SAFE Agreement: How They Work, Important Terms
Jump to Section
Quick Facts — SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Avg cost to draft a SAFE Note: $590.00
- Avg cost to review a SAFE Note: $500.00
- Lawyers available: 140 startup lawyers
- Clients helped: 230 recent SAFE agreement projects
- Avg lawyer rating: 4.95 (45 reviews)
Startups need to raise money, but it’s nearly impossible to attract new investors without discuss valuation and performance indicator data. While this may seem like a latent problem without a solution, the good news is that there’s an investment instrument, known as a SAFE agreement, that solves it.
Find out everything you need to know about SAFE agreements through the article below.
What Is A SAFE Agreement?
SAFE agreements, also known as simple agreements for future equity and SAFE notes, are financial agreements that startups use to raise seed financing capital and similar to a warrant. They’re an alternative to convertible notes and KISS notes and were introduced by Y Combinator in 2013. The terms and conditions of SAFE agreements determine the relationship between the startup and investor regarding equity rights for triggering liquidity events.
Triggering Liquidity Event
A ‘triggering liquidity event’ in a SAFE agreement refers to an event that causes the conversion of a SAFE into equity. These can include:
- Equity Financing. If a startup raises capital by selling preferred shares to investors, the financing round can trigger the SAFE agreement holders’ investment to convert into equity, often at the discount rate or valuation cap.
- Liquidity Event. A liquidity event is a broad category, but can include things like the sale of a company or an Initial Public Offering (IPO). If these happen, the SAFE agreement holders’ investment converts into equity before the transaction.
- Dissolution or Bankruptcy. If the company goes out of business, dissolves, or files bankruptcy, the SAFE agreement holders may have rights to remaining assets of the company and can cause the investment to convert into equity.
Here’s an article that discusses SAFE agreements.
How Do SAFE Agreements Work?
It’s challenging to value a startup at the beginning of its inception. SAFE agreements solve this problem. They allow you to delay valuation until a future date while still having the opportunity to invest or raise capital.
Once the company grows, it will likely raise additional capital and subsequently increase in value. It’s this result that investors are trying to achieve. The SAFE agreement converts into company shares when new investors do priced rounds in the future.
Example of How Safe Agreements Work
Let’s say you invest $25,000 through a SAFE agreement. Since assigning a valuation to early stage companies is almost meaningless, the startup will leverage its SAFE agreement to find new investors to defer valuation to a future event. The investors are simply buying the right to equity in the future, when the startup has more traction and performance data that would allow an institutional investor to properly value the startup. At this point, your $25,000 would convert into equity relative to the valuation of the priced round. Early investors typically get a benefit from taking a risk, which includes discounts and valuation caps.
This article also discusses what you need to know about SAFE Agreements.
SAFE Note Templates
Important Terms in a SAFE Agreement
SAFE agreements are powerful investing tools. However, there are important terms in SAFE Agreements that you must understand. The five terms we’ll consider in this article include discounts, valuation caps, pre-money or post-money, pro-rata rights, and the most favored nations provision.
Discount
SAFE agreements can include a discount. The discount is used if the SAFE investor money converts in future financing rounds and the valuation was at or below the valuation cap. For example, a 20% discount rate means an investors money would buy shares at a $8m valuation if the priced round was $10m (20% discount).
Valuation Cap
Valuation caps are another common term in SAFE agreements that investors can use to obtain a more favorable price per share in the future by setting a maximum convertible price. They reward investors for taking on additional risk.
As an example, suppose a startup is raising capital at a $10m valuation and the SAFE investor had a valuation cap of $5m. In that case, SAFE investors shares convert at the valuation cap ($5m) despite the startup has just been valued at a $10m valuation. SAFE investors are typically happy if the valuation cap comes into play.
Pre-Money or Post-Money
Pre-money or post-money refers to valuation measurements that help investors and founders understand how much a company is worth. It’s one of the most essential terms in a SAFE agreement. Pre-money means the valuation is before new investor money. Post-money means the valuation includes the capital raised in that round.
Here is an article about pre-money and post-money valuation.
Pro-Rata Rights
Pro-rata rights allow investors to add more funds to maintain ownership percentage rights following equity financing rounds. The investor will pay the new price versus the original price. These rights are an excellent way to keep strong investors motivated to move forward with their investment over the long term.
Most-Favored Nations Provision
Most-favored nations provisions (MFNs), also known as non-discrimination clauses, require startups to give the same privileges to all investors. For example, if convertible securities are issued to future investors at better terms, the previous investors will also receive those same terms.
For example, if you invest in a startup at a 20% discount and $3m valuation cap, and a future investor receives a 30% discount, you will automatically receive the 30% discount.
SAFE Agreement vs. Convertible Note
SAFE agreements are different from convertible notes. The former is a contractual agreement that could convert into equity in a future financing round, while the latter is short-term debt that converts into equity. However, they’re similar due to simplicity and flexibility, which is attractive to both investors and startups.
Here’s a closer look at SAFE agreements vs. convertible notes below:
Difference 1. Interest Rates and Maturity
In some circles, SAFE agreements are superior to convertible notes for the simple fact that they aren’t debt. As such, investors don’t have to worry about interest rates and maturity dates. In contrast, convertible notes involve both of these elements.
Many startups would prefer not to have debt on their balance sheet.
Difference 2. Structure
SAFEs also act as a standalone instrument that works in concert with other SAFE agreements purchased by new investors in the future at different dates and amounts. Convertible notes can be structured as a standalone or a series.
Difference 3. Risk and Tolerance
The risk and tolerance of SAFE agreements contrast convertible notes. Many investors are already familiar with convertibles notes since they have been around longer, and may feel unsure about SAFE agreements and their tax implications.
Difference 4. Options
The relative recency of SAFE agreements allows them to function as a standardized arrangement. In short, they’re more similarly structured from investment to investment. Convertible notes, on the other hand, come in many forms, which increases investing flexibility.
Which Is Better? SAFEs or Convertible Notes
The type of instrument you choose depends upon the startup and investor. Understanding the pros and cons of either one will help you understand why they’re used and, potentially, which one will work well for you. Venture capital lawyers can also become a wealth of information and insight to startups and investors alike.
Is a SAFE Agreement Debt or Equity?
SAFE agreements are neither debt nor equity. Instead, they’re the contractual rights to future equity. These rights are in exchange for early capital contributions invested into the startup. SAFE agreements allow investors to convert investments into equity during a priced round at some future point.
It’s also worth noting that SAFE agreements are advanced, high-risk instruments that may never turn into equity. They don’t accrue interest, nor are startups required to repay investors if they fail.
How Are SAFEs Accounted For?
Companies should generally account for SAFEs as a long-term liability, but may vary based on the circumstances. The reason for SAFE agreement accounting working in this manner is that they require startups to deliver an unknown number of future shares at an undisclosed price. As a result, more definitive numbers cannot be established performance or financial metrics come into fruition. It is always recommended to consult with an accountant and financial lawyer to ensure SAFE agreements are accurately represented on financial statements and tax returns.
The Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) also warns that investors should be careful when using SAFE agreements. While they can be structured simply, you should remember that they are not all created equally. In addition, triggering liquidity events may never happen either.
However, when a SAFE agreement goes smoothly, investors’ rights are generally greater than common stock shareholders. As such, SAFEs offer preferential rights, which are extremely attractive to experienced investors.
Get Help with SAFE Agreements
Due to the complexities associated with SAFE agreements, you must draft the terms and conditions accordingly. Once you sign the agreement, then a complete deal is in effect. Securities lawyers possess a strong command of finance law and a wide range of experiences with startups. Ensure you seek their legal counsel before offering or accepting a SAFE agreement. Post your project today to get help with a SAFE agreement.
See Real SAFE Note Projects
Nevada SAFE agreement of sale of 10% A-shares of a Nevada C-Corp Drafting
- Nevada
- 5 lawyer bids
- $650 - $5,000
Delaware Need Lawyer to Review SAFE Agreement Review
- Delaware
- 5 lawyer bids
- $275 - $1,000
Delaware Draft Y Combinator SAFE with a side letter Drafting
- Delaware
- 2 lawyer bids
- $350 - $850
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Need help with a SAFE Agreement?
Meet some of our SAFE Agreement Lawyers
Jo Ann J.
Jo Ann has been practicing for over 20 years, working primarily with high growth companies from inception through exit and all points in between. She is skilled in Mergers & Acquisitions, Contractual Agreements (including founders agreements, voting agreements, licensing agreements, terms of service, privacy policies, stockholder agreements, operating agreements, equity incentive plans, employment agreements, vendor agreements and other commercial agreements), Corporate Governance and Due Diligence.
"Greatly appreciate Jo Ann's responsiveness and quick turnaround. Brought an incredible amount of knowledge and experience to a project I have little experience in."
Jeff C.
Experienced and broad based corporate/business attorney and Outside General Counsel (OGC), for start-ups, small businesses and growing companies of all sizes, advising and assisting clients with corporate and LLC formation, contracts and agreements, internet and terms of use/service agreements, trademarks and intellectual property protection, the purchase and sale of businesses (M&A), labor and employment matters, compliance and risk management, corporate governance, and commercial leasing matters. See other reviews on my website at www.ogcservices.net/reviews
"Jeff is quick, responsive and his work is excellent. I had a great experience, wouldn't hesitate to use his services again."
Kenneth G.
Kenneth E. Gray, Jr. is a business and tax attorney who advises entrepreneurs, investors, and closely held companies on transactions, tax planning, disputes, and long-term wealth structuring. He focuses on helping clients make legally sound decisions that also make business sense. Ken’s practice includes business formation and restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, private investments and fundraising transactions, contract drafting and negotiation, and cross-border matters. He also maintains a significant tax practice, advising on federal and state structuring, specialty filings (including partnership, corporate, and non-resident matters), and representing clients in disputes before the U.S. Tax Court and other federal and state tribunals. In addition to his transactional work, Ken handles commercial and business litigation, including tax controversies, financial disputes, and partnership matters. His litigation experience informs how he structures deals and governance documents, with an eye toward preventing disputes before they arise. Ken also advises individuals and families on estate planning, trust formation, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies, and probate administration, including planning involving closely held businesses and foreign assets. Before practicing law, Ken worked in banking and private equity, including managing a $5 billion emerging markets fund-of-funds portfolio at the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) and serving in equity research at ABN AMRO. That financial background allows him to understand transactions from both the legal and capital perspective. He holds a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and an MBA from Yale University. He practices before the U.S. Tax Court, various state courts, and other federal courts.
"It is not easy to find a lawyer that knows Offshore Asset Protection Trusts, which own a foreign LLC, which owns a USA LLC. Fines could reach $100K if the tax forms are incorrect, or not filed. He was able to review my draft returns and provide memos with required changes (many, many changes), after 1 follow-up everything was basically done other than a few tiny edits. I really appreciated how he worked me in, right in the busiest time of tax season, to ensure there were no errors. Would definitely hire again."
Odini G.
I am an accomplished attorney with more than 19 years of experience and extensive expertise in business negotiations, commercial contracts, and technology transactions. With a proven track record of providing strategic legal advice and delivering exceptional results, I have successfully assisted numerous clients in drafting, reviewing, and negotiating various business arrangements. My experience encompasses a wide range of areas, including intellectual property, data privacy and security, SaaS agreements, and software licenses. I co-founded a reputable general corporate law firm with three offices in Aspen, Atlanta, and New York. As a partner and attorney, I represented diverse clients, including start-ups, public corporations, investors, financial institutions, educational institutions, and non-profit entities. With a focus on delivering comprehensive legal solutions, I provided general counsel, expert dispute resolution, efficient litigation management, and skillful contract drafting and negotiations for businesses across industries.
"Supremely responsive and works surprisingly quickly. Strongly recommend!"
Kristen R.
Kristen R.
Currently fighting Stage 4 Lung Cancer and not taking new clients.
"Kristen worked very quickly to get what we needed! Our local attorneys told us it would take them weeks to do what she did in just a few days. We are thrilled!!"
Muhammad Yar L.
I am Muhammad Yar Lak, a New York-licensed technology attorney with extensive experience advising startups, founders, growing businesses, established companies (including Fortune 100 clients), and individuals on the legal matters that shape how they operate, grow, and protect what they have built. My practice covers business relationships, operational and contractual risk, and corporate structure, including the formation and structuring of LLCs and corporations. I hold a law degree from Georgetown University Law Center and am admitted to practice in New York. I am also CIPP/US certified, reflecting my commitment to privacy and data as core concerns in modern business and technology law. I practice as a Senior Associate with Gogo & Moore, a technology-focused law firm with offices in Aspen, Atlanta, and New York. I have built my practice around the industries defining the next decade, including technology, fintech, artificial intelligence, blockchain and digital assets, and e-commerce, while also serving clients in healthcare, manufacturing, real estate, and entertainment. Wherever my clients are building, I am there. My approach is simple: good legal counsel should empower people, not slow them down. I work hard to understand what my clients are actually trying to accomplish and help them get there. If that sounds like the kind of lawyer you are looking for, I would be glad to connect.
"Muhammad did great work very quickly and was responsive to my time needs at his own expense. I am grateful."
Jana B.
I am a Silicon Valley tech lawyer with over 13 years of in-house experience and additional years in BigLaw. I provide tech licensing, data privacy, employment, international expansion, go to market, and other corporate and commercial legal services to clients in software, SaaS, bio-tech, cryptocurrency, financing, and construction business. I currently run my own practice concentrating on transactional, commercial, corporate or employment matters. Prior to starting my own practice, I joined as the first in-house counsel to lead the global legal strategy to bring tech products to market, increase revenue, decrease exposure to risk, and raise venture funding for HashiCorp Inc., currently an unicorn technology company with evaluation over $5 billion and venture funding over $350 million; Sysdig Inc., a technology company with venture funding of $195 million; and Anaplan Inc., currently a publicly traded company on the US Stock Market. Furthermore, I acted as in-house counsel advising leading technology enterprise companies such as HP, VMware, and Genentech and currently act as member of strategic advisory boards to several technology companies located globally
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers NowLawyer Reviews for SAFE Agreement Projects
friends and family seed funding contacts
"Daniel knows what he is doing, with my SAFE note, he made sure to put in protections for me that I would not have thought of or put in myself. Im too nice, so this was necessary for me."
Review SAFE Agreement for Fundraising
"Daehoon delivered quickly and thoroughly reviewed and adjusted my SAFE agreement. Highly recommended."
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewNeed help with a SAFE Agreement?
Startup lawyers by top cities
- Austin Startup Lawyers
- Boston Startup Lawyers
- Chicago Startup Lawyers
- Dallas Startup Lawyers
- Denver Startup Lawyers
- Houston Startup Lawyers
- Los Angeles Startup Lawyers
- New York Startup Lawyers
- Phoenix Startup Lawyers
- San Diego Startup Lawyers
- Tampa Startup Lawyers
SAFE Agreement lawyers by city
- Austin SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Boston SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Chicago SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Dallas SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Denver SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Houston SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Los Angeles SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- New York SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Phoenix SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- San Diego SAFE Agreement Lawyers
- Tampa SAFE Agreement Lawyers
ContractsCounsel User
create a S.A.F.E. Note
Location: Florida
Turnaround: Less than a week
Service: Drafting
Doc Type: SAFE Note
Number of Bids: 4
Bid Range: $695 - $1,350
User Feedback:
ContractsCounsel User