ContractsCounsel Logo

Noncompetition Agreement

Clients Rate Lawyers on our Platform 4.9/5 Stars
based on 10,596 reviews
No Upfront Payment Required, Pay Only If You Hire.
Home Contract Samples N Noncompetition Agreement

Jump to Section

What is a Noncompetition Agreement?

A noncompetition agreement is a legal document that restricts an employee from competing with their employer's business for a designated amount of time. Some states do not allow for this agreement, such as California and Florida. However, most states do allow it as long as enough consideration is given to the employee.

Sufficient consideration for an employee in a noncompetition agreement could be in the form of higher pay or more company benefits. Noncompetition agreements include restricted territory, benefits and compensation, and what would cause a termination of employment.

Common Sections in Noncompetition Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Noncompetition Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Noncompetition Agreement Sample

Exhibit 99.2

EXECUTION COPY

NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

This Non-Competition Agreement (this “Agreement”) is being executed and delivered as of December 21, 2009 by John Vincent (“Stockholder”) in favor and for the benefit of Limelight Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”) (together the “Parties”). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Merger Agreement (as defined below).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Parent, the Company, Elvis Merger Sub One Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub One”), Elvis Merger Sub Two LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub Two” and together with Merger Sub One, the “Merger Subs”), John Vincent, as stockholder representative and Deutsche Bank National Trust, as Escrow Agent have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger of even date herewith (the “Merger Agreement”), which provides for, among other things, and as a single integrated transaction, the merger of Merger Sub One with and into the Company (the “First Step Merger”) in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL. As soon as practicable following the First Step Merger, Parent will cause the Company to merge with and into Merger Sub Two with Merger Sub Two continuing as the surviving entity (the “Second Step Merger” and, taken together with the First Step Merger, the “Merger”);

WHEREAS, Stockholder is employed by the Company as its Chief Executive Officer;

WHEREAS, Stockholder has a substantial interest in the Company as the holder of a significant number of shares of the Company’s capital stock, and, as a result of the Merger, Stockholder shall receive significant consideration in connection with the Merger;

WHEREAS, upon completion of the Merger, Stockholder shall be employed by the Company as Chief Executive Officer of Merger Sub Two;

WHEREAS, Parent and Stockholder mutually desire that the entire goodwill of the Company be transferred to Parent as part of the Merger and acknowledge that the parties explicitly considered the value of the goodwill transferred and it was valued as a component of the consideration of the Merger. Parent and Stockholder agree that Parent’s failure to receive the entire goodwill contemplated by the Merger would have the effect of reducing the value of the Company to Parent;

WHEREAS, Parent and Stockholder both agree that, prior to the Merger, the Company’s business consisted of the design, development, production, marketing and sales of products and services related to the Business (as defined below) in the Restricted Territory (as defined below), and Parent represents and Stockholder understands that, following the Merger, Parent will continue conducting the Business in the Restricted Territory; and

WHEREAS, as a condition and mutual inducement to the Merger, and to preserve the value and goodwill of the business being acquired by Parent after the Merger, the Merger

 

- 1 -


Agreement contemplates, among other things, that Stockholder shall enter into this Agreement and that this Agreement shall become effective at the Effective Time (as that term is defined in the Merger Agreement).

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made herein, Parent and Stockholder hereby agree as follows:

1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Time. This Agreement shall be null and void if the Merger is not consummated as contemplated in the Merger Agreement.

2. Non-competition. Stockholder acknowledges that in order to protect and preserve the value and goodwill of the business of the Company being transferred to Parent as part of the Merger, a post-termination employment restriction is reasonable, as without such a restriction, Stockholder’s employment or engagement with one of the competitors identified herein would detrimentally, irreversibly, and immeasurably diminish the value and goodwill of the business of the Company. Thus, both to ensure that the value and goodwill related to the business of the Company being transferred to Parent as part of the Merger is protected and preserved, and to avoid the actual or threatened misappropriation of the Company’s and Parent’s trade secrets and confidential information, Stockholder agrees that during the period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on the 36-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later (or, in the event any reviewing court finds thirty-six (36) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 24-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (or, in the event any reviewing court finds twenty-four (24) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 12-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (the “Non-Competition Period”), Stockholder shall not (other than in connection with his employment services to Parent, Merger Sub Two, or any subsidiary thereof or their respective successors or assigns), without the prior written consent of Parent, directly or indirectly:

How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

(a) engage, on his own behalf or on behalf of any other Person (as defined below), anywhere in the Restricted Territory (as defined below) in any business (including research and development), operations, activities and/or services on behalf of or in connection with a Competitor (as defined below);

(b) be or become an officer, director, stockholder, owner, affiliate, salesperson, co-owner, partner, trustee, promoter, technician, engineer, analyst, employee, agent, representative, supplier, contractor, consultant, advisor or manager of or to, or otherwise acquire or hold any interest in, or participate in or facilitate the financing, operation, management or control of, any Competitor in the Restricted Territory, including the promotion of investments in an entity which is a Competitor in the Restricted Territory;

 

- 2 -


(c) solicit or attempt to solicit any of the Company’s customers for a Competitor, or in connection with a Competitor, including any attempts to obtain a confidential customer list or any other Company trade secrets; or

(d) provide any service (as an employee, consultant, or otherwise), product, support, or technology to any Competitor in the Restricted Territory;

As used herein, “Competitor” shall mean and include Akamai, Eyeblaster, Pointroll, the ad serving division of Google, CDNetworks, Level 3, the ad serving division of AT&T, the CDN division of AT&T, BitGravity, Edgecast, Admotion, Adrime, CheckM8, DGFastChannel (Unicast division), Interpolls, and the Atlas division of Microsoft Corporation and any Person (now existing or hereafter formed) engaged in Business that is directly competitive with the Business conducted by Eyewonder, Inc. as of the date of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Stockholder’s employment as Chief Executive Officer of Merger Sub Two is terminated without Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement), then the Non-Competition Period shall terminate on the date which is six (6) months after such date of termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Stockholder’s employment as Chief Executive Officer is terminated by his voluntary resignation in Connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the Employment Agreement), then the Non-Competition Period shall terminate on the date which is twelve (12) months after such date of termination.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent or restrict Stockholder from any of the following: (i) owning as a passive investment less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the capital stock of a corporation (whether public or private) that is engaged in a Competing Business and Stockholder is not otherwise associated with such corporation; (ii) performing speaking engagements and receiving honoraria in connection with such engagements; (iii) being employed by any government agency, college, university, or other non-profit research organization; (iv) owning a passive equity interest in a private debt or equity investment fund in which the Stockholder does not have the ability to control or exercise any managerial influence over such fund; (v) becoming associated with, employed by, or otherwise performing services for any person or entity, or subsidiary, subdivision, division, or joint venture of such entity that is a Competitor, where (i) the particular division, subdivision, subsidiary, or business unit that employs Stockholder or for which Stockholder provides services or is associated with is not a Competitor, or (ii) the employment or services provided by Stockholder do not otherwise relate to a Competing Business Purpose; (vi) becoming associated with, employed by, or otherwise performing services for any person or entity, or subsidiary, subdivision, division, or joint venture of such entity (including any actions or services provided in forming or developing any such entity) that is not a Competitor, but may do business with or otherwise perform services for a person or entity, or subsidiary, subdivision, division, or joint venture of such entity, as long as Stockholder’s services are not related to a Competing Business Purpose, or (vii) any activity consented to in writing by Parent.

Business” means the business of developing, designing, manufacturing, producing, marketing, publishing, or selling: (i) Content Delivery Network (CDN) services via a network of servers placed variously around the Internet with the goal of maximizing access to client data

 

- 3 -


and/or (ii) online management solutions for online creative agencies, online ad buy agencies, or online publishers.

Person” means a natural person, corporation, partnership, or other legal entity, or a joint venture of two or more of the foregoing.

Restricted Territory” means i) each and every country, province, state, city or other political subdivision of the United States and Canada; ii) each and every country, province, state, city or other political subdivision of the European Union; and iii) each and every country, province, state, city, or other political subdivision of the world in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates is currently engaged in, currently plans to engage in, or engages in during the Non-Competition Period, a Competing Business Purpose.

3. Non-solicitation. To preserve the value and goodwill of the business of the Company being transferred to Parent as part of the Merger, Stockholder further agrees that during the period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on the 36-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later (or, in the event any reviewing court finds thirty-six (36) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 24-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (or, in the event any reviewing court finds twenty-four (24) months to be overbroad and unenforceable, ending on the 12-month anniversary of the Closing Date or the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two or any subsidiary thereof, whichever occurs later) (the “Non-Solicitation Period”), Stockholder shall not, without the prior written consent of Parent, solicit, encourage, or take any other action, directly or indirectly, that is intended to induce or encourage, or has the effect of inducing or encouraging, any employee of Merger Sub Two or Parent, or any subsidiary of Merger Sub Two or Parent, to (i) leave his or her employment with Merger Sub Two or Parent, or any subsidiary of Merger Sub Two or Parent, or any of their respective successors or assigns or (ii) engage in any activity in which Stockholder would, under the provisions of Section 2 hereof, be prohibited from engaging. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of this Agreement, the placement of general advertisements that may be targeted to a particular geographic or technical area but that are not specifically targeted toward employees of Merger Sub Two or Parent or any subsidiary of Merger Sub Two or Parent or their respective successors or assigns, shall not be deemed to be a breach of this Section 3.

4. Severability of Covenants. The covenants contained in Section 2 hereof shall be construed as a series of separate covenants, one for each country, province, state, city or other political subdivision of the Restricted Territory. Except for geographic coverage, each such separate covenant shall be deemed identical in terms to the covenant contained in Section 2 hereof. If, in any judicial proceeding, a court refuses to enforce any of such separate covenants (or any part thereof), then Parent, Merger Sub Two and Stockholder agree that such unenforceable covenant (or such part) shall be eliminated from this Agreement to the extent necessary to permit the remaining separate covenants (or portions thereof) to be enforced. In the event that the provisions of Section 2 or Section 3 are deemed to exceed the time, geographic or scope limitations permitted by applicable law, then Parent, Merger Sub Two and Stockholder

 

- 4 -


agree that such provisions shall be reformed to the maximum time, geographic, or scope limitations, as the case may be, permitted by applicable law.

5. Independence of Obligations. The covenants and obligations of Stockholder set forth in this Agreement shall be construed as independent of any other agreement or arrangement between Stockholder, on the one hand, and Parent, Merger Sub Two, or any subsidiary of Parent or Merger Sub Two, on the other.

6. Stockholder Acknowledgements. Stockholder acknowledges that (i) Stockholder has a substantial interest in the Company as the holder of a significant number of shares of the Company’s capital stock and, as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, is a key and significant member of the management of the Company; (ii) the goodwill associated with the existing business, customers, and assets of the Company prior to the Merger is an integral component of the value of the Company to Parent and is reflected in the consideration payable to Stockholder in connection with the Merger, and (iii) Stockholder’s agreement as set forth herein is necessary for the protection of the legitimate business interests of Parent in the Merger and to preserve the value and goodwill of the Company for Parent following the Merger.

Stockholder also acknowledges and agrees that the limitations of time, geography, and scope of activity agreed to in this Agreement are reasonable because, among other things: (A) the Company and Parent are engaged in a highly competitive industry, (B) Stockholder has had unique access to the trade secrets and know-how of the Company and Parent, including, without limitation, the plans and strategy (and, in particular, the competitive strategy) of the Company and Parent, (C) Stockholder has accepted employment with Parent in connection with the Merger on terms that Stockholder believes are favorable to him, (D) by virtue of his employment with the Parent, Stockholder will have access to Parent’s trade secrets and know how, including Parent’s plans and strategy (and, in particular, Parent’s competitive strategy), (E) in the event Stockholder’s employment with Parent or Merger Sub Two ended, Stockholder believes he would be able to obtain suitable and satisfactory employment without violation of this Agreement; (F) Stockholder believes that this Agreement provides no more protection than is reasonably necessary to protect Parent’s legitimate interest in the goodwill, trade secrets, and confidential information of the Company, (G) Stockholder has no current intention of engaging in a Competing Business Purpose within the area and the time limits set forth in this Agreement, and (H) Stockholder’s obligations under this Agreement (and the enforcement thereof) will not prevent him from earning a livelihood

Stockholder further acknowledges and agrees that (i) the execution and delivery and continuation in force of this Agreement is a material inducement to Parent to execute the Merger Agreement and is a mandatory condition precedent to the closing of the Merger, without which Parent would not close the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (ii) breach of this Agreement will be such that Parent will not have an adequate remedy at law because of the unique nature of the operations and assets being conveyed to Parent; and (iii) execution of this Agreement shall not limit Parent’s or Merger Sub Two’s employee policies, including, without limitation, the provisions set forth in Parent’s and Merger Sub Two’s confidentiality and proprietary information agreements.

 

- 5 -


Stockholder further acknowledges and agrees that (i) Stockholder is subject to Parent’s confidential information and trade secret protection policies and agrees to comply with such policies, (ii) Stockholder’s obligations under this Agreement shall remain in effect if Stockholder’s employment with Parent is terminated for any or no reason, and (iii) during the Non-Competition Period, prior to becoming an employee or partner of or consultant to any Person, Stockholder will provide written notice of such employment, partnership, or consultancy to Parent and provide such Person with an executed copy of this Agreement. Stockholder agrees that the Non-Competition Period shall be tolled during any period of violation of the covenants contained in Section 2 and the Non-Solicitation Period shall be tolled during any period of violation of the covenants contained in Section 3.

7. Arbitration and Equitable Relief.

(a) The Parties agree that any and all disputes arising out of, or relating to, the terms of this Agreement, their interpretation, and any of the matters herein released, shall be subject to binding arbitration in Maricopa County before the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Rules. The Parties agree that the prevailing party in any arbitration shall be entitled to injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the arbitration award. The Parties agree that the prevailing party in any arbitration shall be awarded its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. The Parties hereby agree to waive their right to have any dispute between them resolved in a court of law by a judge or jury. This section will not prevent either party from seeking injunctive relief (or any other provisional remedy) from any court having jurisdiction over the Parties and the subject matter of their dispute relating to Employee’s obligations under this Agreement and the agreements incorporated herein by reference.

(b) STOCKHOLDER HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS THIS SECTION 7, WHICH DISCUSSES ARBITRATION. STOCKHOLDER UNDERSTANDS THAT BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, STOCKHOLDER AGREES, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO SUBMIT ANY CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF, RELATING TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE INTERPRETATION, VALIDITY, CONSTRUCTION, PERFORMANCE, BREACH, OR TERMINATION THEREOF, TO BINDING ARBITRATION, AND THAT THIS ARBITRATION CLAUSE CONSTITUTES A WAIVER OF STOCKHOLDER’S RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL AND RELATES TO THE RESOLUTION OF ALL DISPUTES REFERRED TO IN SECTION 7(A) ABOVE.

8. Remedy. Stockholder acknowledges and agrees that (a) the rights of Parent under this Agreement are of a specialized and unique character and that immediate and irreparable damage will result to Parent if Stockholder fails to or refuses to perform his obligations under this Agreement and (b) Parent may, in addition to any other remedies and damages available, obtain an injunction to restrain any such failure or refusal. No single exercise of the foregoing remedies shall be deemed to exhaust Parent’s right to such remedies, but the right to such remedies shall continue undiminished and may be exercised from time to time as often as Parent may elect.

9. Non-Exclusivity. The rights and remedies of Parent hereunder are not exclusive of or limited by any other rights or remedies that Parent hereunder may have, whether at law, in

 

- 6 -


equity, by contract, or otherwise, all of which shall be cumulative (and not alternative). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights and remedies of Parent hereunder, and the obligations and liabilities of Stockholder hereunder, are in addition to their respective rights, remedies, obligations, and liabilities under the law of unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets, and the like. This Agreement does not limit Stockholder’s obligations or the rights of Parent (or any affiliate of Parent) under the terms of any other agreement between Stockholder and Parent or any affiliate of Parent.

10. Termination of Employment. Stockholder’s obligations under this Agreement shall not be eliminated or diminished by the termination of Stockholder’s employment with Parent, Merger Sub Two, the Company, or any of their subsidiaries, as the case may be, for any reason, including as a result of Stockholder’s resignation.

11. Notices. All notices and other communications pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed to be sufficient if contained in a written instrument and shall be deemed given if delivered personally, telecopied, sent by nationally-recognized overnight courier or mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), postage prepaid, to the respective parties at the following address:

How ContractsCounsel Works
Hiring a lawyer on ContractsCounsel is easy, transparent and affordable.
1. Post a Free Project
Complete our 4-step process to provide info on what you need done.
2. Get Bids to Review
Receive flat-fee bids from lawyers in our marketplace to compare.
3. Start Your Project
Securely pay to start working with the lawyer you select.

 

  (a) if to Parent or Merger Sub Two, to:

Limelight Networks, Inc.

2220 W. 14th Street

Tempe, AZ 85281

Attention: Philip C. Maynard

SVP & CLO

Telephone No.: (602) 850-5000

Facsimile No.: (602) 850-5001

with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, California 94304

Attention: Mark Reinstra

Telephone No.: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile No.: (650) 493-6811

 

  (b) if to Stockholder, to the address for notice set forth on Stockholder’s signature page hereto

with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to:

 

- 7 -


Kilpatrick Stockton LLP

1100 Peachtree Street, NE

Suite 2800

Atlanta, GA 30309-4530

Attention: W. Benjamin Barkley

Facsimile No.: (404) 541-3121

or to such other address as any party may have furnished to the other in writing in accordance herewith, except that notices of change of address shall only be effective upon receipt.

12. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or any part of any such provision is held under any circumstances to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then (a) such provision or part thereof shall, with respect to such circumstances and in such jurisdiction, be deemed amended to conform to applicable laws so as to be valid and enforceable to the fullest possible extent, (b) the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision or part thereof under such circumstances and in such jurisdiction shall not affect the validity or enforceability of such provision or part thereof under any other circumstances or in any other jurisdiction and (c) such invalidity of enforceability of such provision or part thereof shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of such provision or the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement.

13. Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Arizona, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflicts of law thereof. Subject to Section 7, each of the parties hereto irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the state and federal courts located in Arizona, in connection with any matter based upon or arising out of this Agreement or the matters contemplated herein, agrees that process may be served upon them in any manner authorized by the laws of the state of Arizona for such persons and waives and covenants not to assert or plead any objection which they might otherwise have to such jurisdiction and venue in the state of Arizona and such process.

14. Waiver. No failure on the part of any party to exercise any power, right, privilege or remedy under this Agreement, and no delay on the part of any party in exercising any power, right, privilege or remedy under this Agreement, shall operate as a waiver of such power, right, privilege or remedy; and no single or partial exercise of any such power, right, privilege or remedy shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof or of any other power, right, privilege or remedy. No party shall be deemed to have waived any claim arising out of this Agreement, or any power, right, privilege or remedy under this Agreement, unless the waiver of such claim, power, right, privilege or remedy is expressly set forth in a written instrument duly executed and delivered on behalf of the waiving party; and any such waiver shall not be applicable or have any effect except in the specific instance in which it is given.

15. Captions. The captions contained in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only, shall not be deemed to be a part of this Agreement, shall not affect in any way the meaning of this Agreement, and shall not be referred to in connection with the construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

 

- 8 -


16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and the other agreements referred to herein, set forth the entire understanding of Stockholder and Parent relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between any of such parties relating to the subject matter hereof (but does not in any way merge or supersede the Merger Agreement or any other agreement executed in connection with the Merger Agreement, including the Stockholder’s employment agreement with Parent). Stockholder understands and agrees that he has had an opportunity to seek his own counsel in his review of this Agreement.

17. Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended, modified, altered, or supplemented other than by means of a written instrument duly executed and delivered on behalf of Parent and Stockholder.

18. Assignment. This Agreement and all obligations hereunder are personal to Stockholder and may not be transferred or assigned by Stockholder at any time. Parent may assign its rights under this Agreement to any entity in connection with any merger or sale or transfer of all or substantially all of Parent’s assets.

19. Binding Nature. Subject to Section 18, this Agreement will be binding upon Stockholder and Stockholder’s representatives, executors, administrators, estate, heirs, successors and assigns, and will inure to the benefit of Parent and its successors and assigns.

20. Counterpart Execution. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

[remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 

- 9 -


In witness whereof, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

“STOCKHOLDER”   By:      

/s/ John Vincent

 
    John Vincent  
      Address:  

1293 Hayes Dr.

        Smyrna GA 30080
      Telephone:  

404 663 1419

      Fax:                                                                                                          

“PARENT”

   

LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.

a Delaware corporation

    /s/ Philip C. Maynard
   

Philip C. Maynard

SVP & CLO


Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-99.2 3 dex992.htm NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT, Viewed January 27, 2022, View Source on SEC.

Who Helps With Noncompetition Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on noncompetition agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a noncompetition agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate noncompetition agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Need help with a Noncompetition Agreement?

Create a free project posting

Meet some of our Noncompetition Agreement Lawyers

Jo Ann J. on ContractsCounsel
View Jo Ann
5.0 (6)
Member Since:
February 23, 2021

Jo Ann J.

Partner
Free Consultation
Boston, MA
28 Yrs Experience
Licensed in MA
Suffolk Universtiy Law School

Jo Ann has been practicing for over 20 years, working primarily with high growth companies from inception through exit and all points in between. She is skilled in Mergers & Acquisitions, Contractual Agreements (including founders agreements, voting agreements, licensing agreements, terms of service, privacy policies, stockholder agreements, operating agreements, equity incentive plans, employment agreements, vendor agreements and other commercial agreements), Corporate Governance and Due Diligence.

Mark D. on ContractsCounsel
View Mark
5.0 (4)
Member Since:
March 15, 2022

Mark D.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Dallas/Houston Texas
29 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CO, TX
Thomas M Cooley Law School

Partnering with business clients to keep their greatest asset - their employees - from becoming their biggest liability. Mark accomplishes this by working with in-house counsel and human resource professionals of several Fortune 50 companies, as well as many smaller public and privately held profit and not for profit organizations, to provide advice and counsel on the day to day employment and workforce practice issues encountered by those organizations. For over fifteen years Mark has been Board Certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. He is licensed and practices in both Texas and Colorado and has focused his practice for the last 20 plus years on defending companies in employment and labor related matters. During this time Mark has had extensive experience in handling and responding to a wide range of local, state and federal employment issues that impact the management and operations of businesses in a wide range of industries. Mark's experience includes appearances before state and federal agencies and regulatory boards, litigation in both state and federal courts, defense of class actions and appearances before courts of appeal. While Mark regularly handles matters in litigation, he has a high regard for handling every issue with the best interest of the client’s business. Mark is a published author and regular speaks on labor, employment and workplace practice topics. Whether it be an investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Wage & Hour division of the U.S. Department of Labor, or other state agency; an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or state agency charge claiming a violation of local, state or federal employment or labor laws; or the need for direction on a hiring, termination or business operational issue involving employees, Mark has extensive experience in handling these and many other employment and labor issues.

Jason P. on ContractsCounsel
View Jason
5.0 (5)
Member Since:
December 1, 2022

Jason P.

Business Lawyer
Free Consultation
Portland, OR
8 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OR, WA
Lewis & Clark Law School

Jason is a self-starting, go-getting lawyer who takes a pragmatic approach to helping his clients. He co-founded Fortify Law because he was not satisfied with the traditional approach to providing legal services. He firmly believes that legal costs should be predictable, transparent and value-driven. Jason’s entrepreneurial mindset enables him to better understand his clients’ needs. His first taste of entrepreneurship came from an early age when he helped manage his family’s small free range cattle farm. Every morning, before school, he would deliver hay to a herd of 50 hungry cows. In addition, he was responsible for sweeping "the shop" at his parent's 40-employee HVAC business. Before becoming a lawyer, he clerked at the Lewis & Clark Small Business Legal Clinic where he handled a diverse range of legal issues including establishing new businesses, registering trademarks, and drafting contracts. He also spent time working with the in-house team at adidas® where, among other things, he reviewed and negotiated complex agreements and created training materials for employees. He also previously worked with Meriwether Group, a Portland-based business consulting firm focused on accelerating the growth of disruptive consumer brands and facilitating founder exits. These experiences have enabled Jason to not only understand the unique legal hurdles that can threaten a business, but also help position them for growth. Jason's practice focuses on Business and Intellectual Property Law, including: ​ -Reviewing and negotiating contracts -Resolving internal corporate disputes -Creating employment and HR policies -Registering and protecting intellectual property -Forming new businesses and subsidiaries -Facilitating Business mergers, acquisitions, and exit strategies -Conducting international business transactions ​​ In his free time, Jason is an adventure junkie and gear-head. He especially enjoys backpacking, kayaking, and snowboarding. He is also a technology enthusiast, craft beer connoisseur, and avid soccer player.

Casey B. on ContractsCounsel
View Casey
5.0 (1)
Member Since:
October 16, 2023

Casey B.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Atlanta, Georgia
6 Yrs Experience
Licensed in GA
Mercer University, Walter F. George School of Law

I have a Juris Doctorate degree from Mercer Law School, and I am an active member of the Georgia State Bar Association. I have spent the last eight years reviewing, drafting, editing, and negotiating hundreds of contracts on a monthly basis, working in-house for a Fortune 500 company. I am a results-driven, self-motivated, experienced contracts attorney with exceptional drafting, research and communication abilities.

Drew M. on ContractsCounsel
View Drew
Member Since:
October 19, 2023

Drew M.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Florida
17 Yrs Experience
Licensed in FL, MA
University of Florida

Drew Melville is a Florida and Massachusetts-licensed attorney with fourteen years' experience in real estate transactions, title insurance and land use. His practice includes all aspects of commercial real estate acquisitions, dispositions, financing, joint venture formation, leasing and land use approvals. Mr. Melville is a title agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, First American Title Insurance Company, and Stewart Title Guaranty Company. Mr. Melville's practice is national in scope, and he brings a creative and solution-oriented approach to his clients' diverse array of real estate investment and development activities in all real estate asset classes. These often include urban infill, adaptive reuse, affordable and workforce housing, historic preservation, sustainable building, brownfield or gray-field redevelopment and opportunity zones. Prior to starting his own firm, he was an in house counsel for the real estate development subsidiary of a large, diversified land and agribusiness company. To date, Mr. Melville has closed over $1.2 billion in commercial real estate transactions.

Hao L. on ContractsCounsel
View Hao
Member Since:
October 19, 2023

Hao L.

Partner
Free Consultation
Miami, Florida
1 Yr Experience
Licensed in FL
Golden Gate University School of Law

Florida Licensed Attorney & CFA® Charterholder Specializing in Immigration, Taxation, Aviation, Bankruptcy, Estate & Succession, and Business & Civil Litigation

Corey H. on ContractsCounsel
View Corey
Member Since:
October 20, 2023

Corey H.

Managing Partner
Free Consultation
Richmond, Virginia
15 Yrs Experience
Licensed in DC, MA, VA
UC Berkeley Law - LL.M

Veritas Global Law, PLLC ("Veritas") is a law firm specializing in Life Sciences, Private Equity, M&A, technology transactions and general corporate law. Veritas frequently represents clients seeking cost a cost efficient, on-demand, general counsel in a variety of general corporate law matters, and a range of contracts including NDAs, MSAs, Software as a Service (Saas) agreements. Veritas also represents U.S. and non-U.S. private investment fund GPs and LPs across a broad range of activities with a particular emphasis on private equity, venture capital, secondary funds, distressed funds and funds of funds. Mr. Harris received his LL.M. from the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law and served as an articles editor of the Berkeley Business Law Journal and was an active member of the Berkeley Center for Law Business and the Economy. Additionally, Mr. Harris also holds a J.D. from Boston College Law School, a M.B.A. from the Boston College Carroll School of Management, a B.A. from Hampton University in Political Science with a minor in Economics and Spanish and a certificate in financial valuation from the University of Oxford, Saïd Business School.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Contracts

Noncompetition Agreement

New York

Asked on May 23, 2022

Looking for legal advice on a non-compete agreement in NY State

I am an existing employee of a medium sized privately owed manufacturing company and have worked here for over 15 years. I recently was asked to sign a non-compete and non-disclosure agreement. I have had a series of promotions over the last 7 years but this agreement was presented several months after my latest promotion without any additional consideration for signing this agreement now.

Donya G.

Answered May 24, 2022

Signing a non compete or a non disclosure is not in and of itself illegal. In NY and in most states a non compete are individually accessed based on the language and scope (how long and what the non compete entails) and is generally examined by courts under a watchful eye as long as its not too restrictive or burdensome and would not prevent the free movement of goods and services. In order to advise you on your agreement, I would need to review it to advise you. If you need additional assistance, you may contact me directly on Contracts Counsel to engage my services. All the best. Donya Gordon

Read 1 attorney answer>
See more legal questions…

Need help with a Noncompetition Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Employment lawyers by top cities
See All Employment Lawyers
Noncompetition Agreement lawyers by city
See All Noncompetition Agreement Lawyers

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
Reviewing PIIAA contact + noncompete
Location: Washington
Turnaround: Over a week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Non-Compete Agreement
Page Count: 13
Number of Bids: 6
Bid Range: $150 - $545

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
Employment Contract Review
Location: District of Columbia
Turnaround: Less than a week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Non-Compete Agreement
Page Count: 8
Number of Bids: 2
Bid Range: $475 - $950
related contracts
See More Contracts
other helpful articles

Need help with a Noncompetition Agreement?

Create a free project posting

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city