactly this kind of issue.
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
- Austin Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Chicago Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Dallas Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Denver Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Los Angeles Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Phoenix Intellectual Property Lawyers
- San Diego Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Tampa Intellectual Property Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer