Intellectual Property Lawyers for Kent, Washington

You might think that because you wrote the code, you have the right to share it, but that’s not how developer agreements usually work. In Washington State, these contracts are enforceable, and they can absolutely stop you from sharing or reusing code you created during a project. It really comes down to ownership, and under most contracts, that ownership belongs to the company, not you. Let’s Talk About Who Owns the Code When you sign a developer agreement, you’re usually agreeing to one of two things: either it’s a “work-for-hire” deal or you're assigning your intellectual property rights. Either way, the result is the same. The company owns whatever you build for them. Since they own it, they get to decide what happens to it. Even if you’re the one who wrote every line, that doesn’t mean you have the right to reuse or share it if you’ve already signed those rights away. This kind of setup is standard in the tech world. Companies need to protect their IP, especially when it includes competitive advantages or trade secrets. That’s why they ask developers to assign rights and agree to keep things confidential. What About Washington State Law? Washington does offer some protection to developers, but it’s limited. There’s a statute, RCW 49.44.140, that says employers can’t claim ownership of inventions you created entirely on your own time, using your own resources, and completely unrelated to their business. That sounds helpful, but here’s the catch. It only applies if you’re an employee, not an independent contractor. And even then, the second your work overlaps with their business or involves any company resources, the protection probably doesn’t apply. So if the code you’re writing is part of a contract, or even just loosely connected to the company’s business, then the company likely owns it. Why This Matters If you violate the agreement, you’re not just risking a slap on the wrist. The company could send a takedown notice to GitHub, file for an injunction, or even sue for breach of contract or copyright infringement. If the code includes anything proprietary, like business logic or algorithms, they might also go after you for trade secret misappropriation. And beyond the legal problems, there’s your reputation to think about. Word travels fast in development circles, especially in local communities. Getting labeled as someone who mishandles IP can make future contracts harder to land. How to Protect Yourself The good news is that you still have leverage before you sign. A lot of companies start with broad IP assignment language, but they’re often open to carving out exceptions. You can ask to include a “prior inventions” schedule that lists tools, frameworks, or libraries you already created. That way, you can keep using your own work in other projects. If open-source contribution is important to you, say so upfront. Some companies will allow developers to contribute non-proprietary or generic components to open-source projects, especially if those contributions don’t compete with their business. Just make sure it’s all clearly spelled out in writing and approved in advance. You might also negotiate a time limit on confidentiality terms. The company will likely want to own the core project code permanently. That doesn’t mean you can’t eventually talk about general techniques or patterns you used, especially after some time has passed. Smart Moves Before You Sign Before you agree to anything, take a moment to list any existing code or tools you plan to use. Try to get those explicitly excluded from the IP assignment, or at least confirm that you’ll retain the right to use them elsewhere. And again, if open-source is part of your career plan, be upfront. Get language in the contract that allows you to publish select components with written approval. If you develop a useful utility during the project and think it might have broader uses, talk to the company before the contract ends. See if they’d be open to letting you open-source it or license it back to yourself for use in future projects. When It’s Time to Bring in a Lawyer If all this feels high-stakes, and it often is, consider having a tech-savvy attorney take a look. A good lawyer can help spot overly aggressive clauses, suggest better language, and help you protect both your rights and your long-term goals. This is especially important if you’re actively contributing to open-source or if you’ve built up your own libraries over time. A little legal help now can save you a lot of trouble later.

It would be a good idea for you to have the agreement reviewed by an attorney. You said there's no explicit language regarding termination or notice - is there something implied? With no language regarding termination, most likely either party can terminate at any time, with just a moment's notice, and no reason given. You have asked a lot of questions - I suggest that you post a project here on Contracts Counsel, and ask for an attorney well versed in intellectual property (not me) to discuss your rights, as that is probably the most important issue. An attorney who can also review the language of the entire agreement would be very helpful. (I'm sorry, but I'm not available for this project).

You’re not the first to confuse a KISS Note with intellectual property protection, and you definitely won’t be the last. It’s a common mix-up in the startup world. But here’s the truth: A KISS Note has nothing to do with protecting your software. It’s a financing instrument created by 500 Startups, designed as an alternative to convertible notes and SAFEs for early-stage fundraising. It’s a way for investors to give you money now in exchange for equity later. It does not offer any legal protection for your code or ideas. So What Do You Actually Need to Protect Your IP? If you're building software in California, there are several key legal tools you’ll want to have in place. Start with the ones that offer immediate protection and work your way toward longer-term strategies. Always Start with NDAs If you're showing your software to anyone (whether it's a co-founder, a contractor, an investor, or a beta tester) you need a solid non-disclosure agreement in place before you share anything. It’s your first line of defense, especially if you want to preserve trade secret protection. Your NDA should spell out exactly what you consider confidential. This might include your source code, algorithms, user data, business plans, or any other proprietary information. The agreement should also state how long confidentiality lasts and what the other party can and cannot do with your information. One important note here: California law prohibits non-compete clauses under Business and Professions Code Section 16600. Do not include one in your NDA. It won't be enforceable. Instead, focus strictly on confidentiality and use limitations. Copyright is Automatic, but Registration Matters As soon as you write your code, it’s protected under federal copyright law. That protection applies to the actual expression (the specific code) not to your underlying ideas, functionality, or algorithms. Even though protection is automatic, registering with the U.S. Copyright Office gives you significant legal benefits. You can’t file a federal lawsuit without registration. And if your copyright is registered before infringement occurs, you may be eligible for statutory damages of up to $150,000 per work and recovery of attorney’s fees. The process usually costs between $65 and $85 and takes a few months. Trade Secrets Require Real Effort to Stay Protected If your software includes proprietary algorithms, confidential processes, or unique technical methods that provide a competitive edge, you may be eligible for trade secret protection under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act. But here’s the catch. That protection only lasts as long as you actively protect the information. This includes limiting access to your source code, using secure development environments, marking documents as confidential, and having everyone involved sign NDAs. You need to treat your trade secrets like actual secrets if you want the law to do the same. Considering Patents? Proceed Carefully Software patents are complex, especially following the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice decision. You can’t patent abstract ideas, mathematical formulas, or generic computer processes. Your software needs to solve a specific technical problem in a novel, non-obvious way or improve the functionality of a computer system itself. If you've developed something truly unique — like a new data compression algorithm, a better machine learning architecture, or a new way to optimize networking — a patent might be worth exploring. Just keep in mind that the process is expensive, often costing $10,000 to $15,000 with legal fees. It can also take several years. Many software companies choose to rely on trade secrets and copyrights instead. How to Put All of This Into Practice Begin with what you can implement right away. Create a strong NDA template and use it consistently. Register your copyright as soon as your codebase is developed enough to be meaningful. Protect your trade secrets by putting real technical and legal safeguards in place. Track your development process carefully. Version control, timestamps, and contributor logs can all serve as useful evidence in a legal dispute. If you’re working with employees or contractors in California, be especially cautious. The state has employee-friendly laws, so your contracts must clearly state that all work product belongs to your company and that all confidential information stays confidential. When Should You Talk to a Lawyer? Once you’re dealing with patents, investor negotiations, infringement threats, or user data privacy, it’s time to bring in professional legal help. These are complex areas, and the risks are too high to wing it.

Without seeing the handbook it would be difficult to answer your question. Generally, what an employee creates for the Company is Company property, unless you have an agreement with them that states otherwise. It would also be helpful to know if you are an employee or independent contractor. Sometimes Company's give employee handbooks to independent contractors but the classification of whether you are an employee or independent contractor is important to this analysis.

Hi. If the Creative Commons License that you mentioned (CC BY-NC 4.0) does not allow for commercial usage, using that content commercially would violate the license. If you tranform the work sufficiently, you could potentially use it without violating the terms of the license.