Intellectual Property Lawyers for Spokane, Washington
Need an intellectual property lawyer in Spokane, Washington?
ContractsCounsel matches businesses with Spokane-based intellectual property lawyers, providing fixed-fee quotes from vetted attorneys with the first proposal typically arriving in just a few hours.
Hire a Lawyer for 60% Less than Traditional Law Firms
Meet some of our Spokane Intellectual Property Lawyers
Rosario A.
I'm a Washington-licensed lawyer specializing in trademark practice and with an extensive trademark education and academic background. I currently work with domestic and international businesses seeking trademark protection in the U.S. by conducting trademark searches, providing legal advice, submitting USPTO applications, and preparing responses to office actions. I'm passionate about trademark law and always looking forward to helping small and medium businesses promote their value by having a registered federal trademark. If you have questions or concerns about trademark/copyright/IP licensing and require legal advice, feel free to contact me and we can have a first chat.
"Provided what I asked for along with the revisions I needed. Was responsive and attentive to the needs of the project."
Justin A.
I am a lawyer who helps small businesses, nonprofits, and startups with a wide variety of agreements, corporate formation, and corporate governance. I earned my BA from Tulane University and my JD from the University of Chicago Law School. Before starting my own practice, I worked at an international law firm in New York City. Outside of work, I am on the board of the nonprofit Seattle REconomy (which runs the NE Seattle and Shoreline tool libraries) and I enjoy gardening, baking bread, and outdoor activities with my spouse and two dogs.
"Justin provided excellent, expedient service and made sure my needs were met satisfactorily."
Jason P.
Jason is a self-starting, go-getting lawyer who takes a pragmatic approach to helping his clients. He co-founded Fortify Law because he was not satisfied with the traditional approach to providing legal services. He firmly believes that legal costs should be predictable, transparent and value-driven. Jason’s entrepreneurial mindset enables him to better understand his clients’ needs. His first taste of entrepreneurship came from an early age when he helped manage his family’s small free range cattle farm. Every morning, before school, he would deliver hay to a herd of 50 hungry cows. In addition, he was responsible for sweeping "the shop" at his parent's 40-employee HVAC business. Before becoming a lawyer, he clerked at the Lewis & Clark Small Business Legal Clinic where he handled a diverse range of legal issues including establishing new businesses, registering trademarks, and drafting contracts. He also spent time working with the in-house team at adidas® where, among other things, he reviewed and negotiated complex agreements and created training materials for employees. He also previously worked with Meriwether Group, a Portland-based business consulting firm focused on accelerating the growth of disruptive consumer brands and facilitating founder exits. These experiences have enabled Jason to not only understand the unique legal hurdles that can threaten a business, but also help position them for growth. Jason's practice focuses on Business and Intellectual Property Law, including: -Reviewing and negotiating contracts -Resolving internal corporate disputes -Creating employment and HR policies -Registering and protecting intellectual property -Forming new businesses and subsidiaries -Facilitating Business mergers, acquisitions, and exit strategies -Conducting international business transactions In his free time, Jason is an adventure junkie and gear-head. He especially enjoys backpacking, kayaking, and snowboarding. He is also a technology enthusiast, craft beer connoisseur, and avid soccer player.
"Very nice! Great on responding back and being available! Recommend 100% !"
Curt B.
Curt Brown has experience advising clients on a variety of franchising, business litigation, transactional, and securities law matters. Mr. Brown's accolades include: - Super Lawyers Rising Star - California Lawyer of the Year by The Daily Journal - Pro Bono Attorney of the Year the USC Public Interest Law Fund Curt started his legal career in the Los Angeles office of the prestigious firm of Irell & Manella LLP, where his practice focused on a wide variety of complex civil litigation matters, including securities litigation, antitrust, trademark, bankruptcy, and class action defense. Mr. Brown also has experience advising mergers and acquisitions and international companies concerning cyber liability and class action defense. He is admitted in California, Florida, D.C., Washington, Illinois, Colorado, and Michigan.
"I was very impressed with the responsiveness and knowledge brought to my situation."
Janice K.
Twenty-plus years experience in family law, employment law, public agency law, federal, state and local contracts drafting and review, appellate practice.
"Janice was friendly, kind and efficient. She always held my best interest in mind and was very respectful and helpful at all times. Thank you so much Janice!"
October 21, 2021
Reuben O.
As an entrepreneur at heart, I enjoy working with business owners and executives on a variety of corporate matters, including mergers and acquisitions, corporate financing, corporate governance, public and private securities offerings, privacy regulation and early-stage corporate matters including formation. As a lawyer and business professional, I understand the value of providing personal service and focused legal answers to clients navigating a rapidly changing regulatory environment. Whether in Aerospace, Consumer Goods, or Technology, I find great success in work collaboratively with clients to strategical structure their business or implementing strategic growth-oriented financing opportunities.
Amy P.
Amy has served as outside general counsel and litigator to established businesses throughout western Washington since 2010. Her passion and focus is providing the best possible representation for clients in the construction, transportation and hospitality industries.
July 3, 2023
Eleanor W.
I have been working as a document review attorney since 2011. I have also done some business and estate planning work. I am fluent in English, Chinese, French, and Japanese.
July 30, 2023
Diamond R.
July 29, 2023 My name is Diamond Simpson Roberts, ESQ, MSPH and I am convinced that I can be a value added asset to most any company. As the first in my family to graduate a four-year university, I graduated from Wayne State University Law School in 2000 but could not afford a bar prep course upon completion. After over 20 years, I sat for the July 2022 UBE, successfully passed and am currently licensed in three states! This is an example of my self-motivation, internal drive and passion. I offer over 28 years of diverse experience in healthcare, strategy, sales/marketing, legal/policy and business savvy. I have many years building, leveraging, and sustaining long term relations to drive revenue as an entrepreneur and for corporations. My analytical strengths provide me with an innate ability to think through tough situations/topics while viewing both vantage points (which is excellent for law and life). I have been appointed to serve on numerous committees due to my heightened ability to identify client issues and priorities and provide solutions based upon relevant products, services and needs. I have led teams with and without authority; specifically, I have managed teams for an Adult Foster Care Facility called Etonne Cares, during my post-graduate fellowship with the largest Catholic Healthcare System in the U.S. and during my two-year executive order appointment with the Federal Government (Presidential Management Fellowship). Most importantly, I am a collaborative team player who knows how to improvise, overcome and adapt! I offer numerous years of being a pharmaceutical trainer and being an adjunct using the online platform. I welcome the opportunity to continue in the interview so that I may further highlight the skills I can (and will) contribute to my success in the role. Respectfully, Diamond Simpson Roberts, ESQ, MSPH DQSSIMPSON@GMAIL.COM M: 313-942-6747
July 31, 2023
Daniel W.
In my thirteen years of practice, I've had the opportunity to argue cases in state, federal, and tribal courts; in subjects as diverse as gaming, land tenure, water rights, treaty rights, finance, employment, criminal defense, conflict of laws, and tort (among others). But the real value I brought my clients came through avoiding litigation, fostering relationships, and developing long-term strategies.
September 22, 2023
Wilberforce A.
Wilberforce Agyekum is an attorney with 16 years of experience practicing in areas of contracts, immigration, and criminal law. Wilberforce received a Bachelor of Science degree from Washington Adventist University, and Juris Doctorate from Seattle University School of Law.
December 4, 2023
McCoy S.
P. McCoy Smith is the Founding Attorney at Lex Pan Law LLC, a full-service technology and intellectual property law firm based in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A and Opsequio LLC, an open source compliance consultancy. Prior to his current position, he spent 20 years in the legal department of a Fortune 50 multinational technology company as a business unit intellectual property specialist; among his duties was setting up the free & open source legal function and policies for that company. He preceded his in-house experience with 8 years in private practice in a large New York City-based boutique intellectual property law firm, working simultaneously as a U.S. patent litigator and U.S. patent prosecutor. He was also a patent examiner at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office prior to attending law school. He is licensed to practice law in Oregon, California & New York and to prosecute patent applications in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; he is also a registered Trademark and Patent Agent with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. He has degrees from Colorado State University (Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, with honors), Johns Hopkins University (Masters of Liberal Arts) and the University of Virginia (Juris Doctor). While in private practice, and continuing into his in-house career, he taught portions of the U.S. patent bar exam for a long-standing and well-known patent bar exam preparation course, and from 2014-2020 was on the editorial board of the Journal of Open Law, Technology & Society (JOLTS), and starting in 2023 will be on the editorial board of the American Intellectual Property Law Quarterly Journal (AIPLAQJ). He is the author or co-author of chapters on open source and copyright and patents in “Open Source Law, Policy & Practice” (2022, Oxford University Press). He lectures frequently around the world on free and open source issues as well as other intellectual property topics.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowIntellectual Property Legal Questions and Answers
Intellectual Property
Developer Agreement
Washington
Can a developer agreement restrict me from sharing my own code with others?
Can a developer agreement legally restrict me from sharing my own code with other developers or open-source communities? I am a software developer who has recently been offered a contract to work on a project for a company, and they have presented me with a developer agreement that includes a clause stating that I cannot disclose or share any of the code I develop during the project. However, I am passionate about collaborating with other developers and contributing to open-source projects, so I am concerned about the implications of this restriction on my ability to share my code and participate in the development community. I want to understand the legal implications and potential consequences of signing such an agreement.
Randy M.
You might think that because you wrote the code, you have the right to share it, but that’s not how developer agreements usually work. In Washington State, these contracts are enforceable, and they can absolutely stop you from sharing or reusing code you created during a project. It really comes down to ownership, and under most contracts, that ownership belongs to the company, not you. Let’s Talk About Who Owns the Code When you sign a developer agreement, you’re usually agreeing to one of two things: either it’s a “work-for-hire” deal or you're assigning your intellectual property rights. Either way, the result is the same. The company owns whatever you build for them. Since they own it, they get to decide what happens to it. Even if you’re the one who wrote every line, that doesn’t mean you have the right to reuse or share it if you’ve already signed those rights away. This kind of setup is standard in the tech world. Companies need to protect their IP, especially when it includes competitive advantages or trade secrets. That’s why they ask developers to assign rights and agree to keep things confidential. What About Washington State Law? Washington does offer some protection to developers, but it’s limited. There’s a statute, RCW 49.44.140, that says employers can’t claim ownership of inventions you created entirely on your own time, using your own resources, and completely unrelated to their business. That sounds helpful, but here’s the catch. It only applies if you’re an employee, not an independent contractor. And even then, the second your work overlaps with their business or involves any company resources, the protection probably doesn’t apply. So if the code you’re writing is part of a contract, or even just loosely connected to the company’s business, then the company likely owns it. Why This Matters If you violate the agreement, you’re not just risking a slap on the wrist. The company could send a takedown notice to GitHub, file for an injunction, or even sue for breach of contract or copyright infringement. If the code includes anything proprietary, like business logic or algorithms, they might also go after you for trade secret misappropriation. And beyond the legal problems, there’s your reputation to think about. Word travels fast in development circles, especially in local communities. Getting labeled as someone who mishandles IP can make future contracts harder to land. How to Protect Yourself The good news is that you still have leverage before you sign. A lot of companies start with broad IP assignment language, but they’re often open to carving out exceptions. You can ask to include a “prior inventions” schedule that lists tools, frameworks, or libraries you already created. That way, you can keep using your own work in other projects. If open-source contribution is important to you, say so upfront. Some companies will allow developers to contribute non-proprietary or generic components to open-source projects, especially if those contributions don’t compete with their business. Just make sure it’s all clearly spelled out in writing and approved in advance. You might also negotiate a time limit on confidentiality terms. The company will likely want to own the core project code permanently. That doesn’t mean you can’t eventually talk about general techniques or patterns you used, especially after some time has passed. Smart Moves Before You Sign Before you agree to anything, take a moment to list any existing code or tools you plan to use. Try to get those explicitly excluded from the IP assignment, or at least confirm that you’ll retain the right to use them elsewhere. And again, if open-source is part of your career plan, be upfront. Get language in the contract that allows you to publish select components with written approval. If you develop a useful utility during the project and think it might have broader uses, talk to the company before the contract ends. See if they’d be open to letting you open-source it or license it back to yourself for use in future projects. When It’s Time to Bring in a Lawyer If all this feels high-stakes, and it often is, consider having a tech-savvy attorney take a look. A good lawyer can help spot overly aggressive clauses, suggest better language, and help you protect both your rights and your long-term goals. This is especially important if you’re actively contributing to open-source or if you’ve built up your own libraries over time. A little legal help now can save you a lot of trouble later.
Intellectual Property
Content Creator Agreement
Washington
Can a content creator agreement be terminated by either party at any time and without cause?
I am a content creator who recently entered into a content creator agreement with a media company. The agreement does not explicitly mention termination, and I am wondering if either party can terminate the agreement at any time and without cause. I am concerned about the potential implications of termination without cause on my rights, compensation, and intellectual property, and I would like to understand my rights and obligations under the agreement.
Merry K.
It would be a good idea for you to have the agreement reviewed by an attorney. You said there's no explicit language regarding termination or notice - is there something implied? With no language regarding termination, most likely either party can terminate at any time, with just a moment's notice, and no reason given. You have asked a lot of questions - I suggest that you post a project here on Contracts Counsel, and ask for an attorney well versed in intellectual property (not me) to discuss your rights, as that is probably the most important issue. An attorney who can also review the language of the entire agreement would be very helpful. (I'm sorry, but I'm not available for this project).
Intellectual Property
Patent License Agreement
New York
Can you explain the key provisions and considerations in a Patent License Agreement?
I am a startup founder and I have developed a unique software algorithm that I believe has significant market potential. I have been approached by a larger company that is interested in licensing my patent rights to incorporate the algorithm into their existing product. I am unfamiliar with the intricacies of patent licensing and want to ensure I understand the key provisions and considerations that should be included in a Patent License Agreement to protect my interests and maximize the value of my invention.
Benjamin D.
To protect your interests and maximize the value of your invention, a well-structured Patent License Agreement should include several key provisions and considerations. Here are some essential elements: Grant of License The grant clause is crucial as it defines the scope and extent of patent rights given to the licensee. Be specific about: -Type of license (exclusive or non-exclusive) -Geographic territory covered -Market segments or fields of use -Duration of the license Clearly outlining these aspects helps prevent misuse and ensures you retain control over your invention's application. -Financial Terms -Royalties and Fees Establish a clear compensation structure that may include: -Upfront fees -Ongoing royalties (consider tiered rates based on sales volume) -Minimum annual guarantees -Milestone payments Ensure the royalty calculation method is well-defined, whether based on net sales, profits, or another metric. -Payment Terms -Specify payment frequency (e.g., monthly, quarterly, annually) and reporting requirements. -Term and Termination Define the agreement's duration and include provisions for: -Early termination conditions (e.g., breach of contract, bankruptcy) -Renewal options -Effects of termination on rights and obligations Intellectual Property Protection Include clauses that: -Affirm your ownership of the patent -Prohibit the licensee from challenging the patent's validity -Outline responsibilities for maintaining and enforcing the patent -Address ownership of improvements or modifications to the invention Performance Obligations Consider including: -Minimum sales targets -Marketing commitments -Development milestones These ensure the licensee actively commercializes your invention. Confidentiality Protect your sensitive information with robust confidentiality provisions, specifying: -What information is considered confidential -How it can be used -Duration of confidentiality obligations Sublicensing Rights If allowing sublicensing, clearly define: -Conditions under which sublicensing is permitted -Your approval rights for sublicensees -How sublicense revenue will be shared Quality Control If your patent is associated with a trademark, include provisions for: -Inspecting and approving the quality of goods before sale -Maintaining quality standards -Indemnification and Liability Include clauses that: -Protect you from legal claims arising from the licensee's use of the patent -Define limitations on liability for both parties -Dispute Resolution Specify mechanisms for resolving conflicts, such as: -Mediation -Arbitration -Litigation Governing law and jurisdiction By carefully addressing these key provisions and considerations in your Patent License Agreement, you can better protect your interests and maximize the value of your invention. Remember to tailor the agreement to your specific situation and consider seeking legal counsel to ensure all aspects are properly covered.
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property License Agreement
New York
Can I include clauses in an Intellectual Property License Agreement to protect my rights as the licensor?
I am a software developer who has created a unique application that I want to license to multiple clients. I have been researching Intellectual Property License Agreements and want to ensure that my rights as the licensor are protected. I am wondering if it is possible to include clauses in the agreement that address issues such as termination, infringement, and confidentiality, to safeguard my intellectual property and prevent unauthorized use or distribution of my software.
Randy M.
Yes, you can and should include clauses in an Intellectual Property License Agreement that protect your rights as the licensor. A license agreement is your main tool for controlling how your software is used, setting boundaries for your clients, and limiting your financial exposure. The key is to draft it in a way that leaves no doubt about what rights are granted, what’s restricted, and what happens if there’s a breach. Grant of License Start with a clear license grant. Spell out that you’re giving the client only limited rights, not ownership. Most licensors define the license as non-exclusive, non-transferable, and revocable if the client doesn’t follow the terms. For example, you might allow a client to use the software only for its internal business operations, and only on a set number of machines. It’s equally important to list what the licensee cannot do, such as reverse engineering, modifying, sublicensing, or providing the software to third parties. Intellectual Property Ownership Reinforce that you retain all ownership rights in the software and any related intellectual property. A simple but strong statement is that you hold all right, title, and interest in the software, and the client only receives a limited right to use it under the agreement. This prevents confusion between a license and a sale. You can also require the licensee to notify you if they discover third-party infringement and confirm that you alone have the right to pursue action against infringers. Confidentiality If you’re providing source code, algorithms, or other sensitive information, a confidentiality clause is essential. Define confidential information broadly to include not just the software itself but also any documentation or business information you share. Require the client to protect that information with at least the same care they use for their own confidential material, and make the obligation survive termination of the agreement. Termination Every strong license has a termination clause. Termination for cause should allow you to end the agreement if the client fails to pay, violates the license scope, or breaches confidentiality. Many agreements include a short cure period, such as thirty days, for the licensee to fix the breach before termination takes effect. Spell out the consequences of termination: the licensee must stop using the software immediately, return or destroy all copies, and certify that they’ve complied. Without this, you risk losing leverage if the relationship breaks down. Payment Terms Protect your revenue by making payment terms clear. Define license fees, support or maintenance fees if applicable, the payment schedule, and penalties for late payment such as interest. Courts generally enforce these provisions as long as they’re reasonable. Disclaimers and Limitation of Liability These clauses protect you from lawsuits if things go wrong. A limited warranty might cover basic performance for a set time, but beyond that you should disclaim all other warranties. Standard language is that the software is provided “as is” and you disclaim implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. To limit your exposure, cap liability at a defined amount, often the fees paid by the licensee in the previous twelve months, and exclude liability for indirect or consequential damages such as lost profits. Courts usually enforce these limits, except in cases of fraud or intentional misconduct. Audit Rights If your pricing model depends on the number of users or installations, an audit right is valuable. This allows you to check, on reasonable notice, that the licensee isn’t exceeding their rights. For example, you might reserve the right to inspect usage records once a year during normal business hours. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution Designating which state’s law governs and how disputes are resolved reduces uncertainty. Many licensors choose their home state’s law and either local courts or arbitration for disputes. Remedies Make sure your agreement lets you seek injunctive relief if the licensee misuses or discloses your software. Monetary damages often aren’t enough to protect intellectual property, so courts will enforce contract terms that authorize immediate injunctive relief. Protect Your Software with Legal Guidance When you’re licensing valuable software, the details in your agreement can make the difference between real protection and unnecessary risk. The lawyers on Contracts Counsel are available to draft, review, or negotiate a license that secures your rights and keeps your business protected.
Intellectual Property
Trademark Transfer Agreement
Maryland
Need advice on Trademark Transfer Agreement.
I recently started a small business and have developed a unique brand name and logo. I have been approached by another company expressing interest in acquiring my trademark rights through a transfer agreement. I am unfamiliar with the legal aspects of trademark transfers and would like to understand the process, potential risks, and ensure that I am adequately protecting my brand before entering into any agreement.
Roman V.
Hello, I wanted to express my interest in helping you understand your trademark rights and the trademark transfer proposal you received. As brief background, I am a US-licensed trademark attorney and have helped clients in similar situations buy, sell, and otherwise transfer trademark rights through transfer agreements. I can also help you prepare and file a federal trademark registration to protect your unique brand name and logo throughout the US. I'd be glad to set up a brief call to learn more about your business and see how I can help. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Roman Vayner (c) 414.628.9099 (e) rvayner@vaynerlegal.com www.vaynerlegal.com VaynerLegal, LLC
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
- Austin Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Chicago Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Dallas Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Denver Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Los Angeles Intellectual Property Lawyers
- New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Phoenix Intellectual Property Lawyers
- San Diego Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Tampa Intellectual Property Lawyers
Intellectual Property lawyers by nearby cities
- Bellevue Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Everett Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Kent Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Renton Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Seattle Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Spokane Valley Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Tacoma Intellectual Property Lawyers
- Vancouver Intellectual Property Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer