Home Contract Samples N Noncompetition Agreement

Jump to Section

Quick Facts — Noncompetition Agreement Lawyers

What is a Noncompetition Agreement?

A noncompetition agreement is a legal document that restricts an employee from competing with their employer's business for a designated amount of time. Some states do not allow for this agreement, such as California and Florida. However, most states do allow it as long as enough consideration is given to the employee.

Sufficient consideration for an employee in a noncompetition agreement could be in the form of higher pay or more company benefits. Noncompetition agreements include restricted territory, benefits and compensation, and what would cause a termination of employment.

Common Sections in Noncompetition Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Noncompetition Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Noncompetition Agreement Sample

Exhibit 99.2

EXECUTION COPY

NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

This Non-Competition Agreement (this “Agreement”) is being executed and delivered as of December 21, 2009 by John Vincent (“Stockholder”) in favor and for the benefit of Limelight Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”) (together the “Parties”). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Merger Agreement (as defined below).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Parent, the Company, Elvis Merger Sub One Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub One”), Elvis Merger Sub Two LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub Two” and together with Merger Sub One, the “Merger Subs”), John Vincent, as stockholder representative and Deutsche Bank National Trust, as Escrow Agent have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger of even date herewith (the “Merger Agreement”), which provides for, among other things, and as a single integrated transaction, the merger of Merger Sub One with and into the Company (the “First Step Merger”) in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL. As soon as practicable following the First Step Merger, Parent will cause the Company to merge with and into Merger Sub Two with Merger Sub Two continuing as the surviving entity (the “Second Step Merger” and, taken together with the First Step Merger, the “Merger”);

WHEREAS, Stockholder is employed by the Company as its Chief Executive Officer;

WHEREAS, Stockholder has a substantial interest in the Company as the holder of a significant number of shares of the Company’s capital stock, and, as a result of the Merger, Stockholder shall receive significant consideration in connection with the Merger;

WHEREAS, upon completion of the Merger, Stockholder shall be employed by the Company as Chief Executive Officer of Merger Sub Two;

WHEREAS, Parent and Stockholder mutually desire that the entire goodwill of the Company be transferred to Parent as part of the Merger and acknowledge that the parties explicitly considered the value of the goodwill transferred and it was valued as a component of the consideration of the Merger. Parent and Stockholder agree that Parent’s failure to receive the entire goodwill contemplated by the Merger would have the effect of reducing the value of the Company to Parent;

WHEREAS, Parent and Stockholder both agree that, prior to the Merger, the Company’s business consisted of the design, development, production, marketing and sales of products and services related to the Business (as defined below) in the Restricted Territory (as defined below), and Parent represents and Stockholder understands that, following the Merger, Parent will continue conducting the Business in the Restricted Territory; and

WHEREAS, as a condition and mutual inducement to the Merger, and to preserve the value and goodwill of the business being acquired by Parent after the Merger, the Merger

 

- 1 -


Agreement contemplates, among other things, that Stockholder shall enter into this Agreement and that this Agreement shall become effective at the Effective Time (as that term is defined in the Merger Agreement).

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made herein, Parent and Stockholder hereby agree as follows:

1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Time. This Agreement shall be null and void if the Merger is not consummated as contemplated in the Merger Agreement.

2. Non-competition. Stockholder acknowledges that in order to protect and preserve the value and goodwill of the business of the Company being transferred to Parent as part of the Merger, a post-termination employment restriction is reasonable, as without such a restriction, Stockholder’s employment or engagement with one of the competitors identified herein would detrimentally, irreversibly, and immeasurably diminish the value and goodwill of the business of the Company. Thus, both to ensure that the value and goodwill related to the business of the Company being transferred to Parent as part of the Merger is protected and preserved, and to avoid the actual or threatened misappropriation of the Company’s and Parent’s trade secrets and confidential information, Stockholder agrees that during the period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on the 36-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later (or, in the event any reviewing court finds thirty-six (36) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 24-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (or, in the event any reviewing court finds twenty-four (24) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 12-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (the “Non-Competition Period”), Stockholder shall not (other than in connection with his employment services to Parent, Merger Sub Two, or any subsidiary thereof or their respective successors or assigns), without the prior written consent of Parent, directly or indirectly:

How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

(a) engage, on his own behalf or on behalf of any other Person (as defined below), anywhere in the Restricted Territory (as defined below) in any business (including research and development), operations, activities and/or services on behalf of or in connection with a Competitor (as defined below);

(b) be or become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, affiliate, salesperson, co-owner, partner, trustee, promoter, technician, engineer, analyst, employee, agent, representative, supplier, contractor, consultant, advisor or manager of or to, or otherwise acquire or hold any interest in, or participate in or facilitate the financing, operation, management or control of, any Competitor in the Restricted Territory, including the promotion of investments in an entity which is a Competitor in the Restricted Territory;

 

- 2 -


(c) solicit or attempt to solicit any of the Company’s customers for a Competitor, or in connection with a Competitor, including any attempts to obtain a confidential customer list or any other Company trade secrets; or

(d) provide any service (as an employee, consultant, or otherwise), product, support, or technology to any Competitor in the Restricted Territory;

As used herein, “Competitor” shall mean and include Akamai, Eyeblaster, Pointroll, the ad serving division of Google, CDNetworks, Level 3, the ad serving division of AT&T, the CDN division of AT&T, BitGravity, Edgecast, Admotion, Adrime, CheckM8, DGFastChannel (Unicast division), Interpolls, and the Atlas division of Microsoft Corporation and any Person (now existing or hereafter formed) engaged in Business that is directly competitive with the Business conducted by Eyewonder, Inc. as of the date of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Stockholder’s employment as Chief Executive Officer of Merger Sub Two is terminated without Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement), then the Non-Competition Period shall terminate on the date which is six (6) months after such date of termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Stockholder’s employment as Chief Executive Officer is terminated by his voluntary resignation in Connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the Employment Agreement), then the Non-Competition Period shall terminate on the date which is twelve (12) months after such date of termination.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent or restrict Stockholder from any of the following: (i) owning as a passive investment less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of a corporation (whether public or private) that is engaged in a Competing Business and Stockholder is not otherwise associated with such corporation; (ii) performing speaking engagements and receiving honoraria in connection with such engagements; (iii) being employed by any government agency, college, university, or other non-profit research organization; (iv) owning a passive equity interest in a private debt or equity investment fund in which the Stockholder does not have the ability to control or exercise any managerial influence over such fund; (v) becoming associated with, employed by, or otherwise performing services for any person or entity, or subsidiary, subdivision, division, or joint venture of such entity that is a Competitor, where (i) the particular division, subdivision, subsidiary, or business unit that employs Stockholder or for which Stockholder provides services or is associated with is not a Competitor, or (ii) the employment or services provided by Stockholder do not otherwise relate to a Competing Business Purpose; (vi) becoming associated with, employed by, or otherwise performing services for any person or entity, or subsidiary, subdivision, division, or joint venture of such entity (including any actions or services provided in forming or developing any such entity) that is not a Competitor, but may do business with or otherwise perform services for a person or entity, or subsidiary, subdivision, division, or joint venture of such entity, as long as Stockholder’s services are not related to a Competing Business Purpose, or (vii) any activity consented to in writing by Parent.

Business” means the business of developing, designing, manufacturing, producing, marketing, publishing, or selling: (i) Content Delivery Network (CDN) services via a network of servers placed variously around the Internet with the goal of maximizing access to client data

 

- 3 -


and/or (ii) online management solutions for online creative agencies, online ad buy agencies, or online publishers.

Person” means a natural person, corporation, partnership, or other legal entity, or a joint venture of two or more of the foregoing.

Restricted Territory” means i) each and every country, province, state, city or other political subdivision of the United States and Canada; ii) each and every country, province, state, city or other political subdivision of the European Union; and iii) each and every country, province, state, city, or other political subdivision of the world in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates is currently engaged in, currently plans to engage in, or engages in during the Non-Competition Period, a Competing Business Purpose.

3. Non-solicitation. To preserve the value and goodwill of the business of the Company being transferred to Parent as part of the Merger, Stockholder further agrees that during the period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on the 36-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later (or, in the event any reviewing court finds thirty-six (36) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 24-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (or, in the event any reviewing court finds twenty-four (24) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 12-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (the “Non-Solicitation Period”), Stockholder shall not, without the prior written consent of Parent, solicit, encourage, or take any other action, directly or indirectly, that is intended to induce or encourage, or has the effect of inducing or encouraging, any employee of Merger Sub Two or Parent, or any subsidiary of Merger Sub Two or Parent, to (i) leave his or her employment with Merger Sub Two or Parent, or any subsidiary of Merger Sub Two or Parent, or any of their respective successors or assigns or (ii) engage in any activity in which Stockholder would, under the provisions of Section 2 hereof, be prohibited from engaging. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement, the placement of general advertisements that may be targeted to a particular geographic or technical area but that are not specifically targeted toward employees of Merger Sub Two or Parent or any subsidiary of Merger Sub Two or Parent or their respective successors or assigns, shall not be deemed to be a breach of this Section 3.

4. Severability of Covenants. The covenants contained in Section 2 hereof shall be construed as a series of separate covenants, one for each country, province, state, city or other political subdivision of the Restricted Territory. Except for geographic coverage, each such separate covenant shall be deemed identical in terms to the covenant contained in Section 2 hereof. If, in any judicial proceeding, a court refuses to enforce any of such separate covenants (or any part thereof), then Parent, Merger Sub Two and Stockholder agree that such unenforceable covenant (or such part) shall be eliminated from this Agreement to the extent necessary to permit the remaining separate covenants (or portions thereof) to be enforced. In the event that the provisions of Section 2 or Section 3 are deemed to exceed the time, geographic or scope limitations permitted by applicable law, then Parent, Merger Sub Two and Stockholder

 

- 4 -


agree that such provisions shall be reformed to the maximum time, geographic, or scope limitations, as the case may be, permitted by applicable law.

5. Independence of Obligations. The covenants and obligations of Stockholder set forth in this Agreement shall be construed as independent of any other agreement or arrangement between Stockholder, on the one hand, and Parent, Merger Sub Two, or any subsidiary of Parent or Merger Sub Two, on the other.

6. Stockholder Acknowledgements. Stockholder acknowledges that (i) Stockholder has a substantial interest in the Company as the holder of a significant number of shares of the Company’s capital stock and, as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, is a key and significant member of the management of the Company; (ii) the goodwill associated with the existing business, customers, and assets of the Company prior to the Merger is an integral component of the value of the Company to Parent and is reflected in the consideration payable to Stockholder in connection with the Merger, and (iii) Stockholder’s agreement as set forth herein is necessary for the protection of the legitimate business interests of Parent in the Merger and to preserve the value and goodwill of the Company for Parent following the Merger.

Stockholder also acknowledges and agrees that the limitations of time, geography, and scope of activity agreed to in this Agreement are reasonable because, among other things: (A) the Company and Parent are engaged in a highly competitive industry, (B) Stockholder has had unique access to the trade secrets and know-how of the Company and Parent, including, without limitation, the plans and strategy (and, in particular, the competitive strategy) of the Company and Parent, (C) Stockholder has accepted employment with Parent in connection with the Merger on terms that Stockholder believes are favorable to him, (D) by virtue of his employment with the Parent, Stockholder will have access to Parent’s trade secrets and know how, including Parent’s plans and strategy (and, in particular, Parent’s competitive strategy), (E) in the event Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two ended, Stockholder believes he would be able to obtain suitable and satisfactory employment without violation of this Agreement; (F) Stockholder believes that this Agreement provides no more protection than is reasonably necessary to protect Parent’s legitimate interest in the goodwill, trade secrets, and confidential information of the Company, (G) Stockholder has no current intention of engaging in a Competing Business Purpose within the area and the time limits set forth in this Agreement, and (H) Stockholder’s obligations under this Agreement (and the enforcement thereof) will not prevent him from earning a livelihood

Stockholder further acknowledges and agrees that (i) the execution and delivery and continuation in force of this Agreement is a material inducement to Parent to execute the Merger Agreement and is a mandatory condition precedent to the closing of the Merger, without which Parent would not close the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (ii) breach of this Agreement will be such that Parent will not have an adequate remedy at law because of the unique nature of the operations and assets being conveyed to Parent; and (iii) execution of this Agreement shall not limit Parent’s or Merger Sub Two’s employee policies, including, without limitation, the provisions set forth in Parent’s and Merger Sub Two’s confidentiality and proprietary information agreements.

 

- 5 -


Stockholder further acknowledges and agrees that (i) Stockholder is subject to Parent’s confidential information and trade secret protection policies and agrees to comply with such policies, (ii) Stockholder’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain in effect if Stockholder’s employment with Parent is terminated for any or no reason, and (iii) during the Non-Competition Period, prior to becoming an employee or partner of or consultant to any Person, Stockholder will provide written notice of such employment, partnership, or consultancy to Parent and provide such Person with an executed copy of this Agreement. Stockholder agrees that the Non-Competition Period shall be tolled during any period of violation of the covenants contained in Section 2 and the Non-Solicitation Period shall be tolled during any period of violation of the covenants contained in Section 3.

7. Arbitration and Equitable Relief.

(a) The Parties agree that any and all disputes arising out of, or relating to, the terms of this Agreement, their interpretation, and any of the matters herein released, shall be subject to binding arbitration in Maricopa County before the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Rules. The Parties agree that the prevailing party in any arbitration shall be entitled to injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the arbitration award. The Parties agree that the prevailing party in any arbitration shall be awarded its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. The Parties hereby agree to waive their right to have any dispute between them resolved in a court of law by a judge or jury. This section will not prevent either party from seeking injunctive relief (or any other provisional remedy) from any court having jurisdiction over the Parties and the subject matter of their dispute relating to Employee’s obligations under this Agreement and the agreements incorporated herein by reference.

(b) STOCKHOLDER HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS THIS SECTION 7, WHICH DISCUSSES ARBITRATION. STOCKHOLDER UNDERSTANDS THAT BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, STOCKHOLDER AGREES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO SUBMIT ANY CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF, RELATING TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE INTERPRETATION, VALIDITY, CONSTRUCTION, PERFORMANCE, BREACH, OR TERMINATION THEREOF, TO BINDING ARBITRATION, AND THAT THIS ARBITRATION CLAUSE CONSTITUTES A WAIVER OF STOCKHOLDER’S RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL AND RELATES TO THE RESOLUTION OF ALL DISPUTES REFERRED TO IN SECTION 7(A) ABOVE.

8. Remedy. Stockholder acknowledges and agrees that (a) the rights of Parent under this Agreement are of a specialized and unique character and that immediate and irreparable damage will result to Parent if Stockholder fails to or refuses to perform his obligations under this Agreement and (b) Parent may, in addition to any other remedies and damages available, obtain an injunction to restrain any such failure or refusal. No single exercise of the foregoing remedies shall be deemed to exhaust Parent’s right to such remedies, but the right to such remedies shall continue undiminished and may be exercised from time to time as often as Parent may elect.

9. Non-Exclusivity. The rights and remedies of Parent hereunder are not exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies that Parent hereunder may have, whether at law, in

 

- 6 -


equity, by contract, or otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not alternative). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights and remedies of Parent hereunder, and the obligations and liabilities of Stockholder hereunder, are in addition to their respective rights, remedies, obligations, and liabilities under the law of unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets, and the like. This Agreement does not limit Stockholder’s obligations or the rights of Parent (or any affiliate of Parent) under the terms of any other agreement between Stockholder and Parent or any affiliate of Parent.

10. Termination of Employment. Stockholder’s obligations under this Agreement shall not be eliminated or diminished by the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent, Merger Sub Two, the Company, or any of their subsidiaries, as the case may be, for any reason, including as a result of Stockholder’s resignation.

11. Notices. All notices and other communications pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed to be sufficient if contained in a written instrument and shall be deemed given if delivered personally, telecopied, sent by nationally-recognized overnight courier or mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), postage prepaid, to the respective parties at the following address:

How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

 

  (a) if to Parent or Merger Sub Two, to:

Limelight Networks, Inc.

2220 W. 14th Street

Tempe, AZ 85281

Attention: Philip C. Maynard

SVP & CLO

Telephone No.: (602) 850-5000

Facsimile No.: (602) 850-5001

with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304

Attention: Mark Reinstra

Telephone No.: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile No.: (650) 493-6811

 

  (b) if to Stockholder, to the address for notice set forth on Stockholder’s signature page hereto

with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

 

- 7 -


Kilpatrick Stockton LLP

1100 Peachtree Street, NE

Suite 2800

Atlanta, GA 30309-4530

Attention: W. Benjamin Barkley

Facsimile No.: (404) 541-3121

or to such other address as any party may have furnished to the other in writing in accordance herewith, except that notices of change of address shall only be effective upon receipt.

12. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or any part of any such provision is held under any circumstances to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then (a) such provision or part thereof shall, with respect to such circumstances and in such jurisdiction, be deemed amended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable to the fullest possible extent, (b) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part thereof under such circumstances and in such jurisdiction shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such provision or part thereof under any other circumstances or in any other jurisdiction and (c) such invalidity of enforceability of such provision or part thereof shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of such provision or the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.

13. Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Arizona, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of law thereof. Subject to Section 7, each of the parties hereto irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the state and federal courts located in Arizona, in connection with any matter based upon or arising out of this Agreement or the matters contemplated herein, agrees that process may be served upon them in any manner authorized by the laws of the state of Arizona for such persons and waives and covenants not to assert or plead any objection which they might otherwise have to such jurisdiction and venue in the state of Arizona and such process.

14. Waiver. No failure on the part of any party to exercise any power, right, privilege or remedy under this Agreement, and no delay on the part of any party in exercising any power, right, privilege or remedy under this Agreement, shall operate as a waiver of such power, right, privilege or remedy; and no single or partial exercise of any such power, right, privilege or remedy shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof or of any other power, right, privilege or remedy. No party shall be deemed to have waived any claim arising out of this Agreement, or any power, right, privilege or remedy under this Agreement, unless the waiver of such claim, power, right, privilege or remedy is expressly set forth in a written instrument duly executed and delivered on behalf of the waiving party; and any such waiver shall not be applicable or have any effect except in the specific instance in which it is given.

15. Captions. The captions contained in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only, shall not be deemed to be a part of this Agreement, shall not affect in any way the meaning of this Agreement, and shall not be referred to in connection with the construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

 

- 8 -


16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and the other agreements referred to herein, set forth the entire understanding of Stockholder and Parent relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between any of such parties relating to the subject matter hereof (but does not in any way merge or supersede the Merger Agreement or any other agreement executed in connection with the Merger Agreement, including the Stockholder’s employment agreement with Parent). Stockholder understands and agrees that he has had an opportunity to seek his own counsel in his review of this Agreement.

17. Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended, modified, altered, or supplemented other than by means of a written instrument duly executed and delivered on behalf of Parent and Stockholder.

18. Assignment. This Agreement and all obligations hereunder are personal to Stockholder and may not be transferred or assigned by Stockholder at any time. Parent may assign its rights under this Agreement to any entity in connection with any merger or sale or transfer of all or substantially all of Parent’s assets.

19. Binding Nature. Subject to Section 18, this Agreement will be binding upon Stockholder and Stockholder’s representatives, executors, administrators, estate, heirs, successors and assigns, and will inure to the benefit of Parent and its successors and assigns.

20. Counterpart Execution. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

[remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 

- 9 -


In witness whereof, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

“STOCKHOLDER”   By:      

/s/ John Vincent

 
    John Vincent  
      Address:  

1293 Hayes Dr.

        Smyrna GA 30080
      Telephone:  

404 663 1419

      Fax:                                                                                                          

“PARENT”

   

LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.

a Delaware corporation

    /s/ Philip C. Maynard
   

Philip C. Maynard

SVP & CLO


Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-99.2 3 dex992.htm NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT, Viewed January 27, 2022, View Source on SEC.

Who Helps With Noncompetition Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on noncompetition agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a noncompetition agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate noncompetition agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

See Real Non-Compete Agreement Projects

Florida NDA and NCA Review
  • Florida
  • 7 lawyer bids
  • $225 - $500
View Details
Utah Non-compete analysis Review
  • Utah
  • 3 lawyer bids
  • $495 - $1,850
View Details
Massachusetts Non-Compete Clause in Employment (1099) contract Review
  • Massachusetts
  • 5 lawyer bids
  • $250 - $795
View Details
California Review non-compete and proprietary invention agreement Review
  • California
  • 7 lawyer bids
  • $495 - $1,500
View Details
Florida Review Noncompete Agreement Review
  • Florida
  • 8 lawyer bids
  • $240 - $700
View Details
California Review non-compete clauses for Blockchain Startup Offer Letter Review
  • California
  • 6 lawyer bids
  • $150 - $400
View Details

See all Non-Compete Agreement projects


ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.


Need help with a Noncompetition Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 23,263 reviews

Meet some of our Noncompetition Agreement Lawyers

Stacey D. on ContractsCounsel
View Stacey
5.0 (34)
Member Since:
July 16, 2020

Stacey D.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Grand Rapids, MI
16 Yrs Experience
Licensed in FL, MI
Stetson University College of Law

I enjoy helping businesses of all sizes succeed, from start-ups to existing small and medium sized businesses. I regularly advise corporate clients on a variety of legal issues including formation, day to day governance, reviewing and drafting business contracts and other agreements, business acquisitions and sales, as well as commercial and residential real estate issues, including sales, purchases and leases. As an attorney licensed in both Michigan and Florida, I also advise clients on real estate issues affecting businesses and individuals owning real property in either state, whether commercial, residential or vacation/investment property. I also regularly assist nonprofit organizations in obtaining and maintaining tax exempt status, and provide general legal counsel on all matters affecting public charities, private foundations and other nonprofit organizations.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Stacey was responsive, knowledgeable and helped me trough the negotiation process"

Brian S. on ContractsCounsel
View Brian
5.0 (16)
Member Since:
April 16, 2022

Brian S.

Chief Legal Officer
Free Consultation
Washington, DC
17 Yrs Experience
Licensed in DC, PA
Duquesne Law School

Corporate attorney with 16+ years of in-house counsel, people leadership and client management experience. Provides legal expertise and a business-oriented approach to problem solving and building lines of business. Consistently works under pressure, prioritizing and managing workload and simultaneous tasks to meet deadlines in a changing, fast-paced environment.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Great work and communication. Would recommend working with Brian!"

Morgan S. on ContractsCounsel
View Morgan
4.9 (18)
Member Since:
July 31, 2023

Morgan S.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Austin, Texas
5 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NY, TX, WV
University of Pittsburgh Law School

Corporate Attorney that represents startups, businesses, investors, VC/PE doing business throughout the country. Representing in a range of matters from formation to regulatory compliance to financings to exit. Have a practice that represents both domestic and foreign startups, businesses, and entrepreneurs. Along with VC, Private Equity, and investors.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"Morgan delivered far beyond the price point. He didn't just review our investor package — he caught gaps two other reviewers missed (including a top-tier venture firm we benchmarked him against), rebuilt the custom documents to professional standard, and added missing closing mechanics we didn't even know we needed: the 83(b) election, escrow instructions, stock assignment. He pushed back on his own client when the documents said otherwise — that's the lawyer you want. §144 analysis citing the 2025 Delaware reform, triple anti-broker-dealer protections, a related-party ARR cap he invented on his own — depth you'd expect at five times the fee, closed out with a proper written memo on firm letterhead. The timeline ran a bit longer than planned in places, but the result was more than worth it: every item closed, every question answered, the whole package consistent and ready to sign. Very happy overall — would hire again, and our next project is already queued."

Thomas L. on ContractsCounsel
View Thomas
5.0 (1)
Member Since:
March 21, 2023

Thomas L.

Owner
Free Consultation
Wethersfield, Connecticut, USA
42 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CT
University of Connecticut Law School

I am a Lawyer/CPA/Technology Startup Advisor/Executive with experience in global corporate law and finance, startup finance, accounting, technology, and business operations with a focus on startups of all kinds and non-profits. I have worked at a large international finance law firm, one of the Big Four Accounting firms, technology startups and non-profits. I help startups and non-profits get organized, get funded, and get going. I've seen all the mistakes made (often more than once), and so I can help you learn from, rather than repeat, history. I know all the insider rules, so you end up getting a fair start and a fair deal, rather than getting taken advantage of (whether an entrepreneur or an investor). My expertise includes: - organization of corporations | organizations of llcs | non-profits and dealing with the IRS - splitting equity | founder structure | founder equity | founder disputes - startup valuation | pitch decks and forecasts | raising capital | finding angel investors, accelerators and venture investors - SAFEs | convertible notes | preferred stock | restricted stock | stock options | 409A - Advisors - setting up cyber-secure business operations - trademarks | patents | intellectual property - employment law - cyber liability and ecommerce including privacy policies and terms of service - accounting and tax - litigation management References: https://www.upcounsel.com/profile/tjlovejr#reviews LION: LinkedIn Open Networker / connect with me at tlove@tjlovejr.com

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"I was extremely satisfied. Tom was my shark atty. and I would highly recommend him. You will not regret hiring Tom."

O.T. W. on ContractsCounsel
View O.T.
5.0 (1)
Member Since:
March 8, 2023

O.T. W.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Washington, DC
11 Yrs Experience
Licensed in MD, NY
Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law

Hi, my name is O.T. and I own The Walker Collective, a law firm that caters to the contractual, intellectual property, and business formation needs of creative entrepreneurs and small business owners. I am licensed to practice in Maryland and New York.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"O.T was very personable, knowledgable, and resourceful. Would definitely use her again!"

David B. on ContractsCounsel
View David
5.0 (1)
Member Since:
April 1, 2021

David B.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Trussville, Alabama
30 Yrs Experience
Licensed in AL
Birmingham School of Law

A twenty-five year attorney and certified mediator native to the Birmingham, Alabama area.

Recent  ContractsCounsel Client  Review:
5.0

"David was able to meet my turnaround time and still do a thorough job and provide great feedback on my document."

Ema T. on ContractsCounsel
View Ema
Member Since:
March 12, 2021

Ema T.

Contract and IP Attorney
Free Consultation
New York, NY
8 Yrs Experience
Licensed in NY
Chicago Kent

I am a NY licensed attorney experienced in business contracts, agreements, waivers and more, corporate law, and trademark registration. My office is a sole member Law firm therefore, I Take pride in giving every client my direct attention and focus. I focus on getting the job done fast while maintaining high standards.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Lawyer Reviews for Noncompetition Agreement Projects

Review Noncompete Agreement

"Great to work with!"

Wisconsin
Review
Non-Compete Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Non-Compete Agreement and Employment Offer Review, Pre-signing

5.0

"Paul was stellar in every way. Highest recommendation possible; I will be continuing to partner with him. Thank you, Paul."

Massachusetts
Review
Non-Compete Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Review Noncompete Agreement

4.7

"Great concise and helped me review documents"

Florida
Review
Non-Compete Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Non Compete for Civil Engineering

5.0

"Great expertise and efficiency"

Florida
Review
Non-Compete Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Texas Post-Employment Non-Compete & Non-Solicit Review — 4 Written Questions, Flat Fee.

4.0

"Delivered the scoped work product ahead of the agreed deadline. The memorandum was clear, well-organized, and the analysis was actionable. Texas covenant knowledge as advertised. One caution: the bid listed a deliverable that was later recharacterized, and all requests were answered with strict scope language. Ensure everything from the bid appears in the engagement letter before signing. Work quality: strong. Style: strictly transactional."

Reply From Philips V.

View More
Texas
Review
Non-Compete Agreement
ContractsCounsel User

Contracts

Noncompetition Agreement

New York

Asked on May 23, 2022

Looking for legal advice on a non-compete agreement in NY State

I am an existing employee of a medium sized privately owed manufacturing company and have worked here for over 15 years. I recently was asked to sign a non-compete and non-disclosure agreement. I have had a series of promotions over the last 7 years but this agreement was presented several months after my latest promotion without any additional consideration for signing this agreement now.

Donya G.

Answered May 24, 2022

Signing a non compete or a non disclosure is not in and of itself illegal. In NY and in most states a non compete are individually accessed based on the language and scope (how long and what the non compete entails) and is generally examined by courts under a watchful eye as long as its not too restrictive or burdensome and would not prevent the free movement of goods and services. In order to advise you on your agreement, I would need to review it to advise you. If you need additional assistance, you may contact me directly on Contracts Counsel to engage my services. All the best. Donya Gordon

Read 1 attorney answer>
See more legal questions…

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

View Trustpilot Review

Need help with a Noncompetition Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 23,263 reviews
Employment lawyers by top cities
See All Employment Lawyers
Noncompetition Agreement lawyers by city
See All Noncompetition Agreement Lawyers

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
Employment non compete question session
Location: California
Turnaround: Less than a week
Service: Drafting
Doc Type: Non-Compete Agreement
Number of Bids: 6
Bid Range: $249 - $500
User Feedback:
Michael was there to answer all my questions, and some I may have in the future.

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
I have two non competes that needs review, one on rollover shares and as a retired officer
Location: Nevada
Turnaround: A week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Non-Compete Agreement
Page Count: 3
Number of Bids: 3
Bid Range: $400 - $500
User Feedback:
Great service

Need help with a Noncompetition Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 23,263 reviews

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city