Home Q&A Forum Can a party terminate an international contract due to force majeure?

Business Contracts

International Contract

California

Asked on Jun 27, 2025

Can a party terminate an international contract due to force majeure?

I am a small business owner based in the United States and I have recently entered into an international contract with a supplier in China to provide raw materials for my manufacturing process. However, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the global supply chain has been severely disrupted, causing significant delays and making it impossible for the supplier to fulfill their obligations under the contract. I want to know if I have the right to terminate the contract based on force majeure and what potential legal consequences or liabilities I may face if I do so.

Answers from 1 Lawyer

Answer

Business Contracts

California

Answered 251 days ago

Norman R.

ContractsCounsel verified

Business Lawyer
Licensed in District of Columbia
Free Consultation
View Norman R.
5.0 (1)
Member Since:
December 31, 2024

Whether an international contract may be terminated due to force majeure depends on whether the contract includes a "force majeure clause" that defines those events that are beyond the control of either party and would render contract performance impossible. Typical force majeure events could include, war, natural or man-made disasters, "acts-of-god", civil turmoil, etc. Disruptions to global supply chains due to the Covid-19 pandemic could be considered a force majeure event if it is identified as such in the force majeure clause of the contract. To determine the legal consequences and liabilities of terminating the contract the contract should be reviewed by a qualified lawyer to evaluate: whether supply chain disruptions due to Covid-19 qualifies as a force majeure event; whether there are notice requirements for declaring a force majeure event; whether the notice requirements (if any) have been properly satisfied; whether the Party declaring a force majeure event must take mitigating actions, etc. You should consult with a qualified lawyer to determine specific legal consequences and liabilities based on the actual terms of your contract.

Use of the ContractsCounsel Q&A Forum does not create an attorney-client relationship between User and any Lawyer User. The Forum is not a substitute for legal advice from a lawyer but is intended to be educational and to help the user determine if legal services are necessary. The Forum, Content, and communications on the Forum do not constitute legal advice.
Meet some lawyers on our platform

Daniel R.

309 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Jehan C.

6 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Allen L.

69 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Randy M.

20 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

People Also Asked

Business

International Contract

California

Asked on Dec 28, 2024

What legal protections exist for me as a small business owner in the United States entering into an international contract?

As a small business owner in the United States, I am considering entering into an international contract with a supplier based in a different country. I am concerned about the potential risks and legal challenges that may arise from conducting business across borders. I want to know what legal protections exist for me in terms of contract enforcement, dispute resolution, and intellectual property rights, as well as any other important considerations I should be aware of before entering into an international contract.

View Dolan W.
5.0 (317)

Dolan W.

Answered Dec 31, 2024

Hello! My name is Dolan and thank you so much for coming to the site. So the contract itself is going to be the most important piece of protection. The law doesn't provide for specific protections for individuals or businesses entering into international agreements, but the contract itself, and its terms, are what you need to pay close attention to. If you are selling goods, then there are some rules that help clarify what AI said earlier. The first is the Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (called the CISG). The CISG applies automatically if both parties to the contract are located in countries that have adopted the treaty unless the parties specifically agree to opt out of it. It covers many aspects of a sales contract, such as the obligations of the buyer and seller, delivery of goods, payment, breach of contract, and remedies for non-performance. In other word, the CISG is kind of like a default set of rules for cross-border contracts unless you opt out of it, so knowing whether it helps or hurts your position is worth looking into. When it comes to intellectual property, be proactive. Just because you’ve got protections in the U.S. doesn’t mean they automatically apply abroad. Consider registering trademarks or patents in the country where your supplier is based to prevent them from using your intellectual property without permission. So what do I recommend you do? 1. Put in the contract what state is going to be the state for lawsuits (e.g. California); 2. Put it in writing! We can draft it up for you just let us know!

Read 1 attorney answer>

Trade

International Contract

California

Asked on May 13, 2025

Can a party terminate an international contract if the other party fails to perform due to COVID-19 pandemic?

Can a party terminate an international contract if the other party fails to perform due to the COVID-19 pandemic? I am a small business owner who entered into a contract with a foreign supplier to provide goods for my business. However, due to the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the supplier has been unable to fulfill their obligations. I am concerned about the potential legal consequences of terminating the contract and the possibility of facing breach of contract claims.

View Sara S.
4.9 (154)

Sara S.

Answered Jun 13, 2025

Hi, What you are likely looking for is a deep dive into your international contract's "Force Majeure" clause with a qualified attorney.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Business Contracts

Settlement Agreement

California

Asked on Sep 10, 2021

When does a non-disparagement clause end?

8.2 Continuing Obligations of Contractor. The provisions of Sections 1.3, 1.4, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7.2, and 8 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason. 9. Additional Provisions. 9.1 Non-Disparagement. Both Parties agree that they shall not, directly or indirectly, engage in any conduct or make any statement, whether in commercial or noncommercial speech, disparaging or criticizing in any way of the other Party, or any of its affiliates or clients or any of their respective owners, officers, employees or agents or services offered by any of them, nor shall either Party engage in any other conduct or make any other statement whether in writing, verbally or on-line, that could be reasonably expected to impair the goodwill or reputation of the other Party or any of its affiliates or clients. 9.2 Non-Solicitation. During the term of this Agreement, and for a period of twelve (12) months following termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall not, without the prior written consent of Company, directly or indirectly solicit for employment, employ or otherwise engage the services of employees or individual consultants of the Company. This subsection shall not apply to general solicitations, public job postings, or newspaper advertisements for employment opportunities.

View JOSEPH L.
4.8 (16)

JOSEPH L.

Answered Sep 28, 2021

Since Section 9, Non-Disparagement, is not listed as one of the sections that "survives termination of this Agreement" it is arguable that once the Agreement terminates pursuant to the termination clause of the Agreement then the Non-Disparagement restriction will terminate as well. If no term is stated in a written agreement then presumably the restriction on disparaging that the parties agree to is not terminated, since the contract did not specify one, and therefore is a continuing obligation of both parties. Damages is another issue though. If the contract does not specify damages if one party breaches the agreement by disparaging the other, then what are the damages? Courts hate to guess at damages so the non-breaching party would have to prove "actual damages". If the non-breaching party cannot prove a loss of business or a lost contract with a client as a "direct result" of the disparaging comment, then the court will not guess at damages so the most the non-breaching party may hope to gain is an injunction against future disparaging comments and an order that such comments be removed from the internet, if that is where the comments appear.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Business Contracts

Software License

California

Asked on Sep 14, 2021

What invalidates a perpetual software license?

What would invalidate a perpetual S/W license under a user agreement that was purchased over 20 years by the customer under a services contract for a unique legacy test system still in use? Would the customer be required to purchase an annual subscription S/W license under a new contract when they are not receiving any additional enhancements, features or benefits for legacy S/W maintenance, training or upgrades since it in stalled on legacy Linux operating system computer workstations? This legacy S/W still operates under it intended use and functions correctly as advertised. Replacing the legacy S/W with new subscription S/W license would also force the customer to purchase new computer H/W at an additional cost and impact other legacy H/W and S/W that interfaces the legacy perpetual S/W. This would create additional S/W develop to test and modify existing code to validate the change would still meet it original intent and test capability. I am curious if this proposal would violate any federal acquisition or ethics rules in attempting to force the customer to pay for a S/W license that are not required to perform its current function providing no additional value because the company has changed their business rules to follow the current trend to charge customers for subscription based S/W license? Their justification is they are charging another customer an annual subscription S/W license so we should also be required to go along with their new business rules.

View Octavia P.
5.0 (2)

Octavia P.

Answered Sep 24, 2021

A perpetual license generally authorizes use of a specific version of a software program indefinitely with the payment of a single upfront fee. However, software companies usually limit supplemental support and updates to a specific time (i.e., three years) and when that period ends, gives the customer the option to use the current version with or without paid support. Consequently, if there is a perpetual license in place your company should be free to continue to use your particular version of the software indefinitely without the requirement to move to a subscription-based plan unless your company requires tech support or any type of update/upgrade to continue to use the software which does not seem to be the case here. Nevertheless, the original user agreement and any ancillary agreements should be reviewed to determine factors such as the actual type of license and the powers/rights of the software vendor and your company to terminate or invalidate the license. If you would like a legal review of the user agreement/services contract you can post a contract review project on this platform, based on your question, to receive and compare multiple proposals from licensed attorneys who are registered and verified. Once you receive a response from an attorney you will be able to correspond through the platform to help with your decision to hire that attorney for the project.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Business Contracts

Non-Competition Agreement

California

Asked on Jan 27, 2022

My previous job had a secret non-compete closure

I left my previous job because I did not appreciate how I was treated when returning from maternity leave. I stepped down because with a colic infant and a national staffing shortage I couldn’t handle the work load, right after I stepped down they changed the schedule to minimize stress for the current programs director. They also allowed employees to unprofessional to me, when I returned the employee I trained and managed for years lectured me how todo my current position and asked if I had any disabilities or injuries because I had a C-section. This company for years treated me differently then other employees even though I ran and managed profitable programs. Before I left I asked Premier Aquatics that I wanted to be placed in a position similar to the one I had before, and they didn’t have a position for me. I decided to resign and I want to work for another company near their location. I’ve known in the past that they do come after employees with a non-compete and they never offered me anything for the non-compete.

View JOSEPH L.
4.8 (16)

JOSEPH L.

Answered Feb 8, 2022

Generally speaking non-competes are not enforceable in California against employees or independent contractors. The situation may be different depending on all the facts if you were an equity owner or partner in the company. Also, when a business is sold, a reasonable non-compete is enforceable against the former owner(s) since they were paid as part of the purchase price for non-competition representations. California has long had a public policy against non-compete clauses against employees and independent contractors since it affects their ability to earn a living. I am not sure what information you have about them "coming after other employees". Note: I don't have all the facts, and this answer is for informational and research purposes only.

Read 1 attorney answer>

Find lawyers and attorneys by city