Simple Agreement For Future Tokens: What it Is and How it Works
Jump to Section
What is a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT)?
A simple agreement for future tokens, or SAFT, is an investment contract offered to accredited investors by cryptocurrency developers. These are specifically designed token sales and are not meant to represent equity in a company. However, they help companies comply with securities regulations while fundraising. The US government classifies cryptocurrency tokens as a type of security, requiring the parties to follow all applicable rules and regulations.
A SAFT is a security since accredited investors offer financing without expecting a future, guaranteed return. When an investor invests in a project, they expect the project’s tokens to sell for a higher price, which allows the investor to profit. The SAFT is used to complete the investment, which satisfies the fundamental requirements and is subject to state and federal securities regulations, depending on the jurisdiction.
This website will show you a SAFT sample via the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SECs).
What is a Token Purchase?
A token purchase is an investment transaction, typically activated by an initial coin offering (ICO), the cryptocurrency’s version of an initial public offering, or IPO. Token purchases are a vehicle for cryptocurrency companies to raise many through accredited investors. These transactions are governed through contracts, such as a token purchase agreement or a private token sale agreement.
How SAFT Agreements Work
SAFT agreements compensate accredited investors for early financing. The cryptocurrency company will issue tokens at a discount or liquidation scenario’s value, similar to convertible notes. The discount price is a single token’s value multiplied by the discount rate during a triggering event.
A SAFT essentially allows the company to defer the valuation of the token. Certain SAFT agreements may have a valuation cap. Thus, when parties raise capital through a SAFT with a valuation cap, they essentially negotiate a valuation.
SAFTs do not need to fall under the balance sheet as a debt. However, suppose the company fails before the cash converts to tokens. In that case, it typically offers to pay the investor an amount equal to the capital investment before paying its shareholders.
What’s Included in a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT)?
Negotiating three terms before signing a SAFT is critical, including triggering events, valuation caps, discounts, and pro-rata rights, which are explained below. SAFTs are not all created equal, which means that the terms can make your investment sink or swim. An experienced startup lawyer can assist you in negotiating and drafting these terms.
Here is what you should know about each one and how they affect the investment:
- Trigger Events. Upon triggering an event such as a company sale, initial coin offering (ICO), or merger, future tokens convert to tokens. If the company goes bankrupt or the triggering events never occur, the SAFT is worthless. A future token investment can serve as the trigger. The SAFT investor receives the same number of tokens as prospective investors.
- Valuation Caps. A seed-stage investor takes a significant risk in the early stages. For the investor, a valuation cap resolves this issue. A valuation cap establishes a maximum token value to determine the investor’s ownership percentage. Without a cap on the token’s valuation, the percentage available to the SAFT investor continues to decline as the company’s value increases.
- Discounts. A discount rate provides a deal to the SAFT investor on the value of the tokens at the time of the triggering event. It is a discount from the anticipated price in the future. For example, a discount rate of 80 percent means that the SAFT investor receives their future tokens for 80 percent of the price paid by future investors as an early investment reward.
- Pro-Rata Rights. Pro-rata rights allow the SAFT investor to participate in future fundraising rounds. While this benefits the accredited investor, the company could face issues with future investors if they want the round to themselves. This issue could be exacerbated if the company has granted pro-rata rights to multiple SAFT investors.
SAFT vs. SAFE
A simple agreement for future equity (SAFE), or SAFE agreement, is different from a SAFT. A SAFE agreement is an investment contract that entitles investors to future equity upon triggering a qualifying event, such as a merger, acquisition, or financing round. Basically, instead of receiving tokens like with a SAFT, the SAFE allows the investor to receive equity at a later date. SAFE notes were invented by Y-Combinator, a San Francisco-based startup incubator, and are viewed as a more founder-friendly alternative to convertible notes.
SAFT vs. ICO
SAFTs often work in conjunction with initial coin offerings (ICOs). An ICO involves a project selling its tokens to regular, pre-approved users during the launch. On the other hand, SAFTs deal exclusively with accredited investors. ICOs offer coins upfront where with SAFTs, investors put up funds first and receive new tokens at a later date.
Accredited investors are those who can legally conduct securities transactions. In addition, they meet certain income, net worth, and professional experience requirements. Investor class distinctions enable SAFTs to be classified as a security that satisfies the fundamental requirements of US federal laws.
Image via Pexels by David McBee
Pros and Cons of SAFT Agreements
There are pros and cons of SAFTs for both investors and startups. On the one hand, SAFTs offer the stability and transparency that fiat markets have come to expect. On the other, this level of control could make the industry bristle since it bases its existence on decentralization and freedom from control.
Below, we’ve created a few pros and cons for your consideration when it comes to using SAFT agreements.
3 Pros of SAFTs:
- Potential Standardization. SAFT contracts could result in industry standardization, which would make regulators happy. It would also allow startups to continue using digital token sales to fund the development of their offerings.
- Increased Security. ICO scams would significantly decrease, as SAFT contracts are securities that must go through a vetting process. In addition, the SEC would subject the transactions to regulatory oversight at every point in the process.
- Wider Investor Base. The advantages of SAFT agreements alone could help expand the investor base for token sales. Not only would they provide some level of security for investors, but they also offer transparency that the public wants.
3 Cons of SAFTs:
- Limited Investors. The primary disadvantage of SAFT contracts is that they are only available to accredited investors. This means that small private investors must wait until the token becomes tradable on the secondary market.
- Perception. SAFT contracts may appear to work against the crypto movement. The entire premise of crypto and digital currencies is to move toward independence and freedom. Some people may push back against their becoming a standardized element.
- Limited Reach. SAFTs were based on the federal laws of the United States. Therefore, they may not gain as much global participation due to a lack of international applicability.
SAFT agreements are a new investment vehicle that assures compliance with US securities laws. They are both simple and effective but should be negotiated and considered carefully with a startup attorney. Regardless of your role, your lawyer can assist you in negotiating and understanding these terms so that it is a meaningful transaction for both parties.
Post a project in ContractsCounsel’s marketplace to get flat fee bids from lawyers for your legal project. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer-reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
Octavia P.
I am a business law attorney with over 15 years’ experience and a strong background in information technology. I am a graduate of the University of California Berkeley, a member of the Illinois bar, New York bar and a licensed lawyer (Solicitor) of England and Wales. I actively partner directly with my clients or indirectly, as Of Counsel, to boutique law firms to streamline business practices and manage legal risks by focusing on essentials such as - business contracts, corporate structure, employment/independent contractor agreements, website terms and policies, IP, technology, and commercial related agreements as well as business risk and compliance guidance.
"Octavia P. is very responsive and knowledgeable. She was able to make changes for me in less than a day, and was able to make adjustments and changes as needed."
Albert M.
I am a New Jersey licensed attorney and I have been in practice for over nineteen years. My practice mainly consists of representing public entities (municipalities, school boards, etc) and businesses, both small and large. In that capacity, much of work consists of drafting, reviewing and revising contracts.
"Albert was accommodating and attentive to the project. Great rate."
January 20, 2021
Elizabeth R.
Elizabeth is an experienced attorney with a demonstrated history of handling transactional legal matters for a wide range of small businesses and entrepreneurs, with a distinct understanding of dental and medical practices. Elizabeth also earned a BBA in Accounting, giving her unique perspective about the financial considerations her clients encounter regularly while navigating the legal and business environments. Elizabeth is highly responsive, personable and has great attention to detail. She is also fluent in Spanish.
Abby V.
Abby is an attorney and public policy specialist who has fused together her experience as an advocate, education in economics and public health, and passion for working with animals to create healthier communities for people and animals alike. At Opening Doors PLLC, she helps housing providers ensure the integrity of animal accommodation requests, comply with fair housing requirements, and implement safer pet policies. Abby also assists residents with their pet-related housing problems and works with community stakeholders to increase housing stability in underserved communities. She is a nationally-recognized expert in animal accommodation laws and her work has been featured in The Washington Post, USA Today, Bloomberg, and Cosmopolitan magazine.
January 4, 2021
Matan S.
Matan is an experienced M&A, corporate, tax and real estate attorney advising closely held businesses, technology start ups, service businesses, and manufacturers in purchases, sales, and other exit strategies. Matan works with founders and first-and-second generation owners to strategically transition businesses.
Sean D.
Accomplished and results-driven business attorney with extensive experience in commercial real estate / project finance, commercial transactions, and entity formations, that possesses a winning blend of subject matter expertise, skill in client relationship management, and practical experience. Leverages a unique mix of legal, strategic, and analytical expertise that consistently meets and surpasses client expectations. Specialties: Commercial Real Estate Law, Contract Negotiation, Entity Formation, Joint Ventures, Procurement, Lease/Buy/Sell Transactions, Business Consultations, Team Leadership, and Economic Development
February 8, 2021
Jonathan D.
Miami-based duly licensed attorney and customs broker with significant experience in various types of supply chain business agreements, as well as experience in entertainment law.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Financial lawyers by top cities
- Austin Financial Lawyers
- Boston Financial Lawyers
- Chicago Financial Lawyers
- Dallas Financial Lawyers
- Denver Financial Lawyers
- Houston Financial Lawyers
- Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
- New York Financial Lawyers
- Phoenix Financial Lawyers
- San Diego Financial Lawyers
- Tampa Financial Lawyers
Simple Agreement For Future Tokens lawyers by city
- Austin Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Boston Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Chicago Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Dallas Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Denver Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Houston Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Los Angeles Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- New York Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Phoenix Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- San Diego Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Tampa Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review