Home Contract Samples J Joint Services Agreement

Jump to Section

Quick Facts — Joint Services Agreement Lawyers

What is a Joint Services Agreement?

A joint services agreement (JSA) is an agreement between two or more businesses that outlines the specific services that will be provided by each business. This type of agreement can be helpful for businesses that are looking to outsource certain services, or for businesses that need to collaborate on a project. By outlining the specific services each business will provide, a joint services agreement can help to avoid any confusion about who is responsible for what. It can also help to ensure that all parties involved are held accountable for their commitments.

Common Sections in Joint Services Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Joint Services Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Joint Services Agreement Sample

Exhibit 10.18

 

JOINT SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

THIS JOINT SERVICES AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made as of this 18th day of June 2004, by and between Resorts International Hotel, Inc., a New Jersey corporation having a place of business at 1133 Boardwalk, Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401(“RIH”) and Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company having a place of business at The Las Vegas Hilton, 3000 Paradise Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109 (“LVH”).

 

RECITALS:

 

A. RIH owns and operates “Resorts Atlantic City,” a hotel and casino resort facility located in Atlantic City, New Jersey (“RIH Casino”).

 

B. LVH owns and operates “The Las Vegas Hilton,” a hotel and casino resort facility located in Las Vegas, Nevada (“LVH Casino,” and together with the RIH Casino, the “Casinos”).

 

C. RIH and LVH each believe it to be in their best interests to jointly procure certain products and services, and to otherwise cooperate in the use and implementation of such products and services, in the areas of insurance, risk management, legal, information technology, entertainment booking and purchasing, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and that by so doing each of RIH and LVH can achieve substantial cost savings and efficiencies in the operation of the Casinos.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises and representations contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1. JOINT PROPOSALS.

 

1.1 Cooperative Covenant. The parties agree to cooperatively develop and implement such joint programs for the Casinos for the procurement and implementation of insurance products and services, risk management services, legal services, information technology products and services, entertainment products and services and general purchasing needs as they may mutually agree upon. In connection with the efforts of the parties under this Agreement, each party shall utilize such personnel, resources, skills, know-how and information, as it considers necessary and consistent with its internal policies.

 

1.2 Joint Efforts. Each of RIH and LVH shall, by notice to the other, designate one officer or employee (a “Liaison”) to serve as a primary liaison to the other party in each of the areas of insurance, risk management, legal, information technology, entertainment and purchasing. Each Liaison shall confer with his or her counterpart in order to explore opportunities for collective cost savings and efficiencies in the procurement by the Casinos of products or services within their respective areas of expertise, and, to the extent feasible, develop programs or proposals to achieve such cost savings and efficiencies (a “Joint Proposal”). A Joint Proposal may consist of a single transaction (such as the using combined purchasing power to command more favorable terms for the purchase of commonly needed supplies) or an on-going program (such as joint liability insurance coverage).

 


1.3 Acceptance of Joint Proposals. RIH and LVH may accept or reject any Joint Proposal in their respective sole and absolute discretion. In the event RIH and LVH both accept a Joint Proposal, then the parties shall implement such Joint Proposal in accordance with its terms and the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the terms of a Joint Proposal and the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall control.

 

2. TERM.
How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

 

2.1 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue for a period of three (3) years (the “Initial Term”) and, at the end of the Initial Term and each year thereafter, shall automatically renew for an additional one (1) year (Initial Term together with any renewal, the “Term”) unless the Initial Term or Term are sooner terminated as provided for herein.

 

2.2 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated:

 

a. Upon six (6) months’ prior written notice to the other party; or

 

b. Upon the mutual written consent of both parties.

 

2.3 Automatic Termination. This Agreement shall automatically terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events:

 

a. The breach by a party of any of its obligations hereunder provided that the other party has given written notice of the alleged breach and such breach is continuing after thirty (30) days from the date of said notice;

 

b. The loss by either party of any license required to operate their respective Casino;

 

c. Any material part of the parties’ rights under this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable;

 

d. A party ceases to function as a going concern, becomes insolvent, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, files a petition or has a petition filed against it under any bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or similar law in any country, commits an act of bankruptcy or similar law or takes any action to effect any of the foregoing; or

 

e. The acquisition by a third party, whether by way of merger, consolidation, asset sale or stock sale, of either RIH or LVH.

 

f. In the event Archon Financial, L.P. exercises any of it remedies pursuant to the Loan Agreement dated as of June 18, 2004 between LVH, as Borrower, and Archon Financial, L.P., as Lender, including foreclosure on the LVH Casino or the tender by LVH of a deed in lieu of foreclosure.

 

- 2 -


4. COSTS OF PREPARING AND IMPLEMENTING JOINT PROPOSALS.

 

4.1 Consideration for Joint Proposals. All Joint Proposals shall be on terms that would be available to RIH and LVH on an arm’s length basis with third parties and which are no less favorable to both RIH and LVH than those that would have been obtained in a comparable transaction with an unrelated person.

 

4.2 Cost Allocation. Any party that incurs costs in excess of its direct share or any expense which is directly allocable to or incurred on behalf of the other party shall be reimbursed by such party so long as such party consented to such expense prior to the incurrence of same. Unless an alternative reimbursement method is specified in an accepted Joint Proposal, a party seeking reimbursement shall issue a reimbursement request to the other party detailing the costs and expenses incurred for which reimbursement is sought, the calculation of each party’s share of such costs and expenses, and such supporting documentation and other information as the other party may reasonably request. Within twenty (20) days of receipt of a reimbursement request and supporting documentation, the party with the reimbursement obligation shall reimburse the party seeking reimbursement for such costs and expenses. All expenses associated with the compliance of any governmental authority regulating gaming in the States of New Jersey and Nevada, including without limitation the New Jersey Casino Control Commission, the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement, the Nevada Gaming Commission and the Nevada State Gaming Control Board shall be the expense of the party regulated by such authority.

 

4.3 Expenses. Each of RIH and, LVH agrees to be solely responsible for and to pay out of its own funds all expenses incurred by such party relating to or arising out of such party’s performance of this Agreement and the implementation of any Joint Proposal, including without limitation, fees, taxes, insurance premiums, legal and accounting service fees, all secretarial, photocopying, telecommunications, office supplies and other support services, and travel, food and lodging expenses.

 

4.4 Employer Liability. Each party agrees that its shall be solely responsible for, and that the other party shall have no liability with respect to, the compensation of and any claims asserted by its respective officers, directors, partners, members, employees or agents assigned or requested to perform under this Agreement. For purposes of this Section 4.4, “compensation” shall include salary, wages, benefits and federal, state and local payroll taxes, and “claims” shall include disability, workers’ compensation, discrimination or other employer liability or tort claim.

 

5. CONFIDENTIALITY.
How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

 

5.1 Confidentiality. Each of RIH and LVH acknowledges that it may acquire Confidential Information (as defined below) with respect to the other party and the business such party conducts. In connection therewith, each party covenants to refrain from disclosing at any time any such Confidential Information with respect to the other unless legally compelled to disclose such information in response to a summons, order or subpoena issued by a court or governmental agency (provided that such party shall have provided the other party with prompt written notice of any such request or requirement so that it may seek a protective order or other appropriate remedy). Upon any termination of this Agreement, each party agrees to return to the

 

- 3 -


other party all documents or recorded material of any type (including all copies thereof) which may be in its possession or under its control and which constitutes or relates to Confidential Information of the other party.

 

For purposes of this Agreement “Confidential Information” shall mean all confidential information with respect to a party and its affiliates and the business they conduct, including, without limitation, confidential information and trade secrets concerning business and other plans, customer names, customer requirements and supplier names, profit formulas and financial plans. “Confidential Information” shall not include (i) information generally known to the public, and (ii) information properly and legally received from a third party which is not an affiliate of RIH or LVH and which is not under any duty to the other party not to disclose such information.

 

5.2 Remedies. Each of RIH and LVH hereby acknowledges and agrees that the prohibitions against disclosure of Confidential Information recited herein are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any rights or remedies each may have available to it pursuant to the laws of any jurisdiction or common law or judicial precedent to prevent the disclosure of proprietary or Confidential Information, and the enforcement by either of them of its rights and remedies pursuant to this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any other rights or available remedies that it may possess in law or equity absent this Agreement.

 

5.3 Survival. The provisions of this Article 5 shall survive any termination of this Agreement.

 

6. INDEMNIFICATION.

 

6.1 Each of RIH and LVH (each an “Indemnitor”) agrees to indemnify the other party and such party’s officers, members, shareholders, employees, agents and controlling persons (collectively, “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all liabilities imposed on such party and its Indemnitees by any governmental authority by reason of Indemnitor’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement or the implementation by Indemnitor of a Joint Proposal.

 

6.2 Each of RIH and LVH agrees to indemnify and hold the other party and such party’s Indemnitees free and harmless from and against any damages, liability, cost, claim, fee, obligation or expense, including attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in defense of any of the foregoing (“Losses”), arising out of or in connection with the performance by Indemnitor of its obligations under this Agreement or the implementation by Indemnitor of a Joint Proposal; provided, however, that the obligation to indemnify and hold harmless hereunder shall not include any Losses suffered by any party or its Indemnitees arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of any such party or its Indemnitees or the performance of duties not in conformity with, or in breach of, this Agreement.

 

6.3 The provisions of this Section 6 shall survive any termination of this Agreement.

 

7. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES.

 

7.1 RIH Representations and Warranties. RIH represents and warrants as follows:

 

a. RIH is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business as now conducted.

 

- 4 -


b. The execution, delivery and performance by it of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby do not and will not violate or conflict with any provision of its organizational documents of RIH, or any other agreement.

 

c. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by RIH and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of RIH enforceable against it in accordance with its terms.

 

7.2 LVH Representations and Warranties. LVH represents and warrants as follows:

 

a. LVH is a limited liability company duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Nevada, and has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business as now conducted.

 

b. The execution, delivery and performance by it of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby do not and will not violate or conflict with any provision of its organizational documents or operating agreement of LVH, or any other agreement.

 

c. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by LVH and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of LVH enforceable against it in accordance with its terms.

 

8. MISCELLANEOUS.
How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

 

8.1 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is exclusively for the benefit of the parties hereto and it may not be enforced by any party other than the parties to this Agreement and shall not give rise to liability to any third party other than the authorized successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

 

8.2 Relationship of the Parties. For all purposes herein, RIH and LVH shall be deemed to be independent contractors of one another and neither party shall act, represent or hold itself out as having authority to act as an agent or partner of the other party. Nothing express or implied in this Agreement is intended or shall be construed to create or establish a joint venture or a partnership between the parties hereof.

 

8.3 Limitation on Damages. Neither party shall be liable to the other party for any consequential damages resulting from a breach hereof.

 

8.4 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be responsible for delays, failures or omissions due to any cause beyond its reasonable control, wherever arising and not due to its own negligence and which cannot be overcome by the exercise of due diligence, including, but not limited to, labor disturbances, riots, fires, earthquakes, floods, storms, lightening, epidemics, war, civil disorders, hostilities, expropriation or confiscation of properties, failure of or delays by

 

- 5 -


carriers, interference by civil or military authorities, acts of God, acts or regulations of Federal, state or local governments or branches or agencies thereof. When the event operating to excuse performance by either party shall cease this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

 

8.5 Assignments. This Agreement shall not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. No such assignment shall be valid until approved to the extent required by the New Jersey Casino Control Commission or the Nevada Gaming Commission. If an assignment is so approved, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding on the assignee or subcontractor.

 

8.6 Dispute Resolution. Any dispute or controversy arising under, out of, in connection with or in relation to this Agreement, any amendments thereof, or the breach thereof, shall be determined and settled by arbitration in New York, New York in accordance with the Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Any award rendered therein shall be final and binding on the parties, and judgment may be entered thereon in any court having jurisdiction thereof. All costs of arbitration shall be borne equally.

 

8.7 Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended, modified, altered or waived, in whole or in part, except by a subsequent writing, signed by both parties.

 

8.8 Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given to the applicable party (i) on the date of personal delivery or delivery by telecopier, (ii) on the business day immediately following transmittal to a major overnight commercial courier, or (iii) five (5) days after deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, in any case addressed to the address or telecopy number of the applicable party set forth below, or such other address or number as such party may hereafter specify by notice to the other:

 

If to RIH:    Resorts International Hotel, Inc.
     1133 Boardwalk
     Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401
     Facsimile: 609-340-7892
     Attention: Nicholas R. Amato
                      Sr. Vice President & General Counsel
If to LVH:    Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC
     The Las Vegas Hilton
     3000 Paradise Road
     Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
     Facsimile: 702-739-5927
     Attention: Lou Dorn
                      Vice President & General Counsel

 

8.9 Governing Law. The rights and obligations of the parties and the interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of New Jersey.

 

- 6 -


8.10 Casino/Gambling Acts. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, this Agreement shall be deemed to include all provisions required by the New Jersey Casino Control Act, Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “Applicable Gaming Laws”), incorporate by reference such provisions as if fully restated in this Agreement and shall, to the extent required, be conditioned upon approval of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission and the Nevada Gaming Commission. To the extent that any term or provision contained in this Agreement shall be inconsistent with the Applicable Gaming Laws, the provisions of such Applicable Gaming Laws shall govern. To the extent so required pursuant to the laws of the State of New Jersey or the State of Nevada, the New Jersey Casino Control Commission and the Nevada Gaming Commission shall have the right to subsequently disapprove and cancel this Agreement. Each party agrees to perform its duties under this Agreement in accordance with the laws, ordinances, regulations and rules of any and all qualified public authorities having jurisdiction over the conduct of each of the parties’ business and Casinos, including without limitation, New Jersey Casino Control Commission and the Nevada Gaming Commission.

 

8.11 Entire Agreement. This document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, all prior oral or written agreements being merged herein, and supersedes all prior representations. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings, oral or written, between or among the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement that are not fully expressed herein.

 

8.12 Captions. The captions used. herein are for convenience only and do not in any way affect, limit, amplify or otherwise modify the terms and provisions of this Agreement.

 

8.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts with each such counterpart deemed to be an original hereof and all such counterparts deemed to be one and the same Agreement.

 

- 7 -


8.13 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts with each such counterpart deemed to be an original hereof and all such counterparts deemed to be one and the same Agreement.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Joint Marketing Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

 

Resorts International Hotel, Inc.

By:

 

/s/ Audrey Oswell

   

Audrey Oswell

President and Chief Executive Officer

Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC

By:

 

/s/ Rodolfo Prieto

   

Rodolfo Prieto

Chief Executive Officer

and General Manager

 

- 8 -


Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.18 8 dex1018.htm JOINT SERVICES AGREEMENT, Viewed April 19, 2022, View Source on SEC.

Who Helps With Joint Services Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on joint services agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a joint services agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate joint services agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

See Real Service Agreement Projects

Florida Home watch service contract Drafting
  • Florida
  • 4 lawyer bids
  • $350 - $650
View Details
Florida 3D Virtual Tours, Drone Photography & Videography, and Photos Drafting
  • Florida
  • 6 lawyer bids
  • $350 - $750
View Details
New York rental agreement Drafting
  • New York
  • 4 lawyer bids
  • $500 - $1,600
View Details
Connecticut Review contract and edit if needed Review
  • Connecticut
  • 2 lawyer bids
  • $700 - $750
View Details
California Review Service Agreement Contract Review
  • California
  • 6 lawyer bids
  • $375 - $500
View Details
California Review drafted client agreement for marketing agency Review
  • California
  • 7 lawyer bids
  • $400 - $850
View Details

See all Service Agreement projects


ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.


Need help with a Joint Services Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 22,737 reviews

Meet some of our Joint Services Agreement Lawyers

Anatalia S. on ContractsCounsel
View Anatalia
4.8 (5)
Member Since:
August 26, 2020
LeMont J. on ContractsCounsel
View LeMont
5.0 (11)
Member Since:
June 8, 2026

LeMont J.

Managing Partner
Free Consultation
Hoboken, New Jersey
13 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NJ
Washington and Lee University School of Law

LeMont leads a corporate and transactional practice with a focus on delivering practical, business-oriented legal solutions. His practice spans corporate law, commercial transactions, and real estate matters, advising clients through entity formation, governance, contract negotiation, acquisitions, and complex deal structuring. In the corporate and transactional space, LeMont counsels closely held businesses, startups, and growth-stage companies on formation strategy, operating agreements, shareholder arrangements, and day-to-day commercial contracting. He is known for structuring deals in a way that balances legal protection with operational flexibility, ensuring that agreements are both enforceable and commercially workable. His real estate practice includes representing clients in residential and commercial transactions, including purchases, sales, leasing arrangements, and hybrid structures such as rent-to-own and option-to-purchase agreements. He regularly works with clients to navigate deal risk, clarify ownership timelines, and document transactions to minimize future disputes.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Hired LeMont for a compliance review — a claim I was about to print and an agreement I was about to sign. He asked good questions before starting instead of guessing at my facts, and one of them caught a real gap in my own draft. Where the law was unsettled he told me what he'd do rather than stopping at "it depends," which is the entire reason I hired a lawyer instead of trying to read the statutes myself. He also surfaced something my own research had missed entirely. He flagged an issue he could easily have billed me to analyze, and told me to wait until it was actually a problem. Delivered on time, at the flat fee quoted, no surprises. I'll be hiring him again."

Caroline N. on ContractsCounsel
View Caroline
5.0 (3)
Member Since:
April 18, 2026

Caroline N.

Attorney
Los Angeles County, California
4 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
Chapman Fowler School of Law

Caroline K. Nam, Esq. is a solo attorney who provides legal counsel with a management-first mindset, combining legal expertise with proactive policy development. Prior to starting her own practice, Caroline gained extensive legal experience as a litigator defending and advising employers of all sizes, ranging from a single business owner, to a small family-owned winery, and major, nationwide corporations. Caroline also has experience on the plaintiffs' side representing survivors of sexual abuse against school districts and churches. With her unique litigation background and expertise representing both plaintiffs and defendants, Caroline understands that legal compliance is only a piece of the puzzle for business success. She is committed to leading with compassion to provide a personalized, approachable service for each client. Having safeguarded companies against a variety of business and employment disputes, Caroline is focused on preventative risk management, helping owners reduce potential employment litigation that she has defended firsthand in court. Caroline is dedicated to helping entrepreneurs spend less time worried about liability and more time focusing on business growth. Based in Los Angeles County, she provides accessible, actionable legal solutions throughout Southern California. During her free time, Caroline enjoys yoga and serving her Los Angeles community. In 2025, she partnered with NLSLA to provide pro bono legal services to individuals impacted by the Eaton Fire. Currently, she serves on the board of directors of a nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"I had Caroline create a liability waiver for my Sports Fencing Club. She was prompt in completing the task, helpful and courteous in answering my questions, and in every way professional. I would use her services again if required."

Anand A. on ContractsCounsel
View Anand
5.0 (39)
Member Since:
July 17, 2022

Anand A.

Counsel
Free Consultation
Philadelphia, PA
12 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NJ, PA
Rutgers University School of Law

Anand is an entrepreneur and attorney with a wide-ranging background. In his legal capacity, Anand has represented parties in (i) commercial finance, (ii) corporate, and (iii) real estate matters throughout the country, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Arizona, and Georgia. He is well-versed in business formation and management, reviewing and negotiating contracts, advising clients on financing strategy, and various other arenas in which individuals and businesses commonly find themselves. As an entrepreneur, Anand is involved in the hospitality industry and commercial real estate. His approach to the legal practice is to treat clients fairly and provide the highest quality representation possible. Anand received his law degree from Rutgers University School of Law in 2013 and his Bachelor of Business Administration from Pace University, Lubin School of Business in 2007.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Anand was a pleasure to work with! He was very thorough and professional."

Rene H. on ContractsCounsel
View Rene
5.0 (25)
Member Since:
February 6, 2023

Rene H.

Attorney
Free Consultation
San Diego, CA
15 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
Northwestern University

I am an attorney licensed in both California and Mexico. I offer a unique blend of 14 years of legal expertise that bridges the gap between diverse legal landscapes. My background is enriched by significant roles as in-house counsel for global powerhouses such as Anheuser-Busch, Campari Group, and Grupo Lala, alongside contributions to Tier 1 law firms. I specialize in navigating the complexities of two pivotal areas: AI/Tech Innovation: With a profound grasp of both cutting-edge transformer models and foundational machine learning technologies, I am your go-to advisor for integrating these advancements into your business. Whether it's B2B or B2C applications, I ensure that your company harnesses the power of AI in a manner that's not only enterprise-friendly but also fully compliant with regulatory standards. Cross-Border Excellence: My expertise extends beyond borders, with over a decade of experience facilitating cross-border operations for companies in more than 20 countries. I am particularly adept at enhancing US-Mexico operations, ensuring seamless and efficient business transactions across these territories.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Rene understood our business operations perfectly and drafted in a few days all required documents. All revisions were delivered almost the same day. I felt that Rene did more than we paid for and never asked for any extra fees. Simply excellent cooperation. I highly recommend Rene!"

Anna V. on ContractsCounsel
View Anna
Member Since:
September 19, 2025

Anna V.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Sacramento
5 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
UC Berkeley

Multilingual California Attorney with experience in Immigration, Real Estate, Contracts.

Rosanne M. on ContractsCounsel
View Rosanne
Member Since:
September 22, 2025

Rosanne M.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Carlsbad, California
10 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CA
Santa Clara Law

Rosanne (Rosie) Brady Muschenheim is an experienced estate planning attorney practicing law exclusively in trusts, estates, business, and tax law. She studied advanced tax law by taking several courses through Boston University's LLM program. She served as the Western Region Estate Planning Consultant for Bessemer Trust Company in addition to running her own law firm. Rosie spent several years working in Silicon Valley at a prestigious law firm serving ultra high net worth clients, including Founders, Directors, and Officers at companies such as Google, Netflix, Juniper Networks, Tesla, DocuSign, Looker, Nvidia, Xilinx, and Fortinet. Rosie spent time practicing in Honolulu, Hawaii serving ultra high net worth clients, including descendants of Hawaiian royalty. While in Orange County, Rosie assisted many high net worth clients of notable fame in the entertainment industry and the manufacturing industry. Rosie started her own law firm to provide a more customized and personal service to clients than what is offered through larger law firms. Trust is essential to building client relationships, and with her own law firm Rosie is able to provide more attention and care to each client matter.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Lawyer Reviews for Joint Services Agreement Projects

Review Service Agreement

5.0

"It was good working with Willliam"

California
Review
Service Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

CMRA Business

5.0

"Money well spent."

North Carolina
Drafting
Service Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Healthcare Attorney Review: HIPAA Business Associate Agreement + Marketing Service Agreement (CA)

5.0

"Dolan was agile, professional and extremely thorough when he helped me finalize a contract for my SEO Agency, Ethos Ink."

California
Review
Service Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Legal review and adjustment of video monitoring service contract

"Thank you very much for all the answers and recommendations! I will proceed with the final payment for the review right now. I will integrate the suggested clauses into our master agreement internally. I appreciate your thorough work and will keep your contact in mind for future legal matters in Texas."

Texas
Review
Service Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Review & Finalize Client Services Agreement and HIPAA BAA

5.0

"Excellent experience working with Dolan. He was responsive, thorough, and incredibly helpful throughout the process. He not only strengthened my agreements but clearly explained his recommendations and identified important issues I hadn’t considered. Fast turnaround, excellent communication, and very professional. I would absolutely work with him again and highly recommend him."

Florida
Drafting
Service Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

View Trustpilot Review

Need help with a Joint Services Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 22,737 reviews
Business lawyers by top cities
See All Business Lawyers
Joint Services Agreement lawyers by city
See All Joint Services Agreement Lawyers

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
Review contract and edit if needed
Location: Connecticut
Turnaround: Over a week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Service Agreement
Page Count: 3
Number of Bids: 2
Bid Range: $700 - $750
User Feedback:
I would definitely use her again she was great. Very professional and very knowledgeable. Any questions i had she answered quickly. Thank you Jane

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
Review Service Agreement Contract
Location: California
Turnaround: Less than a week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Service Agreement
Page Count: 3
Number of Bids: 6
Bid Range: $375 - $500

Need help with a Joint Services Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 22,737 reviews

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city