Contract Clauses
Jump to Section
Arbitration Clause Defined
Arbitration clauses, also known as arbitration agreements or arbitration provisions, are alternative dispute resolutions. Both parties essentially agree to settle disputes out-of-court with an arbitrator. Decisions coming from arbitration are legally binding unless the parties otherwise stipulate that the outcome is non-binding.
Laws apply to arbitration hearings at the local, state, and federal levels. You should understand how these laws apply to your situation before making legal decisions that can impact your future.
Here is an article on the definition of Arbitration Clauses.
Arbitration Clause Explained
A standard arbitration clause defines the terms and conditions surrounding the dispute resolution process. Dispute resolution addresses legal concerns that go beyond customer service issues. However, arbitration clause signers should understand that they limit their right to civil court redress when they sign them.
Here is an article on Arbitration Agreements.
Purpose of an Arbitration Clause
The purpose of an arbitration clause is to reduce costs associated with settling disputes. Arbitration proceedings are faster and private. Parties can also choose whom they want to handle the proceedings.
For example, international contracts follow an arbitral tribunal process where proceedings consist of one or three arbitrators. Other laws apply to other locations.
Here is deeper look into Arbitration Clauses by the International Chamber of Commerce.
Arbitration Clause Examples
Examples of arbitration clause use include:
- Example 1: Keeping divorce proceedings more private
- Example 2: Settling disputes with insurance companies
- Example 3: Working through issues with business partners
- Example 4: Not hiring employees until they sign the arbitration clause
- Example 5: Not taking personal injury cases to civil court
Arbitration Clause Samples
Sample 1 - Employment Contract:
Arbitration. Except for disputes, controversies or claims arising out of or related to the Proprietary Agreement and/or the Non-Competition Agreement attached as Annex A and B, respectively, any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to its existence, validity, interpretation, performance or non-performance, or breach, shall be decided by a single neutral arbitrator agreed upon by the parties hereto in Wilmington, North Carolina in binding arbitration pursuant to the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. The parties to any such arbitration shall be limited to the parties to this Agreement or any successor thereof. The written decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding and may be entered and enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction. Each party waives any right to a jury trial in any such forum. Each party to the arbitration shall pay its fees and expenses, unless otherwise determined by the arbitrator.
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.281 4 d226725dex10281.htm EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, Viewed April 5, 2021, < https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1003124/000119312511292827/d226725dex10281.htm >.
Sample 2 – Sales Contract:
Any dispute arising from or in connection with the Sales Contract shall be settled through friendly negotiation. In case no settlement can be reached, the dispute shall be then submitted to china international economic and trade arbitration commission for arbitration in accordance with its rules in effect at the time of applying for arbitration. The arbitral award is final and binding upon both parties.
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.52 9 dex1052.htm SALES CONTRACT, Viewed April 5, 2021, < https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1481513/000119312510025743/dex1052.htm >.
Sample 3 – Share Purchase Agreement:
12.10 Mediation; Binding Arbitration.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in Sections 2.3(c)(v), 6.14, 7.6 and 12.11, any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement and the rights of the parties will be submitted to JAMS, or its successor, for mediation, and if the matter is not resolved through mediation as provided herein, then it will be submitted to JAMS, or its successor, for final and binding arbitration in accordance with the provisions of this Section. The agreement of the parties to arbitrate covers all disputes of every kind relating to or arising out of this Agreement, including actions for breach of contract with respect to this Agreement, as well as any claim based upon tort or any other causes of action relating to this Agreement, such as claims based upon an allegation of fraud or misrepresentation and claims based upon a federal or state statute. The arbitrator selected according to procedures set forth below will determine the arbitrability of any matter submitted, and that determination will be final and binding on the parties.
(b) Either party may commence mediation by providing to JAMS and the other party a written request for mediation, setting forth the subject of the dispute and the relief requested.
(c) The parties will cooperate with JAMS and with one another in selecting a mediator from the JAMS panel of neutrals and in scheduling a mediation meeting (in person or via teleconference). The parties will share equally the costs of the mediation.
(d) All offers, promises, conduct and statements, whether oral or written, made in the course of the mediation by any of the parties, their agents, employees, experts and attorneys, and by the mediator or any JAMS employees, are confidential, privileged and inadmissible for any purpose, including impeachment, in any arbitration or other proceeding involving the parties, provided that evidence that is otherwise admissible or discoverable shall not be rendered inadmissible or non-discoverable as a result of its use in the mediation.
(e) Either party may initiate arbitration with respect to the matters submitted to mediation by filing a written demand for arbitration at any time following the initial mediation session or at any time following 30 days from the date of filing the written request for mediation, whichever occurs first (“Earliest Initiation Date”). The mediation may continue after the commencement of arbitration if the parties mutually agree.
(f) At no time prior to the Earliest Initiation Date shall either side initiate an arbitration or litigation related to this Agreement except to pursue a provisional remedy that is authorized by law or by JAMS Rules or by agreement of the parties. However, this limitation is inapplicable to a party if the other party refuses to comply with the requirements of subsection (c) above.
(g) All matters arising out of or relating to this Agreement and the rights of the parties (whether in contract, tort, or otherwise) will be governed by and construed and interpreted under the Laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of Laws of any jurisdiction other than those of the State of Delaware. The arbitration will be conducted in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The arbitration will be administered by JAMS pursuant to JAMS’ Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures (the “JAMS Rules”), subject to the agreements set forth herein. The arbitrator will not have the power to add to, modify or change any of the provisions of this Agreement, or to make mistakes of law. The parties may conduct discovery, including document requests, depositions and interrogatories, in accordance with Delaware law.
(h) The arbitration will be conducted by one neutral arbitrator mutually agreed upon by the parties. If no arbitrator is agreed upon within 10 days following commencement of arbitration, or if the arbitrator selected by the parties is unable or unwilling to arbitrate the dispute, the arbitrator will be such neutral arbitrator as is selected by JAMS. The award in writing of the arbitrator will be final and binding upon the parties.
(i) The arbitrator will be bound to honor claims of privilege or work-product doctrine recognized at law, but the arbitrator will have the discretion to determine whether any such claim of privilege or work product doctrine applies based upon applicable law or ethical rules.
(j) The arbitrator will provide a reasoned basis for the resolution of each dispute and for any award. The arbitrator will have power and authority to award any remedy or judgment that could be awarded by a court of law or equity in the State of Delaware not inconsistent with or in addition to the provisions of this Agreement.
(k) Except as set forth in this subsection (k) or in subsection (l) below, each party will bear its own costs in connection with any arbitration or mediation proceeding. The costs of the arbitration and mediation, including any JAMS administration fee, and arbitrators’ and mediators’ fees, and costs of the use of facilities during the hearings, will be borne equally by the parties in the first instance. The arbitrator shall, as part of the award, apportion the costs of arbitration and mediation based on the extent to which each Party prevailed.
(l) If a party to this Agreement brings any arbitration action, or any other action, suit, counterclaim or appeal, for any relief against the other parties, declaratory or otherwise, to enforce the terms hereof or to declare rights hereunder (referred to herein as an “Action”), the non-prevailing party in such Action will be required to pay to the prevailing party in such Action a reasonable sum for the prevailing party’s attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in prosecuting or defending such Action and/or enforcing any judgment, order, ruling or award (referred to herein as a “Decision”), granted therein. Any Decision entered into in such Action will contain a specific provision providing for the recovery of attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in enforcing such Decision. The court or arbitrator may fix the amount of reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses upon the request of any party. For purposes of this Section, attorneys’ fees will include, without limitation, fees incurred in connection with (1) postjudgment motions and collection actions, (2) contempt proceedings, (3) garnishment, levy and debtor and third party examination, (4) discovery, and (5) bankruptcy litigation.
(m) Nothing in this Section will limit a party’s ability to (i) enforce an arbitration award in a court of appropriate jurisdiction, or (ii) obtain specific performance or other injunctive relief.
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-2.1 2 d557691dex21.htm SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT, Viewed April 5, 2021, < https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/842023/000119312513262619/d557691dex21.htm >.
Common Contracts with Arbitration Clauses
Common contracts with arbitration clauses include:
- International contracts
- Insurance contracts
- Employment agreements
- Partnership agreements
- Prenuptial agreements
- Credit card agreements
- Purchase agreements
Arbitration Clause FAQs
Arbitration clauses limit both party’s rights to file a civil claim in court. It’s essential to understand what you are signing or drafting beforehand.
Below, please find the answers to some common arbitration clause FAQs:
Are arbitration clauses legal?
Yes, arbitration clauses are legal. However, they don’t apply to cases challenging the enforceability of the agreement.
For more information about how to beat an arbitration clause or draft one, speak with arbitration lawyers for advice.
Is it OK to sign an arbitration agreement?
It’s OK to sign an arbitration agreement when you understand the legal implications involved. Some companies won’t work with you unless you sign their arbitration agreement. For instance, employers won’t hire employees who don’t sign their arbitration clause.
Arbitration attorneys can help you review the agreement before signing.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Lawyers
Jordan M.
I am a software developer turned lawyer with 7+ years of experience drafting, reviewing, and negotiating SaaS agreements, as well as other technology agreements. I am a partner at Freeman Lovell PLLC, where I lead commercial contracts practice group. I work with startups, growing companies, and the Fortune 500 to make sure your legal go-to-market strategy works for you.
Tabetha H.
I am a startup veteran with a demonstrated history of execution with companies from formation through growth stage and acquisition. A collaborative and data-driven manager, I love to build and lead successful teams, and enjoy working full-stack across all aspects of the business.
"Tabetha provided feedback on a legal document in a timely and thorough manner. I plan to use her services going forward."
Elbert T.
Elbert Thomas is the founder of the Thomas Law Group, LLC. Elbert is proficient in contract creation, drafting, reviewing, and negotiating various business contracts and demand letters in industries such as construction, personal, professional services, non-profits, and real estate. Elbert typically represents small and large companies in drafting and negotiating countless agreements such as purchase sale agreements, interconnection agreements, lease agreements, demand letters, cease & desist letters, transfer of deeds in real property, and merger/acquisition agreements. In addition, Elbert is also experienced in start-ups, small business formation, drafting operating agreements, and estate planning.
"I enjoyed working with Elbert. He is thoughtful and willing to walk an ambiguous idea forward with you until there's clarity."
November 12, 2021
Jonathan K.
Pico & Kooker provides hands on legal advice in structuring, drafting, negotiating, interpreting, managing and enforcing complex high value commercial transactions. Adept at navigating complex environments, Jonathan has extensive expertise advising clients on a wide range of long- and medium-term cross border and financial engagements, including public tender participation, PPPs, export sales agreements as well as policy and regulatory formulation. Jonathan and his co-founder, Eva Pico have represented and acted on behalf of lenders, global corporations and other market participants across a range of industries including financial services, infrastructure and transportation. As outside counsel, Pico & Kooker, has developed a strong rapport and working relationship with their clients and appropriately work with their in-house teams to increase consistency, processes and procedures. The company employs a unique approach as practical, business minded outside legal counsel who believe in proactively partnering with their clients to achieve desired results while managing and engaging key stakeholders. They listen to their clients to develop customized solutions that best meet their needs while aligning with their objectives, vision and values. Some representative transactions include advising the World Bank on project finance and portfolio options to address the costs and risks associated with integrating renewable power sources. Also advising them as legal counsel, Jonathan developed policies, regulation and models for emerging market governments entering into public-private partnerships. In addition to his work with the World Bank, Jonathan has worked with some of the world’s largest consulting firms, financial institutions and governmental organizations, including the United Nations, the governments of the US, UK and select African countries. Through out his career, he has worked with large, multinational corporations both by consulting in-house and acting as outside counsel on large cross-border transactions. He graduated from Georgetown University’s law school and was admitted practice as a lawyer in New York, England and Wales and, as a foreign lawyer, in Germany. He has written several articles for trade journals and has been cited by several business publications in worldwide. Jonathan is a native English speaker and has high proficiency in German and a functional understanding of Spanish.
October 21, 2021
Reuben O.
As an entrepreneur at heart, I enjoy working with business owners and executives on a variety of corporate matters, including mergers and acquisitions, corporate financing, corporate governance, public and private securities offerings, privacy regulation and early-stage corporate matters including formation. As a lawyer and business professional, I understand the value of providing personal service and focused legal answers to clients navigating a rapidly changing regulatory environment. Whether in Aerospace, Consumer Goods, or Technology, I find great success in work collaboratively with clients to strategical structure their business or implementing strategic growth-oriented financing opportunities.
October 22, 2021
Thaddeus W.
Experienced legal counsel to entrepreneurs, small businesses, and investors. Advising clients starting, buying, selling, operating, financing, and investing in businesses // U.S. Army Veteran // Ironman Triathlete, Marathoner, Open Water Swimmer, USAT Triathlon Coach // Lover of Dogs, Cribbage, Craft Beer, Bourbon, and Cigars
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewCONTRACT lawyers by city
- Atlanta Contract Lawyers
- Austin Contract Lawyers
- Boston Contract Lawyers
- Chicago Contract Lawyers
- Dallas Contract Lawyers
- Denver Contract Lawyers
- Fort Lauderdale Contract Lawyers
- Houston Contract Lawyers
- Las Vegas Contract Lawyers
- Los Angeles Contract Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review