Covenant Not to Sue: Definition, Example
Jump to Section
What is a Covenant Not To Sue?
A covenant not to sue is a contractual agreement that restricts one or more parties from filing claims against another. For example, in the world of mergers and acquisitions, buyers often request covenants not to sue from sellers. Signing the document is usually beneficial for both parties, as it helps avoid costly and lengthy litigation in the event of a failed merger or acquisition.
While a covenant not to sue restricts future claims from being made, the party signing the document is still free to file a lawsuit if it breaches the terms of that agreement. If one or more parties don't sign a covenant not to sue, then they are open for any claim and lawsuit.
Covenant Not To Sue Sample
Exhibit 10.1
RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE
This Release of Claims and Covenant Not to Sue (“Release”) is executed as of the day of December, 2004 by [ , an individual resident of the State of [ ]]1 [[ ], a [ ] corporation]2 (“Releasor”).
In consideration of a certain agreement by and between Asconi Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and the Releasor, entered into on December , 2004, whereby the Company has agreed to reduce the purchase price of its securities sold to certain “accredited” investors (including both individuals and institutions) in the December 30, 2003 private placement of the Company’s securities (the “2003 Private Placement”) from $5.00 to $3.50 per share by (x) reducing the exercise price of the warrants sold in the 2003 Private Placement to $5.00 (the “Warrant Repricing”) and (y) issuing additional common stock shares of the Company (the “Share Issuance”), and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Releasor, for itself and its [subsidiaries, successors-in-interest, representatives, agents and assigns,]3 [heirs, administrators, executors, representatives, beneficiaries and assigns]4 hereby irrevocably and unconditionally releases and discharges each of the Company, together with its respective officers, directors, shareholders, partners, employees, heirs, administrators, executors, representatives, beneficiaries, attorneys and assigns (collectively, the “Releasees”), from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, actions, judgments, liens, indebtedness, costs, damages, obligations, attorneys’ fees, losses and liability of whatever kind and character, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, in law or equity, liquidated or unliquidated, whether asserted personally, derivatively or in any other capacity, arising from, referring to, relating to or in connection with, the beginning of time to the date hereof, including, without limiting the foregoing, those specifically related in any way to the Releasor’s purchase of the Company’s securities in the 2003 Private Placement (all of the foregoing being collectively referred to herein as the “Claims”).
The Releasor covenants and agrees not to sue or bring any action in law, or in equity, including, but not limited to, an action in any court, forum, or arbitration proceeding whether by original process or demand, counterclaim, cross-claim, third-party process, impleader, claim for indemnity or contribution or otherwise against the Releasees, and their successors, and assigns, arising from, referring to, relating to, or in connection with, any of the Releasees with respect to any claim (a) related in any way to the Claims, and/or (b) otherwise released herein.
The Company hereby agrees to effect the Share Issuance and Warrant Repricing no later than ten (10) business days of the date of this Release.
| 1 | To be inserted if Releasor is an individual. |
| 2 | To be inserted if Releasor is a corporation. |
| 3 | To be inserted if Releasor is a corporation. |
| 4 | To be inserted if Releasor is an individual. |
In connection with the above-referenced Share Issuance and Warrant Repricing, the Releasor understands and hereby acknowledges that:
1. The shares of the Company’s common stock issued in connection with the Share Issuance (the “Shares”) and the warrants to be issued in connection with the Warrant Repricing (the “Repriced Warrants”) have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) or any applicable state securities laws;
2. The Releasor cannot sell such Shares, the Repriced Warrants or the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Repriced Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”) unless they are registered under the Act and any applicable state securities laws or unless exemptions from such registration requirements are available; a legend will be placed on any certificate or certificates evidencing the Shares, stating that such securities have not been registered under the Act and setting forth or referring to the restrictions on transferability and sales of the securities; the Company will place stop transfer instructions against the securities and the certificates for the securities to restrict the transfer thereof; and the Company has no obligations to register the securities or assist the undersigned in obtaining an exemption from the various registration requirements except as set forth herein or therein. The Releasor agrees not to resell the Shares, the Repriced Warrants, or the Warrant Shares without compliance with the Act and any applicable state securities laws;
3. The Releasor will acquire the Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares solely for the Releasor’s own account for investment purposes only and not with a view toward resale or distribution, either in whole or in part; has no contract, undertaking, agreement or other arrangement, in existence or contemplated, to sell, pledge, assign or otherwise transfer the Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares to any other person; and agrees not to sell or otherwise transfer the Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares unless and until such securities are subsequently registered under the Act and any applicable state securities laws or unless an exemption from any such registration is available;
4. The Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares represent substantial risks, including the fact that the Releasor could lose the entire amount of the Releasor’s investment,
5. Either alone or together with the Releasor’s purchaser representative (as that term is defined in Regulation D under the Act), the Releasor has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that the Releasor is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Company;
6. The Releasor represents and warrants that he satisfies the definition of “accredited investor” as set forth in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Act;
7. The Releasor is aware that the Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares have not been registered under the Act and that the Releasor has adequate means of providing for his current needs and personal and family contingencies, has no need for liquidity in the investment contemplated hereby, and is able to bear the risk of loss of the Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares and that he may find it impossible to liquidate his investment at a time when it may be desirable to do so, or at any other time;
8. The Releasor shall not sell, assign, encumber or transfer all or any part of the Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares (except a transfer upon his death, incapacity or bankruptcy or a transfer without consideration to his spouse and/or children and/or a trust for the benefit of such family members), unless the Company has determined, upon the advice of counsel for the Company, that no applicable federal or state securities laws will be violated as a result of such transfer and that the
Company may require an opinion of counsel acceptable to the Company to the effect that such transfer or assignment (a) may be effected without registration of the Shares, the Repriced Warrants and the Warrant Shares under the Act, and (b) does not violate any applicable federal or state securities laws; and,
9. The Releasor expressly represents, warrants and agrees that, in connection with the conversion set forth hereunder, the Company is relying upon the Releasor’s representations and warranties as contained herein and that the foregoing representations and warranties are true as of the date hereof and the Releasor shall give prompt written notice of any change in the foregoing representations and warranties to the Company.
The Releasor hereby declares that the Releasor voluntarily accepts the above-mentioned consideration for the purpose of making a full and final compromise, adjustment, release and settlement of the Claims.
Piggy-Back Registration Rights.
If at any time prior to December 5, 2006, the Company shall determine to prepare and file with the Commission a registration statement, or amend an existing registration statement relating to an offering for its own account or the account of other shareholders of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Act”) of any of its equity securities, other than on Form S-4, Form S-8 or any similar short-form registration which may not be available at such time (each as promulgated under the Act) or their then equivalents relating to equity securities to be issued solely in connection with any acquisition of any entity or business or equity securities issuable in connection with the stock options or other employee benefit plans, then the Company shall send to the Releasor a written notice of such determination and, if within fifteen (15) days after the date of such notice, the Releasor shall so request in writing, the Company shall include in such registration statement all or any part of the Shares and the Warrant Shares such Releasor requests to be registered, subject to customary underwriter cutbacks and lock-ups as would be applicable to the officers and the directors of the Company. The Releasor further understands and agrees that the Company undertakes no obligation to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement with a current prospectus available after the earlier of: (i) March 5, 2007, or (ii) such time as all of the Shares and the Warrant Shares have been sold.
No provision of this Release may be amended, modified or waived except by a written instrument executed by the Releasor and the Company.
If any term or provision of this Release is held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality shall not affect the remaining terms or provisions hereof, and each term and provision of this Release shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
The Releasor further understands, covenants, and agrees that the delivery of the above-mentioned consideration does not constitute an admission of any liability whatsoever by any person or party with respect to the Claims. The Releasor further understands, covenants, and agrees that the terms and conditions of this Release constitute the full and complete understandings, agreements, and arrangements of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, that there are no other agreements, covenants, promises, or arrangements other than those set forth herein, and that this Release will be construed and governed by Florida law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Releasor and the Company have caused this Release to be duly executed and delivered as of this day of December, 2004.
| THE RELEASOR | ||
| By: |
| |
| Name: |
||
| Title: |
||
| THE COMPANY | ||
| By: |
| |
| Name: |
||
| Title: |
||
Reference:
Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.1 2 dex101.htm FORM RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE, Viewed October 6, 2021, View Source on SEC.
Who Helps With Covenants Not To Sue?
Lawyers with backgrounds working on covenants not to sue work with clients to help. Do you need help with a covenant not to sue?
Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate covenants not to sue. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
Lynn C.
I am a transactional attorney based in the Metro Atlanta, GA area, with a focus on real estate transactions, nonprofit, municipal law, corporate governance, and estate planning.
"Lynn is very knowledgeable and resourceful, she was able to explain me the process in details and provide all necessary information. Highly recommend. thank you"
October 8, 2025
Katherine B.
Attorney and former in-house counsel with 15+ years of leadership and project management experience in corporate & business law, risk management, compliance, strategy, and regulatory oversight in the private and federal sectors. Primary areas of practice are corporate governance & business law, compliance & financial services regulation, transformation & change management, regulatory response & remediations, consumer regulation & employment law, and conduct / ethics & investigations at regional, large and complex corporations. My experience includes banking, payment & ecommerce regulations, trade & product law, consumer regulations, employment & labor law, contracts and privacy laws. I have extensive experience advising firms on consumer protection and regulatory law, and I have specialized experience with firms engaging in large-scale transformations and remediations. I am admitted to the Washington State Bar Association and licensed to practice law, I am a Federal Reserve System commissioned Examiner, and I am a Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager (CRCM). At Phoenix Law PLLC, I advise individual clients and provide legal and regulatory guidance, corporate counsel services, as well as strategic consulting services to businesses. I leverage my unique experience and skillset to provide innovative solutions and achieve favorable results, with the goal of empowering clients to move successfully forward. www.phoenixlawpllc.com kbrandt@phoenixlawpllc.com
Sean D.
After 15+ years at leading firms in Silicon Valley, Boston, and DC, I started Supernova Law to partner with the clients who inspire me most—start-ups, mission-driven companies, B-Corps, and non-profits. My goal is simple: provide accessible, affordable, high-quality legal support to innovators creating positive change for our society. At Supernova Law, your vision and values come first.
October 10, 2025
Matthew K.
Member CA State Bar since 1978. Martindale-Hubbell rated A-v Preeminent. Avvo 5-stars
October 13, 2025
Vivek S.
Vivek Singh is a real estate attorney who brings clients far more than legal theory — he brings the perspective of a business owner, investor, and developer who has personally navigated the same challenges they face. With almost 20 years of experience in real estate law, construction, development, and property management, Vivek combines deep legal knowledge with real‑world operational insight. In addition to running his own law practice, Vivek has founded and managed construction and property management companies, invested in and developed real estate, and handled his own business disputes and litigation. This hands‑on experience gives him a unique advantage as an attorney: he understands the practical, financial, and strategic stakes behind every contract, negotiation, and deal. Vivek represents buyers, sellers, landlords, tenants, investors, and developers in transactions, commercial leasing, construction agreements, land use approvals, and complex negotiations. Clients appreciate that he speaks their language, anticipates risks before they arise, and approaches every matter with the mindset of both a lawyer and a fellow business operator.
Brad A.
Brad Adams is the founder of Adams Outside GC, PLLC, a legal consulting firm providing fractional General Counsel services to businesses across Florida, Alabama, and Georgia. With more than 25 years of legal experience, Brad offers practical, business-minded legal support to help companies navigate complex legal issues, minimize risk, and focus on growth. Brad’s practice spans both business law and employment law, with a focus on delivering real-world solutions tailored to each client’s needs. He regularly advises companies on legal compliance, drafts and negotiates contracts, supports clients with collections and dispute resolution, and helps businesses manage day-to-day legal and HR matters. His employment law experience includes drafting policies and agreements, conducting internal investigations, delivering compliance training, guiding employers through regulatory challenges and responding to administrative complaints. Brad has represented employers of all sizes—ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies—in a wide variety of industries, including construction, manufacturing, retail, healthcare, hospitality, solar energy, and technology. In addition to this broad experience, Brad has developed significant expertise in worker classification issues, particularly in the gig economy. He has worked with businesses using independent contractor models to help them navigate the legal and operational complexities unique to non-traditional workforces. Brad’s guidance helps clients reduce misclassification risk and design more sustainable, compliant contractor arrangements that support operational flexibility. His published work on this topic has appeared in Bloomberg Law’s Daily Labor Report, and he is a valuable resource for companies working within this rapidly evolving space. Prior to founding Adams Outside GC, Brad served as General Counsel for Meraki Installers LLC, where he managed the company’s legal, compliance, and HR functions. He previously practiced at top national and regional law firms, including Littler Mendelson, P.C., where he spent over a decade focusing exclusively on employment law as both an associate and shareholder. Earlier in his career, he worked in the Atlanta office of Powell Goldstein LLP (now Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner) and the Mobile, Alabama office of McDowell Knight Roedder & Sledge, LLC. Prior to joining Meraki, Brad worked in the Pensacola, Florida office of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon. Brad is licensed in Florida, Alabama, and Georgia, and is a Board-Certified Specialist in Labor and Employment Law through the Florida Bar. He earned his J.D. with honors from the University of Florida Levin College of Law, where he was recognized for excellence in legal writing. He also holds a B.A. with honors and distinction from the University of the South (Sewanee). Brad is a speaker and published author on employment law topics and compliance strategy, contributing to Bloomberg Law, LexisNexis, and regional HR and legal conferences. For additional information, please visit adamsoutsidegc.com
Monica T.
October 20, 2025
Monica T.
NYC based attorney of over 15 years in NY & CT who specializes in entertainment transactional law. 10 years as a general/in-house counsel in 2 entertainment companies and former indie film company executive as well as a creative professional (actress, singer, writer, model, blogger, podcast host/producer and beauty ambassador). Also have over 5 years of court appearance experience in various practice areas including foreclosure defense, bankruptcy, personal injury (plaintiff), immigration, consumer debt, etc.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Business lawyers by top cities
- Austin Business Lawyers
- Boston Business Lawyers
- Chicago Business Lawyers
- Dallas Business Lawyers
- Denver Business Lawyers
- Houston Business Lawyers
- Los Angeles Business Lawyers
- New York Business Lawyers
- Phoenix Business Lawyers
- San Diego Business Lawyers
- Tampa Business Lawyers
Covenant Not To Sue lawyers by city
- Austin Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Boston Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Chicago Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Dallas Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Denver Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Houston Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Los Angeles Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- New York Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Phoenix Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- San Diego Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
- Tampa Covenant Not To Sue Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review