Home Types of Contracts Patent Licensing Agreement

Jump to Section

ContractsCounsel has assisted 50 clients with patent licensing agreements and maintains a network of 56 intellectual property lawyers available daily. Customers rate lawyers for patent licensing agreement matters 4.29.

A patent licensing agreement is a legal arrangement that empowers a third party, the licensee, to manufacture or use a design protected by a patent licensor. In addition, patent licensing agreements foster cooperation, invention, and the efficient allocation of technology by permitting licensees to leverage patented inventions. This blog post will discuss a patent licensing agreement, its elements, key considerations, and more.

Essential Clauses in a Patent Licensing Agreement

In a patent licensing agreement, different provisions establish the terms and conditions overseeing the association between the Licensor (the patent owner) and the licensee (the individual obtaining the license). Below are the key clauses commonly found in a patent licensing agreement.

  • Grant of License: The grant of license clause determines the extent and scope of the rights given to the licensee. It defines the patents, patent registrations, or inventions covered by the agreement and any restrictions on usage, territories, and field of use. This clause ensures clarity regarding the licensed technology and the licensee's rights to utilize it.
  • Royalty and Payment Terms: The royalty and payment terms clause outlines the financial aspects of the licensing agreement. It details the payment obligations of the licensee, including upfront fees, ongoing royalties, minimum sales thresholds, and other relevant charges. This clause may also address payment methods, frequency, and provisions for auditing financial records.
  • Term and Termination: The term and termination clause specifies the duration of the licensing agreement and determines the circumstances under which either party can prematurely end the licensing agreement. It may include provisions for renewal, automatic termination in certain events, or termination due to contract infringements. This provision offers transparency on the contract's duration and the occurrences under which it can be terminated.
  • Intellectual Property Rights and Ownership: The intellectual property rights and ownership clause describes the licensed technology rights and patent ownership. It may state that the Licensor maintains the license and all other privileges not explicitly given to the licensee. Additionally, this clause may address obligations regarding the maintenance and prosecution of patents, including fees, maintenance deadlines, and handling of infringement claims.
  • Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality: The confidentiality and non-disclosure provision ensures the confidentiality of sensitive details transmitted during the licensing contract. It summarizes the responsibilities of both parties to safeguard technical data, trade secrets, and other proprietary details. This clause generally includes provisions for treating confidential data during and after the agreement.
  • Representations and Warranties: The representations and warranties clause establishes the assurances made by each party regarding their rights, authority, and the accuracy of the provided information. It may include issues such as validity, patent ownership and enforceability of the licensed technology, and lack of violation claims. This provision builds trust and guarantees that both parties have the legal capability to consent.
  • Indemnification and Liability: The indemnification and liability clause handles the distribution of threats between the licensor and licensee. It outlines the obligation of each individual in case of third-party claims alleging patent violation or other infringements of intellectual property rights. This clause usually comprises provisions for limitations of liability, indemnification, and procedures for handling lawsuits and conflicts.
  • Governing Law and Jurisdiction: The governing law and jurisdiction clause determines the legal framework and jurisdiction governing any disputes arising from the licensing agreement. It specifies the applicable law and the courts or arbitration forums where legal actions will be pursued. This clause clarifies the legal framework under which the agreement will be interpreted and enforced.

Types of Patent Licensing Agreements

Some common types of patent licenses are as follows:

  • Exclusive Patent License: In an exclusive patent license, the licensor gives the licensee exclusive ownership to utilize the patented technology within a specified domain or region. In addition, the licensor cannot give similar privileges to any other licensee as they are prohibited from using or entrusting technology to others. This kind of license offers licensees a competitive edge in the marketplace and a chance to earn higher profits.
  • Non-Exclusive License: A non-exclusive license authorizes the licensee to utilize the technology, but the owner retains the privilege to license the technology rights to other individuals. Numerous licensees can get non-exclusive licenses and may contend with each other using the authorized technology.
  • Sole License: A sole license is comparable to an exclusive patent license but with one important difference. While the licensor cannot provide rights to other parties, they maintain the ownership to use the technology. This patent license is usually used when the licensor wants to retain some authority over the technology but still authorizes a licensee to have a substantial market presence.
  • Field-of-Use License: A field-of-use license gives the licensee the ownership to use the patented technology within a specific domain or industry. The licensor owns the rights to license the technology in other domains. This type of license is prevalent when patented technology is used in numerous industries, and the licensor hopes to license it to different businesses in those industries.
  • Territory License: A territory license allows the licensee to utilize the patented technology within a distinct geographic area or nation. The licensor can keep the ownership to license the technology in other domains. This license type is generally used when the licensor wants to focus on diverse industries or when licensing regulations and regulations vary between areas.
  • Cross-License: A cross-license concerns the exchange of patent ownership between two or more individuals. Each party presents the other party with the privilege to use their patented technology, typically to facilitate cooperation or to settle intellectual property conflicts. This license type is prevalent in industries where numerous businesses have overlapping patent portfolios.
  • Compulsory License: A compulsory license is provided by a state or regulatory institution without the patent holder's consent. It authorizes a third party to use the patented technology when the patent holder misuses their rights. Compulsory licenses are generally given in special circumstances and are subject to distinctive legal requirements.
Meet some lawyers on our platform

Zachary J.

414 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Keidi C.

17 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Benjamin W.

88 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Dolan W.

79 projects on CC
CC verified
View Profile

Key Terms for Patent Licensing Agreements

  • Field of Application: A limitation on the utilization of a patented innovation, confining it to a specific industry, utilization, or market segment.
  • Territorial Restriction: The designated geographic area or region in which a licensee possesses the privilege to utilize the patented technology, as specified within the licensing agreement.
  • Sub-License: The act of giving approval to a third party by a licensee, allowing them to use the licensed technology.
  • Patent Infringement: The unlawful utilization, creation or sale of patented technology without the patent holder's permission, which can result in legal repercussions.
  • Mutual Licensing: An arrangement between two or more entities to exchange licenses for their respective patented technologies, frequently employed to evade infringement disputes and foster innovation.
  • Patent Pooling: A collaborative approach to licensing where multiple patent owners contribute their patents to a shared pool, allowing licensees to access a broader array of technologies.

Final Thoughts on Patent Licensing Agreements

Patent licensing agreements are essential in simplifying patented technology's commercialization and widespread utilization. Understanding the key elements of these agreements authorizes developers, licensees, and all stakeholders to understand the complexities of intellectual property licensing. Moreover, patent holders can leverage their inventions while promoting innovation and cooperation in various industries by striking a fair and mutually advantageous agreement.

If you want free pricing proposals from vetted lawyers that are 60% less than typical law firms, click here to get started. By comparing multiple proposals for free, you can save the time and stress of finding a quality lawyer for your business needs.


ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.


Need help with a Patent Licensing Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 12,397 reviews

Meet some of our Patent Licensing Agreement Lawyers

JOSEPH L. on ContractsCounsel
View JOSEPH
4.8 (16)
Member Since:
July 26, 2021

JOSEPH L.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Stratford, CT
41 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CT
Southwestern University School of Law

Mr. LaRocco's focus is business law, corporate structuring, and contracts. He has a depth of experience working with entrepreneurs and startups, including some small public companies. As a result of his business background, he has not only acted as general counsel to companies, but has also been on the board of directors of several and been a business advisor and strategist. Some clients and projects I have recently done work for include hospitality consulting companies, web development/marketing agency, a governmental contractor, e-commerce consumer goods companies, an online apps, a music file-sharing company, a company that licenses its photos and graphic images, a video editing company, several SaaS companies, a merchant processing/services company, a financial services software company that earned a licensing and marketing contract with Thomson Reuters, manufacturing companies, and a real estate software company.

Tim E. on ContractsCounsel
View Tim
4.9 (52)
Member Since:
August 12, 2020

Tim E.

Founding Member/Attorney
Free Consultation
Cleveland, OH
10 Yrs Experience
Licensed in OH
Cleveland State University College of Law

Tim advises small businesses, entrepreneurs, and start-ups on a wide range of legal matters. He has experience with company formation and restructuring, capital and equity planning, tax planning and tax controversy, contract drafting, and employment law issues. His clients range from side gig sole proprietors to companies recognized by Inc. magazine.

Mathew K. on ContractsCounsel
View Mathew
5.0 (3)
Member Since:
February 1, 2022

Mathew K.

Founding Attorney
Free Consultation
Illinois
9 Yrs Experience
Licensed in IL
DePaul University College of Law

Kerbis' practice includes business and real estate transactions, estate planning, and limited scope litigation consulting. Mathew has negotiated deals involving multinational corporate franchises and has collectively helped hundreds of clients with their transactional, civil litigation, and appellate legal needs. Throughout his tenure as an American Bar Association leader, Mathew has advocated for legal education reform, interviewed ABA Presidents and State Appellate and Supreme Court Justices, and lobbied Congress on behalf of the legal profession. As a law student, Mathew served as an extern for the Honorable Justice Robert E. Gordon of the Illinois Appellate Court, First District.

Meghan T. on ContractsCounsel
View Meghan
4.8 (16)
Member Since:
February 1, 2022

Meghan T.

Partner
Free Consultation
Atlanta
5 Yrs Experience
Licensed in GA
Emory University

Meghan Thomas is an accomplished transactional attorney. She specializes in IP, real estate and tech related transactional matters, and business contracts. Meghan's innovative leadership style has attributed to the firm's rapid development and presence in the metro-Atlanta market. She obtained her Doctor of Law from Emory University where she worked with the State Attorney General and litigated property disputes for disadvantaged clients. ​ Prior to practicing, Meghan negotiated complex transactions for Fortune 500 tech and healthcare companies. She lives with her family in Southwest Atlanta, enjoys cooking, travel, dance and continues to develop her research in the areas of transactional law and legal sustainability.

Leah C. on ContractsCounsel
View Leah
Member Since:
January 18, 2022

Leah C.

Attorney
Free Consultation
Alabama
9 Yrs Experience
Licensed in AL
Birmingham School of Law

I am an attorney licensed in Alabama and have been in solo practice for 7 years. I have experience in Contracts drafting and review, Litigation and Immigration practice areas. I am available for new projects.

Cecilia O. on ContractsCounsel
View Cecilia
Member Since:
January 31, 2022

Cecilia O.

Contracts Attorney
Free Consultation
San Antonio
17 Yrs Experience
Licensed in CT, MD
Ghana School of Law

With 15 years of extensive transactional/contracts experience reviewing and negotiating commercial contracts including a wide variety of purchase orders and contracts and non-disclosure agreements (NDA), I believe I can immediately contribute to the continued success of your team. I have been commended for a range of valuable skills—excellent contract management and contract administration, legal research, risk analysis, drafting and negotiations, and strategic thinking. I have worked as a legal consultant for 10+ years and I have reviewed over 7,500 contracts through this position. Contracts I have reviewed include but not limited to purchase orders, commercial and construction contracts, equipment rental agreements, non-disclosure, confidentiality, vendor agreements, service agreements, site access agreements, international agreements, request for proposals (RFP), bids and government contracts. These experiences have enabled me to master the ability to work independently and expeditiously to identify and assess issues and provide legally sound recommendations, consistent with good business practices. I have led teams (sales, insurance and management) to successfully negotiate contract terms with customers. Effective Communicator and Negotiator. I am a people person, and for the past 13 years, I have acquired excellent oral and written communication skills that enable me to interact and negotiate effectively with stakeholders at all levels. I am a self-starter with a strong work ethic. I have a high degree of resourcefulness, diligence, and dependability. Most important, I adapt to changing priorities quickly, thriving in an environment with high volume and short turnaround deadlines. My experience over the years allows me to transfer my skills to all types of contracts to meet the client’s needs. I am hopeful to provide similar legal expertise, effective contract administration and leadership to your organization. It would be a pleasure to meet within the next few weeks and discuss how my qualifications, experience, and capabilities will best fit the needs of your outfit.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Browse Lawyers Now

Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.

View Trustpilot Review

Need help with a Patent Licensing Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 12,397 reviews
Intellectual Property lawyers by top cities
See All Intellectual Property Lawyers
Patent Licensing Agreement lawyers by city
See All Patent Licensing Agreement Lawyers

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
License Agreement between Content Creator and Merchandise Company
Location: California
Turnaround: Less than a week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Intellectual Property License Agreement
Page Count: 15
Number of Bids: 8
Bid Range: $470 - $1,000

ContractsCounsel User

Recent Project:
Review intellectual property agreement
Location: Texas
Turnaround: Over a week
Service: Contract Review
Doc Type: Intellectual Property License Agreement
Page Count: 8
Number of Bids: 6
Bid Range: $350 - $1,500

Need help with a Patent Licensing Agreement?

Create a free project posting
Clients Rate Lawyers 4.9 Stars
based on 12,397 reviews

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Request a call

Find lawyers and attorneys by city