Business Contracts
Assignment Of Partnership Interest
California
Can a partner assign their interest in a partnership without the consent of the other partners?
Can a partner, who is dissatisfied with the partnership and wishes to exit, legally assign their interest in the partnership to a third party without the consent of the other partners, and what are the potential implications or restrictions that may arise from such an assignment? I am currently a partner in a business that operates as a partnership, but due to personal circumstances, I am looking to leave the partnership and transfer my interest to another individual who is interested in joining. However, the other partners have been resistant to the idea of allowing me to assign my interest, and I am unsure of the legal rights and obligations surrounding this matter.
Answers from 1 Lawyer
Answer
Business Contracts
California
Dawn K.
ContractsCounsel verified
You don't say what the partnership entity structure is, so I'm going to answer this as if it was an LLC. If this is just a partnership agreement that operates as a different structure, the answer would be found in whatever the partnership agreement says, but many "partnership" entities that I see in practice are formed with an LLC structure, with the partners as "members." If you are an LLC, it is time to look at your operating agreement. If you do not have one, you'll be under the "default rules" in California. There are two potential structures- a "manager" managed LLC and a "member" managed LLC, you'll need to look at your specific operating agreement to see whether your LLC is specified as "manager" managed. If you do not have one, by default, your business is more than likely, a member managed LLC. Generally, and this is education, not legal advice, there are specific acts that require unanimous consent of all members- and this may include transfer of interests- depending on any restrictions in the Operating Agreement. I would start from the documentation you signed to create the partnership, whether it is a stand-alone partnership agreement or an LLC and if you have an LLC structure look for whether your company is under the default rules or what the Operating Agreement states regarding transfers.
People Also Asked
Business
Assignment Of Partnership Interest
California
Can a partner assign their interest in a partnership to another person without the consent of the other partners?
I am a partner in a small business partnership and I recently discovered that one of my partners plans to assign their interest in the partnership to a third party without informing or seeking consent from the other partners. This raises concerns for me as we have a close-knit working relationship and I believe that such a significant change in ownership should require the approval of all partners. I would like to know if it is legally permissible for a partner to assign their interest in a partnership without the consent of the other partners, and what actions can be taken to protect the interests of the remaining partners in such a situation.
Dolan W.
Hello! My name is Dolan and I'm happy to answer this question. The short answer? Whether your partner can assign their interest without your consent depends on your partnership agreement. Most agreements require all partners to approve something like this, especially in a close-knit setup like yours. If there’s no agreement or it doesn’t cover this, state law usually allows a partner to transfer their financial stake (like profits and losses) but not their management rights or status as a partner without everyone’s okay. First, check your partnership agreement to see if this move breaks the rules. If it does, you can push back. If there’s no agreement, the new person likely can’t step into full partnership status without your consent. To avoid issues like this in the future, consider updating the agreement to require unanimous approval for transfers. If things get messy, a lawyer who knows partnership law can help you sort it out and protect your business. We can update your agreement, or at least revise it, on this site. Thanks so much! Dolan
Read 1 attorney answer>Partnership
Assignment Of Partnership Interest
Texas
Can a partner assign their interest in a partnership without the consent of the other partners?
I am a partner in a small business partnership, and one of my fellow partners is looking to assign their interest in the partnership to a third party. However, we do not have any provisions in our partnership agreement regarding the assignment of partnership interests. I am concerned about the implications of this assignment and whether it can be done without the consent of the other partners. I want to understand the legal rights and obligations surrounding the assignment of partnership interests in order to make an informed decision and protect the interests of all partners involved.
Thomas D.
It is highly unusual that your partnership agreement does not address this issue. If there is no agreement to the contrary, then subject to very limited exceptions, a partner can assign its partnership interest.
Read 1 attorney answer>Business Contracts
Settlement Agreement
California
When does a non-disparagement clause end?
8.2 Continuing Obligations of Contractor. The provisions of Sections 1.3, 1.4, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7.2, and 8 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason. 9. Additional Provisions. 9.1 Non-Disparagement. Both Parties agree that they shall not, directly or indirectly, engage in any conduct or make any statement, whether in commercial or noncommercial speech, disparaging or criticizing in any way of the other Party, or any of its affiliates or clients or any of their respective owners, officers, employees or agents or services offered by any of them, nor shall either Party engage in any other conduct or make any other statement whether in writing, verbally or on-line, that could be reasonably expected to impair the goodwill or reputation of the other Party or any of its affiliates or clients. 9.2 Non-Solicitation. During the term of this Agreement, and for a period of twelve (12) months following termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall not, without the prior written consent of Company, directly or indirectly solicit for employment, employ or otherwise engage the services of employees or individual consultants of the Company. This subsection shall not apply to general solicitations, public job postings, or newspaper advertisements for employment opportunities.
JOSEPH L.
Since Section 9, Non-Disparagement, is not listed as one of the sections that "survives termination of this Agreement" it is arguable that once the Agreement terminates pursuant to the termination clause of the Agreement then the Non-Disparagement restriction will terminate as well. If no term is stated in a written agreement then presumably the restriction on disparaging that the parties agree to is not terminated, since the contract did not specify one, and therefore is a continuing obligation of both parties. Damages is another issue though. If the contract does not specify damages if one party breaches the agreement by disparaging the other, then what are the damages? Courts hate to guess at damages so the non-breaching party would have to prove "actual damages". If the non-breaching party cannot prove a loss of business or a lost contract with a client as a "direct result" of the disparaging comment, then the court will not guess at damages so the most the non-breaching party may hope to gain is an injunction against future disparaging comments and an order that such comments be removed from the internet, if that is where the comments appear.
Read 1 attorney answer>Business Contracts
Software License
California
What invalidates a perpetual software license?
What would invalidate a perpetual S/W license under a user agreement that was purchased over 20 years by the customer under a services contract for a unique legacy test system still in use? Would the customer be required to purchase an annual subscription S/W license under a new contract when they are not receiving any additional enhancements, features or benefits for legacy S/W maintenance, training or upgrades since it in stalled on legacy Linux operating system computer workstations? This legacy S/W still operates under it intended use and functions correctly as advertised. Replacing the legacy S/W with new subscription S/W license would also force the customer to purchase new computer H/W at an additional cost and impact other legacy H/W and S/W that interfaces the legacy perpetual S/W. This would create additional S/W develop to test and modify existing code to validate the change would still meet it original intent and test capability. I am curious if this proposal would violate any federal acquisition or ethics rules in attempting to force the customer to pay for a S/W license that are not required to perform its current function providing no additional value because the company has changed their business rules to follow the current trend to charge customers for subscription based S/W license? Their justification is they are charging another customer an annual subscription S/W license so we should also be required to go along with their new business rules.
Octavia P.
A perpetual license generally authorizes use of a specific version of a software program indefinitely with the payment of a single upfront fee. However, software companies usually limit supplemental support and updates to a specific time (i.e., three years) and when that period ends, gives the customer the option to use the current version with or without paid support. Consequently, if there is a perpetual license in place your company should be free to continue to use your particular version of the software indefinitely without the requirement to move to a subscription-based plan unless your company requires tech support or any type of update/upgrade to continue to use the software which does not seem to be the case here. Nevertheless, the original user agreement and any ancillary agreements should be reviewed to determine factors such as the actual type of license and the powers/rights of the software vendor and your company to terminate or invalidate the license. If you would like a legal review of the user agreement/services contract you can post a contract review project on this platform, based on your question, to receive and compare multiple proposals from licensed attorneys who are registered and verified. Once you receive a response from an attorney you will be able to correspond through the platform to help with your decision to hire that attorney for the project.
Read 1 attorney answer>Business Contracts
Non-Competition Agreement
California
My previous job had a secret non-compete closure
I left my previous job because I did not appreciate how I was treated when returning from maternity leave. I stepped down because with a colic infant and a national staffing shortage I couldn’t handle the work load, right after I stepped down they changed the schedule to minimize stress for the current programs director. They also allowed employees to unprofessional to me, when I returned the employee I trained and managed for years lectured me how todo my current position and asked if I had any disabilities or injuries because I had a C-section. This company for years treated me differently then other employees even though I ran and managed profitable programs. Before I left I asked Premier Aquatics that I wanted to be placed in a position similar to the one I had before, and they didn’t have a position for me. I decided to resign and I want to work for another company near their location. I’ve known in the past that they do come after employees with a non-compete and they never offered me anything for the non-compete.
JOSEPH L.
Generally speaking non-competes are not enforceable in California against employees or independent contractors. The situation may be different depending on all the facts if you were an equity owner or partner in the company. Also, when a business is sold, a reasonable non-compete is enforceable against the former owner(s) since they were paid as part of the purchase price for non-competition representations. California has long had a public policy against non-compete clauses against employees and independent contractors since it affects their ability to earn a living. I am not sure what information you have about them "coming after other employees". Note: I don't have all the facts, and this answer is for informational and research purposes only.
Read 1 attorney answer>